Miracle in the United Kingdom

This note is a continuation of the previous article "Waiting for a Miracle". In both cases, "miracle" means a change in the scientific paradigm in the field of natural sciences, which, according to the authors, should occur if, instead of mythical electric charges, physicists use the mass of nuclei, electrons and other elementary particles. A periodic change in the scientific paradigm is an extremely rare phenomenon, which is why it has shades of miracle, although in general this is a common and necessary thing.
As mentioned earlier, our final article "On the problem of a unified field theory", based on the decisive role of the mass of the atomic nucleus and elementary particles, was not admitted to publication in ZhETF, "as not of sufficient independent interest." It was obvious that the editors of the journal did not want to risk the reputation of the journal and go for the publication of an article that could cause a sharp turn in the development of physics, but could end in a major scandal in the scientific world. In a word, the editors of the magazine lacked either determination or courage to make a decision.
After much deliberation, hesitation and advice with neighbors, it was decided to send the article for publication to the flagship of world physical science - the British journal Nature Physics. It was believed that if an article contains material valuable for science, then in all cases it will not end up in the waste basket.
The article was sent to Nature Physics on 06.06.2021.
The article noted that replacing an electric charge in an atom with a mass with a density of 1012 g / cm3 allows, taking into account the discovery of Laplace's PS on the transformation of gravitational forces into molecular (electrical) forces with an increase in the density of matter, to come to the conclusion about the common nature of gravitational and electromagnetic fields. The dream of the author and devotee of the problem of the unified field theory A. Einstein would come true!
It turned out that the planetary structure of the macro and micro world is not accidental, but these are parts of one system in which the inverse quadratic law of gravitation of masses acts, and in which in both cases it is realized in the form of the orbital motion of both parts of the system. Moreover, the nature of the orbital motion (types of orbits) in the micro world determines the aggregate state of matter in the macro world: open hyperbolic and parabolic orbits correspond to a gaseous state, and closed circular and elliptical to a condensed liquid and solid state of matter, that is, a direct direct connection is established between the two worlds.
Like the Newtonian gravitational constant, the microgravitational constant acts in the world of atoms, the exact value of which is equal to 1.847 ; 1028 ± 0.045 cm3 / s2g, obtained by calculating the equation of Kepler's third law for the wavelengths of characteristic X-ray radiation for 10 chemical elements located in different parts periodic table of chemical elements.
The micro gravitational constant is the same unifying principle for the objects of the micro world, like the gravitational constant of gravitation in Newton's law and allows you to perform calculations with high accuracy for all chemical elements. Paper for publication was submitted on 06/06/2021 to naturephysics@nature.com

The answer was received the next day
06/07/2021, 11: 3 .
“Dear Professor Serkov!

Thank you for posting the article "On the Problem of the Unified Field Theory".

Your application has been assigned the following tracking number: NPHYS-2021-06-01510. We will contact you again as soon as we make a decision. Please include tracking number in any message.

Please note that this email simply acknowledges receipt of your application. This does not mean that the article will be submitted for formal review. Once an editorial decision has been made, we will contact you as soon as possible.
If an editor decides to submit your manuscript for external review, he will first contact you and ask you to complete an Editorial Policy Checklist confirming that all necessary editorial policies are being followed. More information about our editorial policies, including a simplified version of this form, can be found at www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html.

You can track the status of your application by clicking the link below. After logging in, you should access the Live Manuscript folder and then click the Check Manuscript Status link.
Please take part in our short survey to tell us more about your decision to publish in this journal: We remind you that Nature Physics reserves the right not to publish articles previously discussed with the media. Detailed information on our embargo policy can be found at www.nature.com/nphys/authors/.

Please note that all published research manuscripts must contain a declaration of any financial and non-financial competing interests. Full policy information can be found at www.nature.com/nphys/authors/.

You can now use single sign-on for all your accounts, view the status of all submitted manuscripts and reviews, access usage statistics for your published articles, and upload your peer review records for Nature journals. Check your account regularly and make sure we have
your current contact information.

To increase the transparency of the peer review process, Springer Nature has partnered with Research Square to provide you with a personal author dashboard where you can access more detailed information on the status of your manuscript during peer review through the peer review timeline. Research Square will contact you separately with more details about this service.
In addition, Springer Nature encourages all authors and reviewers to associate an Open Investigator and Contributor ID (ORCID) with their account. ORCID is a community initiative that provides an open, non-proprietary, and transparent registry of unique identifiers to help disambiguate research findings.

Thank you for choosing to submit your manuscript to Nature Physics.

Yours sincerely

Manuscript Management, Nature Physics
www.nature.com/nphys

Macmillan building
Crinan Street
London N1 9XW
United Kingdom
Tel +44 (0) 20 7833 4000
Fax +44 (0) 20 7843 4563 ".
The start was promising, promising mutual understanding and creative collaboration. In any case, it seemed to me so. The editors of Nature kept their word and directed their subsidiary company Research Square to create and publish preprints of our article on the Internet. Unfortunately, things got so cold before the publication of the preprints ...

“Dear Doctor Arkady Serkov,

Your paper "On the Unified Field Theory Challenge" has been submitted to Research Square, a preprint platform that allows you to share your work in advance, get feedback, and improve your paper before submitting it to the journal. We know how hard you've worked to get to this point, and we're glad you decided to post the preprint with us.
What's next?
Your manuscript is currently being reviewed by our editors to ensure it meets our standards for online posting. We will send you an email as soon as your manuscript is posted online and ready for publication. Preprints are usually dispatched within 48 business hours.

Thank you for making communication about research faster, fairer and more rewarding!
Unfortunately, it happened like Chernomyrdin, "they wanted the best, but it turned out as always." Apparently, the Nature management got acquainted with our article in more detail, presented a storm of indignation from its readers and decided to refuse to publish our article. We received a letter from Research Square, which was tasked with producing and publishing the preprints of our article on the Internet, with the following letter: Research Square. Unfortunately, our reviewers have determined that the type of manuscript or its content is not suitable for publication as a preprint on Research Square. Please note that this decision does not reflect the quality or importance of the work and is based on our editorial policy regarding content type and verification.

We appreciate your interest in Research Square and wish you the best of luck with your manuscript.
Sincerely,
Research Square Team

To guarantee, I had to contact Nature Physics a second time, whether they really refuse to publish our article:

From: Arkady Serkov <arkady07@rambler.ru>
Sent: 15 Jun '2021 14:33
To: Nature Physics <Nature.Physics@springernature.com>
Subject: RE: Statement on your Nature Physics NPHIS-2021-06-01510

“We have received a refusal from Research Square to publish a preprint of the article“ On the problem of a unified field theory ”. Does this mean that Nature physics finally refuses to publish our article and we can turn to another journal? "

“Dear Professor Serkov!

  Thanks for your letter. As detailed in our previous correspondence, we cannot offer the publication of your manuscript: "To the problem of a unified field theory."

My hope is that you will soon receive a more favorable response from another magazine.

Yours faithfully,

Nature Physics Management ”.

So the attempt to publish our article in Nature Physics ended in vain.
What's next? Of course, there could be no talk of any refusal to complete the project. What is the next strategy? A long, grueling siege of the fortress lies ahead. The content of the idea is presented in 35 articles, which were published in three collections in Russian and English on the Internet. Further time and the desire of people to learn the truth will do their job. And the «miracle» will happen!