Religion is not opium

Marxism and the religious question.

Religion as an ally, not an opponent in the strategy of progress.

 the realities of monopoly post - imperialism-global oligarchic rule are as follows. That religion has entered into serious contradictions with this system and formation.
The contradictions between capitalism and religion are much greater than between socialism and religion. If we talk about Christianity, there are even parallels.
Therefore, religion, as unnecessary to the regime, will be removed and perverted.
Religion can become an ally, especially if it is approached meaningfully. But this can certainly lead to a reaction, but in modern times, in the contradictions of science and religion, religion can be modernized and brought into line with the realities without a reaction.

Mental terror (various kinds of gulags) against the people led to a complete loss of orientation and the ability to psychological self-defense of society.
The worldview is replaced in values. Instead of the traditional worldview, "ecological thinking" is introduced, environmentalists (eugenists and others) set their main goal to REDUCE the POPULATION of aborigines. An apocalyptic train of thought and environmental anti-human values are being imposed. Consumer values have been imposed for a long time, they are being replaced by environmentalist anti-human ones. And like Nazism in the late USSR. The occupiers are launching anti-human installations from above, using the media and all the institutions of the state.

There are even similar shortcomings in Christianity and Marxism now.
For example, the Old Testament is glued to the new one, although the new one carries completely different messages. Instead of the Old Testament "an eye for an eye", Christ introduced "love your neighbor" And if anyone criticizes Zyuganov for his "Christ is the first communist" , Then he criticizes in vain. (Although there were fighters for justice earlier. Nevertheless, the teaching of Christ, even if greatly distorted, brought Human teaching into the world, against the Old Testament one built on cruelty and social Darwinism. The Old Testament was glued to the new one already in the 3rd century, that is, it was politics... Islam, on the other hand, was a reactive teaching that returns to the Old Testament part, while Isa, as it were, embraces and his teaching, already neutralized, is returned to the old part. The old part-the Talmud is essentially a Jewish chronicle, there are also instructive books there (Soloson's Parables, the book of David) But these human books are not included in the Talmud, although they are sometimes included. The old part, as a chronicle, follows the new one into the Bible. Although there is no essence of the same, but there is the opposite. Marx also described capitalism as how to break it... Engels, Lenin. But the parallel is not developed further in theory. There are some of Stalin's developments on the economy in the USSR (like a new testament) And everything. There is no theory of socialism, the abolition of money. That is, a description of capitalism, but there is no description of the construction of communism (only socialism in Stalin) After Stalin, degradation, reaction begins, private-property animal instincts are developed. And instead of theory, the incompetent speeches of the secretaries about the threat from outside . And the threat from outside is NOTHING compared to ideological incompetence. It's like the Middle Ages. The founders of the teachings cry, seeing how they fatten on scraps of their names. And. With the teaching of Christ, exactly the same thing happened as with the Victory, for example. (Or the teaching of the Buddha) The ruling class, if it cannot overcome the teaching, then privatizes it.
"You can't win - embrace" And this happens with any revolutionary teaching, even in religion, even in philosophy, even in science. The ruling classes neutralize it, privatize it.
Later, the differences between the teachings are used for the tactics of "divide and conquer"
Some religions blame others. Lenin according to Stalin.. White vs. black, etc. Pitting each other against each other in order to distract from the ruling class has been everywhere and all the time for many millennia. And " the Pharaoh remains at the pyramid.
And the masses.. Few of the masses are even able to compare the Old Testament with the new, or even read the Manifesto of the Communist Party. Yes, they can't read 20 pages, and they believe everything that they will give and chew. That's why they are the masses. How to harden them? How can we make them critically thinking, responsible, altruistic, experiencing and leading the life of their countries?
The theory of education, the theory of socialism, has not been developed at all since the 50s.

Many people are not capable not only of scientific thinking, but also of a religious, mythical worldview. Reduction to the level of cattle, these are the realities of psychic warfare. The Dulles plan is executed in such a way that there are almost no thinking people in our people. Charlatans are flourishing. Under these conditions. Religion is no longer opium. This is probably one of the levers, institutions for the revival of culture and through which it is possible to return some people to the path of critical scientific thinking.
Religion, the presence of market elements is already a reality compatible with socialism.
What we will need to work on is the transition to non-monetary relations, possibly with the preservation of private-property productions.
The theory of education, the creation of a person capable of leading society and mentally hardened. That's what the theorists will have to work on.
Progressive taxes show which countries have the status of metropolises, in which colonies. This system will be in crisis. Already today, a concentration camp is being built and a scapegoat of the crisis is being created in the face of pandemics. The crisis will be the end of the old order. The final battle of the class struggle. Good versus evil. Socialism against Slavery


Рецензии