Science and religion in Tuymen State University of

On what the science and religion can argue
Majors Dmitry Nikolaevich
On February 20, 2014, university news, Institute of technology, Scientific and innovative
Majors Dmitry Nikolaevich
The day before in Tuymen State University of Gas and Oil  was the first meeting of a scientific and philosophical circle on the cathedra of physics, methods diagnostics and control (FMD) on a subject «Scientific and religious development of reality took place. Interaction area». The seminar was carried out by the teacher of FMD cathedra Dmitry Mayorov. Referring to historical examples, he tried to prove that the direct conflict between a science and religion is impossible. At each of these spheres of uniform spiritual culture of mankind the purposes, tasks, methods.
It is known that in 1632 the church trial of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) took place. However still very few people knows that in its business the science and religion, and new and old astronomy, ideas of scientists of the heliocentric and geocentric device of Solar System faced not. Certainly, it is impossible to justify thus constraint of intellectual freedom of the scientist by Church, but to be fair it should be noted: neither that, nor at other party had no resolute proofs of the correctness. Only in the XIX century by means of telescopes reflectors it was possible to find out a star parallax of stars close to the Sun that at the time of Galilee it was simply impossible. Telescopes refractors of that time were not capable to distinguish shift of close stars rather distant at Earth roundabout round the Sun. This shift (parallax) has an order about one angular second (1/3600 degrees, a full circle - 360 degrees). So Galilee the Catholic Church resolved books only after 1820 when to resist to heliocentric model old geocentric system could not any more. Galilei was all life the religious person, and the last phrase attributed to it in life about Earth; «Nevertheless it spins» - an example not its antiklerikalnost, and only scientific persistence, to promoting progress in science.
Other historical example considered at meeting of a scientific and philosophical circle, is connected with Charles Darvina's identity (1809-1882) and his books «An origin of species by natural selection or preservation of favorable races in fight for life» (1859) and «An origin of the person and sexual selection» (1871) . Known dispute of scientist Gaksli with the bishop Uilberforsom is more historical joke, than the valid event. During meeting British associations of support of a science soon after a publication of the book, the bishop asked Gaksli about from whom it occurred from a monkey - in the area of the grandmother or the grandfather. Gaksli answered it that it is better to occur from a monkey, than from the bishop, afraid to face the truth. Most likely, this history is composed by Gaksli. It is known that the bishop of the Village Uilberfors wrote the positive review of the book of Darwin. Darwin, the graduate of theological faculty of the Cambridge university, never was the atheist. Having lost Christian faith, he became an agnostic. About it he wrote to "Autobiographies". But this evolution of outlook occurred at it, most likely, not under the influence of a science, and after loss of beloved daughter Elaine and a serious illness. In travel on the ship "Biggl" Darwin took except other editions the book At. Peyli «Natural theology» (1802) in which the professor of the Cambridge university proved that the device of eyes of animals and the telescope device surprisingly coincide with each other, and in a basis have the same laws of optics. Therefore, as the telescope should have a reasonable master, and creations of the nature should have a superreasonable Creator. Darwin looked for an alternative explanation of an origin of eyes of animals by evolution, but at a live being we cannot find the reason of emergence of the very first eye. If we cannot give the theological answer proved by a science about a life origin, we can become the most bigger agnostics, but not atheists.
The following meeting of a scientific circle at chair of Physics, control methods and diagnostics is planned to carry out on February 26 at 17.15 to 205 audiences in the third case of TYUMGNGU. Participants of a meeting will consider models of interaction of scientific and religious outlooks. To work of a seminar students, young scientists, teachers are invited. Discussed questions can become a basis of the whole scientific direction causing wide interest in the scientific world of the USA and Western Europe. Within work of a seminar the international grantovy activity is planned. (Explanations can be received by e-mail dmitriy1967@hotbox.ru).
It is possible to hear to the first meeting of a scientific and philosophical circle in an audioformat.
 


© Copyright: Majors Dmitry Nikolaevich, 2014
Certificate on the publication No. 214022001910
The list readers / Printable version / to Place the announcement / to Edit / Remove
Reviews
To write the review
We invite to meetings. Write, dear colleagues, on mail