Insolent
[About 30% of the territory of Japan is, in fact, the United States. Some believe Okinawa's largest "aircraft carrier" in the world. ]
http://news.leit.ru/archives/6649
Insolent
Japan has invented a new formulation for the Kuril Islands
February 24, 2011, 10:13 Japan, Russia, Diplomacy, scandals
"The rule that has no legal basis" - so now the official Tokyo calls the Russian island. Without the interest and support of the U.S. such an onslaught of Japan is impossible.
Japan renounced the term "illegal occupation" in talking about the situation from the Kuril Islands. Instead, the government has to find a new language - "the rule of having no legal basis." The new term, one after another repeated at a meeting of the budget commission of the lower chamber of parliament FM Seiji Maehara and Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano, reports Prime-Tass reports with reference to Itar-Tass.
Clarification of Foreign Minister and Secretary General of the Cabinet were made in response to a question from opposition deputies, who demanded that they be clear, stay there and the Southern Kuril islands controlled by Seoul Takeshima under "illegal occupation of foreign countries."
The agency notes that Maehara himself repeatedly and expressively used the term "illegal occupation" in respect of the South Kuriles. However, after his appointment to head the Foreign Ministry official was more cautious in his expressions.
A new formulation for the Southern Kuriles and the islands of Takeshima has strongly condemned the opposition Liberal Democratic Party. "We are sending the wrong signal to the very fact that we introduce a taboo on the term illegal occupation" - said the deputy from the LDP Hakubun Shimomura.
At the same time, the current correction terms does not mean that Japan is changing its approach to the issue of the South Kuriles. In particular, the site of the Japanese Foreign Ministry still maintains that they are under "illegal occupation" of Russia.
This territorial issue escalated in November when the president of Russia Dmitry Medvedev has visited the island of Kunashir. Visit the Russian leader of his Japanese counterpart, Naoto Cann then called "inexcusable rudeness."
Last week, Secretary General of the Cabinet Edano made "inspection from the air," Southern Kuril Islands. He then spoke in favor of dialogue with Russia "in a calm atmosphere," adding that "the voice of the Japanese people on the so-called territorial issue would have sounded louder, ponder the Japanese, as they are close to the island." In response, Russian Foreign Ministry stated that "the actual call to the Japanese public to" speak louder "on the so-called territorial issue" contrary to the previous master's thesis about Edano quiet character dialogue. After that Edano hastened to announce that his words were not hostile to Russia.
More: http://news.mail.ru/politics/5394130/?frommail=1
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Южные_Курилы
http://gidepark.ru/community/129/article/271992
U.S. will support Japan in the fight for Kurily21 February 2011 at 15:17
Gaydparker: Sergey Siberians
1,117 views
Rating 169
Discuss (86)
According to the Japanese agency Kyodo, "dated February 18, expressed relative to the position of Russia absolutely senseless talks with Japan over the South Kuril Islands (Japanese name" northern territories "), Deputy Spokesman U.S. State Department Toner said at a briefing that" both countries should to seek dialogue "and urged the parties to resolve the issue through negotiations. Toner pointed to the need to maintain stability in the region and expressed concern that the worsening of relations between Russia and Japan could lead to instability in Northeast Asia.
The report says that earlier the U.S. has repeatedly stated that the "northern territories" belong to Japan, Toner did the emphasis on "absolute clarity" of the U.S. government.
Anatoly Wasserman political consultants and political scientist, Gregory Trofimchuk told the correspondent of IA REX on the settlement of the territorial dispute between Japan and Russia ..
Anatoly Wasserman: Toner said at a briefing that "both countries should seek to engage in dialogue" ... It was necessary to us to recommend them to solve the conflict through negotiations around Pearl Harbor (Pearl Harbour). According to the Japanese agency Kyodo, "The Japanese ... wishful thinking?
According to Anatoly Wasserman reason for the deterioration of relations there. The status of the entire Kuril chain (including the part lying south of the northern tip of Hokkaido) is completely defined by international agreements. Even if no
under one of these agreements is not at the same time our Japanese and sign - the whole collection of them clearly gives us all the Kuriles and deprive Japan of any kind were no grounds for claims.
The report says that earlier the U.S. has repeatedly stated that the "northern territories" belong to Japan, Toner did the same emphasis on
"Absolute clarity" of the U.S. government.
That is, the United States of America have already managed to unlock not only on their signatures under the Yalta and Potsdam agreements of 1945, but even the signature under the San Francisco Peace Treaty, 1951 with Japan? Then, on what basis they keep their troops in Japan?
IA REX: give in to pressure the Russian government of Japan and the United States and give the South Kuril Islands?
Anatoly Wasserman believes that by today's Russian authorities "to expect any miracles terrible. But I hope that even the current Minister of Defense of Russia understand the unacceptability of the impact the Japanese Shikotan, better controlled in the winter weather out of the Sea of Okhotsk in the Pacific Ocean "- suggests the expert.
Gregory Trofimchuk notes: The fact that Russia and Japan will slow to push for more hot form of confrontation, "Center for Modeling Strategic Development indicated as soon as it became clear that the recent aggravation of the problems around the South Kuril Islands, which began several months ago, unlike the previous Discussion spikes confined to the "February 7," etc. Statement by the U.S. State Department once again confirms the seriousness of the situation.
Already it is clear that Russia will close the strategic Asian (raw materials and technology) corridor, which she can safely use in the case of periodic exacerbation of relations with Europe and the West. Should not be overlooked that the tactics of the boycott to be applied to sporting events, can be applied to the summits of this kind, such as the APEC-2012 in Vladivostok. Have to bear in mind that North Korea would be plunged more high atmospheric pressure, with the parallel establishment near the South Kuril Islands, "Asian NATO."
Russia long ago it was time to start - in the public field, in NGOs - forming the very "confidence", which have repeatedly said Russian officials during his visit to Tokyo - in particular, the head of the Presidential Administration, Sergei Naryshkin. After all, Russia, unlike Japan, there is no social organization which would deal with the theme of the South Kuriles / "Northern Territories". I know of only one such - the Russian-Asian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, which appeared just a few months ago, but has already managed to offer a non-trivial projects in this regard.
If Russia will not be following the example of Japan, to strengthen the civilian wing, it will try to impose, for starters, on a wider range - including the "Kaliningrad problem", tying in general, and her and the South Kuril issue to the end of World War II .
IA REX: Do not follow the example of Japan is the other neighboring countries in advancing territorial claims?
Anatoly Wasserman sure if cede - certainly follow
Follow any other neighboring countries for example in Japan, still depends on Russia itself, "said Gregory Trofimchuk. "I, as always, strive to specifics, so personally I have specific recommendations for reducing stress in this issue. However, there is a big "but": the Kremlin - hundreds of biased experts who sit on the budget funds and must answer to current challenges. However, they are mainly engaged in scientific-sounding statistics, not having anything to do with modern technology, the information counter.
The problem of the South Kuriles directly included in the range of questions which they must solve, but can not solve. That's why I recently proposed to form Alternative Advisory Council, which will include a range of new persons who can do more on creativity in the most severe and closing themes.
Wasserman, Anatoly
Country: Russia, Ukraine
lexicographer, political consultants
In November 1991 a journalist since 1995 - a political consultant in a team with Nurali Latypov. In 1994, he ran to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (ranked second in the district). 2008-2010. - Chief editor of the popular science magazine "Idea X". Wasserman - a supporter of Ukraine's accession to Russia, also repeatedly stated that he considered the Ukrainian language is a dialect of Russian, and not a separate language.
http://gidepark.ru/community/129/article/271992
Flow ...
From ancient times to the present day Russian history shows: every time when Russia is weakened or so considered its enemies on its borders immediately appeared candidates for acquisition of its ancestral lands.
The most notorious of all such contender is the Japanese.
Today we will focus on the characterization of their position as the most typical of these entities and, more importantly, because their claims and responses of the Russian regime moved in the implementation phase and requires immediate refutation.
Japan's territorial claims in the Soviet Union-Russia relations are the manifestation of the Japanese imperial chauvinism and direct child and porodolzheniem genocidal extermination-Cold War imperial-fascist West against the Soviet Union and the anti-Soviet policy.
USSR, the USA and the UK in accordance with the decisions of the Cairo Conference, the United States and Britain, Yalta and Potsdam conferences of the USSR, the USA, the UK, including the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 51 countries-Japan winner with her story of returning all the territories Japan has ever captured it from other peoples and nations, their original owners (which was done immediately after the defeat of Japan in 1945) and Japan's renunciation of all rights and title to the returned land.
But the U.S. is already in the mid-50's have allowed the Japanese under their occupation, to put forward a claim to the Soviet Union about the "return" of the two islands of the South Kuriles. Thus, this decision, the U.S. began to hand the Japanese principles of the postwar dismantling of democratic peace and blessing of Japanese and German policy of revenge.
And just to power in the Soviet Union came disguised antisotsialisty, the Japanese government with the approval of the U.S., using the fact that the USSR did not sign the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951, in his own violation of his due the possibility of concluding a peace treaty with the Soviet Union with the transfer of Japan's two islands of the Soviet Southern Kuril Islands.
Soviet anti-Stalinist under the ridiculous pretext, voiced by Khrushchev - Habomai and Shikotan so close to coming to Japan, which should take into account the interests of Japan, "- immediately agreed with the requirement of revenge-seeking Japanese and in 1956 signed the Moscow Soviet-Japanese declaration of readiness to conclude a peace treaty on the this condition.
When Japan in 1961 signed with the U.S. anti-Soviet in spirit "Contract Security", the Soviet government denounced the item "Moscow Declaration" on the transfer of two islands. And Japanese revanchists silent for more than a quarter of a century, until the late 80-ies of XX century.
With a creeping takeover of the USSR "perestroikists socialism" Japanese resumed their revenge harassment. And anti-Russian "process has begun." From 1988 to 2005 took more than two dozen intergovernmental "meetings", "negotiation", "agreements" on "Kuril issue."
That is only the most illustrative of them.
1991 - Gorbachev without any justification in the "Joint Statement" acknowledges the problem of the four southern Kuril Islands, September 1991 - Deputy. Foreign Minister Kunadze says residents of the island of Shikotan, protesting against the transfer of the islands of Japan: "You can spoil our relations with Japan, but the island will still be transferred"; 1992 - signed a "Plan for Yeltsin - Hashimoto," a phased settlement of the Kuril issue by 2000; 1995 - Russian Foreign Minister Kozyrev has translated "Kuril issue in the issue of" ownership of islands "and" disengagement Borders 1996 - before the opening of the Tokyo International Exhibition of Technology, Russian President Boris Yeltsin complied brazen demand to remove Japanese with the Russian pavilion National Flag and map of Russia from the Kuril Islands. And, perhaps, the apex of such a betrayal was the signing of the Russian president and prime minister of Japan, 13 November 1998 Moscow Declaration on Establishing a Creative Partnership between Russia and Japan "This is a document, defamatory Russia hypocrisy, attributing it to imperial-fascist principles and ideas falsification of history itself, the substitution of objective notions of imperialist interpretations.
On behalf of Russia and Japan, noting that in the capitalist world - socialism signatories is not mentioned - "there are processes of democratization" that is, imperialist fascization life, "and the active development of new forms of interstate cooperation," ie, globalist dictatorship of the "Big Seven" and forced submission of other kapstran, meet modern global realities, "that is the destruction of socialism in Europe and parts of Asia, the rule of imperial fascism, Russia and Japan, combined the universal values of freedom, ie freedom of capital imperialist" democracy "that is, the dictatorship imperialist bourgeoisie, "the rule of law" that is, the rule of capital strength, and respect for basic human rights - no right to a normalized, we have paid work, education and safety of life at the shelter and without the freedoms and duties, no rights, freedoms and responsibilities of citizens, peoples, nations, work collectives, and social systems, People and class movements and parties, "are intended to build meet their strategic and geopolitical interests of the relations of constructive partnership" - what kind of partnership, especially as geopolitical, can we talk about between the Imperial Japan's fascist and anti-imperialist in nature Russia? - "to overcome the painful legacy of the past on the basis of ... transmission of Russian islands of Etorofu, Kunashiri, Shikotan and Habomai ... Japan and the border demarcation "- is, instead of Japan once again to abandon their traditional claims to land in Russia, Korea, China and other countries and to comply strictly with the obligations set out for her San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951, which is nobody's not canceled.
These Jesuit replaced sensible positions imperial-fascist, anti-imperialist Russia postscript their heads of governments of the two states are trying to justify anti-Russian policy in Japan, by 1998, extend continuously for two centuries, and resume actually captures the Russian lands and waters of the peaceful policy of violence and deception on the part of Japan to justify , to consolidate and continue the policy of creeping, treacherous, anti-national, neither legal nor historical, nor politically justified the transfer of lands of Russia, its national wealth, the law itself to the sovereignty of its territory and power, the transfer of all this one of the traditional, ineradicable hostility of Russia - Japan.
On the reality of these anti-Russian position and goals reflected in the fact that the declaration of "appreciate the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of Japan on cooperation in fishing operations for marine living resources" on February 21, 1998 It Russia's sovereignty over the four islands of the South Kuriles with the waters around them is not even mentioned, but the Japanese have the right to fish there without permission from Russian authorities.
The next President of Russia VV Putin, in his statement "firmly to continue the course of President Yeltsin."
In 2002, while in Germany, he proclaimed the principle of allowing all Governments to continue their anti-Russian policy: "Each country should possess such a territory which it is able to manage." And smoking in general, like most Russian regions, "the era of violent restoration of capitalism appeared in such" unmanaged "state, that of" possession "of Putin said would be simply indecent.
And, perhaps because he, in August of that year, organized a closed-from the Russian people of the scientific forum of 40 Russian and Japanese scientists on the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin, and on 22 August when he was in Vladivostok - a helicopter circled over the Japanese foreign minister waters Southern Kuril Islands.
January 10, 2003, President Putin and Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi signed a joint statement ...." Перевод: русский > английский
"Joint statement ...." and "Plan of Action ... as soon as possible a peace treaty by solving the question of ownership of islands of Etorofu, Kunashiri, Shikotan and Habomai, based on all previously adopted documents ...".
The "documents" the parties recognize only started with restorers capitalism in the USSR, rather than documents, based on real historical events.
But this was not enough for Putin rigged. In signing the latest "document", he added: "We must not forget in what context, and because of what's on these islands came under the jurisdiction of Russia." These words of Mr. Putin - a direct falsification of history: the Kuril Islands and the southern part of Sakhalin are not passed to Russian jurisdiction. They were returned to military force under its sovereignty after 70-and 40-year occupation of Japan, respectively. And the Russian president had not distort history and to show Japan's expense to compensate for the damage Russia such a prolonged occupation of these areas of damage. But at the same time and demand the immediate return of the gold reserves of Russia, were not returned so far by Japan, with interest payments for their use in 85 years.
And so in 2009 - a new activation "Kuril problem, it seems, with access to the" home straight ".
According to media reports, Prime Minister Putin of Russia in May 2009, during his working visit in Tokyo, said: "Russia is ready to address the issue of the South Kuriles. And as soon as he left Tokyo, the Japanese parliament adopted the law on territorial jurisdiction of the South Kuriles, Japan. And on May 22 Japanese Ambassador to Russia informed the citizens of Russia to introduce visa-free visits to the Japanese Southern Kuril Islands.
And as the official talks with Russia on Japan Kuril issue in May 2009 was not - the Russian government did not notify the citizens of the country - the decision of the Japanese Parliament was a public slap in the face the Russian state, the Russian people. But neither Prime Minister nor the President of Russia in any way at this insult did not answer, no it is not explained.
Moreover, Russian President Medvedev DA, after a business meeting with Japanese Prime Minister at a meeting of Group of Eight in Italy in July, said: "The sole basis for solving this issue is the Moscow Declaration of the USSR-Japan 1956 ".
Immediately, questions arise.
Is 15 months of presidency, DA Medvedev was not informed by the Foreign Ministry that the thesis of the Moscow Declaration of 1956 on the possibility of transmission of two Japanese Kuril Islands was denounced by the Soviet government on Jan. 27, 1961? Or the president of Russia - the successor of the USSR - does not consider itself obligated to abide by the decisions of the Soviet Government on Indigenous issues of the Russian national state?
The above-mentioned positions and actions of the governments of Japan and Russia resumed the angry protests of the population Kuril Islands and the Far East, the patriotic forces of all Russia, protests, condemning the Japanese arrogance and betrayal of the Russian regime - politicians, generated by the complete neglect of the history of the nationality of those territories, that is, its boundless falsification.
"And you ought to trouble to happen: just this May under the influence of popular indignation falsification of the history of Russian people and state - Russia, Russia-USSR - Russia's President Medvedev issued a decree "On the Education Committee under the Russian President to counter attempts to falsify history to the detriment of Russia."
These statements by the Prime Minister and the President of Russia's Kuril issue and the presidential decree on the fight against falsification of history is indisputable evidence that the government of our country's left hand does not know that at the same time makes right. And there rights policies or complete historical ignorance, or a frank and impudent betrayal of our homeland.
And sharply rising number of historical and political questions:
- What is the primary nationality of the Kuril Islands and other "to dispute" Japanese Russian territory?
- What are the historical, national and legal framework of Japanese claims to the Russian land?
- What are the policy regimes of Russia and Japan?
And what should be done to Russian, constituent peoples to Russia once and for all put an end to the imperialist ambitions of its ancestral territory?
The answer to these questions can only give a true history of public ownership "objectionable," as the Japanese say, the earth.
And she is.
As in ancient times, in medieval Russian people living in the entire Eastern European area, strong enough to defend their country from the destruction of the Tartar invaders, looters and European colonialists in the last third of the sixteenth century. move to the east, in Siberia.
Russian explorers, by the middle of the seventeenth century. came to the shores of the Pacific Ocean in the area from the Bering Strait to Japan. Since that time, our stories are touching.
The Japanese have not yet conquered the entire island of Hokkaido to escape from European colonialists in 1639, shut down their country to foreigners who have entered a period of self-isolation and officially stayed there until 1854
Japanese historian M. Tseokan in the book "Karafuto writes:" In 1643 (20 th year of the Kam-II) came to the Russian Kamchatka and the Kuril Islands was opened. "
In the second half of the seventeenth century. Russian explorers have visited all the Kurile Islands and Sakhalin Island. In the late seventeenth century. Atlasov examined the Kamchatka Peninsula, and in 1697 it was incorporated into Russia. In 1707 Peter the Great issued a decree on the survey Kuril Islands and Japan. V1728, the Russian expedition led by Behring made a survey of the Okhotsk Sea, Kamchatka, the Kuril Islands and the coast of Japan. In the years 1738-1739. Russian expedition examined and described all 32 Kuril Islands, giving them Russian names. Indigenous populations - the Ainu. Japanese in the Kuril Islands were not.
In 1741 Alaska from the Aleutian and all other islands were incorporated into the Russian Empire. Went on mastering the Kuril Islands. In 1749, for Fr. Shumshu opened the first school in 1775 and on. Paramushir. Almost all of the Ainu people began to speak in Russian. In 1768 the islands of Iturup and Urup were built Russian fortifications.
In 1779 was issued an imperial decree to abolish in order to strengthen friendship with the Ainu, "charging them with a tribute. By the end of the eighteenth century. the entire population of the Kuril Islands has become orthodox.
In 1786 was compiled Roster Russian possessions on the shores of the Pacific Ocean, "which includes all the Kurile Islands. He was brought to the attention of European powers. The Japanese government was notified about this special Russian ambassador, said: "To the north of Matsman (Japanese Matsumae principality on the island of Hokkaido. - AV), all land and water belong to the Russian Emperor."
That is the true story pervootkrytiya, pervoosvoeniya and pervovklyucheniya of the Russian nation-state - Russia - Kamchatka, Alaska, with the islands of the Kuril Islands.
In 1796 was published "Atlas of the Russian Empire," which included all of these areas.
But immediately after the notice of Japanese about the Russian possessions on the Pacific coast, they have become aggressive. Also in 1786 they were unceremoniously sent an expedition to survey for. Kunashiri and the western and eastern coasts of. Sakhalin Island to Cape Siretoko. In 1787 they explored Etorofu and Urup.
In 1794, Russia has built a fortified parking on about. Urup. In 1798 the Japanese landed on about. Etorofu, upset Russian signposts and set your own. In 1801 they put their posts on about. Urup.
In the late eighteenth - early nineteenth century. When Russia was in a military conflict, then at war with imperialist France, the Japanese seized on. Kunashiri and the Habomai archipelago, then Shikotan and Etorofu. In subsequent years, the Japanese atrocities continue and strengthen.
Russia, which has no physical capacity to oppose Japanese aggression intensified remedies. In September 1821 the Decree of the Senate had approved the "Regulations on the limits of navigation and order of maritime affairs along the coast of eastern Siberia, northwestern America and islands in the Aleutian, Kuril, and others." According to this decree, all the rights of all trades and industries provided "the only Russian citizen."
August 6, 1822 Russian-American company announced "Notes" for all contenders for the Russian land, in which he stated that Russian explorers' first discovered these countries and first brought them home, "which" serves as a convincing proof of the discovery the add " .
But the arrogance of Japanese increased.
In 1855, when Russia is defeated in the anti-Russian English-French (Crimean) War, Japan, threatening war, forced Russia to sign Sinodsky Treatise on Trade and friendship. " Treatise "legitimized" the capture of Japan's Southern Kuril Islands and Sakhalin Island announce "an undivided territory."
In 1775, using the profound socio-political crisis in Russia, Japan, once again threatening war, made Catherine II signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki, which had already passed all the Kurile Islands of Japan in "exchange" in transition "undivided" in Sinodskomu treatise Sakhalin possession Russia.
With the emergence in the late nineteenth century. economic imperialism, Japan, just emerging from isolation, squeezed into the ranks of the imperialist colonial world - UK, USA, France and Germany. Russia not only did not join them, but their offer to participate in the economic section of China forcibly in 1893 concluded with the world's first equitable economic agreement.
In the "response" imperialist colonizers of the world, remembering all the "wrongs" inflicted on them by Russia during their anti-Russian robberies, and realizing that the Russian people and Russia not only will never be their allies in the conquest of the world, but will their opponents, they decided to destroy them .
Joint efforts for 10 years has produced a century of warring with Russia, Japan to such a war, and threw it against Russia. And Japan in 1904-1905. conducted the first anti-Russian-genocidal war of extermination. Her "victory" created "mediator" - the U.S. government - and a betrayal of Witte & Co., has given half of Japan. Sakhalin and leased by Russia from China's Liaodong Peninsula.
In 1918, using as a pretext for unwelcome imperialist establishment of Soviet power, Japan seized the northern part of Sakhalin, Primorye and all Transbaikalia to Chita, inclusive, and keeping them by force of arms to his exile in late 1920, while the northern part of Sakhalin - until May 1925
With the capture in 1929 in northeastern China, Japan, endless provocations turned the Soviet border in the bleeding wound of the incredible character. Only one border guard Karatsupa detained more than 400 Japanese spies and saboteurs.
In 1938 at Lake Hassan in 1939, Khalkhin Gol in Mongolia, the Union of the USSR, preparing for war with the Soviet Union, already a member of the fascist Anti-Comintern Pact, Japan felt the force of arms the strength of the defense of the USSR. In obeh aggression she was defeated in April 1941 was forced to conclude with the Soviet Union "Neutrality Pact, offers her the USSR since 1931
But Japan has not abandoned its expansionist policies. In a secret plan to create a "Co-Prosperity Sphere Greater East Asia under the leadership of the Japanese nation" provides for the seizure has the entire eastern part of the USSR, up to and including Lake Baikal and Irkutsk.
With the Nazi assault on the Soviet Union in Europe 22 June 1941 the Government of Japan June 25, 1941 announced the Government German Reich: "The basis of Japan's foreign policy is" Triple (Germany, Japan and Italy. - AV) pact, "and if this War and Neutrality Pact "would be in contradiction with the" Tripartite Pact ", the" Pact of neutrality "will have no effect."
Already 2 July 1941 the Japanese government with the emperor decided to "not yet enter the war against the USSR" and start it, "if the German-Soviet war will develop in favor of Japan." Meanwhile, Japan will be "secretly preparing to take up arms against the Soviet Union."
Japan's General Staff developed a plan, "Kahn Toku Ann," on which the Kwantung Army, which is located on the Soviet-Manchurian border, southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, had already been to dekabryu1941 was reduced to 1.1 million personnel and fully prepared for an attack.
And during the Great Patriotic War the Soviet people under the influence "of the Neutrality Pact" Japan kept the USSR in tension, showing an armed hostility: 779 times the Japanese army violated the Soviet border, the Japanese air force 433 times invaded Soviet air space, the Japanese navy sank 18 and detained 178 Soviet merchant ships, Japanese diplomacy has systematically provided the Nazi Reich, his intelligence on the Soviet Union, demonstrating commitment to the anti-Comintern pact.
By the war against the Soviet Union and the decisive phase of the war for the "Co-Prosperity Sphere ..." Japan is ready to chemical and biological weapons!. All that the Soviet government was forced to consider.
This anti-Soviet policy in Japan has generated a large share of losses and failures of the initial period of the Great Patriotic War, the Soviet people, as needed for the war against the fascists in Europe the number of troops has not yet been mobilized, and maneuver with Japan's "front" was not.
Japanese imperialist aggression before and after release from isolation and war for the "Co-Prosperity Sphere ..." led to the seizure of the territories Japan nearly a dozen Asian countries.
Therefore, when Japan was defeated by allied forces, when all - or land seized by Japan in other countries at the request of the peoples and the decision of the Yalta, Potsdam Conference of Allied Powers and in accordance with the UN Charter were returned to their rightful owners. The Soviet Union returned its Kurile Islands and Sakhalin Island.
These realities and decisions were made to the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 51 countries-winner in Japan with her and signed by Japan. Moreover, under this treaty, Japan renounced all further rights and title to ownership of the returned foreign lands.
Thus, the San Francisco Peace Treaty was fully restored historic justice.
It would seem that Japan's relations with the countries - former victims of its aggression would establish common sense. But the imperialist philosophy of the Japanese government has prevailed over common sense.
Beginning of the Cold War imperial fascism against the Soviet Union and communist ideology, Japan immediately began to use their national imperialist order and wait for the opportune moment to implement them.
And when the power in the Soviet Union came camouflaged antisotsialisty, the Japanese imperial nationalists decided that the time has come and started another, the modern period of the nationalist aggression, as defined at the outset.
Thus, the above facts:
a) The true story pervootkrytiya, pervoosvoeniya, pervoogosudarstvleniya island territories of the Far East;
b) two centuries of shameless power grabs and war Japanese government island and continental lands of the Russian state;
c) anti-national anti-socialist readiness of Soviet-Russian authorities to give the required Japanese ... and a strong, fair position of the Russian patriotic forces that reject the treacherous policy of the globalist-puppet regimes of the USSR, Russia and arrogant claims of Japan - lead us to the realization of irrefutable conclusions and decisions required:
1. History has shown undeniable affiliation Russian national state of Russia-USSR, all the Kurile Islands and Sakhalin in their pervootkrytiyu, pervoosvoeniyu, pervoogosudarstvleniyu Russian pioneers, Russia.
2. Temporary acquisition of named Russian territories Japan has been aggressive violence, threats of war, anti-Russian wars - poverty of philosophy of imperial colonialism.
3. Current position of non-recognition of Japanese sovereignty of Russia over its island possessions in the Pacific Ocean indicate non-recognition of Japan's historical rights and obligations of peoples enshrined in the fundamental decisions of the Yalta and Potsdam conferences of great powers, the San Francisco Peace Treaty of the victorious countries of Japan with her, the UN Charter and the really mean "book" Japan's right to capture these and other lands by military force.
Incredible brutality carried out against the Russian-Soviet genocidal, destructive wars and the ongoing Cold War, encouraged Russia to demand from the UN General Assembly decision on the withdrawal of Japan, like Germany, the right to ever take to the UN guidelines.
In light of this urgent tasks of all patriotic organizations and the forces of Russia should be:
1. Address to the UN General Assembly to condemn the requirement revanchist policies Empire of Japan, aimed at the rejection of the UN Charter, the decisions of the Yalta and Potsdam conferences the Great Powers - the creators of the UN, a violation of Japan's San Francisco Peace Treaty of the victorious countries of Japan with her.
2. Demand from the Russian Government cease any "negotiations with Japan on the territorial issue and the immediate denunciation of all agreements on this issue, concluded during the period from 1988 to present.
3. Demand from the Russian Government to immediately sign the San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan, or a separate peace treaty with her on the territorial issue on the principles of the San Francisco Peace Treaty in 1951.
Contract demand from Japan to the ultimatum condition: if Japan did not sign a peace treaty with Russia in 2010 - 65 th anniversary of the end of the second imperialist world war, then Russia as the restoration of a unified Russian nation-state, will return to the question of concluding peace with Japan is not before 2051, until such time supporting her only consular relations.
AV Volchenkov, Doctor, Professor.,
WWII veteran
http://www.kbarieru.info/200920/?20_3_1
And he's right.
Japanese gentlemen, you are destroying the U.S. and betrayed.
http://www.vesti.ru/videos?vid=269477 etc.
Russia has no territorial claims against Japan ... yet.
Свидетельство о публикации №211022401020