Science news... research on the kitchen table

Everything new is being sought not in huge institutions, but in our home laboratory. Almost from scratch. You will learn how to concentrate the energy scattered in nature, restore the past, and see the invisible.


…How to collect scattered in space, as if already asleep energy? Obviously, there are natural natural processes that increase its quality to its original value.
These are not some complicated devices. Everything happens by itself. You just need to be able to see.
The hot kettle on the table gives energy to the space – the table, the streams of air, etc. With the passage of time it cools down. The motion of molecules is evenly distributed in the environment. The energy of high order disappeared, replaced by a uniform thermal background. Is it possible to reverse the process? Will the impulses from the environment of the teapot be transferred in a particular case, will it boil right on your kitchen table?
This is how it should be if in nature, from the beginning of time, there is a cycle of energy.
One of the author’s first publications on this topic is an article in “TM”, No. 4, 2000:
“What is the difference between an object of the macrocosm — a monolith — from a cloud of dust obtained as a result of its long grinding and subsequent shaking? Well-known: the area of contact with the environment of another phase, for example, with gas. That is why the chemical reactions that occur in powders are completely unaffected by monoliths, iron filings burn in the air, whereas an iron nail, except in pure oxygen…

DUSTY LASER?

But the question is: what happens when the monolith is grinded or, conversely, how does the dust coalesce again into a monolith with a radiation-absorption spectrum? Let’s help the laws of quantum physics.
In monolith, the spectrum runs through all the energy levels, theoretically, as many as the atoms in the body. In a gas, individual atoms radiate independently, on a few levels. But when the neighboring atoms appear, the levels shift so as not to repeat each other, the prohibition principle introduced at the beginning of the 20th century works. Wolfgang Pauli: there can not be interconnected atoms, the energy parameters of which are completely the same.
But the powder is an intermediate state between the gas and the solid. Apparently, a sharp boundary, on which the properties change spasmodically, can not be carried out. And accordingly, the spectrum of the dust cloud, as the particles are fragmented, will approach the gas spectrum.
But what happens if you thicken it to the volume of the original monolith?
When merging, say, a hundred particles, each energy level will take at once one hundred atoms. To restore the order adopted in the microcosm, each of these supersaturated levels will tend to split into a hundred isolated spectral lines. The most natural way to restore the energy hierarchy for atoms of a newly formed monolith is to radiate a certain number of electromagnetic quanta. Consequently, the condensed cloud of dust will become generally colder than the surrounding environment.
Are we humans the same hubs? Than our cells are not isolated “motes” separated by membranes? But the permeability of membranes is constantly changing. And are there many unrelated properties of living organisms that are not associated with such a unification of many millions of “dust particles”?”
Continuation – in the article “Energy concentrators”, “TM” No. 6, 2002, already based on practical, not mental experiments.


1. cabinet with thermal insulation
2. Dewar vessels
3. continuous medium (water)
4. porous medium
5. electronic thermometers (error not more than 0,02Ñ)
6. temperature sensors
Two vessels – one with a porous medium, the other – with a solid, are located in a thermally insulated cabinet. They have thermal sensors; the temperature inside is measured every 20 minutes.
It was found out that the temperature in a container with a granulated medium (wet sand, etc.) varies abruptly, with considerable amplitude. The solid medium gives a very flat temperature graph, without bursts and any periodicity.
Porous, granular, otherwise – ordered matter has the property of ordering – to collect in space and time, energy. Probably, this property manifests itself on different scales. Local heating can also occur in a handful of sand, earth, porous clay, only one or two degrees, and in large areas, in square kilometers. The temperature can increase by tens, hundreds of degrees, possibly accompanied by radioactive emissions. So the energy of a high level comes back to the world.
In a certain way ordering matter, it is possible to achieve a predictable ejection of heat (or cold), in certain areas of the created system. Covered by feedback, the system creates a “cold-heat” pulsation; from this one can obtain a steady stream of energy. The ordering can be performed on macroscopic (fractions of a millimeter) and micro-levels (the distance between the atoms of the crystal). In the latter case, it is possible to achieve not intermittent flicker, “eternal radiance”.
In the first approximation, the concentration system looks like the organization of flows of a homogeneous, initially disconnected substance to some common point, a kind of “heart” with subsequent separation.
Some successes in this, perhaps even intuitively realizing the essence of the process, were achieved by American researchers Fleischman and Pons. They are known to conduct electrolysis of heavy water on palladium electrodes. Their idea – the molecules of the hydrogen isotope accumulate in the crystal lattice of the metal, as closely as possible – and interact. As a result of the “cold nuclear fusion” (NNS), an anomalous heat release occurred (four times higher than the calculated one), but, in addition, there was no neutron radiation associated with it.
In the end, experiments – although they were reproduced in other laboratories, were abandoned, they were almost forgotten. But, with a satisfactory theory: “A structured substance structures energy, creates an order around itself,” they can be revived, put on an appropriate, correct pattern. Hydrogen atoms were collected in one small volume, and therefore they were forced to radiate (relatively soft) photons from their upper energy levels. Isotopes, the synthesis of light nuclei, radiation – this can be forgotten. New reactors of Eternal Motors are loaded with any, not radioactive, but – structured substance.
Note: A structured body (massif) is a cluster of clusters (dust grains) of a substance of equal shape, composition that is some distance from each other in a semitransparent medium or a vacuum. An additional structure in time, give periodic rendezvous and separation of particles – which is like breathing or pulse.
The author reproduced the experiments of Fleischmann and Pons at home, replacing heavy water with ordinary tap water, and palladium electrodes with sand.
It turned out this article:

ELECTRONS GET TIRED?

“Some of the fundamental laws of physics are so simple and obvious that no one doubts their justice, and no one is involved in their verification. In particular, this applies to Ohm’s law, according to which the direct current in the circuit (in any case at its low density) is equal to the voltage divided by the resistance: I = U / R. This is followed by other rules of electrical engineering. For example, according to the Joule-Lentz law, the heat W allocated to the resistance R is directly proportional to the voltage drop across it U, the current I and the duration of its passage t, that is, W = R-U-1-t. Therefore, if two identical resistances are sequentially included in a closed circuit, then the same amount of heat should be allocated to them in a unit of time. It seems quite obvious that, bypassing the first resistance, the electrons are not able to either acquire additional energy or lose it.
But does Ohm’s law really hold for resistances of all kinds at low current densities? Interested in this issue, I performed a series of simple experiments. Two, if possible, the same resistance, I included in the DC circuit, and next to them attached sensors sensitive thermometers. Each resistance, together with its “own” sensor, was placed in a separate thermostat.
In the first experiments, as resistance, I used incandescent lamps (calculated for a voltage of 2.5 V and a current of 0.15 A). Turning on the current (its source was a reducing stabilizing transformer and a rectifier included in a household circuit with a voltage of 220 V), I measured the temperature in thermostats for an hour; then changed the lamps in places and repeated the measurements. Five series of similar experiments showed that the metallic resistances gave off the amount of heat in full accordance with the classical laws of electrical engineering, and no matter where these resistances were located.
I did not make measurements using resistances of other types, but I performed the experiment using electrolytic cells as a resistance in which ordinary tap water was decomposed on stainless steel electrodes; the result again did not reveal any anomalies.
But if electrolysis of water was carried out in a porous, heterogeneous medium, the picture turned out to be different.
I filled the electrolytic cells with a mixture of quartz sand and tap water, acidified for better electrical conductivity by several drops of hydrochloric acid (which, generally speaking, is not necessary). And the first experiments gave amazing results, not corresponding to the classical laws of electrical engineering.
Namely, the temperature in the thermostat located in the course of the motion of the electrons turned out to be much higher than the temperature in the next thermostat! At a voltage of a current source of 220 V and its strength of 0.5 A, the difference was 90°C, which significantly exceeded the error value of previous experiments. In total I performed 10 similar experiments and noticed that the difference in temperature between cells clearly depends on the current strength in the circuit and can reach even a few tens of degrees.
I also noticed that on the first cell the voltage drop was higher than the second one (150 and 70 V, respectively), which explains the increased heat release. But the main question remained without an answer: why is there such a noticeable asymmetry, if before and after the experiments the resistance of the cells were the same? After all, this effect should not be!
It can be assumed that in the first cell the electrons for some reason lose some of their internal energy and therefore in the second cell they are no longer able to interact with ions as intensively. But in fact the second cell too (though not style strongly) heats up. True, in the sand-water electrolytic cells there are many local and rather sharp differences in the resistance of the medium, as a result of which the electrons in it are sharply accelerated, then they are sharply slowed down. Is not this the reason for the effect that I observed?
Of course, my assumption that after passing a certain device, the electrons can seem to get tired, giving the environment some special energy, contradicts the laws of nuclear physics, according to which the electron does not have an internal structure and has only a reserve of external kinetic energy. But if I’m wrong, then let me point out the error, preferably by repeating my experiments.


1—4. electrodes made of stainless steel
5. thermometer sensors
6. The first sand-water cell
7. The second sand-water cell
8. Thermostats
9. DC power supply
…The original idea of the experiment is an anomalous heat release in a granular medium. It turned out not quite what was supposed to be found, but still, the result is interesting. It looks as if the charge carrier, ions and electrons, interacting tightly with each other in the first cell along the current, lose some of their internal energy. And, of course, all this happens in an internally divided, more or less ordered environment.
Unfortunately, the lack of calorimeters, tools for accurate determination of the amount of heat released do not allow to receive data at a quantitative level. But the qualitative result is also a good result.
In the first approximation, the generator of electromagnetic energy can look like a slurry of magnetic microscopic balls in an external medium. According to all the above, the ordered array should periodically change its properties (and hence the magnetic flux) in time. It remains to add to it a coil with a wire to get a more or less perpetual generator.
In the case of a teapot, things are as follows. Let the table on which it is left to cool – a highly ordered structure of many identical elements, in a closed volume (it can be large). The energy of boiling water is first distributed throughout the volume. Then, macroscopic temperature fluctuations will arise in the system. The period of their appearance in this or that place can be calculated or even organized. We put the cooled vessel at the right time in the right place – and it boils.
This structure can work in an open space, attracting the energy scattered in the medium, raising it to the previous high level.
To such systems, undoubtedly, one can class living beings, beginning with the simplest unicellular ones. The body consists of billions, trillions of pores, membranes opening and closing according to a certain rhythm. For its life, it attracts more energy than it consumes when digesting food, which is proved by some scientific studies. Obviously, living, ordered matter is a kind of perpetual motion machine – however, not quite perfect yet. At the very least, food is needed for metabolism, cell replacement, and the like.
High orderliness is possessed by forest massifs, crops of crops, ice cover, possibly, deserts and dried salt lakes. Here, first of all, it is necessary to look for anomalous heat releases, and even radiation.
The energy (thermal, electromagnetic) that passes through the massif of matter evenly brings order into it. A standard example is the Benard cells, hexagonal honeycombs emerging in the oil layer on the heated surface. Thus, systems reanimating energy can be created, including a melt, from a solidification, under conditions of thermal energy inhomogeneity.

INTERACTION OF SIMILAR FORMS

It is intuitively clear that two identical objects are linked in some way; Further on this inner conviction layered the well-known physical formulas and principles.
Any physical body has a strictly set of levels of absorption-radiation of electromagnetic waves. The location of the energy bars is affected by the structure, shape, chemical composition, temperature, etc. In other words, the spectrum, in its entirety, is the name of the thing, the set of drawings, the code.
What will happen if, in a closed volume, two identical things are located next to each other? They will start exchanging radiation. The system will tend to come to a stable equilibrium. This is possible when the lines of the spectra of both bodies coincide.
In other words, the spectrum of the body A will tend to impose itself on the body B, and vice versa. Electromagnetic radiation is not purely informational, it has a certain power component. If the bodies A and B (at least one of them) are sufficiently plastic, they will tend to change – in the direction of maximum mutual similarity.
Here, presumably, at a macroscopic level, Pauli’s principle (prohibition) can come into force – two objects can not be (nearby, in the same system) at a single energy level. Thus, around the body A there are concentric zones in which its action on B will be destructive, or creative. The likeness of A and B depends on exactly how far apart they are separated. It is possible to determine this distance only empirically (ie, experimentally).
We will refer to the act of additional assimilation by exchanging our own radiations – Synchronization. As a result, we get two physical bodies, each of which has microparticles having their reflection, a synchronized pair, in another object. And, these particles interact by exchanging electromagnetic quanta (and, perhaps, somehow in some other way).
Here, the Heisenberg uncertainty relation (principle) comes into play. Roughly speaking, two microparticles in a relatively small region, having the same parameters, become paradoxically connected in some way. Some changes in the particle A are transmitted to the partner B, instantly, and, as the founders of quantum mechanics claim, in a non-physical way (ie, without the participation of any waves or particles). A and B are considered as a single system, even if the parts are in different parts of the universe.
It turns out, after the primary synchronization, the macroscopic bodies A and B, made up of myriads of microscopic a and b, feel each other’s changes. There are various schools of quantum mechanics, some of them try to observe the principles of the Theory of Relativity (the finiteness of the speed of light). But it seems that we have a communication system in which the signals are transmitted many times higher than the “constant” C (300 000 km s).
In the first experiments, I used two identical containers A and B. In the first I put a simple small addition – a figure of a triangle, a square, a pentagon … In both tanks I poured a hot solution of hyposulfite, placed them side by side in a thermally insulated box, and waited for the crystals to show. The solidifying solution is the desired plastic body, sensitive to internal and external influences.
In many cases, the crystals actually appeared on the surface of the solution, formed a kind of label. But, with each time such experiments were reproduced worse and worse, coming to naught usually, to the fourth repetition. This is not quite what modern science requires – experience must be reproduced every time, with accurate reproduction of all conditions, in any laboratory in the world. And of course, the article on such tests is quite serious publications will not take. In the end, the material – just to have something in print – was published in the journal “Young Technician”, 2013, No. 5, under the heading “Mad Ideas”.
Strange experiments
“We are used to the fact that only living organisms have the ability to learn. But can such a property boast chemical compounds? Our long-time author … believes that it is possible and such. That they seem to confirm the experiments they have set.
Take two identical containers – for example, plates or photocells, if any. Mix the alabaster on the solution of hyposulfite (photophyxis). The resultant slowly set the mixture in the same portions on plates. Then put on the surface of one of the plates a mark – carved from plastic or wood triangle. Place the tanks at a distance of one meter from each other, and to protect against external influences, you can cover them with something, for example, with the same plates.
As the mixture solidifies, fine white crystallites of hyposulfite appear on its surface. In this case, the hyposulfite crystals in the second plate formed, as the author claims, the contours of the triangle, copying the triangular spots that appeared in the first form around the real triangle.


“Three experiments in a row showed approximately one result,” the author emphasizes.
Then he conducted the following experiment. Instead of a triangle, a rectangle was placed in the transmitter form (A). The mixtures, as before, crystallized. But on their surface formed white spots, which have nothing to do with either the triangle or the rectangle! All subsequent attempts to get the previous result failed. Neither the triangle nor the rectangle in any way wanted to broadcast information about itself in the form-receiver (B).
The author postponed the experiments and returned to them only a week later. And the incredible happened! The previous results were almost completely restored! Three experiences – three good luck. Three times in the receiver, a ghost of a rectangle’s mark appeared more or less clearly … Then again the formless whitish spots began to appear.
Such an effect is explained by the author by a special M-field, which introduces the course of natural processes in similar objects to one another in a certain direction.
About this “morphogenetic field” the author read in the book of the British scientist Rupert Sheldrake “The New Science of Life.” In it, the English professor claims that the biological forms that existed before, nevertheless, affect similar forms (that is, living beings) and at the present time.
Something similar has to do with inanimate objects, the author believes. If chemist scientists with great difficulty manage to grow the crystal they need from a certain solution, then each succeeding crystal will be given to them more easily, until finally the crystals begin to grow spontaneously. That is, it turns out, the first crystal sets a certain field, which helps the formation of the following, similar formations.
Is it really? By publishing notes.., we suspect that someone else from our readers will want to reproduce his “insane” experiments? I wonder what will happen to you?.. Let us know.


The leading journalist of the edition simplified the presentation of the material of the experiments. In fact, each subsequent experience, as if experiencing the influence of all previous similar experiments, is not better, but worse.
I present a more complete exposition:


1. Form B
2. reflection of the label in form B
3. The brightest reflection of the mark in B
4. manifestation of reflection of the mark on the membrane, side view
5. Ink solution B
6. A solution of ink of Form A
7. the membrane of form A
8. “mark” on the membrane
9. “mark” on membrane A, top view
10. Form A
11. reflection of the label in form A
So, there are two forms-containers, A and B. They can be ordinary plastic (identical) trays, plates, glass cuvettes. Sometimes the molds are produced independently, for example, from ceramic slabs 20 to 20 cm thick by a centimeter, enclosed on the perimeter by plastic walls on a water-resistant glue. Such capacitances are intentionally made not symmetrical, but with a beveled corner – so that the mark and its reflections are oriented in the interior space, they distinguish, if one can say, the sides of the world. Practice shows only the limited validity of self-made forms – made by the factory way, punching, the capacities perform their role as a transmitter and receiver much better.
Now it is necessary to organize processes in A and B that go uniformly along their entire surface. Add to A a certain label, a small difference, so that it is affected (according to the theory of the assimilation of forms) appropriately and on B.
Flowing evenly on a certain area of the process – this is, for example, the diffusion of ink through a sheet of paper, lying on the water. Its buoyancy is sufficient to keep a mark on itself, but usually I cut through holes in the sheet, which correspond to the size of the additive. In this case, the label stood at the bottom of cell A. Adding a sheet to Form A improves the result, but not significantly. The sheet only introduces an additional similarity in forms. You can do without it, this simplifies the experiment a little.
Both sheets are recommended to be pre-conditioned in water for half an hour – so that its pores are impregnated with water and the subsequent diffusion goes evenly. But A4 sheets can be dry on top – in this case solutions should be heated to 60–70°C.
The sheets are located on the surface of the cuvette with a solution of office ink, the cuvettes themselves are next to each other (one meter-two), for the initial experiments the closed thermally insulated box is better.
The experiment starts. Soon you can see how on the surface of Form B the outlines of the mark appear. And there are usually a few there.
Reflections or “phantoms” of the mark appear in the form of A. In general, the appearance of ghosts in the form of A – a pledge that they will arise in a similar cuvette B.
The result is very good for the first time, not bad in the second experiment, distinguishable in the third, and almost none in the fourth.
The idea that such forms are connected not only in space, but also in time, vertically, comes to mind. The past experience has not disappeared anywhere, it is hovering somewhere near, and strives to exert its influence on something like what is happening in the present. Something like this would happen if we imagine that the electromagnetic signal does not fly away from the receiver and the transmitter at the speed of light, but hangs near it like a cloud. Past images, sounds, mix with the currently broadcast, and create an illegible mixture.
The professor from Great Britain, the creator of the “theory of the morphogenetic field” Rupert Sheldrake believes that, on the contrary, the previous biological forms of one kind or another help strengthen all new representatives of this species. He was interested in my practical experiments with inanimate forms, but confused, obviously, conclusions about the attenuation of the effect.
However, the positive result was manifested – the professor announced that he would start instrumental research himself and would use cameras in which synchronizing sound fluctuations were induced.
This concludes our long correspondence; temporarily, or not – time will tell.
An interesting method of using as an indicator, “clouds of ink.” At the same time, certain details emerged: the desirability of activating Form A with bright light, as well as the factor that allows us to extend a series of successful experiments.
“… There are two identical, rather massive tanks A and B.
In the first of them, a certain addition is the figure you selected. Further very interesting. If A is activated, for example, by a stream of light, the addition tends to manifest itself also in the capacitor B. You can manifest a ghost if you pour a sugar syrup and drop a drop of ink in a vessel. The resulting cloud draws out the contours of the figure, the reflection of structure A in B. The dense solution “weighs” the drop, so that the ink molecules, subject to subtle influences, outline the field structure. One can imagine that the phenomenon is universal, it can be applied to people, imagining that a certain addition is a pattern of neural connections. The more massive the forms A and B, the more clearly the translation. An important role is played by stands — massive slabs under and above the forms. Broadcasting is successful one, two, rarely three times to resume transmission, form B needs to be rearranged to another location. Experience can not be reproduced exactly under the same conditions as before. Obviously, this is the paradigm of a new science. Otherwise, the results of previous experiments are “layered” on the equipment; as if the soul is infused into the body — and distort the experience. Evolution is clearly traced in a series of experiments: the broadcast information displaces the previous images.

1

1À

2

2À

2Â

2Ñ

2D

2E

3

3À

3Â

3Ñ

4

4À

5

5A
Experience 1. Translation of the pentagon — was successful (an example of one of four similar results). 1 — a photo of the form (capacity) A with a label, 1A — its “reflection” or “aiming” in the form B.
Experience 2. An attempt to translate the shape of a square an hour and a half after a series of experiments on translating the shape of a pentagon. 2 — shape with a new label — a plastic square, 2A — a figure combining the “idea” of the past experience — a pentagon with the image of a new label — a square. 2B — the faces of the square (in the same direction as the sides of the mark in the first container) appear; the shape of the pentagon tries to express itself on one side. 2C (Form A without modification); The shape of the square is clearly visible, although, in the formation of the image, the tension of the water is distorted. To weaken it, it is recommended to lay a spoonful of table salt per liter of the solution. 2D-the shape of the square appeared. 2E — a square with uneven faces, but even edges. Capacity B after each experiment must be moved to a new location: the experience can not be reproduced exactly in the conditions that before.
Experience 3 — a triangle is placed in the form A. Its reflection is shown in photo 3A; manifested in the framework of the triangle, with the elements of the square. 3B — the image of the triangle is strengthened. Reflection makes a 180; turn — a frequent occurrence. 3C — the triangle display becomes complete.
Photo 4 — a new label is placed in the receptacle A — a glass plate. Stretched rectangles are the best copy object. 4A — the reflection of the bar in the form B. The orientation of the induced image is the same as in A, with respect to the capacitance. In order for the image not to “spin” in the form, A and B are marked in the same way, with some peculiarities — for example, holes on the top of the case.
5 — a wooden block was chosen for copying. The tree is a good material for translation, it has a different microstructure. 5À — the result is visible — a rectangle of the same shape, slightly larger”.

In order for the new experiment to be reproduced successfully, in isolation from the experiment already performed, its conditions should be radically changed. As already reported, the simplest, most effective way is to move in space, to a new place, at least one of the forms A and B. Attempts were made to change simultaneously some parameters of the forms, as well as their surroundings, for example, to install nearby stone blocks, other order. But, this method is less effective than the permutation B. In addition, the cells A and B themselves are very sensitive to additions-for example, adding additional details, they should rather remain as they are-by strict factory stamping.
The impact of experience (in effect, any specific physical, chemical process) on oneself, in several repetitions, is an interesting topic. To check, at least in general terms, whether this is so, I took a hermetically sealed vessel, attached a syringe to it, with a sealed connection, so that a substance could be injected into the container. From above there is a gas outlet, a tube connected to a gas volume meter.
Progress of the experiment: a solution of yeast (a strictly measured amount) is placed in a vessel. The container closes, after that a certain amount of sweet water is injected into it. Carbon dioxide is released, its amount is measured. Then the vessel is thoroughly rinsed, prepared for the next similar experiment.
The ambient temperature is controlled.
The experiments are separated by an interval of half an hour. A total of 12 measurements were taken.
The first experiment gives the maximum of the extracted gas. But, before the fifth experiment, the graph shows a sharp decrease in volume. Then a small plateau is formed, and the volume again tends upward. The eighth test shows a new peak – however, below the values of the first experiment. And again the line goes down – to a new plateau and rise, already smaller amplitude.
We change the vessel, the whole instrument – the whole schedule, repeats itself.
The permutation (the only one in the given statement) of the vessel-shape to another place does not give a visible zeroing of the previous states (in this case the gas level would again come to a maximum). However, this result is not 100% reliable, perhaps changing the external conditions still gives an effect.
The second option is a usual chemical reaction. Combined metered quantities of table salt, copper sulfate, aluminum and water. In this case, hydrogen is released. The reaction is long enough, it is possible to connect components without hermetic injection (in this case, water).
And in this case the first output of the product is maximum. Then he sharply tends to go down. In the fifth experiment a very stable plateau is formed, almost without hesitation. Increase the yield is possible only by sustaining a significant time interval — about a month, and changing equipment. And even thus, it is not possible to return to the original high result. It seems that many variations of the process are imprinted in space, in and of itself “there were such and such reactions”, already without binding to certain receptacles-forms. Sometimes it seems that the undesirable element of the stability of the environment, is the experimenter himself — the same person. A request to those who are going to advise: how to change the experience, how to put it right, how to apply new expensive equipment, etc.: “First, reproduce the experiment, present the results, and then give your valuable wishes.”
The experimental materials could be any, give different results – the rate of oxidation of metals, the burning temperature of a certain combustible substance, chemical or biochemical reactions of any kind. Presumably, the more complex the substances involved in the interaction, the more clearly the effect. However, experiments with hydrogen evolution seem to refute this conclusion. The question is, what is more difficult in this case is the process of decomposition of sugar by “bare” enzymes, or too, rather complicated, but purely chemical reactions.
A series of experiments was set up, now with the plants. Two pieces of synthetic felt, folded, stitched parallel lines and around the perimeter, then the top layer is cut into the same pockets. The plastic substrate, as shown in the photo, holds water.
Seeds of wheat (or sunflower) are planted, they are flooded with water. After two weeks, the growth of the stems is measured.
Then the matter is cleaned, disinfected, and again put into operation. It does not even leave traces of organic substances. And yet, the second “harvest” is always much weaker. The third is even lower. Then stabilization occurs, the fourth or fifth result becomes higher – although it does not reach the initial level.
And everything repeats itself.
In official agronomy, a similar phenomenon has been known for a very long time. The field gives good, and a good harvest for two years, then it needs to be given a rest – that is, “to stand on steam”. Usually the land is plowed and this time – but nothing is sown. It is believed that the effect is given by certain bacteria that live in the soil – however, a harmonious theory of this kind is stillhere to be found.
In this case there are no soil bacteria. But the effect is. It is not difficult to verify it once again, using, for example, pure hydroponics. The layering of the forms is also relevant in biology.



One of the proofs of the effect of layering processes over time is the inability of a person to assimilate the same food, albeit nutritious, but monotonous, served for two months. And, also, addictive (ie, stop the desired action) to various kinds of medicines, which official medicine is explained only at the level of childish babbling.
…In the first approximation, the interaction of synchronized forms can be realized in a fundamentally new communication device. The speed of signal propagation is higher than C, the lack of screening is interesting. But even more interesting is the use of the method to spread the influence of something to everything else. For example – a man on all his kind, thinking more or less the same. By themselves, it is difficult for people to get rid of stereotypes, wrong attitudes, mistakes, sins, illnesses, including mental ones, etc. The chosen one who has managed to go through the path of purification can help them.
We have already mentioned the importance of massiveness, a clear form, the stability of the connected A and B, as well as the heavy supports under (and above) them. Such stands (for example, stone slabs), as it were, level the space around the forms, serve as beacons for establishing a strong communication channel. A stable object interacts constantly with itself in the past, tries to destroy itself – but, due to the peculiarities of the structure, it can not. This interaction creates a tension of time, a change in its properties in the immediate vicinity of the object. Than this form is more massive, the more this influence is palpable.
…You can play the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. A strong object – for example, a crystal – is an array of microparticles whose coordinates are fairly strictly fixed in space. Reducing the uncertainty of the coordinates in the three changes automatically causes an increase in the uncertainty of time; this simple thesis can draw detailed, correlating with reality mathematical formulas, become the basis of quantitative, not only qualitative experiments.
To obtain the highest level of Translation, Lighthouses must be new (updated) each time, while remaining themselves with them. This statement is not fully supported by experiments, but still has a high degree of plausibility. The Energy Concentrator looks like this, shown in one of the sections of the site – a community of small, mutually similar elements, separated by semi-impermeable membranes.
In practice this results in Mayak’s analysis after the Broadcast, and compilation of it again, in a slightly different configuration, in a new place; to create the next effective communication channel.
To some extent, these experiments with similar forms are confirmed by my long-standing experiments with interference gratings (the only publication in Neposeda magazine, No. 2, 1999). The initial idea: coherent (laser) light beams (waves) slightly shifted relative to each other by a grating, In this form they do not interact with matter, and therefore, gradually breaking up, should manifest themselves behind any screens — which is interesting in itself.

1


2
1. Diagram of the disappearance of rays (of two components of the electromagnetic wave, vectors B and E, only one is shown)
2. The scheme of the experimental setup for obtaining “black rays” (for clarity, the angle of convergence of rays is greatly increased).
1,2 – antiphase rays
3. source of coherent rays (laser)
4. Phase shift device (diffraction grating)
5. the beginning of the “black zone”
6. screen (foil)
7. Photosensitive material (“Conic”, 400 units).
The light that appeared behind the screen-aluminum foil-would, for several hours, have to be fixed by the film. However, neither an increase in exposure, nor a change in the length of the lens barrel, produced a result. Moreover, in the process of work there was a persistent feeling that the dark zones in the beam alignment are not formed at all by the addition of light waves. They appear because the direction of the flight of photons is determined by the interference grating itself. Approximately so, by the way, it is indicated in the textbooks of physics – “there is nothing at all”, but it is rather vague, without any further explanations.
What is an interference grating? A lot of identical material strips. By the way, they spread light into the spectrum, give dark and light bands, even if this light does not, in itself, have a high initial coherence. These strips are like piano strings, responsive to the vibrations of each other, trying to sound in unison.
The thin mechanism of the distribution of photons is still unclear, but one thing is clear: mutually similar “bars” of the grid are somehow connected, and instantly distribute light only in selected directions.
Are such strokes unique? Apparently not. These are just material objects, from a number of great numbers. They do not belong to the microworld, they have an eye-wide extent and width. Consequently, any mutually similar objects illuminated by a single light source are somehow united. Q.E.D.
We also note that the rays of two lasers, equal in length to the wave and amplitude, directed to a single point under a small convergence angle, never add up. There are no such cases as do not adjust the mirrors. Hence, the classical superposition of light waves does not work. The working bodies of lasers, excited atoms, feel the existence of another object, their twins, and do not send photons to where they formed in antiphase, they could violate the law of conservation of energy.

* * *
…Objects are able to transform each other in their image, and this relationship is preserved even if one of them is destroyed.

REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE EXPERIMENT — WE CONDUCT NEW EXPERIMENTS

As is known, physical, chemical experience, under equal conditions, should be reproduced any number of times. This is the paradigm of modern science.
Before that, its forerunner, the enigmatic Alchemy, flourished. Its principle, if one discards little things, is the repeated reproduction of the same experiment; Until as long as he, in some mystical way, does not go into a completely new quality. This is a thousand-fold distillation of water (used later for the preparation of the cherished Elixir), purification of metals (“metalloids”), evaporation of the liquid, calcination of the precipitate, and again its dissolution — without any changes, for many years. Only then the ordinary result can somehow suddenly be replaced by something that strikes the imagination.
And, alas, this experience can no longer be reproduced. A miracle in general is difficult to repeat. The alchemists themselves answer the question of such a behavior of matter vaguely: they say, so develops patience, and after him other supernatural abilities of the alchemist. Or, one of the experiments is superimposed on the corresponding favorable position of the planets, which can not be foreseen.
The following law of alchemy resembles the modern principle of Pauli’s prohibition: in one microparticle (atom, molecule) two corpuscles (an electron, a proton, etc.) can not simultaneously be in the same energy state. In the treatment of alchemists, this proposition reads as follows: any natural essence is unique (outside time and space, so to speak, and vertically), therefore several somewhat formally independent physico-chemical experiments conducted in one place, successively, one after another, so that they Accuracy does not repeat, give an increasingly surprising, sometimes even implausible result. This moment the alchemist waits with lust. Usually the “sign” of transition to a new state — both the material of the experiments, and the soul of the Delatel itself is the appearance of star crystals on the surface of the melt, or the appearance in the crucible of a completely new material, on the surface of which, as in miniature, the Milky Way reflects.
These substances are similar to the metals known to us — copper, gold, etc., however, in addition they have many surprising properties. The soul of an ecchymist, having received a high degree of purification, comes out of the power of human everyday life, the body gets the ability to control itself (change, rejuvenate at will, get rid of diseases, etc.).
In the modern scientific world, the theory of morphogenetic form-forming (M) fields of the British professor of biology Rupert Sheldrake has gained some popularity. Very briefly: any species of living beings, including plants, has its own M-field, which helps to form the following similar forms. The field is active primarily for developing, growing, that is, changing in time creations. All the “past” beings simultaneously act on the existing similarities, thus fixing this species in this way. The more homogeneous ancestors — the higher the degree of stabilization of each born representative of the genus.
This provision applies to inanimate forms. If you believe the examples given by the British professor, some crystals are first allocated by chemists with great difficulty, in specially selected conditions. Then (after a series of identical experiments that strengthen the morphogenetic field), crystals are formed more easily, everywhere, even without any laboratory instruments.
Forms of one kind interact not only along the vertical of time, but also horizontally. Examples Sheldrake — here, some birds are discovering a way to glue the caps from the milk containers exposed at the doors of the British milkmen, and, almost simultaneously, this method is picked up by the tits of the whole of Britain. Rats, who learned to quickly find a way out of the labyrinth, pass this knowledge on to relatives who do not live with them in direct relationship, etc.
…We see two, rather controversial theories, contradictory, but still very interesting. The first, “alchemical” talks about the uniqueness of each experiment, and that the layering of similar, if possible, experiences in time, leads to the birth of completely new chemical processes and materials. The second, Sheldrake’s professional, proclaims the principle of stabilizing form, facilitating its manifestation, as a result of the actions of all its past similarities. Only practical physicochemical experiments can clarify the situation.
…In the first, ambitious experiments, I tried to show the influence of previous experiments (similar processes) on the current ones. The simplest form — in a cuvette with a solidifying hyposulfite a small “label” is installed; Figure of a triangle, square or pentagon. Then the melt is removed, the cuvette is cleaned (there are no traces of the label stay on it), exactly the same portion of the crystal melt is poured into it.
Sometimes, in this way, it was possible to obtain an exact copy of the previous form — with the image of the label that appeared in the texture of the crystal. But, this effect quickly faded. Even if you produce ten forms with a label in a row, a dull, monotonous background is observed in a clean burette.
Something like this happens in a series of experiments with the same metal plates. We take ten galvanized plates in sizes (in one of the options) 8 by 12 centimeters. We make differences on them — for example, cut a triangular hole. Then we dip into hydrochloric acid — simultaneously or sequentially, in order to change our forms in time (partially destroy) accordingly, to create some initial “M-field”. The expected result is the appearance on the same plate, but without a mark, of a stain caused by slowed or accelerated dissolution of zinc.
Sometimes the phantom of the mark really showed itself, provoking a vigorous enthusiasm of the experimenter. Sometimes — no.
In the third series of experiments, the amount of gas measured by identical metal plates in hydrochloric acid was measured, of course, of a certain amount and degree of dilution. Here began to appear some, subtle, but nevertheless regularities.
The first experiment, as a rule, is the record for productivity. Further, the yield of the product (gas) decreases sharply, to the fifth-sixth sample rises, although it does not reach the initial level. Occurs, traced to, at least twelve experiments, stabilization.
While the gas yield decreases, the rate of interaction of the metal with the acid is definitely increasing. The photo shows a typical series of experiments. First, the reaction rate is minimal. Then it sharply increases (the acid eats up almost all of the zinc on the surface), and returns almost to its original values. After that follows a long series of rather monotonous results — the reaction rate, as a rule, is higher than the initial one.
I reproduced a series of experiments with crystals in identical burettes, without marks. The goal is to track the rate of crystallization, establish a general principle of reproducibility of the same experiments. From this, and it was necessary to start everything.
Here, such statistics were revealed. After the first experiment, the crystallization rate decreases (the burette is photographed 30 minutes after the melt is poured, without the lid). Then the rate of crystallization increases by 7—8% (visually) and remains so for 8 consecutive experiments.
The main regularity is revealed: the first experiment is always special, after it follows a splash in the yield of the product, the reaction rate, and then the result is somewhat stabilized.
We can “tear” one series of experiments from the other, if we move the place of experiments to another room, or even just to the other end of the laboratory table, we will choose containers of a different shape, we change the concentration of acid and the length of the sides of the plates. Then, and only then we will be able to observe a new hill of change after the initial experiment.
This article poses the problem rather than the final answers. The discovery of the regularity of the “splash after the first experiment” is possible only in a series of successive experiments. After a day, the result — with the same reagent concentration, medium temperature, other similar conditions, can differ up to 40% of the product yield.
We can recall the works of the Russian Doctor of Biological Sciences, Simon Elievich Shnol, who represent to us the theory of “macroscopic fluctuations”. Far from frozen in academic dogma, a professor at the Moscow State University, even fifty years ago, he derived a number of regularities in the flow of physico-chemical, including electronic processes, depending on the time of day, year, so-called. “Local time” and geographical latitude. The yield of reaction products (practically, any) varies throughout the year, according to the position of the Earth in the world space, and, again, cyclically repeats.
However, this state of affairs does not detract from the assumption that any physico-chemical, as well as the biological system in which a number of similar, formally independent processes occur, has, from birth, a personal cycle of childhood, turbulent youth and stabilization, followed by, Possibly, extinction. This cycle, as it was said, is formed by a superposition in time of traces from all those similar previous states. He is not a straight line, predicted by Rupert Sheldrake, leading to a kind of stagnation of this image in future generations (cycles), but a function, first of all, with a pronounced “hill of youth” of the system.
Probably, there are other patterns, which are hampered, in this case, by technical difficulties with carrying out a long (in hundreds and thousands of repetitions) series of experiments. In one variation of the chain of experiments to determine the influence of terrestrial latitude, Professor Shnol used precise electronic instruments (changes in the frequency of a quartz oscillator were studied), yielding millions of repetitions per second. Perhaps, this technique can also be used when identifying the natural frequency of a system. In the simplest case, every time, even with the most delicate rearrangement of the crystal oscillator to another place (at least in one longitude), the frequency of the resonator cycles, breaking away from the previous series, according to what has been said, should “spontaneously” produce a splash of a certain shape.
Well, we know from personal experience that any change in the situation, diet, long-distance business, leads, as a rule, to a “restart of the system”, to some of our rejuvenation, creative activity and fresh feelings.
Another very interesting observation, which we can not refuse to analyze, is the phenomenon of a radio-echo (Long Delay Echo, also LDE) discovered in the distant 1927 by Scandinavian radio engineer Jordan Halls. Since then it has been confirmed by many independent researchers, it is observed to this day. Its essence lies in the fact that radio stations, emitting a signal of a certain frequency to the world space, receive radio echo in a few seconds (tuned to reception). In this case, the waveform and its strength are practically independent of the delay time (up to 40 seconds), which is unimaginable if the radio wave is reflected from the ionosphere or even (back and forth) from the Moon. The theory of the reflection of a signal from some mysterious alien ship, as well as the hypothesis of “mirror alternative realities,” we will not consider here.
Further, it is noted that in the frequency bands, which are just beginning to be mastered by radio amateurs, the phenomenon of LDE manifests itself clearly and serially; But after a few years the radio echo is “blurred”. There is a frequency shift and a time compression between the response signals, in comparison with the time between the pulses of the main signal. Eventually, in order to re-enjoy the effect of the radio-echo, the inquisitive researcher has to look for some other wavelength.
We can assume, in this case, the electronic device “remembers” its past state. The previous experiment (the active state of radiation of the radio wave) acts on the present, and induces a signal in a very sensitive oscillatory circuit. Does this seem like a fantasy? But, it is no more no-fiction than the aliens dangling in near-earth orbit, thinking how to encode it for the earthmen with a prophetic message. In the end, our experiments with crystals and plates, quite reliably confirm this version.
Establish the truth will help the next, not so complicated (but practical, delivered at a high level) experience. It is necessary to conclude a radio station in the so-called. “Faraday cage”, opaque to radio waves, and try to catch the radio echo again. The signal emitted into space, according to our maxima, has nothing to do with it, it does not return, and does not affect the receiver. If the LDE is reproduced in such an amazing setting of the experiment, then it means that “the system recalls the seemingly irretrievably past state, the past definitely acts on the present”) and the modernized theory of the morphogenetic field will take one more step forward. We will get new knowledge about the development of systems — both biological and inanimate, perhaps, we will find ways to combat extinction, in its various manifestations.

STRUCTURES OF LIGHT

From the known to us, taught in schools and universities of science, the unknown, mysterious, strong, now already similar to religion or magic, its top has budged. It happened, apparently, in the first half of the twentieth century.
First of all, the provision was made that the particles of light do not have their own rest mass. These particles themselves have lost the status of proper, material formations and have come to be called “pure energy.” And, this is in spite of the fact that energy is an abstract meaning, simply – the body’s ability to do some kind of work.
We know the formula E = mc;, usually attributed to Einstein, first found by the English physicist J. Thompson, popularized by A. Poincar;. It is interesting that if instead of speed of light C in it to substitute simply speed – V, we receive the equation defining energy of a flywheel. Perhaps this is the meaning of the-photon, getting into the microparticle, makes it rotate around the axis. It may be, interestingly, but science (at least, its visible part) chose to go beyond any physical representations, confining itself to complex surface descriptions.
So, a particle of light, according to modern ideas, is something that is capable of giving a mass to atoms of a periodic table, but the mass itself does not. But most importantly – it can not exist “at rest”, have zero, or near-zero speed relative to microparticles. Of course, in this case, the creation of stable light structures (in a vacuum or dense medium) is impossible.
We can assume that such a state of things sought to present the Special and General Theories of Relativity, created at the beginning of the twentieth century – attributed to A. Einstein, embedded in the consciousness of the masses by social structures unknown to us.
The basis for creating theories of SRT and GTR, however there is — a curious behavior of light. First, its speed, as if, is always the same, equal to the constant C — 300 thousand kilometers per second. Otherwise, the starry sky, for example, would be a set of glowing lines, not points. The stars move fairly quickly, to the same, turn around their axis. If their own speed were transmitted to particles of light, accelerated or decelerated photons, arriving at the observer on Earth, respectively, sooner or later, blurred the image of the star in a wide line.
Is this the reason for the statement of the SRT: “The speed of light is constant, does not depend on the motion of the source,” and all the mentalities coming from that?
Probably, photons having a speed different from C exist, there are many of them, however, the method of their registration should be different.
The Mossbauer effect is known. Two cooled to near absolute zero, a crystal with substantially stopped atoms not being able to share the gamma quanta ( “hard light”) if only begin to move relative to one another with some speed. Quanta fly through the crystal, not finding an atom with a suitable absorption spectrum.
The same happens with the ordinary, soft, visible eye, light. Accelerated or retarded photons fly through the retina, not registering photosensitive cells. In order to meet a suitable microparticle, they need to pass a considerable distance in the detector.
This distance is greater than the layer of cone-rods, film or semiconductor deposition of the elements of the electronic chamber. Pressure of a stream of light is not capable to estimate also the most thin wing of torsion scales. So, 99, 999% of photons float through these, too large-mesh networks for them.
This, in particular, asserts, the article of the author (“TM” 4, 2001) “SRT and speed”, in which, based on the Mossbauer effect, known radiation-absorption laws, the works of the American physicist Raymond Chau are analyzed.
Here is an excerpt from S. Slavin’s article (TM No. 3, 1999):
“At the end of last year, at the University of Berkeley, California, Professor Raymond Chau in the experiment was able to fix the speed of light that exceeds the most famous, universal constant, which – we quote this figure for accuracy lovers – is 299 792.5 km / s.

LIGHT IS FASTER LIGHT
In general, the scheme of the experiment looked like this. The laser beam was used as a directed flux of photons, they bombarded the finest mirror film. On its other side was located the device that registered the entry of photons into it, if, of course, these hits had taken place. After all, the situation was typical where photons were either reflected from a mirror or absorbed in it.
However, in practice, it turned out that individual photons could penetrate through the screen. And they, with anomalous behavior, had a speed exceeding the known constant C, since less time was elapsed between the time of their emission and the capture than was supposed. It is, of course, possible to write off the obtained data for the experimental error. However, Raymond Chau is known among the colleagues as a punctual person, and he repeatedly checked both the installation and her testimony before deciding to disclose the results.
So theorists had no choice but to put forward some explanations for the phenomenon. One of them looks something like this.
We will calculate that four-dimensional space-time is so curved under the influence of gravitational fields, which is closed, for example, it has the shape of a sphere. And under normal conditions, all the movements of particles, including photons, go along its surface. That is, to make the light get from one pole of the sphere to the other, it must move along the curve. But those particles that behaved abnormally during the experiment, as if straightening their way – pierced the sphere, walked along the corridor connecting two points on its surface – the source and the end.
What is it – a violation of the laws of physics? No, not at all …
The speed of light enters the mathematical expression of the curvature of space. And the larger the first, the smaller the second for the same potential of the gravitational field. In other words, if we assume the reality of the speed of light above C, then this is possible in a space that is more rectilinear. In principle, nothing prevents teleportation – the instantaneous movement of a particle from one point of the universe to another.
So far, however, Raymond Chau managed to get the speed of light in the course of the experiment, which exceeds the classical one by a factor of 1.7. However, he does not intend to be satisfied with what he has achieved. Moreover, he hopes to detect even a negative speed. This is when the photon reaches the receiver before … it is emitted by the source!
Is this also subject to any logical interpretation? After all, a clear violation of cause-effect relationships! Nevertheless, the explanations are chosen. “We are used to the fact that the cause precedes the investigation,” says Professor Chau. – But in this case it can be assumed that the Universe reacts, as it were, to the experimenter’s mental intentions. Still only are going to release a photon, and as a result it appears that it has already appeared”…
What is it — a fantastic breakthrough in modern physics or a faithful delusion of a scientist keen on his idea? The answer will give further research.”

* * *
…So, gravitational anomalies, teleportation, paradoxes of time … Modern physicists like to fog, forgetting about the main principle of modern science – “Occam’s razor”: it is necessary to cut off the superfluous, more complex than the phenomenon being studied. Is everything a little simpler?
“Technology-Youth”, No. 4, 2001, excerpt from the author’s article: “… A superluminal quantum exists, obeys the ballistic law of addition of velocities, but it is difficult to weed out and register it.
So, it’s important not only what to look at, but also HOW, and THAN.
Mirror film is a kind of filter for quanta. Those photons are scattered, whose radiating atoms have an insignificant velocity relative to the atoms of the screen. Such quanta, according to the aforesaid, have great advantages in absorption. Accelerated, “unsuitable” energetically to the spectrum of the screen, the photons pass freely through the thin film, and yet are absorbed (partially) in the dense and extended body of the photosensor installed behind it. The fact is that according to the Boltzmann statistics, atoms can be found in it, even at room temperature, comparable in energy, speed, and direction of motion to the atoms of the laser-emitter. And if so, their speeds will be reset, and the superluminal signal will be registered.
What are the advantages of this approach to the problem of superlight? Probably, there is no need to “pierce” space. If we want to prove the hypothesis, it is enough just to heat the receiver and the generator, thereby increasing the number of their microscopic elementary components moving at a decent, noticeable speed. Proportional to the square of the temperature on both sides of the “constant” C, the velocity of the measured signal is spreading.”
…The sensor behind the film is set to a low level of radiation, so it is able to take part of the “superluminal” photons – which in fact are many. They filled the world, they are here, create unusual structures, you only need to see, and do not let fog yourself!
Let’s review one more author’s article, in which approaches to identifying and even creating “non-standard” photons are already outlined.
“LIGHT IS FASTER OF LIGHT” (an article from the journal Technique-Youth No. 10, 2001, p. 53)
“Recently, in TM (No. 4, 2001, p.58), a note was published,” Is the speed of light constant?”, The author of which proposed a scheme of a rather complex experiment that allows one to directly verify the validity of the second postulate of the special theory of relativity, according to which it is impossible to exceed the speed of light in a vacuum, I was able to make such a test, using simple “home” means and get a result that contradicts SRT.
In an ordinary household fluorescent lamp, the plasma temperature is of the order of tens of thousands of degrees, which corresponds to the motion of charged particles at a speed of about 100 km / s. Perpendicular to this lamp, I installed a 750 mm long tube, with two diaphragms and a camera at the end (see figure), placing a transparent cross-shaped “sight” between the shutter of the camera shutter and the film.
Photons emitted by ions flying at a velocity V should have a velocity C + V directed along the axis of the lamp parallel to the film, in accordance with the classical ballistic principle of addition of velocities (and not with the SRT formulas). If so, the spot on the film will shift from the “sight” point in the direction of the ions that emit light.




Since the particle velocity in the fluorescent lamp is about 100 km / s, then, according to my estimates, at a distance of 750 mm on the photographic film, the light spot should be displaced toward the ion motion by approximately 0.25 mm. Such a displacement from the crosspiece of the “sight” is easy to detect with a subsequent increase in the photograph. But if the second postulate of SRT is true, then there will be no displacement of the light spot: the speed of movement of the light source V is not added to the value of C.
With the help of a simple electrical circuit, I changed the direction of the current in the fluorescent lamp (i.e., the direction of ion motion), and then compared the obtained photographs with each other. And found that the light spot really shifts from the middle position towards the motion of the ions just about 0.25 mm. When the fluorescent lamp was fed with alternating current at a frequency of 50 Hz, no displacement of the light spot was observed.
It follows that either the second postulate of SRT is incorrect, or its physical meaning needs some special explanations.
Observations of SRT and addition of velocities (an article from Technique-Youth No. 3, 2002, p. 24)
“In the October issue of” TM “over the past year, my article” Light faster than light? “Was published about the experimental determination of the speed of light emitted by a fluorescent lamp. The technique of this experiment was immediately subjected to fair criticism.
But the problem remains: is the statement of SRT true that the speed of light does not depend on the speed of its source? Even earlier, in the April issue of “TM” for the same year, a note of V. Podgorny from Petrozavodsk “Is the speed of light constant?” Was printed. The author proposed schemes of rather complicated experiments to test the second postulate of the SRT; from this note it followed that everything is not so simple – the STO postulate on the constancy of the speed of light in a vacuum has never been experimentally tested by anyone!
I tried to make this experience again, using, so to speak, domestic means and taking into account the criticism voiced in my address. Namely, instead of a fluorescent lamp, the inner surface of which is covered with a layer of phosphor that converts UV radiation into visible light, I used a miniature neon lamp with a transparent glass sheath. At a pressure of about 0.1 mmHg, a distance of 1.7 mm between the electrodes and a working voltage of 220 V, the ions of the inert gas are able to acquire a velocity comparable to the speed of light C.
In the first experiment, the light from such a lamp passed through a narrow diaphragm (collimator) and hit the screen located parallel to the plane of the emitter electrodes at a distance of 0.8 m (Fig. 1); the direction of the current could be changed with a diode.


After the lamp was turned on, a projection appeared on the projection screen: both electrodes and the gas discharge column between them were clearly visible. When the direction of the current was changed, this image shifted towards the motion of positive ions by 11 mm with an absolute error of only 0.2 mm (based on the results of 20 switching operations). This meant that the speed of light C was combined with the speed of its source V’s movement according to the classical, “ballistic” principle, and not in accordance with the SRT formulas.
I could not determine the exact magnitude of the ion velocity in the neon lamp; by indirect estimates it is of the order of more than 2000 km / s, which agrees well with the results of my experiment.
But, as the saying goes, “Ein Versuch ist kein Versuch” (Search-so seek), and so I put the second experience with a neon lamp, fundamentally changing its conditions.
The main element of the spectroscope is a glass prism, differently deflecting rays of light with different wavelengths and, therefore, moving in the material of the prism at different speeds. But if outside the prism, in a vacuum, the speed of light changes, then it will change in the material of the prism. That is, if the speed of light becomes more than C, the spectrum will move to the violet side, and if it becomes less than C, then a “red shift” will occur, as in the case of observing the source of radiation that is being removed (in astronomy this effect is described by Hubble’s law).
The same neon lamp I placed so that its electrodes were located strictly perpendicular to the collimator and, consequently, the motion of the ions did not occur along, but across the motion of the light quanta (Fig. 2). When the device was turned on, a light spot appeared on the screen; After reversing the polarity, the beam was shifted by 24 angular minutes. The absolute error of this deviation was 4 angular minutes (in a series of 30 switchings). Using the known formulas, it was possible to calculate that in this case the change in the speed of light was 520 km / s with an error of about 85 km / s.


The fact that in the second experiment the change in the speed of light turned out to be smaller can be explained by the fact that it decreases as it passes through optical media. So, in the first case, the displacement of the light spot was smaller if a glass plate was placed in front of the lamp instead of the lens.”
…These experiments caused some resonance, but, unfortunately, none of the experimenters – lovers did not want to reproduce them. The matter was limited to suggestions for improving experiments, and good advice.
Yes, it requires methods of direct, rather than indirect (by displacement) measurement of the speed of light. In addition, the exact velocities of microparticles in neon and mercury tubes are not known – they are defined as “plausible”. Confuses a clear displacement of the projections of the gas discharge lamp – according to the calculations, the screen should register only a small part of the “superluminal” photons.
However … such, direct experience has been done. And not even amateurs, but professionals of high rank. Of course, without references to articles in the “Technician-Youth.” This is evidenced by the article of the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences E. Aleksandrov in the journal Science and Life, No. 8, 2011.
“… Such an experiment was recently carried out by a group of Russian scientists at the Kurchatov Synchrotron Radiation Center, SIC CI. In experiments, the source of synchrotron radiation (SI), the electron storage device “Siberia-1”, was used as a pulsed light source.
SI electrons, accelerated to relativistic velocities (close to the speed of light), has a wide spectrum from the infrared and visible to the X-ray range. Radiation propagates in a narrow cone along a tangent to the trajectory of electrons along the lead channel and is discharged through the sapphire window into the atmosphere. There, light is collected by a lens on the photocathode of a fast photodetector. A light beam on a path in a vacuum could be overlapped by a glass plate introduced by a magnetic drive. At the same time, according to the logic of the ballistic hypothesis, the light, previously thought to have doubled the speed of 2C, after the window should have found the usual speed C”.
…Of course, this experiment showed the speed of light, within the error of 0.5%, equal to the constant C. The synchrotron replaced the modest gas discharge lamp, photosensors with high-speed oscilloscopes – a cardboard screen and a pinhole camera.
The experiment is rather complicated, but the main reason for the errors is the assumption that the “superluminal” photons have the same degree of absorption (if one may so express it) as the ordinary ones flying at a speed of C. To register the quanta overclocked to, practically, 2C,: a) Screen (mirror film, etc.) that cuts off the flow of “standard” photons, c) an extremely long photocam sensor – or a conventional detector tuned to a low signal level. To catch a superluminal signal by a conventional sensor is like trying to fix X-rays with an electronic camera.
How can sensors that are tuned to “hidden” light look? Let us turn to the “non-format” experiments of the astrophysicist N. Kozyrev to determine the path of the star in the sky. Let’s discard the intricate theorizing about “the influence of Time on physical processes,” and leave a clean experiment. So, the academician directs the telescope to a distant light. Closes the lens with an aluminum screen (2mm). Places the thermal resistor in the focus of the eyepiece. The change in the resistance of the sensor does not occur in a thin surface layer (as in an “ordinary” photocell), but over the entire volume of a relatively massive object. And – the signal is confidently registered on the already traversed path of the star. The detector captures “superluminal” and “pre-light” photons.
Can we believe that the experiments of the century before last, conducted by P. Lebedev-the measurement of the pressure of light-are not correct, should they be repeated?
Let’s turn to the same “Technics-Youth”, which until about 2005 it was accepted to publish interesting “non-format” materials. Article V. Belyaev “Delta – spider thread”, No. 9, 1980 The author reproduces the experiments of prof. N. Myshkin (and, to some extent, V. Crookes), produced in the early twentieth century. A disc suspended on a thin thread that does not create a counteraction to twisting, without visible external causes, periodically turns to one or another angle. These movements correlate with solar activity, the position of the Moon, even when the torsion balance is in the basement, covered with screens, protected from electromagnetic and heat fluxes.
We can assume that torsion scales with sufficiently massive suspensions on the arms of the rocker arm are capable of registering hidden light.
One of the author’s long experiences is the translucence of a rotating semitransparent disk. The photographs show that, closer to its edge, where the linear velocity is higher, the screen becomes more transparent (whereas with a fixed disk, the illumination is uniform). The higher the mutual speed of the light source and the barriers, the lower the probability of absorption by the screen of “non-standard” quanta.


1. A semitransparent textolite disk capable of rotating with a linear rim speed of 10 ms.
2. Projection of the spot of light transmitted through the disk.
3. A stream of light passing through the disk (for the sake of clarity, it is shown rotated by 90°).
4. A lamp creating a stream of light
5. Tube with lamp
6. Fixed platform with a tube
7. The flow of a disk passing through an oval region, light.
8. Photographic material – photographic paper, or film (in this case, to obtain a clear projection of the spot, a camera obscura is used).
9. Immediately, the translucent area of the disk.
10. An electric motor that rotates the disk.
11. The area of the spot, which becomes when the disk rotates, is lighter.
12. The spot area (closer to the center where the screen speed is smaller), in comparison with the remote from the axis, is darker.
It should also be noted that, in the course of rotation, the spot moves somewhat, becoming like a drop. This can be caused by the entrainment of the light flux by the material, or fluorescence (which is almost the same, in this case).
…The movement of the screen can be replaced by heating it. Indeed, after all, its atoms and molecules begin to move faster, although the material itself remains in place. About this experiment – publication in “TM” No. 5, 2000. – “Temperature and radiation”.
A directional stream of light passes through the glass, with a temperature gradient from 200°C to room temperature. In this case, the photographic paper located behind the screen fixes the appearance of dark bands, which were longitudinal to the gradient, which did not exist before the screen was heated. In general, the heated area becomes lighter (more transparent). Thus, the idea that photons with non-standard velocity (and also, probably, hard quanta) are captured by matter with a slightly lesser probability is again confirmed.


1. Light source.
2. The screen.
3 and 4. The heating and cooling devices that create a temperature gradient along the screen 2.
5. A translucent screen that regulates the intensity of the flow of light (radiation).
6. Photosensitive material.

* * *
The emission, absorption of radio waves is of a collective nature; in this are involved gruppy of microparticles, in metals – free electrons having high own velocities of motion. Therefore, radio waves, “superluminal” and “before light,” are much easier to manifest themselves. Experiments on the radar of celestial bodies, conducted, in particular, by American astrophysicists, convincingly showed that the speed of the electromagnetic wave is added to the velocity of the planet itself. As you know, Soviet, as well as Russian space stations in 80% of cases fail in the study of the Far Space. The percentage of errors in the navigation devices of NASA and the European Agency is much smaller. This ratio is connected, evidently, with the greater conservatism of domestic scientists, who stubbornly do not want to take into account automatic stations the necessary corrections, mindlessly worshiping the authority of Einstein.
Supporters of the STO claim sometimes that relativistic calculations are necessary for the normal functioning of the satellites of the global positioning system (GLONASS, GPS) – but this is not true. The alignment of stations in the near-earth orbit is automatic, without Lorentz’s formulas, tensors and the notorious “slowing down of time”.
We are surrounded by streams of particles of light, which, at first with difficulties, but can be detected. In addition, the light substance is able, obviously, to create structures that have zero or near-zero velocity relative to the gross matter – atoms and molecules.
Perhaps this, at the turn of the century, from the consciousness of the masses, some supranational structures that tried to create the Theory of Relativity tried to hide.
The creation of devices that sensitively see light matter is quite possible. It is only necessary to change the conditions for registering signals, the temperature of the sensors, to put screens shielding the sensors from the “standard” radiation fluxes – and we will see everything, truly, in a different light. Maybe – unusual buildings, structures, living, even animated creatures.
And it’s interesting.

text with illustrations:https://ridero.ru/books/science_news/