The path of mind to the God Father

The arguments (and evidences) are not proofs. Do you agree? But they are proofs. So we have PARADOX. Solution: we call proofs "arguments", because to any sentence like "2+2=4" the demoniacal atheists say: "nonsense", "your logic fails". It is pure madness. But we know line of reason, thus, they are proofs. Here are not arguments, but proofs:

There is one general choice: be mind-less fool, or be mind-full.
I have not violated my mind in Eastern Orthodox Christianity.
Thus, my path is mind-full. Therefore, the Eastern Orthodox Christianity is true.

How one could violate the mind? Consider mental cases. If man believes, what he is Jesus,
then tell him from Bible. Or ask him to talk in Spanish. If man believes, what he is king, then ask him about his blue-blooded relatives.

"I can say the same about my non-Eastern Orthodox faith." Then, you are saying, what I am crazy. All issue is in the mind. The one, who has problem with it, is crazy. I am not crazy: my achievements! I have not violated or lied in my mind. Therefore, the God is Eastern Orthodox!

"I have not violated or lied in my mind" does not equal "therefore my beliefs must be true".

Define the Truth then. I am happy with my mind, and I am constantly using it. So why my mind is wrong? Just because you have closed an eye on some thing in your false religion? I am not crazy - thus, my mind is true to God.

See my use of mind:

Christian to atheist: "How are you going to say that something which was purposefully intended to be fictitious is something I can't prove?"

Good one, brother. Same is with Spaghetti Monster or with the Russell's teapot. The atheists have invented these objects to kill the True God. To kill God is needed another god. Therefore, the atheists are pagans. Proof ends.

    Atheist: "Bertrand Russell isn't "killing" your God with another god. He's not even disproving God with this disclosure. He's only explaining in what sense he's an atheist."

I bet many theists are in hell, killed by Russell's heavy teapot. The madness is contagious. Many dead theists have not become the Eastern Orthodox because of teapot. So, they are killed. Therefore: Holy Spirit was killed in them. Recall: "God is dead" (the Friedrich N., starter of Nihilism).

"How is the god of the Bible self-evident?"

He lefts us here no excuse to go to hell. That is simple.

    Atheist: "Are people who disagree with you, mindless fools?"

So it is now wise to reject God and go to hell? No.

    Atheist: "Which would mean, the vast majority of the world's population, is doomed according to this guy."

Wrong modern Majority is false argument: The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit were the only ones before the Universe came. And they were happy.

Theist: "it is better to believe that God exists"

So its better to be in Paradise, than in hell. Can you prove this statement? In first step define the word "better". The better is the God's preference of one thing and rejecting the other. So, we already need God to decide what is better. You simply suggesting to atheist simply get to be theist. That is starting point here. They can not hear us, the army of evil spirits is blocking their common sense.

Atheist: "So says the man without common sense."

Man without brain is saying, what you have departed from the common sense. This is PARADOX. How one can solve this? Just by ignorance to forget (and get to know the hell)?

-------------
Christian: "However, when you say that, "All can be proved logically," I have to disagree, because this goes against what the New Testament teaches."

Brother, you have not quite global picture: Jesus has used logic. See: Jesus says, what God is not God of dead people, thus, there is no death. It is divine wisdom. See here my new product, because Jesus says, what they will hear not only His, but also our words.

Hawking's idea is debunked: the mystery of Origin remains

Wikipedia: "The Grand Design is a popular-science book written by physicists Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow and published by Bantam Books in 2010. It argues that invoking God is not necessary to explain the origins of the universe, and that the Big Bang is a consequence of the laws of physics alone."

Suppose there is law: today at 12.30 on my desk will appear book on itself. This violates the law of energy conservation, thus it is impossible. But it is infinitely more impossible, if prior to 12.30 there is no time at all. Why? 1) It is extra complication: must appear not only book, but the time itself. And for sure, the energy conservation can not be applied in this NATURAL event. Thus, latter is impossible. 2) Any law connects two known states. But state without time is not known.

Hawking argues, that the total energy of Universe is zero. 1) However, there is no consistent formula to that zero: "Moller Formula Fails the Experimental Test" http://vixra.org/abs/1306.0012. 2) Secondly, if at 12.30 appears Universe with my book, then the energy of book is not zero. Therefore, the energy conservation must be applied in this Natural event with my book. It can't be applied (no state before 12.30), then it is Supernatural event. 3) Thirdly, the zero energy is also energy value, but there is no energy calculation prior to 12.30.

-----------

Suppose we have Universe. Its time is continuous, because otherwise we have not the universe, but large collection of tiny parallel universes. Each one has zero volume.

Therefore, it is infinite number of time moments, in which pen on my desk will be taken. Therefore, number of Many Worlds is actual infinity. Latter can not be linked to physical objects. Therefore, the many worlds interpretation (MWI) of Quantum Mechanics is not real.

Secondly, the wormhole connects different universes. Thus, the MWI is in conflict with No-Clone theorem.

As you see, many things can be proved with mind application. See: we are 100 pro certain, what Bible is true. Therefore Jesus's Revelation is the 100 pro proof.

    Theist: "I, myself, do not believe in the Many Worlds theory."

Now you know, what MWI is wrong, because of me. You can lie around, what you have no such knowledge, just a blind faith. Then you get used to that, and will not study a false religion, in which you might be in.
------------

New thought about Pascal's Wager

    Pascal's Wager besides the known criticism in Wikipedia is the expression of hidden agnosticism: "Theists must have mind-less faith". Then the small step is needed, for the Europe become atheistic: the Pascal is very respected one. And now EU is over the head in atheism. The Pascal has here descended to the level of the "seeker" in desperate try to save one -- it failed: EU is in atheism now. Perhaps Pascal needed to stay above the sickness of rotting man.

    Our freedom (ie, God's non-coercion) is not the absence of logical proofs of God. After all, I have such proofs (not to be envious, Blaise Pascal!). And the Christ's Cross and His Words and Deeds have conclusively proved. Our freedom is in the fact that we are free to think logically and to be sober, but are also free to be fools:

    "The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good.
    " (Psalm 14:1 NIV)

    POETRY:

    The Blaise Pascal was saying, that
    "The mind is only impotent.
    One can decide believe in God,
    But know for sure
    Is over throat."
    That's wrong idea of Theist!
    The Jesus came to us, he missed.
    I've kept my mind in serving God,
    And no-one cut my singing throat:

    (My Proofs of God. http://viXra.org/abs/1507.0114;
    In God We Mind or Physical Considerations of Divine.
http://vixra.org/abs/1507.0152;
    Has the Joke "Spaghetti Monster" a Deeper Meaning for Atheism? http://vixra.org/abs/1509.0269;
    Is Atheism Evil? http://vixra.org/abs/1510.0019)

    The idol is denying God,
    Read Martila's you special blog.
    Therefore, the atheist is wrong.
    He's simply pagan, sinful "blob".

    In dialog:
    My faith is not mindless one. Thanks for reply. Your clip against Pascal has the major flaw: there is single and easy step out of atheism: "God is real, however I do not know more about Him. I want to know. Let me ask Him and let me think and feel." (You will be in Eastern Orthodox Christianity). Point of video: "there are many false religions, so you will pick the wrong one in case you stop being atheist. Therefore, do no stop." It is flaw. The mixing the steps. First step is: "God is real". That is true information. Just keep it through all your life. Many false religions will not change this TRUE information. Guess what? You just stopped being atheist. Do not step back!!!

    See as example: Bob doesn't believe in Obama, but wants to get published in Nature (without high power in connections it is 100 pro impossible). His first step out of delusion is getting into mind: "President of USA does exist!" The next steps include getting his address, email, Obama's character, etc in order to write him convincingly. Same is with God. I understand, what you are opposer to any theist, but please agree on this obvious thing.

    Church Holy Fathers say, that in Paradise there is no faith: just knowledge. So we are moving from blind trust to knowledge.
    All can be proved logically. And can not be unproved. See: because Jesus made impossible miracles, He is God. This is simplest proof of God, which can not be unproved. Next, Jesus loved the man, because He did only good. Therefore, Jesus has not lied. Jesus told us, that there is Holy Trinity. This is 100 pro certain proof, which can not be unproved.

    She: "God is thought to be an entity with awareness, intelligence, personhood, and supernatural powers that is the sole creator and/or orderer of the natural universe. Jesus hasn't demonstrated anything, as far as I can tell, not even his own historical existence."

    Girl, it is your opinion. Perhaps I have more deep one. 1) Because of Free Will, a theist influences the universe. That violates the energy conservation. Therefore, it is not surprising, if holy theist would bring something into existence (due to E=m). Therefore, as Bible say, "You are gods". The one, Who made first Free Will act "C" is the Father of the Free Will creatures. Indeed, without the C, there won't be us. Therefore: get to know the God. 2) Jesus was observed by direct witnesses: Judas, Peter, Maria, and many, many others, including the Rome authorities. Therefore, please explain your point.

-------------

Sinner: "I am not crazy - thus, my mind is true to Buddha."

The man Buddha was atheist, isn't it? The modern Buddhism is not the atheism anymore, isn't it?

The use of mind on eastern philosophy can be devastating: If all is illusion, then this sentence we seeing is not illusion. We came to contradiction, thus, all around can not be illusion. Proof ends.

Then if you now try to defeat this obvious Truth, then you, who have gotten this knowledge from me, is violating and raping own mind. This way the false religions arise: dumb rape of the minds.
God Jesus says: and they did NOT THINK, until the flood came and killed them all (Matthew 24:39 synodal)
-----------------

    Sinner: "The nature of most world religions is that they are mostly grounded in allegedly external (outside-of-one's self) absolutes (e.g. deity supposedly did this in the external world, supposedly transmitted that holy text in the external world..."

Here you have confusing fault: "external (outside-of-one's self)", which without our intervention will cause many theists to fall and go to hell. It sounds like "external (outside-of-the Religion itself)", but it is only master illusion. Serious work devil is conducting. You are demoniacal, aren't you?

sinner: "That is typical of theists. They like to think they are special."

yes, we theists are not atheists. Atheism is trendy now. Thus, theists are special. Moreover, the atheists have lost the Holy Trinity, the theists have kept His "light yoke". Proof ends.
----------------------

    Theist: "it is better to believe that God exists"

So its better to be in Paradise, than in hell. Can you prove this statement? In first step define the word "better". The better is the God's preference of one thing and rejecting the other. So, we already need God to decide what is better. You simply suggesting to atheist simply get to be theist. That is starting point here. They can not hear us, the army of evil spirits is blocking their common sense.

    Atheist: "So says the man without common sense."

Man without brain is saying, what you have departed from the common sense. This is PARADOX. How one can solve this? Just by ignorance to forget (and get to know the hell)?
--------------------
Does the Existence exist?

There is major problem in Science: someone trusts, someone doesn't think about, what the World exists. But Science so high respects illusion teaching of India people, what dears not to prove existence of the Existence.

I am not so tolerant. If the World does not exist, then this sentence is true. Thus, it is real. Therefore, I came to contradiction. Then the World does exist. Proof ends.

Now, the Science can start to gain knowledge, not the illusions.

Does the Existence exist? - ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_the_Existence_exist [accessed Oct 20, 2015].
----------------

Christian: "Brother Dmitri...
However, when you say that, "All can be proved logically," I have to disagree"

YOU HAVE NO SUPPORT IN LOGIC, BRO. THEREFORE, I AM GIVING YOU THIS SUPPORT WITH HELP OF MY ORTHODOX GOD.
NOW YOU WILL WITHSTAND ATHEISM FOR SOME TIME:

It is huge work of pretend, decay, poisoning of society, and self-decay. This does evil. Evil is not reliable, because it always like virus mutates (atheist in pagan Spaghetti Monster sect) and adjusts to destroy good.

No good no evil means, what there is no observer. This was observed, thus there is observer and there is good. If all cause is natural, then this sentence was caused supernaturally. Therefore, there are observers with freewill.

If there is only evil, This truth is good (because evil is not reliable). Therefore, there is good.

The evil destroys good, but there is good. Thus, there is good God.

    Christian: "I agree with much of what you say,"

Why not with all? What is causing problem? Why are you humiliating my intellect in front of atheists?!

Atheist: "Which god is the good god? Atlas, Shiva, Allah? Please try to be specific."

The God exists. Why to be more specific?
--------------------