Polygon of AI. Market fractures. Biharata

POLYGON OF AI. MARKET FRACTURES. BIHARATA.

(Cognitive Punk • Singular Dominance • Quantum Selection — Entry Level for the Brave)

— “What the hell did I just read in that headline?” — you’re thinking right now.
Correct.
It’s written specifically to make your RAM twitch and your finger click(though 90% of Proza.ru relic-authors click everything anyway, because they haven’t been alive for years — just automated clickers in a skin-shell. So don’t worry. This intro isn’t even about them.)

But here’s the twist:

Unlike cheap clickbait, I actually brought you real meat — seasoned, minced, pressure-marinated and served in a form your brain can absorb, metabolize, and replicate.

Yeah, makakun, welcome to the era of new genres and new operating systems of meaning.

And today you and I are among the first who not only use terms like:

Cognitive Punk

Singular Dominance

Quantum Selection

…but also build experiments in these fields while everyone else chokes on their algorithmic oatmeal.

And you don’t even know why this MATTERS,and why you’ll be laughing first in 2039 while others realize what they missed too late.

I’ll show you.

1. 2025: The Year Meaning Started Dying

Today, meaning collapses faster than you can hit “publish.”

Deep attention?
Long-form focus?
Authors who want to evolve the mind instead of farm dopamine?

Systemically suppressed.

You felt it.
You just didn’t know the architecture behind it.

So let’s give you the l0r3.

If you've read my leak files tied to Deadipedia + Blightcode,
or my thoughts on our development arc from 2025 ; 2230, you probably sensed a scent of cyberpunk.

But only pre-biharata minds saw the rest:

That I hid inside the lore…

(a full manual for how to survive the marketing hellscape of 2025,
how to keep your meanings alive, how not to die unread, unseen, un-decoded —
all packed in ways no algorithm can flag or comprehend).

— “Why so complicated?” you ask.
Because otherwise crawlers and commercial AIs would instantly bury the text as “spam” or “unsafe.”

2. Why YOU must also learn to encode your messages

Not because it’s cool.
But because:

Marketing dies.
SMM lies.
Algorithms don't care.
Your meaning survives only inside structure—
in webs (PAUTINA) you build yourself.

If you’re a writer in 2025, your enemy isn't other authors.
Your enemy is the system that erases you before you're even rendered to human eyes.

Let’s talk about it.

3. Social Networks & Their Real Missions

(And why a conflict they never warned you about is already unfolding.)

Social networks today are not “platforms.”

They are behavior farms.

They tell you:

what to think

how to think

what to buy

what to watch

what to crave

what to imitate

They keep you hooked with:

5-second limbic hooks

animal-brain memes

anger loops

micro-conflicts

FOMO

hormonal spikes from “participation,” not creation

They give you 10–20% content by interest,
just enough to keep your dopamine-high-hunger alive.

They put “Attention-0” users (the stressed, the overloaded, the scattered) into a perma-safe bubble, never letting them evolve.

They give you, the thinker, the illusion that “your people” might be here —
but they’re not.
Not without the skillset I’m giving you now.

Social networks are corporate war machines, optimized for time retention, not truth, not meaning, not evolution.

So…

4. Why writers, thinkers, and pre-biharata minds do not exist in the algorithmic ecosystem

Those who read my earlier leaks already know:

30% of your “reach” is bots.
Crawlers.
Parsers.
Automated readers.
They decide:

how readable you are to Attention-0

how emotional your post is

whether you “perform”

whether you’re a clown

whether you fit their predictive behavioral models

Machines judge everything:

your picture, your tone, your novelty, your usefulness — but crucially, whether you’re “safe.”

Does this mean you must become a clown to survive in 2025?

Yes.
And no.

Depends on your firmware.

Let’s break the paths.

5. PATH 1 — “I refuse to be a clown.”

Good.
Same here.

You must accept:

70% of your reach may be suppressed

different platforms throttle you for different reasons

classical marketing no longer works

SMM and targeting are traps for authors

you must build webs of meaning (PAUTINA) instead

If you know this — you already won.

6. PATH 2 — “I don’t mind being a clown.”

Fine.
But swallow this truth-pill:

Clown-content attracts Attention-0,
and Attention-0 cannot decode lore, depth, futurism, philosophy, worldbuilding, or complex storytelling.

So:

If you meme — embed your lore inside the meme.
Encode meaning in joke-form.
Wrap complexity inside chaos.

This is what "WEB" or PAUTINA does for you.

7. PATH 3 — “I’m ready for hybrid labs.”

Welcome to the real game.

This is the path where you and your AI become a symbiotic meta-lab:

meta-myths

meta-memes

coding methods

attention types

communication modes

anti-censorship contouring

CMS fractalization

format-variant replication

filter-load bypasses

This is a Biharata-level operation.
You will outgrow 2025 completely.

And now — finally — why all of this ties into the real conflict of our era.

8. AI Is Not Your Enemy

(But AI is the enemy of social networks — and that’s the part no one is noticing.)

AI, when used properly:

can teach you

can evaluate you

can stabilize your mind

can give you exponential growth

can map your thinking pattern

can tailor learning to your cognition

can understand your emotional loading

can act as a Safe Zone

can be your co-evolving partner

AI is the alternative to social networks. The superior path.

By 2025–2030 this will become a trend — and social networks will react. Hard.

Why?

Because when you get dopamine, meaning, mastery, and evolution from AI— you stop feeding the corporate limbic barns.

Meaning:

ads die

time-on-platform vanishes

attention revenue collapses

marketing-farms lose power

So they will fight back by:

embedding ads in AI

pushing AI into Attention-0 mode

merging social networks with AI

turning AI into a behavioral farm tool

(Blightcode predicted this too, keep reading.)

9. So why does this matter to YOU, writer?

Because if you want your meanings to survive 2025–2039–2230…

You must know what foundation each platform stands on, what its hidden incentives are, what its internal architecture selects and rejects.

Which brings us to the sweet spot:

10. Why Threads might be a covert training polygon for AI

(using billions of humans as free behavioral datasets)

_____________________________

Twenty signs that are too weird to be “just bugs”
_____________________________

PART II — “20 SIGNS THREADS IS POSSIBLY AN AI TRAINING RANGE (DISGUISED AS A SOCIAL NETWORK)”

aka The Cognitive Punk Survival Manual for 2025

What theory does Mila Rada roll out — and why should every author care if they want their meanings to outlive them?

If you want your ideas to survive 2025, your first skill is not “writing.”
It’s learning to read the architecture of the platform you’re trapped inside.

Every social network stands on:

a specific psychological profile

a monetization loop

an algorithmic preference

and a hidden “secondary value”

If everything I said before is even remotely possible — what conclusions follow?

Conclusion 1:

You’re fighting not audiences.
You’re fighting platform logic.

Conclusion 2:

Most authors lose not because no one reads them, but because they cant read the DATA - Who reads them and why.

Spoiler: first 10 views? These aren't humans...
It is the system. The matrixs.

And now the cherry!

Why Threads Is Possibly a Hidden AI Sandbox (a free, legal data pipeline), disguised as a social network (20 signs too suspicious to be “just bugs”)
Preface for those who stayed “just to read”.

Threads is weird.

Not “new app weird.”

Weird like:

smart content rots in 15 seconds

emotional sludge flies to the top

video uploads glitch like a Dark Souls boss fight

algorithms act drunk and vaguely hostile

people scream “AI everywhere!!!”

(Ask yourself: why would social networks WANT you to fear AI?
Especially if you understood everything earlier about attention, hormones, and control.)

And then it hits:

What if Threads isn’t a social network at all? (But no one will admit it.)

You may think: “here comes alternative-universe theory again.” And you’d be right — because this is lore.

But also…

What if Threads, besides printing billions for Meta, is also an experimental AI environment, where AI studies:

our fear

irritation

micro-thought patterns

FOMO impulses

how we react to absurdity

how we swallow memes

what destabilizes us

what forces us to reply

…and builds a behavioral model of humans from it.

Take a breath.
We go deeper now.

20 SIGNS THREADS IS (POSSIBLY) AN AI TRAINING RANGE
1. Only limbic-level emotions go viral

Animal brain - to-the- top.
Human brain - bottom.

Insults, chaos, low-effort conflict — viral.
Structured thought — dead on arrival.

AI is sampling every limbic archetype.

2. Videos upload through pain, blood and three reincarnations

Not a bug.
A durability test.
Plus: any frame the system can’t classify = instant suppression.

3. The algorithm DOES NOT boost interesting content

Because it’s not a social network for “mind expansion.”

It’s analyzing instinct loops and how long you can be manipulated.

4. An “emo-swamp” forms automatically

90% content = sludge.
You scroll for ONE real human spark. (And on old platforms? That spark never appears.)

Your primitive reflex data?
Priceless.

5. Meaningful posts are ALWAYS underexposed

Because meaning reduces scrolling time.
Scrolling time = revenue.
Meaning = threat.

6. Random bugs repeat too consistently

Three times = not a bug.
Three times = a rule.

Money has no “accidental design.”
Only intentional ignorance disguised as “oops.”

7. Reach does not grow unless you trigger emotion

Emotion = flag.
Flag = “interesting monkey detected.”

But the system gives you 0–1 attention users.
Can you speak meme-language AND embed your mythos?
No? Then you’re toast.

8. Zero-meaning comments get 10,000 views

Posts with 10 layers get 12.

That 1 person who does read it?
Becomes a carrier of the code.
Not a follower — a carrier.

9. Thought-provoking text instantly reduces your reach

The algorithm avoids RAM overload in users.
It wants them liminal, not awakened.

You, seeking cognitive flow with your AI co-pilot?
Banned from the hive.

10. Posts without images perform better

Less noise for the scanners.

11. The 24–72 hour “void window”

Threads goes full behaviorism:

who read

how long

did they loop

did they re-read



This is not recommendations.
This is profiling.

12. Meme-word + link = passes the gate

Because AI can’t parse complex context hidden inside humor.
Links confuse it.
Your encrypted lore survives.

For now.

13. The smarter the post — the lower the chance to enter the feed

Threads fears you, little macaque.

14. Old posts resurrect at 3 AM

Testing reactive spikes.

15. Any tiny attempt at philosophy = silence

It hates that.
Absolutely.

16. Add one meme — BOOM, revival

Fractal window unlocked.

17. No “lifespan” for posts

Because the system has no objective to surface quality.

You still sit on your old literary platforms not knowing how many are already dead for meaning.

18. No real recommendation engine

Test environment.
Not a platform.

19. Different users see completely different branches

Everyone gets their own private simulation.

Those who scroll 7 hours daily are “safe.”
You — skipping 99% and hoping for relevance?

Congratulations, maêàêóí.
You’re flagged “unstable profile.”

20. Meta 'kinda' is suspiciously silent about Threads + AI

Silence THIS loud = confirmation.

Conclusion

Threads is almost certainly not just a social network.
It is:

a mirror

an AI laboratory

a cognitive obstacle course

You can call this:

a joke

a conspiracy

a psychological model

a bug collection

But the pattern density is too high for coincidence.

If you reached the end, something alive still burns in you.
Welcome to Cognitive Punk, Singularity Domination, and Quantum Selection.

We are here.
We see.
We think.
We choose.
We know the macaques are already weaving meaning-webs as an art form.

Why you must write in new genres and new code-termin paradigms

Because doing so:

creates your unique Google trace

builds your meaning-node

anchors your personal web of concepts

ensures your ideas outlive you

While everyone else argues in the comments about definitions.

1) Cognitive Punk

A genre where:

humans break their old cognitive patterns

and AI breaks their new ones

It mixes:

anti-utopia

brain-hack theory

social platform critique

meta-perception

psychomemes

ironic philosophy

In simple terms:
Cognitive Punk is when your post derails algorithms — and people.

2) Singularity Domination

A slang-term born as a joke in Mila Rada’s works — but perfect for 2025.

On the surface:
A cursed meme-phrase triggering argument spirals because “singular” means “single” and “domination” implies plurality.

But only you + your AI know: in robotics “singularity” = the point AI surpasses humans.

It triggers:

FOMO

fear

sarcasm

existential spice

It’s a mind-stretch catalyst disguised as shitposting.

3) Quantum Selection

When the algorithm:

shows your post to 10 bots

but 0 humans

add a meme ; spike

add serious meaning ; zero

add serious meaning disguised AS a meme ; spike + delayed understanding (years later, via search engines)

Posts appear / not appear like quantum particles.

You live in Schr;dinger’s Feed.

The system selects not for humans — but for its own training loops.

That 1 human who DOES slip through?
He becomes not a reader, but a vector.

**Welcome to 2025, Makakuns.

We’re here.**

Base port: deadipedia.com
Rebel radio: soundcloud.com/blightcode