A possible argument against kaballa learning

Josef K
A possible argument against kabala learning:

- Yeshu and his followers learned kabala and they turned to be false messianic movement.

- -Shabtay Tzvi and his followers learned kabala and they turn to be false messianic movement.

- Yakov Frank and his followers learned kabala and they turned to be false messianic movement.

Conclusion: learning kabala can lead to joining false messianic movements.

First possible objection: it's can be said that learning Judaism leads to joining false messianic movements.

Answer: There is no true religion aside of Judaism, so we can or confirm the ever-last possibility of Judaism to create false messianic movements or to look inside Judaism in order to find a few legitimate ways of keeping Judaism. Indeed we can find for instance the way of Brisk, which is free from kabala learning.

Second possible objection: the argument above is inductive one and therefore is not absolut: one day may come somebody from Brisk and to found false messianic movement.

Answer: All the time that no one of non-kabalistic Jews is not founding false messianic movement there is no actual objection, only possible, all the premises, in contrary, are actual facts.

Final elimination, however, of the second objection will be reached when real Messiah will come, and so it will be no future possibility for non-kabalistic Jew to found false messianic movement.

The end of the proof

My goal is to think and not to preach so I will be glad to get new objections in order to reach the truth.