On the Structural Structure of Society

    Let us begin to consider the problem of the structure of human society from the standpoint of the first principles of Being. [See. essay "To Sergei"].
By a variation of universal physical laws such as the "Law of Increasing Entropy", we  established that the first principles of Being form a three-dimensional system  of  (abstract) coordinates: TIME, MASS, INFORMATION-ENTROPY, Organic systems of the type of human society have in their foundation the indicated system of coordinates, which is naturally considered as a single substantial principle, from which, as a result of self-development, organic systems with structural isomorphism have arisen. Such a point of view makes possible the simultaneous mutual penetration of parts of the organism (the result of such penetration is expressed in the values of the correlations of the first principles)4and makes it possible to organize the separation of parts of "organic" systems, for example, Aristotle's separation of the three parts of the human soul. One part of the soul – the "vegetative" art – is more correlated with the TIME coordinate. Indeed, the "goal" of the living is the maximum life expectancy. The second part of the Soul – the "animal" part – is more correlated with the MASS, that is, it is based on the material basis. It is obvious that life exists in the form of an organism. The third part of the Soul – the "Mind" – is primarily associated with INFORMATION. Of course, this part of the soul cannot exist without a GOAL and without an organismic form, which all organic systems have. Sometimes a
     "theory" is put forward that the three parts of the Soul (according to Aristotle) arise sequentially. From the standpoint of the first principles of being, it can be considered proved that all three coordinates exist simultaneously and form not only an interconnected, but also an interrelated whole. This fact opens up the possibility for us to give definitions to those categories (TIME, MASS, INFORMATION-ENTROPY) which, as the first concepts, cannot be defined in principle from the very beginning. (For example, Aristotle's reasoning  is known that if there were a preliminary explanation of the categories used, then it is there that we should look for the FIRST principles).
Man, as an organic system, possesses all three "parts"  of the Soul indicated simultaneously. But since each "part"  of the Soul is determined (determined) through the correlations of one variable with two oppositely located variables, in fact (from the standpoint of the sequence of "dimensions"  of the first principles) we we find not three SOULS, but SIX manifestations of the SOUL. For example,  the properties of the SOUL, which determines the lifespan of an organic system on those properties that are generated by the influence of MASS, and on those that are determined by INFORMATION-ENTP;PIA (that is, it depends on the "Mind"). It should be noted right away that these two "correlations", which divided the property "life expectancy" into two reflexive positions, form a triad, not a dialectical pair. As a result, in the process of evolution,  one or the other reflection comes to the fore This result expresses itself in what can be called the  "manifestation of character"  of Man (if we are talking only about him). This conclusion is also valid for two other coordinates –  the first principles. In total, we got the following result: the human SOUL has six reflections, which in the course of evolution can change in the strength of their influence on the organism, and then the FIRST place can be taken by  "life expectancy", "the struggle of Man with Nature", or "Scientific and technical achievements".!
Note. Intuitively, all major sociologists came to the same conclusions. However, reliance on physical models creates an evidence base for those explanations, which, as a rule, appear in many in relation to any object of research.
         Let's move on to the social level.
    A necessary condition for the existence of a person is a collective way of life. It is possible to make an assumption (hypothesis) that in any society there are people at the same time whose character belongs to all six variants of characters we have discovered above. This means that in any society there must be 6 * 6 = 36 cases of collapse of human characters. It can be assumed (hypothesis-2) that people are grouped according to their characters. Confirmation of such hypothesis-2 could be the basis for the formation of various ethnoi. If all types of characters and all the multitude of interactions coexist simultaneously in every society, then an interesting problem arises to find out whether there is a connection between the types of social organizations and the types of standard interactions between people in society.

06/29/2020
Vitaly Sholokhov


© Copyright:Vitaly Sholokhov, 2020
Certificate of publication №220063000093