MH17? Highly Likely. Why not?

     The oddities that accompany the stories of two similar “Boeing-777” Malaysian airlines disappeared flight MH-370 and flight MH-17, three months later destroyed in the sky over the Donbass, cause a lot of questions and give rise to a variety of versions of what happened. Missing flight MH-370 disappeared without a trace. Destroyed MH-17 is still unknown who and what, is haunted due to the extreme danger of the precedent. Whether it was brought down by the surface-to-air missile, whether it was brought down by the fighter plane, whether it was brought down by Russia and Donetsk “separatists”, whether military of Ukraine...
     The only version taken off the table is a terrorist attack on Board. The nature of the damage to the structure of the aircraft shows the penetration of damaging elements from the outside, that is, there was an external impact on the aircraft. However, the absence of traces of any object similar to a missile in the radar data transmitted by Russia to the investigation, encourages to re-consider the possibility of a terrorist attack on Board the liner, not contrary to the nature of the damage.

      Suppose a device was mounted on Board the Boeing to release the warhead (warhead) of the Buk anti-aircraft missile system outside the fuselage. The warhead was shot off the plane in flight on a signal from the ground and, immediately, undermined from the outside!
     Thus, the version about sabotage and explosion on Board is swept aside, after all traces of influence of the striking elements show about their penetration from the outside! Also introduced and confusion in the definition of the place, allegedly, “launch” missiles on the ground. Details of space exploration, the US traditionally don't show anyone. The launch site of the rocket from the ground seemed reasonable to determine the orientation of the cloud of fragments, but in the case where the explosive device (warhead missile complex “Buk”) starts from the Board of the “Boeing” it can lead to incredible results!
 
     Why so difficult? Hit the rocket easier! Blowing up a bomb inside an airplane is even easier! Yes, it's easier if the goal is to destroy the aircraft. But if the goal is a grandiose provocation against Russia, then such a provocation must be prepared very carefully.

     So. Missile launch can be detected! There may be witnesses.
 
     The explosion of a bomb inside the aircraft is easily determined by the damage with the edges turned out. But, the organization of the explosion outside the body of the aircraft allows you to confuse all the cards! Thus, the suspicion of sabotage and explosion on Board is swept aside. Traces of the impact of damaging elements show their penetration from the outside! And no one will see the rocket launch from the ground. He wasn't.

     That is, investigators searched the site of the missile launch from the ground. They were trying to determine the location by the orientation of the shard cloud. And an explosive device was launched from aboard the “Boeing”. This made it impossible to accurately determine the location of the likely Buk launcher on the ground.
 
     On Board the aircraft a lot of technical facilities to accommodate the device release of the explosive device. For example, the toilet is the simplest and most convenient.
 
     But there may be others. The combat part of the Buk missile is very small, 40 centimeters in diameter and 70 centimeters long. It has a weight of 70 kilograms. To shoot such an object in flight is not a difficult task. Just like ejecting a fighter pilot. The task is even simpler because you don't have to worry about the life and health of the pilot. The device is required much more compact ejection seat and the required charge is also required less.
 
      The explosion distance established as a result of the investigation is less than 1 meter and it is impossible to determine whether the missile came from the ground or something flew out of the plane. The time interval between firing the catapult and detonating the explosive device outside the aircraft is extremely small, less than a second, and the sound of the ejection device triggering, could merge with the sound of the explosive device exploding. However, if you listen more closely to the recording of the flight recorder, “black box”, it is likely to detect and distinguish the sound of the catapult.
 
    Maybe that's why the US does not want to provide satellite and other data? Maybe they have no trace of the missile launch?

     Of course, it takes time to prepare such a diversion.  In the conditions of a tight schedule of operation of passenger aircraft, the task seems almost impossible... But here... Maybe we will remember the missing “without a trace” three months before the tragedy of MH17 similar “Boeing 777” flight MH 370 of the same Malaysian airline? So time to create that diversion was enough!

     And then... After the collapse. .. Already on earth... People came with tools, cut the wreckage of the liner, cut, collected and removed all traces of the ejection device that threw the warhead of the Buk missile outside the fuselage of the aircraft.

     It is unlikely that Ukraine shot down the plane. No witnesses to the rocket launch. And it would take at least two missiles to reliably defeat such an important target. Especially, given the low level of practical training of the Ukrainian military. The result should be one hundred percent, without any surprises.

     What is the role of Ukraine in this grandiose provocation? Perhaps this is a responsible role - the creation of an information field in the preparation of sabotage. What did the “Directors” of this crime need to create the necessary opinion in the world community?

     First, it was necessary to create the appearance of an air threat to the population of Donetsk and Lugansk. Appeared in the sky planes of the Ukrainian air force, fired missiles at civilians, killing women and children. Air-to-air missiles were used to avoid mass casualties. Otherwise, the world community could be outraged by the cruelty of Ukraine. The reason that made the defenders of Donetsk and Lugansk fear and react to the threat from the air should only be indicated.

      Secondly, it was necessary to shoot down air targets with the help of hand-held anti-aircraft systems, such as helicopters of the Ukrainian military. It had to be shown that defenders of Donetsk and Lugansk started reflecting air attacks.

     Third, in the hands of the defenders had to get the launcher long-range anti-aircraft missiles. And one such incompetent launcher anti-aircraft complex “Buk” was left to them. It was restored, but it could only move. The world community was informed that the defenders of Donetsk and Lugansk had a serious weapon against aircraft flying at high altitude. The weapon had a short and well-remembered name- “Beech”! Very good sounding for the media.

      Fourth, it was necessary to show that the defenders of Donetsk and Lugansk can destroy the aircraft flying at high altitude. And it was demonstrated to the world community! "Destruction" transport aircraft “An” at an altitude of about 6 000 m! It was too high for the manual anti-aircraft complex “Arrow”.  But you can ask yourself: “Was it a rocket? Or the explosive device in the engine of the transport plane worked?” There was a fire in the right engine, but there was no destruction of the aircraft.

     In the fifth. The inclusion of the radar of the Ukrainian complexes “Buk” and bringing them to combat readiness, it was necessary to show the possession of the Ukraine, working with installations “Buk”, one of which fell to the militia, and probably also functional.

     And now, finally, it's time for the most grandiose provocation, which claimed several hundred lives. There was a catastrophe Malaysian Boeing 777 flight MH17…
At once all interested mass media were included!

     “In the sky over Ukraine at the Donbass shot down a civilian “Boeing” flight MH17 !”

     “Separatists shot down a civilian plane!”

     “Russia destroyed the plane!”

     And loud charges - Russia and Donetsk “separatists”are guilty!
 
     -Afraid of an air attack?
     -Afraid!

     -From manual anti-aircraft systems “Arrow” planes and helicopters shot down?
     -Shot down!
 
     -High-altitude target hit ?
     -Impressed!

     -Did you have one Buk installation?
     -Had! ....

     So guilty!

     Yep... And it would be interesting to compare the numbers of units and units, and the repair history of the two Boeing 777, the missing MH370 and destroyed MH17 .
Handwriting! Handwriting CIA... Dented love of Americans to "beautiful" names and combinations, we can note the abundance of sevens, explicit and hidden, in this operation.
Boeing — 777
Flight 17.
Date — 17.07.2014 ( 14:2=7)
Time — 13:20 approximately. Almost there. 14:00 (14:2=7).
It's not mysticism, it's malice.
From fans of fatal dates and numbers.