Navalny is doomed to defeat

What classes does Navalny rely on?
Putin and Navalny from the point of view of class theory.
Let's remember the story. All philosophy came to Marxism and class theory for a reason. For example , take at least Nicholas 2 . Who did Nikolai rely on? The aristocracy, the nobility. He shot the working class in the squares. But the nobility ended together with the pay-off payments, ended together with serfdom.
Let's remember the same Yeltsin. He knew Marxism well. (To know Marxism does not mean to be a Marxist or a Person) In order to come to power, Yeltsin began to rely on the emerging class of oligarchy. He managed to see the oligarchic class in the party democracy and relied on it. Both Yeltsin and Kerensky simply used the proletariat. They relied on the emerging oligarchy.
And now we come to the main scientific, historical, philosophical, Marxist question.
What class does Navalny rely on?
It relies on the petty-bourgeois class. And what is this class today? Farmers, for example, give out only 13 percent of their products. Agricultural holdings have all the power. In the city, small business is rarely seen at all. Large networks crush small sole proprietors. And this is an objective normal process of capitalism. Concentration of capital. Monopolism is the natural decline of capitalism. Small business - the petty-bourgeois middle class will disappear, and this is the development of capitalism. Some even try to fit the lackeys and servants of the oligarchy, officials into the middle class, but this is ridiculous, the average income is not the middle class. The middle class is disappearing. The oligarchy naturally relies on lackeys, servants, officials. Many say that the proletariat is in the past. The proletariat is any wage worker, anyone who sells his life, time, his abilities in exchange for money. The self-employed is both the petty-bourgeois and the proletariat in one bottle. The proletariat itself. The petty-bourgeois class are very small businessmen who are directly in contact with production, sometimes harnessing themselves into the role of a mercenary for themselves. There are very few of them. It is not necessary to confuse mercenaries engaged in business and the owners themselves - small businessmen. There are very few of them, which is about 0.5% of the population. That is, 1 out of 200 people. These rich people usually cause disgust, envy, and anger among the masses. Sometimes justified, sometimes not. Why? They are forced to use the toughest exploitation to withstand competition. This negligibly small class is five times smaller in number than the number of, for example, riot police. They can fit into one small town. Their only danger is that they can finance agitation among the proletariat. But the proletariat is not particularly led by these new zealots.
Who is Putin relying on? Certainly not on the proletariat. But the proletariat is subject to agitation from controlled media.
Putin relies on the oligarchy class (big business), and business has neither nationality nor Homeland! 70% of the proletariat works for big capital there. All the media work for him. There's money there. Putin relies on the oligarchy class and this is no secret to anyone. And if you remember state-owned companies. To this we can say the following: And who owns the state? The common fund of the oligarchy is the budget under capitalism.
And what about the proletariat? The 99 percent? (If you count together with mercenaries, security forces and all sorts of thugs) The proletariat has neither unity nor self-consciousness now. It is subject to agitation by various groups of capitalists and is used in their interests. By the way, this is also the answer to whether it is worth supporting Neoliberasts... And the systemic opposition today is just another lightning bolt and rose-colored glasses..


Рецензии