Dual Mirror Model Perfect Mirror

 
Dual Mirror Model Perfect Mirror
Vitaly Sholokhov

The "ideal mirror" as a model of general systems should have a multi-layered structure of the system of dialectical contradiction "cognition – society". And this structure should have the form of images in two parallel mirrors, as Hegel pointed out. Moreover, material and ideal (informational) components should alternate like a layer cake. As a result, interrelated systems of various kinds find their logical place in objective reality. The model obtained in this way also reflects the logic of the development of information systems, since it is a model of the structure and development of any dialectical contradiction. In society, the most common situation is the struggle of two organizations (societies, civilizations, states), each of which is a "mirror" for the other. To carry out this struggle, each side evaluates its own and others' goals. E. Kant said it well: "... What goals are essence and at the same time duty? Such are one's own perfection and someone else's happiness." (Immanuel Kant Collection  works in eight volumes, Volume 6, "Metaphysics of Morals", Chero Publishing House, 1994) These assessments are information by definition! To carry out evaluation, nature has a special mechanism, which is described in science as a system of decision-making and execution. (S.L.Optner System Analysis for Solving Business and Industrial Problems) Due to the hierarchical structure of the world, information has its own structure and content, which is revealed by considering the situation of reflexive interaction of objects (parties, organizations, etc.). The interaction itself develops into a system of decision-making and execution. Objective reality is inherent in memory, thinking, purpose, will, and activity aimed at achieving the goal. Although the properties of information are still represented in the most developed form in a person, in society these properties are also gradually objectified and gradually realized in the form of the "World Wide Web". Vernadsky's Foresight of the "Noosphere". (Moiseev N.N. Time to Determine National Goals // "Sustainable Development" and Ecological Education, Moscow, MNEPU Publishing House, vol. 3, p. 215) makes it necessary to consider the contradiction "society – nature". The essence and direction of evolution is the emergence of more and more complex objects (organizations). For example, a message spreads through space by means of communication, reaches (theoretically) every person and then exists in the memory of society even if the source of information is destroyed (removed). The sequence in which the impact on the organization is worked out (the situation of interaction between two organizations) is also the logic of revealing the concept of "information", so to speak, in the historical aspect. And the "logic" of the development of the evaluation process is briefly as follows. External influences (light, sound, heat, smell, pressure, radiation, etc.) are processed in 4 "blocks" (See Fig. 1). 1.)Block No1 interprets the impact, discriminates against it and identifies it with standard impacts. Codes, dictionaries, classifiers, models, images, etc. Block No2 is engaged in assessing the deviation from the goal (parameters and structure) caused by the impact under study. Constraints (types of equalities and inequalities) and connections are also checked here. Block No3 is functional. He develops forecasts, doctrines, concepts, strategies, plans and instructions. Block No4 – execution. The described structure of the organization's activity in processing incoming influences and developing its own effects is generated by the logic of the development of the reflecting structure (as mentioned above). Construction scheme Fig. 2. shows the reflexive structure (spectrum) of interaction, built according to the rules of image construction in two mirrors located in parallel.
M - Objects between the original mirrors - nature (including man) and their parts, considered geometrically (in space and time). Material objects and information flows. All the diversity of the world rests on the dual essence of the quantum: he is a particle; he is a wave. The electron has the same property. As a result, we have three cases of collision of quanta: wave-wave, particle-particle and particle-wave.  one object acts on another. Why is it possible to have an impact at all? Obviously, this is due to the activity of one of the objects. It either moves and collides with another object, or it radiates energy in some form that reaches another object. Here it seems to be self-evident that the space that separates objects is a conductor of influence. Initially, information was understood as nothing more than information; and this understanding was preserved until the middle of the twentieth century. Progress in the development of technical means of mass and other communications has required the improvement of the conditions for transmitting messages and, in this regard, their measurement. The mathematical theory of information began to be created in 1948, after Claude E. Shannon and W. Weaver published the article "The mathematical theory of communication", which used probabilistic methods to measure the amount of information and proposed theorems about bandwidth, as well as technical ideas of noise immunity, coding, etc. (The above excerpt is taken from Lisin's book "Ideality", Notebook XII Totality – Information//p.398)Indeed, from the standpoint of our definition (information is an assessment), it is important for the receiving party to obtain the most accurate information in the shortest possible time. In addition, since information is an element of struggle (unity and struggle of opposites), it must be reliably protected from accidental interference and purposeful distortions. The best case is when the signal itself becomes indistinguishable from a random signal. All this is true. But nevertheless, so far we are considering only a message, a signal. How much information in this signal will be shown by the score. Here we will emphasize that the "space" by which For example, the "Stealth" technology allows you not even to "see" an airplane. Only here we imperceptibly moved from the impact to the object on which the action is performed.1.2. Zero mirror is the beginning of the structure of the reflector.
X(0) Mirror 1 is a non-memory display device, e.g. radar, optical lens. Our open and technical reconnaissance. From a physical point of view, it is a receiving antenna, a camera lens, etc. The task of this level of knowledge is only to "catch" the signal and transmit it further. Of course, the quality requirement affects the selectivity, bandwidth, noise immunity, etc., inherent in the zero mirror.  This allows you to control the entire range of possible impacts. In addition to the "sensors" that a person is equipped with, society has invented a number of sensors for measuring the radiation background, magnetic environment, humidity, temperature, pressure, etc. This is due to the fact that the goals of society are different from the goals of an individual, and therefore the assessment of society is different.In the case of such a "community" as a gas consisting of molecules, the effect exerted on the molecule is immediately transmitted to other molecules. That is, gas is at the same time a set of transmitters, conductors and receivers of "messages" (influences). The general assessment of the state of such an "informational" system is described by a structural function - entropy. Changes that occur in a gas, such as chemical reactions between molecules, are reflected in entropy. Changes in the mass of a gas, the number of molecules in it, and the bonds between molecules (including in the temporal aspect) affect entropy and are therefore important for the Assessment. A decrease in diversity is useful in assessing goals, and an increase is harmful. Therefore, a decrease in diversity is associated with information, and an increase with noise. A decrease in diversity affects a decrease in entropy. This gave L. Szilard the basis to consider information to be only non-entropy (negative entropy).1.3. Reflection of signal properties. W(0) Display of objects between the original mirrors - information carriers: photographic materials, tapes, geographical map, paper.After the "antenna", the signal passes through filters (in the case of lenses - focused) in order to then get to the sensitive elements.1.4. Reflection of the transmitter zero mirror. This is the transmitting antenna itself! Y(0) - Open and technical reconnaissance of the competitor.1.5. Reflection reflection of transmitter properties from the transmitter's point of view.
1.6. Y(-1) Objects similar to human senses - sensors, binoculars, watches. Agents of a competitor. Here we have imperceptibly involved in the consideration not only the communication channel, but also the source (the antenna of the generator) of the signal that should deliver us information.1.7. M(-1) Objects similar to images - paintings, photographs, sculptures.1.8. By the middle of the 20th century, N. Wiener, C.E. Shannon and D. von Neumann had completed the creation of the theory of information transmission as a measure of random selection: in an alternative situation, any event was evaluated not by the content, but by the probability of its occurrence. In other words, when making a choice, there was more information, the less the expected event was. With the number of possible variants of events W, the amount of information received in the process of implementing the choice is proportional to I = lnW, which is identical to the famous Boltzmann relation for entropy to the nearest constant. Same as 1.7, but for a competitor1.10. X(2) Objects that give an idea of display mirrors (2) - drawings, diagrams, models, machines (for example, cash registers), functional devices, computing devices. Residency of our intelligence on our territory.1.11. W(2) Objects-results of the activity of functional devices - travel tickets, checks, punched cards, newspapers, books, money.1.12. Residency of a competitor on its territory.1.13. Same as 1.11, but for a competitor.1.14. Y(-3) Objects that reflect the second level of Human reflection - thermostat, regulator, plans, tasks, summing device at the input of the system with negative feedback. Competitor's residency on our territory.1.15. M(-3) Objects reflecting knowledge of the essence of systems - theory, system of equations.1.16. Our residency on the territory of a competitor.1.17. Same as 1.15, but for a competitor.1.18. X(4) Objects with two levels of reflection - robots, self-adjusting systems. Our Analytical Bodies.1.19. W(4) Objects confirming the second level of reflection - optimization criteria, tactics.1.20. Competitor's Analytical Bodies.1.21. Same as 1.19, but for a competitor.1.22. Y(-5) Objects that carry out awareness of the second level of reflection - plans, investigation of operations. The ideological reserve of a competitor.
1.23. Competitor's propaganda.1.24. Our ideological reserve.1.25. M(5) Objects that reflect the awareness of the second level of reflection - goals, strategies.1.26. X(6) Objects with three levels of reflection - collective activity, party leadership. Our Ideological Organs.1.27. W(6) Objects showing the result of collective activity are objective conscious laws of nature and society.1.28. Ideological organs of the competitor.1.29. Random events, the results of a competitor's action.

Such is the content (and qualitative structure) of the "ideal mirror".

Conclusion. Cognition for philosophy is one of the main subjects of its research. The above is mainly related to the theory of reflection. Therefore, it is expedient to limit ourselves to the problem of the relationship between the theory of reflection and information. The levels of the "ideal mirror" model described above are objectified as social, political, economic, environmental, scientific, legal, defense, security and other systems.  both functional and operational approaches.

2003  Vitaly Sholokhov


© Copyright: Vitaly Sholokhov, 2015Certificate of publication No215030102105