The question of the eternal life and the eternal d

       Let's begin with an example not provoking any doubts. Is a human able to waive his destiny consciously, for example, to spoil a part of his life for a few years? Only in particular cases if one has to choose from two evils the lesser one. For example, to be a slave or to die for the liberty, someone chooses the second thing, joining a last unequal battle against those who is going to turn him in servitude inevitably. At the same time, if he is responsible and operates correctly, he is trying to calculate his movement in a way that he would cause to the enemy the most damage as it is possible. Certainly, if there is a third way making possible to avoid the servitude and continue the struggle, not sacrificing his future, he would choose just this third way. Anyone not being in the state of affect or of intoxication, not being a crazy, he will not keep a devil-may-care attitude towards his future, for example, to come out through a window on the third floor to shorten his path or to kill a first anybody who has looked askew at him or has talked some foolishness.
       Sane people's indifference to his own destiny is beginning to discover, if some trouble or severe trials have to happen not now, not in half year, but in 20-30 years, for example. So the indifference to the destiny after the death one may account not only for unbelief in the afterlife, but more, including the psychological human quality to take thoughtlessly that troubles which stand far, or relatively far in time, even if they are inevitable. This is rightly confirmed by age of the majority of the believers in temples. The closer a calendar age to the limit of human life, the less atheists one can see in a such age group. At the young age, however in a situation of mortal danger, it is observed the same: the percentage of atheists is falling sharply.
       Certainly briefly but as far as possible from all sides, to examine the psychology of the human's attitude to his own destiny we have by no means because of the idle curiosity. We have approached to a very important aspect of this psychology: the faith of most people, what extent in is it conscious and deliberate? If the peoples of all the Earth profess only the same religion, all would be more simple. However the only the Christian Old Belief consists of several hundreds of different confessions. If one considers this fact conscientiously, a question is arising inevitably: why are sure the followers almost every confession that only their faith is right, only they will be saved, but all the others will burn in hell or will lose the God's grace or will suffer damage either this or that? Does that their doctrine seems more convincing? But if we visit in a temple of their opponents, it is doubtful whether another doctrine would seem less convicting. Of course, one can try to go deeper into systems of values either to ones or no others. Essay, please, and you will be just sure that one had taken care of this more before you. In the struggle for existence (pay attention to this) every organization acquired its own powerful and convincing philosophical superstructures, but every complicated philosophical system is found not able to be under philosophical test but it is only able to be checked up by experience, this already was demonstrated convincingly in my essay "The applied foundations".
       What would be the first reaction of the sincere believer in response to the above mentioned facts at the moment when he begins to use the mental abilities that God has endowed him, that is his faith would conscious one? Evidently, he would be driven into the panic: thousands denominations contradicting one another, and one must choose a sole "right" from the thousands of "wrong" and if he errs, he will suffer in the hell always, and the life imprisonment would look like summer holidays in comparison with it. And an attempt to justify himself alleging "the faith of our fathers", this is condemned by the Bible and the Coran. This argument is unfit for an excuse. The problem becomes practically insoluble one. But is that merciful and fair God could throw such insoluble problem to human being whom He had thought highly than the angels? Of course not.
       In fact that's what took place: in different centuries among different nations came the Prophets and the Teachers of humanity. All of them taught the same Truth but even the levels of the propagation were different too. For example, Mohammed and Jesus Christ propagated and their speech was understood for the ordinary people. But Gautama Siddhartha (Buddha) was a prince and he used more complicated concepts. Different levels of the homilies, different countries, different times: as a result of this, it would not go just without differences which the powers that be attempted to use them not always with the noble objectives. If Jesus Christ came with a finished doctrine what one must believe blindly in, then the words "seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you" would be unnecessary, that is superfluous. He just understood and knew that the society is able to modify any alive verity to his dead dogma. So He taught to disregard the public opinion and don't be afraid to seek: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. Or what man is there of you, whom if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone? Or if he ask a fish, will he give him a serpent? If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?" (Matthew 7:7-11) It remains to recall the priests and others moralists revolt in fact against these lines of the Gospel threatening by all the punishments for those who is attempting to dig down to the Truth independently, without their helping. In most cases, they point just at the danger to find oneself as a devil's prey "by inexperience", to the danger of disregarding their "authoritative" opinions, as if they are beings of the highest order mentally and spiritually, and as if it is impossible to grow to their level, excepting those whom the people's mob and the powers that be would admit as an authority and would give them a place, a rank and the documents certifying the profession of a priest. But it is indicated obviously in the foregoing lines of the Gospel that one may not be afraid to seek the Truth independently, that if he disregard the opinion of the public and the authorities he would not find himself as a vulnerable victim in solitude or before the Satan, because the same words of Jesus Christ are directed against the society and the authorities: "if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch". Only the hope upon God, God's helping and protection, the Gifts of God as the mental faculties and the intuition - all this makes humans more strong and invulnerable one before the intrigues of the Satan and the subordinated him society - people's mob, that is "this world". Let the foregoing lines don't give a guarantee to survive physically, because you know, finally many Prophets and Teachers were killed physically by the society. But this hope gives the guarantee to live life happily, and when the time come to die, to meet the death with faith and hope, without torment himself by doubts and remorses.
       Yes, many Prophets and Teachers were killed by the society, but very few people have yet reached up to this destination. And those who had the destination of self-sacrifice, these knew it, felt it, so it is they who had chosen the martyrdom, nobody incited them to it against their will, nobody persuaded to do it, more often it had place the opposite: one put them off doing it. It is enough to remember as Peter attempted to dissuade Christ and received the answer: "Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me". Therefore, if the society calls you to sacrifice yourself for the sake of some of their idols, then most likely it is from the evil one, and anyone wants to use you fraudulently, but these are an especial kind of a rascal who operates not with money, but with lives and these sacrifices will bring for them or for their masters the power and the desired nourishment for the ambitions. If you yield to them, you have very much chances serve to the devil, but not to God. If the way of sacrifice is your predestination, you yourself will feel it, you yourself will go on the warpath and look for a weapon and nobody will incite you to this, most likely one will you dissuade from this and try to prevent from this.
       And now let's return to the fundamental subject: what still one must believe in? What religion is more right? But all the religions are right APPROXIMATELY, because all the Prophets and the Teachers told about the Same Single God, about the single Commandments and they recommended one single way of living. Those discrepancies, which onto the instigators of religious discord cling, depend only on time, place and level of a homily.
       Simple examples: where in the Bible is written than one must not to have wives more than one? However it would be really to observe as a neighbour Christian condemns a neighbour Muslim since he has four wives. However, this time the Muslim is all right. The Koran allows to have not more than four wives. But the Cristian is sinning in the given situation because he breaks the commandment of Christ “Do not judge, or you too will be judged". Another example: a Muslim condemns a Vaisnava because he instead of a prayer repeats the Maha-Mantra: "Hare Krishna, Hare Krishna, Krishna Krishna, Hare Hare ..." But it is most probably that Muhammad didn't know about the teacher Krishna who propagated in another country several thousand years before him. As at that time there wasn't the Internet, weren't the airplanes and the trains. These worlds were different ones absolutely. And there was not the sense to introduce by the Arabs the way of communicating with God like mantras: it could provoke superfluous and needless difficulties, because an ordinary prayer is more understandable and intelligible to them, however, in the India this way passed successfully and favoured consolidation of the faith. However Muhammad did not forbid at all to recognize Krishna as a teacher and to practise the mantras. The ways of Allah so diverse and numerous that for one person, even for a genius, even for a Prophet it is not enough 1,000 years to tell about all the ways and all ways to teach. Already after the Prophet a foolish crowd had set all these needless prohibitions, so distorting thus the creed. Why the Christianity many peoples consider as the cruelest and sanguinary religion? It is because in the Middle Ages the commandment of Christ “Do not judge, or you too will be judged" was broken. So all followers of any religion have better at first pay attention to the observance of their own commandment before to condemn the another's ones.
        Should not look for a perfect faith in the world, which one would join. If such one exists, we should see a society congenial to the ideal and something like a paradise. But if there is not a paradise on the Earth, that means there is not a society which it ought follow blindly. Every religion would be fitted for you, which preaches the faith in the Single God - Creator. As the final determination of your fate in the eternity is not dependent on which society you have joined, is it the "faith of our fathers" or taking into account your individual features, you prefer something another. But you may don't join to any society at all. All depends how your faith is perfect. Pay attention the words of Jesus Christ “Your faith has saved you". That is just the personal faith but not a social environment or something else. How have you been diligent in improving themselves and your personal faith, so high you will rise in eternity. And the question: "What God do you believe in?" is a pointless one, because God is Single and if the name, which you use calling Him, expresses the glory and the respect, it is all right.
       It is necessary to solve only one sore misunderstanding. A Teacher or a Prophet - this is a man reaching the Enlightenment who finds in some way a unity with God, so in India by tradition such humans are named Bhagavan, what signifies the Lord. But this doesn't signify at all as this or that Teacher is God. Must we consider Jesus Christ as God or as a Man? Attempt to examine this yourself personally and if you cannot it, there is not a large trouble for you, only don't focus your attention on any incomprehensible question for you. As in the both cases you would treat Christ positively with respect. If most of people do so, these both great religion Islam and Christianity would  be reconciled and united. But the perfection is not given to the society. The perfection is given to a Personality. Be a Personality, go your own separate way. The society is like an interference in radio, it will confuse you.
       We have the saint scriptures, several, not one. The Apostle Paul said than all the scriptures are useful, still at that time, when the books not were united in the Bible. So it's better don't think very picky about the canonicity of a book. We have the nature around, which can also be considered as a kind of book. We have our own conscience, which can be regarded as a manual too. If it is difficult to embrace and to master all this in complex, it would indicate that one has to develop, perfect yourself, to become more honest and more intelligent. Just the second strong inclination after the sexual one, this is the desire for learning, the inclination to games, to the novelty leading to the knowledge. This is not a violence on oneself, before the recognition of the new something gives the joy always, although it sometimes requires an effort. God has endowed you with intelligence and with the ability and desire to develop it at the same time. If you have refused the development - it is the same burying the talent in the ground. The imbeciles may don't worry: our Lord is a fair judge and will not make responsible strictly them. But those who have the mind all right, they have to develop themselves and to learn, because refusing development is the single sit and it is a cause of all remainder sins, which are possible. The perfection of abilities given us from God - this is a general goal and predestination of our life which is a school. Be perfect as possible, and your faith will be correct. Your faith will save you. Amen.