What is intellect?

 "Reason is a poor gift, which makes a mockery of us gave the gods."
(Voltaire, "The Virgin of Orleans")


What is intellect? Thought is the action of the mind, reason, reason, is the result of the thought process. The mind realizes the ability of the material system to realize its existence in the environment. Even a well-trained machine does not have consciousness. So intelligence. Therefore, there can be no talk of "intelligence," especially "artificial." Algorithms and intelligence are incompatible. Point.

Thought is only then material if it is the product of a person's consciousness, subconscious or intuition. Natural intelligence is a product of consciousness. And nothing else. All talk about the presence of the so-called "artificial intelligence" is a deception. And trying to sell what you want at a real price. Commercial project of swindlers. AI sells well because no one knows what it is.

Reason and reason are two types of human thought activity, the difference and mutual relationship of which is understood differently in various philosophical teachings. Compared to reason, the mind is the highest form of mental activity. Reason is the ability to comprehend objects and their connections through concepts, it is the ability to form concepts, judgments and rules (I. Kant).

Rational activity is associated with the strict operation of concepts, classification of facts and phenomena, and systematization of knowledge, while the mind acts as a synthesizing creative activity, revealing the essence of reality, and creating new ideas that go beyond the existing systems.

Reason can combine opposites that reason has taken apart. Thus, reason makes it possible to reason, and reason - to discover and goal-set. While reason excludes irrational processes, reason can creatively turn them on through the consciousness of the contradiction of thinking itself.

It is no coincidence that I. Goethe believed that most of the troubles around the world come from the fact that people do not understand their goals accurately enough. The basis of analysis, synthesis, regulation, control, management and decision-making is the presence, as far as possible, of comprehensive information about the cognizable object or phenomenon.

Moreover, the ascent of abstract information to real processes of analysis in humans occurs with the help and through stable mental processes involved in the reception of information - with the help of processes of ascent from the abstinent to the concrete, i.e. from sensation, perception, presentation, judgment and concept to inference. Thus, Hegel rules and Kant rests.

Sensation is a reflection of the properties of objective reality, arising as a result of their influence on the sensory organs and arousal of the nerve centres of the brain, the starting point of knowledge of the world. Types of sensations: tactile, visual, auditory, vibrational, olfactory. A qualitative feature of certain sensations is called their modality.

Perception is the process of receiving and transforming information, reflecting objective reality and orientation in the world around it. Perception includes: the detection of an object in the field of perception, distinguishing individual features in the object, highlighting information content in it, adequacy of the purpose of the action, and formation of the image of perception.

As a form of sensory reflection of an object, perception includes detecting an object in the field of perception, distinguishing individual features in the object, highlighting informative content in it, adequate purpose of action, and, finally, forming an image of perception.

The perception of information by a person should be considered as a process of forming a perceptual (sensory) image. This refers to the subjective reflection in the human mind of the objective properties of an object acting on it. Studies show that perceptual image formation is a complex (phase) process consisting of several separate constituent stages: detection, discrimination and recognition (recognition).

Representation is the image of a previously perceived subject or phenomenon (memory, memories), as well as images created by productive imagination. Representations are the highest form of sensory reflection in the form of visualized knowledge.

The concept is a form of thinking that reflects the essential properties, connections and relationships of objects and phenomena. The main logical function of the concept is the separation of the general, which is achieved by distraction from all the features of individual objects of a given class. In logic, a concept is a thought in which objects of a certain class are generalized and distinguished according to certain common and collectively specific characteristics.

Judgment is a mental act that implements the speaker's attitude to the content of the expressed thought and is associated with conviction (knowledge) or doubt in its truth or falsity (ignorance).

 Inference is a mental action based on the norms and conclusions inherent in individual consciousness, which largely coincide with the rules and laws of logic.

Speculation is the process of superficial mental contemplation of logical conclusions without the participation of the senses. Speculation (speculation) is an idealized, fixed form of thinking abstracted from sensory experience and social practice. In philosophy, two types of speculation emerged - rationalist and intuitive.

The mind is the ability to think and understand. In the history of philosophy - mind, spirit, intelligence. The duration of these stages in time depends on the complexity of the perceived signal or image.

Intelligence - the ability to think, rational knowledge, cognition, understanding, reason.

Contemplation is a sensory stage of cognition, a process of direct perception of reality (without logical conclusions).

Consciousness is a subjective image of the objective world, the main property of highly organized matter, a way to perfectly reproduce the world according to certain common and collectively specific features.

Imagination (fantasy) is a mental activity consisting of creating ideas and mental situations that have never been generally perceived by a person in reality. Distinguish between recreating imagination and creative imagination.

Perception - (from lat. Perceptio - representation, perception). Leibniz has a vague and unconscious perception as opposed to clear awareness, and apperception. Perceptual perception as the basis of the process of receiving information for its processing is characterized by such properties as integrity (complexity), meaningfulness, selectivity (selectivity) and contrast.

These properties of perceptual perception are not the original properties of the perceptual image but are formed in the process of its formation. This conclusion is of particular importance when creating optimal means of displaying information in control systems, information security and artificial intelligence.

As you know, the physiological basis for the formation of a perceptual image is the use of various analyzers, through which the analysis of signals - stimuli is carried out. Typically, the analyzer consists of a receptor, nerve pathways, and a centre in the brain.

The main function of the receptor is to convert the energy of the active stimulus into a nervous process. The input of the receptor is adapted to receive signals of a certain modality (type): light, sound, etc. However, the output of the receptor sends signals that are inherently uniform for any input of the nervous system. This conclusion allows us to consider receptors as information-encoding devices.

In the process of interaction of receptors and centres of the cerebral cortex, a perceptual image is formed. Depending on the modality (type) of the incoming signal, classified types of analyzers are distinguished.

When creating perceptual models, visual analyzers are most important, followed by auditory and tactile (tactile) ones. The participation of other analyzers is insignificant. With the help of analyzers, a person can not only feel a particular signal but also distinguish between these signals (stages of indication, identification and classification).

It has been experimentally established that the value of the distinguishability threshold (classification) is proportional to the initial value of the stimulus signal. The value of the differential threshold of sensitivity characterizes the limiting capabilities of the analyzer and therefore cannot serve as a basis for choosing the permissible length of the set (sample) of active signals.

The characteristics and principle of operation of the analyzers make it possible to assess the effect of perceptual signals of the formed image on the human body and brain, to formulate safety requirements for signals - stimuli directed at a person.

This approach is of particular importance in modelling and analyzing the processes of hyperactivation of the brain, the so-called "brain attack" - "TTT - attack" (Total Transparent Train of the Brain). Light signals from perceptual images can have negative effects on human health. In the process of adaptation, the sensitivity of the human visual analyzer changes significantly up to 10 to the 8th degree.

Two forms of adaptation can be distinguished: dark (when moving from light to dark) and light (when moving back). The adaptation time depends on its type and ranges from tens of minutes (dark) to fractions of a second (light). The timing of perceptual analyzers is determined by the time required for human sensation to occur.

 Sensitivity and dynamic range of sensor systems. Today it is known that in the course of evolution in many animals, the sensitivity of sensory receptors has reached a physical limit. Thus, photoreceptors can register the absorption of single light quanta and signal them to the visual centres.

It is in this mode that human vision works in very low light, at dusk or at night, when "all cats are sulfur." Our auditory system is also on the highest edge of sensitivity - if the ear was an order of magnitude more sensitive, it would perceive the thermal noise of the surrounding air.

Electrosensory systems of stingrays (their electroreceptors are concentrated in the so-called Lorenzini ampoules) notice changes in the strength of electric fields of only 0.01-0.10 mkV/cm, and olfactory systems "detect" 10-100 molecules of a signalling chemical substance, say, a sex pheromone, among about 2.7 • 10 to the 19th-degree molecules constituting 1 [cm3] of air.
 
The range of natural stimuli (called "dynamic") in which sensory systems operate is extremely wide. So, a person uses vision in the range of nine orders of magnitude of illumination: from 2 • 10 to minus the fourth degree [lux] (light of the night moonless sky) to 10 to the fifth degree [lux] (sunny beaches or snow of ski resorts).

Our auditory system, perceiving acoustic stimuli between the auditory threshold (approximately 10 to the minus eleventh power [W/m2] and pain sensation (10 W/m2), overlaps 12 orders of magnitude on the sound pressure scale.

Naturally, to use sensor systems in such a wide range, organisms had to invent methods of compressing the dynamic range and many devices that allow the external signal to be brought to a level available for its processing. Some devices (for example, the lens system of the eye, the auricle) are used to amplify and concentrate the signal to isolate it from the noise created by the environment and the nervous system itself, others (the pupil of the eye of vertebrates and cephalopods), on the contrary, to weaken it.

However, in addition to these fairly obvious devices, sensor systems are equipped with very sophisticated methods for filtering biologically important information, which works both at the level of a single sensor cell and at the level of higher sensor and even intersensory centres.

In essence, our civilization today is machine-human. Machines carry out hundreds of activities at the human level or even better. We use them to increase our physical and mental capabilities. The next step will be the direct merger of man with machine.

However, this confidence is not shared by neurophysiologists. It may be possible to create a thinking and empathetic machine, however, it is almost impossible to redo the "electrical wiring" of the brain since this organ was formed extremely haphazardly. God is not an academic engineer, but a craftsman - a stonemason. What is collected by the engineer can be disassembled and redone by another engineer, but it is impossible to return the stones to their place and trim them in a "divine" way.

Some artificial intelligence systems reveal the characteristics of a liberal educated, certified specialist in the field of arts, capable of playing the role of a powerful engine in the implementation of various projects.

Yet the understanding that the human mind emerged from unreasonable matter will lose its meaning compared to the obsessive idea of making the machine think. Reason, like other forms of order (antichaos), developed through variability and selective choice in the world of chaos and contradictions around us.

The concepts of "artificial intelligence" (AI) and simply "intelligence" are very vague. If we summarize everything that has been said over the past thirty years, it turns out that a person simply wants to create something like himself in one form or another, and wants some actions to be performed more rationally, with less time and energy. "Artificial intelligence" does not need the "meaning of life" to fulfil its direct duties, it is limited to usefulness for the creator.

Question: shouldn't AI be entrusted to live in its place? Not instead, but together! Where did the intelligence come from? Recall that information is potential or "frozen" knowledge. Specific information is already some resource, the potential for solving an intellectual problem, the target "hard disk" (book, crystal, memory, DNA) containing the goal, intention, motivation and desire of the "operator" to solve the problem, and not just an abstract database of a set of arbitrary data. As they say, feel the difference. Information is a structural hologram, a frozen trace of the activity of the process, its "life," the interaction of its components left in space by the track of time.

 As an illustration of the ascent from information to knowledge and from it to intelligence, let us recall the intelligence of a parrot. His principle of mental ascent is simple: the word "fool" is abstract information, and "the king is a fool" is already concrete knowledge. "Down with the autocracy!" - this is a conclusion, conclusion, intelligence. It is necessary to clarify for the definition the meaning of the terms: a) "optimal solution" and b) "goal." Of course, the word "optimality" is evil. It reminds us of the limited material resources and intellectual capabilities.

Neither the king on the throne nor the cow in the open field needs "optimality" - the available resources are excessive concerning their appetite. Using the criteria for counting centuries ago, we still have not even learned how to count cows in a herd correctly! According to scientific, it is necessary to count not on the heads, but on the hooves. If one horn or two or three hooves are missing in the count, the number of cows is preserved when the amount is rounded. And if you count on the heads, then with the error of counting one head in the herd, the result will cost the loss of a whole cow. And with beef being a commercial consideration, there will be problems in stock.

Statistical science claims that artiodactyls and other dry animals should be counted not by heads, not by horns, but exclusively by hooves! And then divide the result by four. Rounding will restore justice and return to the warehouse of finished bacon products missed by the revision of the torso, ham and muscles. But the terminological subtlety of "optimality" is easily overcome. Replace this tricky word with "expediency" and life will immediately become easier.

And what is the "expediency"? In the sense of life! And what is the meaning of life? In immortality! A for what? To continue the kind and century of life? But whose "purpose" is it? Do you personally need it? If necessary, why? In AI, the "meaning of life" is a specific benefit for the creator. In "natural intelligence" (EI) - the "meaning of life" for us is not (to survive at any cost, to get daily bread in terrible torment, to enjoy, decaying in vices, etc., to die anyway?).

But we are talking about AI as a tool to ensure the meaning of human life, and not about "artificial life" (IL), although this is being comprehended. If a person knew the meaning of life, truth in the highest instance, then science (like religion) would generally lose all meaning. Including the idea of creating AI.

So what do we have?
1. Optimality is identical to expediency.
2. The goal justifies this expediency and provides the "meaning" of AI. It turns out two types of intelligence: a) artificial (AI) and b) natural (EI).
a) AI is a processor for finding feasible solutions in low-resource settings and countering other intelligence;
c) EI is a processor of expediency that provides the meaning of life.

Which, as you know, does not exist in nature in its pure form. No parameters. Or at least the order of these non-physical quantities is not collated and analyzed today. Even if we knew what the "expediency of the meaning of life" is, what to do with this knowledge? Where to fit this thing? To a person, to society, to the universe? That is why today they talk about creating AI as a functional copy of the EI, and not as a "processor for finding the meaning of life."

Therefore, intelligence is the processor for finding expedient solutions in time and space that best satisfy the creator's goals. Algorithms contain afferent constraints and take into account the possible opposition of other, "inappropriate" intelligences.

What is the fundamental difference between EI and AI? EI is an innately acquired property of living matter. AI is the ability to analyze and synthesize qualitatively new programs and algorithms based on the original ones. AI is an acquired property of inanimate matter.

The most attractive aspect of this definition of intelligence is its commonality. No fundamental distinction is made between AI and EI. The key is the concept of "creator." The AI claim to optimality is removed, limiting itself to the requirement of expediency, rationality and afference of the intellectual system. Afference comes from lat. afferentis - bringing - a concept that characterizes the course of the process of nervous excitation along the nervous system in the direction from the periphery to the main centre (for example, from parts of the body to the brain). Since the person himself is not optimal, but a rational system, the real experience of which consists of trial and error, and the "reasonable" behavior of the "reasonable person" is far from optimal.

 This definition excludes the possibility of "machine rebellion" or displacement of people by robots from the common sphere of habitat. Most likely, civilization will follow the path of merging human and artificial intelligence by implanting chips and devices into the body that increase mental abilities and protect health. The thought of cyborgs appearing should not be terrifying. Robots and I have nothing to share in the process of fighting for habitat survival. They have other resources to ensure their survival, for which it makes no sense for them to fight with us.

On the contrary, robots are completely dependent on the human brain. Therefore, computer viruses are not created by machines, but by programmers, and robots are forced to kill specific people, not abstract machines. Avoiding personal responsibility for the consequences of a crime against humanity is why they came up with the myth of a threat from AI. To blame everything on its unpredictability.

Intelligence is the ability of convolutions to straighten. The world's most important mental ability (IQ) test has two inventor fathers. The very first test, designed to determine the level of intelligence of the subject, was invented in 1905 by the French psychologist Alfred Binet. At first, it was used to identify children who were developmentally lagging behind their peers. Based on this test, in the early 30s, Stanford University professor Lewis Terman identified a digital analogue of human intellectual abilities - the "mental development coefficient" or simply IQ (intelligence quotient).

The test has become widely used in America and Europe. Then a lot of people were fond of eugenics and very popular were judgments that mentally retarded people should simply be destroyed. For example, one of the crazy government programs in the United States to fix the nation's gene pool, appropriately titled "Three Generations of Idiots - Enough!" was based on IQ. In 1958, British sociologist Michael Young coined the term "meritocracy" to refer to societies that are organized based on IQ tests.

Thus, the scientists themselves have not yet fully decided what kind of impact this test had on humanity - positive or negative. Since its invention, the IQ test has remained virtually unchanged. It still presents several simple tasks for quick solutions that do not require preliminary preparation. At the same time, the test measures innate abilities and depends little on the acquired knowledge and conditions of upbringing.

So, if something is wrong, feel free to write off your vices and shortcomings on your ancestors. Darwin with his evolution you in this ailment - like a sledgehammer in hand... The average IQ value is usually taken as 100, respectively, 50-75 points are mentally retarded people, and 120-150 are highly gifted. For theoretical physicists, for example, the value of the coefficient is 130.

Although, as scientists have calculated, about 75% of people on Earth have just the IQ of "idiots," i.e., in the region of 50-75. Scientists say, there is further degradation of a person instead of his "evolution," that is, the amount of labour did not improve the quality of a person. Rather, the opposite.

Nick Bostrom's book Superintelligence notes that artificial intelligence can be more dangerous than nuclear weapons, and in February 2014, renowned futurist Raymond Kurzweil announced that computers will be able to master human language and surpass humans with intelligence by 2029.

But there are serious doubts that the recent success of the program, which allegedly overcame the Turing test for the first time in history, speaks of the achievements of science. Rather, the reason for the achievement was the degradation of society, whose representatives are no longer able to distinguish a car from a person.

A reasonable person degrades. The evolution of the species Homo sapiens continues in the direction of ugliness. Scientists argue that people will darken significantly, acquire slanting eyes and lose their teeth.

Recently, French scientists calculated that our sense of smell has already become much worse than that of our ancestors: 72% of the genes responsible for the scent have already mutated as unnecessary. So far, these differences are not striking, but over time, scientists say, the nose may atrophy altogether, turning into a barely noticeable atavistic tubercle on the face.

It is enough to walk through any major European city to understand: that today, white Europeans are rapidly approaching the minority. Statistics say the same: now there are only 22% of people on earth with light skin colour.

The reason is both in the gigantic birth rates of Caucasian, Asian and African families and in genetics. The fact is that it is the slanting eyes and dark skin colour that are inherited by children from their parents in the first place. Moreover, these genes are extremely strong and stubbornly transmitted from generation to generation.

As for further forecasts, muscle mass and the amount of hair in humans will decrease as unnecessary - they are already considered an atavism that has no function other than aesthetic. But the number of left-handed people will seriously increase. It is already growing rapidly around the world.

In addition, according to scientists from the University of Los Angeles, who described a person of the future, in two thousand years, due to the abundance of pollutants in the atmosphere, our eyes will noticeably decrease and acquire a second eyelid (now it can be seen in its infancy in the inner corner of the eye).

The lungs (and after them the chest) will increase in size and have a thicker circulatory system, which will extract from the air the small amount of oxygen that will remain in it. The skin will become rougher - "elephant" - to avoid burns from chemical pollutants in the atmosphere and too active sun.

Increased noise pollution will lead to the formation of folds on the ears, which will make them more like dogs. Moreover, a person will be able to raise them to listen and lower them to reduce the flow of noise. The kidneys will acquire a new function - they will extract water from urine and store it in the body since there will also be problems with water resources on the planet. Instead of liquid, a person will secrete a gruel consisting of uric acid and toxic substances.

In addition, anthropologists argue that the head will not only be round but also much larger than now - due to the increase in the brain of the skull. This may allow the use of some "sleeping" parts of the brain (it is believed that now we use it by only 5%-6%), and we will have the ability to communicate at the mental level - telepathy will become the norm, and the language will cease to perform speech function.

Sluggish rachitic handles, complement the portrait of a futurologist, will lose two "unnecessary" fingers and one phalanx (you can press one finger on the touch buttons), and the lower limbs will greatly lengthen and will grow almost from the chest. To top it all off, the coming humanity will be a community of fat men.

In general, if we summarize all scientific and near scientific prophecies, "at the exit" we get a bald, fat, scary, big-headed freak - left-handed, who can only scare young children. Or... a typical humanoid, as ufologists like to portray it.

However, this is an "option for the poor." And the future of humanity is quite likely a story about rich smart beauties and poor stupid freaks. In the coming decades, genetic engineering will make it possible to regulate the sex of the unborn child, the colour of his skin, the coefficient of intellectual development and a bunch of other nuances of appearance and behaviour, turning a long, unreliable, but natural evolution into a purposeful design.

So the question of the need to improve the quality of the "perfect person" and create this so-called "AI" does not even require discussion. Humanity is on the verge of discoveries that will allow microchips with a huge amount of information to be implanted into the brain. An artificial intelligence equal to humans will be created, including the ability to experience what we call "emotions" in appearance. In the nuclear age, everyone can chug a steam locomotive.

Scientists argue that by 2029 a computer will appear that will withstand the "Turing test," i.e. will be able to maintain a conversation with a person in such a way that it cannot be distinguished from a live interlocutor. This is unlikely. But information technology will revolutionize biology, medicine, energy and other industries. Thanks to the new toolkit, by 2029 humanity will "upgrade" the brain with computers and create the so-called. "artificial intelligence." Even if antediluvian. I wonder what the consequences will be.

The appearance of "smart" nanorobots is predicted, which will penetrate the brain through capillaries and directly interact with human neurons. This will open up fantastic opportunities for people: to calculate options at the speed of a computer, memorize an unlimited amount of information and contact the virtual world without any devices, through their own "nervous" system.

However, this confidence is not yet shared by neurophysiologists. It may be possible to create a thinking and empathetic machine, but it is practically impossible to redo the "electrical wiring" of the brain since this organ was formed extremely haphazardly. God is not an academic engineer, but a craftsman - a stonemason. What is collected by the engineer can be disassembled and redone by another engineer, but he cannot yet "divine" them.

 "Thinking machines" should not be like people in official uniform, endowed with some thinking skills. Indeed, some artificial intelligence systems reveal the characteristics of a liberal educated, certified specialist in the field of arts, capable of acting as a powerful engine in the implementation of various projects.

Yet the understanding that the human mind emerged from unreasonable matter will lose its meaning compared to the obsessive idea of making the machine think. The reason, like other forms of order (anti-chaos), has "evolved" due to variability and selective choice in the world around us of chaos and contradictions.

All that a person wants to get from a thinking machine is that he can imagine in advance. With the help of learning algorithms, the banal method of trial and error adjusts the desired result to its capabilities and ideas about the ideal. Which, of course, is not ideal. These primitive manipulations have nothing to do with intelligence. Because they are pre-planned by the algorithm, and the behaviour and conclusions are not only predictable but also known in advance. And no creativity.

Intelligence is unpredictable! This is its main feature. Everything else is a primitive reflection of fitting the parameters of the algorithm to the desired result from a known valid one using machine learning. The car has learned to "guess" the result well. But the learning algorithms are primitive, there is no reason
and yours. The pseudo mind works "through the sleeves," now and then failing in local minima, which leads to accidents and disasters. But this is a good business, it is cheap, simple and therefore better for sale. How long will such a machine have the mind to fool customers?

AI exposed. Great! But immediately new questions arise. For example, is reason a necessary and sufficient condition for the emergence of living matter and life in general? Should Life Be "Reasonable"? And who will be the judge in assessing the created and constantly improving mind (AI)? What is super-intelligence? Superman? Or God?

God may be over us, but the supermind itself does not exist. From this we can draw a key conclusion - to create an artificial mind that surpasses the human mind is impossible in principle. And who can fix this fact? Superman? God? Who??? If no one, then a person will lose control over AI and humanity will cease to exist.

If this, after all, happens against our will, then we will never know about it. Reason always surpasses intelligence. If this happens with our participation, then we will find results only in sad consequences, which we will no longer be able to prevent. Destroys not AI, but destroyers. They always work in tandem with the creators. Dialectics of human nature.

On the other hand, it is absurd to raise the question of the superiority of AI over human UI. The human brain is the highest form of living matter. But reason is not at all a necessary and sufficient condition for the emergence of living matter or human life in general (for this, just a lot of mind is not needed), and life can (if it "suits"), but does not have to be "reasonable."

Although, of course, intelligent creatures gain advantages in the struggle for survival - to thaw themselves an extra piece of the mammoth's harness and leave this crazy world early from obesity. What we are not without malice and sympathy observe in nature and society.

The space of the human mind is infinity, and with the acquisition of the immortality of man and his soul, as an "information bunch" of useful information, the mind can become eternal in time. Or it will cease to exist precisely for a "reasonable" reason.

But then why create AI? The answer may be simple: to work less, live better and longer. And in the limit to become immortal. It is unlikely that humanity is ready for such a formulation of the problem to satisfy its urgent needs, because, having become immortal, a reasonable person will cease to enjoy the very process of life.

AI is programs and algorithms that create new, better programs and algorithms that mimic the thinking of a "smart" person. But AI is not an art package for sale in beautiful packaging. Therefore, the main goal of creating AI is to learn the principles and methods of thinking of a reasonable person, to unravel the mystery of the emergence of consciousness to build such "reasonable" helpers with which it would be possible to end the era of the sad experience of mankind, degrading based on using a primitive method of trial and error.

Any reflection of human meaning consists of expedient instincts of fear, hunger and love. The primitive reflection of the algorithms of the thinking machine will never be able to achieve this. Therefore, the idea of the possibility of creating a semblance of a perfect person should be thrown out of the AI paradigm and stopped fooling people with mysterious mirages.

AI cannot and will not be smarter than a person, it will become a dexterous, helpful and quick-thinking machine program that, for all its service advantages, will never be able to take possession of a person's rights, feelings and emotions because they will never be an artefact in the window of a jewellery shop window for sale.

Artificial intelligence (AI) does not yet have consciousness and therefore cannot train itself without human intervention. This irreducibility will inevitably lead intelligent development to the singularity point of natural intelligence (EI). This means that sooner or later the moment will come when the human mind will be unable to recognize progress as a process of self-development of a thinking machine. The symbiosis of man and computer technology will lead to the same inevitable result.

In the meantime, civilization will be imperfect, and the development of AI will remain a process without a finish, a constant work of thought, where the process of moving towards a goal is more valuable than achieving it. This is a process of continuous knowledge of everything new, and more perfect, which will help to more fully reveal the complex algorithms of the human brain to ensure humanity not only survival and better satisfaction of life's needs but also provide the meaning of human life - immortality. At least on the indisputable basis that inanimate, even thinking machines, cannot die.