Supramental philosophy

(apologies for mistakes)
 Supramental philosophy may be called shortly like zeazrosophy (zeazro-super-intelligence and wisdom, Sophia, in gr.) Or Archiepistemology.  In many philosophical systems have elements of Archiepistemology, but they stopped halfway and do not reach a logical outcome, which is presented in zeazrosophy.  The reason for undiscovered real -superintelligence ( zeazrovneba)of classical philosophy is the same reason undiscovered before Freud, the unconscious, "the cult of reason" irrationalism unscientific rejected this "cult".  Zeazrosophy superior views of Kant and Engels.  Incorrectly absolutely deny unknowability things confident; incorrectly think thing in itself absolutely unavailable cognition.  We must find a method of knowing things in themselves.  A true super-intelligence (zeazrovneba) is these method.  Supramental philosophy is an attempt to go beyond the mind by the mind itself.  Philosophical thinking is in itself unable to carry this out, but it can show a path that will carry zeazrogenetic engineering and other sciences.  Creating a true supermind (zeazrovneba) will be economically beneficial, because zeazrovneba will create new goods and services whose value exceeds the cost of creating a true supermind.  It is important to distinguish underfunction and superfunction development, in order to understand what zeazrovneba(a true super-intelligence).  Underfunction development of the functions of knowledge is that on the basis of perception (sensation) may occur supersenses (supersensationse).  Also, on the basis of intelligence can develop proper super-intelligence (superintelligence). Superfunction development differs from underfunction: based on the perception of sensations originated mind.  And as a result of superfunction development occurs zeazrovneba(or zeazrenie or zazrobneva, its synonyms)-, a true super-intelligence.  Underfunction development of knowledge-improving the functions within it, superfunction development-rise development to the next function.  Supersenses its a sense of objects that are not modern senses, but are available or developed other senses.  Overmind has developed a modern mind, which has changed, but still not a real super-intelligence, or in its name and was not supposed to be "mind."  Overmind though, and will provide such knowledge, which is unable to know the modern mind, but will not be able to learn the knowledge, accessible only to the true Overmind- zeazrovneba.  Reason and logic as a super-intelligence types are in a logical way (the class) MIND.  Overmind not distant from the mind as well as the mind is distant from the perception of sensations.  Overmind similar reason as superperception like perception.  A true super-intelligence is so different from the reason that this concept is a logical view is no class in mind, but in class ZEAZROVNEBA(these is the true translation of these term).  Definitions zeazrovneba.  Determination of the closest logical genus and specific difference: zeazrovneba the ability of knowledge, which is not the perception and understanding, and a new function of knowledge.  Determination of origin: cause of zeazrovneba would be evolution, but science-zeazrogenetic Engineering and zeazroneirophiziology-create it quickly.  Functional definition: the goal zeazrovneba-knowledge of the true superthinking cognitive complexity of reality.  Structural definition: elements zeazrovneba-zeazrogens(genetic) zeazroneyrons(neurophysiological) zeazrons (psychological, analogue of thoughts).  Comparative definition: "zeazrovneba-mind" similar treatment "reason- perception".  In the definition not a circle or zeazrovneba not a tautology, zeazrovneba determined on the basis of other concepts.  It is also important to prevent the illusion of tautology with adoption of the international philosophical term zeazrovneba.  Ways to create a concept in logic: an analysis (for the concept zeazrovneba need to analyze the reality and knowledge), synthesis (for the concept zeazrovneba needed synthesis of the philosophical ideas and theories), comparison, abstraction, generalization (were compared perception and thinking in abstraction from their non-essential properties, and made generalization their relations all cognition).                Olden(Starchen)


 © Copyright: Oleg Starchen , 2011