Vladimir Lermontov
August 2026
Russia
MISSION-FUTURE PLUS
CHARGING WITH A DREAM!
It is known that "there is nothing in the world more powerful than
an idea whose time has come."
But Russia is not only a state and a civilization.
Russia in the metaphysical, higher dimension is an Idea,
An idea whose time has come to change the course of history, to become a launching pad for humanity's breakthrough into a brighter future - "Future Plus".
FOUR VIRTUAL, HYPOTHETICAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES
Participants of our time: Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, Narendra Modi, Antonio Guterres, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, leading Russian experts: Alexander Prokhanov, Vardan Baghdasaryan, Sergey Pereslegin, Alexander Dugin, representatives of the Indian and Chinese intellectual elite.
Participants of the spiritual dimension: Krishna, Buddha, Confucius, Lao Tzu, Vladimir Lenin, Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, Swami Vivekananda, Krishnamurti, Sathya Sai Baba, Vedavyas, Elena Ivanovna Roerich, Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich, Sri Aurobindo, Mother (Mirra Alfassa Richard), Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, Vladimir Vernadsky,Nikolai Fedorov, Osho, Vanga, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce.
GUIDE FOR RULERS, BUSINESSMEN,
ARCHITECTS OF THE GLOBAL FUTURE PLUS.
The Future Plus mission provides a revolutionary perspective on creating a new world Truth order. In the center of the story is the concept of "Pravdaria", a unique experimental project that combines spiritual, social and technological aspects of human development.
This book is a powerful manifesto for the new age, where dreams become reality and reality is transformed by the power of collective intent. It reveals to humanity an amazing picture of the future, in which each person can become the creator of their own destiny and the architect of the world.
This book is not a utopia, but a concrete plan of action for creating an alternative model of the future, where everyone can become part of the global creative process.
Here you will find not only inspiring ideas, but also specific tools for creating a brighter tomorrow. This is not just a book — it is a guide on the road to the future, where every step is filled with meaning, and every decision leads to the transformation of the world.
A journey through the edges of the possible.
In its pages, the grandiose project "Pravdaria" comes to life — not just a utopian dream, but a detailed model of the future, where:
- Spiritual values determine the development of technology
- Creativity becomes the basis of progress
- Unity does not suppress individuality, but reveals it
- Competition gives way to co-creation
Voice of the Age of Change
The author leads the reader on the path of great discoveries:
- From idea to practical implementation
- From personal commitment to collective action
- From a dream to creating real projects
- From theory to the formation of a new civilization
For those who are ready
This book is a call to action for:
- Dreamers who have not lost faith in a better future
- Creators who are ready to change the world
- Leaders who strive for genuine creativity
- Explorers of new horizons of the human spirit
- Everyone who hears the call of the future and is ready to answer it
And the main uniqueness of the book is that the moderators of the Future plus are: sages of the past, rulers, futurologists, philosophers, businessmen of the present. This book is a direct embodiment of the "AI - serves Dharma" principle.
A unique creation of the era
This is not just a book-it is a "living dialogue" between eternity and modernity, where the wisdom of millennia meets the providence of our days. For the first time in human history, the voices of great thinkers of the past and outstanding leaders of the present have come together under one cover.
At the heart of the book
Here, as if in outer space, intertwine:
- Ancient wisdom - from Krishna to Confucius
- Insight of contemporaries-from world leaders to outstanding entrepreneurs
- The vision of philosophers-from spiritual teachers to futurologists
- Entrepreneurial spirit-frominnovators to creators of the future
Special features of the approach
In this book, artificial intelligence becomes not just a tool, but a faithful assistant in serving the highest ideals of humanity. It helps you:
- Connect disparate ideas into a single picture of the future
- Find unexpected connections between ancient teachings and modern technologies
- Create a space for dialogue between the past and the future
Traveling through Time
This book is a "bridge between epochs" where every reader can:
- Touch the wisdom of great teachers
- Hear the voices of modern leaders
- Become a part of the global project of the future
- Contribute to the creation of a new world
The advantage of virtual, hypothetical conferences for modeling the semantic core of the future.
Hypothetical conferences are not an alternative to live dialogue, but rather its necessary prologue. It is a laboratory where ideas are ethically and logically tested before being released into the world. In an age when technology is capable of changing the very nature of a person, it is this format that allows you to keep the semantic core and prevent the future from becoming an accidental byproduct of other people's decisions.
Discover the unique opportunity to witness and participate in the birth of a new era, where past and present, wisdom and innovation, traditions and technologies merge into a single whole for the common future of humanity.
AI SERVES THE DHARMA
The conference is modeled using AI
FOUR VIRTUAL, HYPOTHETICAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES "MISSION: FUTURE PLUS-CHARGING WITH A DREAM".
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
introduction
Pravdaria
Charging with a dream. Mission for the Future
Hypothetically, the advertising booklet
1. FIRST VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
PRAVDARIA-THE FUTURE PLUS
Report by Vladimir Lermontov 13
Greetings from participants. …………………………………….…………..…………………..…………...18
Discussion on the topic "Man of the Future 38
Dialogue between Vladimir Lermontov and Peter Thiel on the future plus............................................. 63
2. THE SECOND VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE " TECHNOBUDISM AGAINST TECHNOFASCISM. AI SERVES THE DHARMA"
1. The advantage of virtual, hypothetical conferences
for modeling the semantic core of the
2. Report of V. Lermontov.Technobudism vs technofascism: Two
future scenarios: control or awakening? What vector should we set for the technologies? …………………………………………………………………..……………………………. 106
3.
3. THIRD VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
CATHEDRAL OF THE ENLIGHTENED: MISSION-FUTURE PLUS.
"NUCLEAR PHILOSOPHY-DHARMAPOLITICS-TECHNOBUDISM –
Participants: Krishna, Buddha, Confucius, Lao Tzu, Vladimir Lenin, Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, Swami Vivekananda, Krishnamurti, Sathya Sai Baba, Vedavyas, Elena Ivanovna Roerich, Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich, Sri Aurobindo, Mother (Mirra Alfassa Richard), Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, Vladimir Vernadsky, Nikolai Fedorov, Osho, Vanga, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce.
4. THE FOURTH, FINAL VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE.
GREAT UNITY CATHEDRAL "AHAM"
MISSION: FUTURE PLUS-CHARGING WITH A DREAM......................................144
Participants of the spiritual dimension: Krishna, Buddha, Confucius, Lao Tzu, Vladimir Lenin, Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, Swami Vivekananda, Krishnamurti, Sathya Sai Baba, Vedavyas, Elena Ivanovna Roerich, Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich, Sri Aurobindo, Mother (Mirra Alfassa Richard), Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, Vladimir Vernadsky,Nikolai Fedorov, Osho, Vanga, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce.
Participants of our time: Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, Narendra Modi, Antonio Guterres, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, leading Russian experts: Alexander Prokhanov, Vardan Baghdasaryan, Sergey Pereslegin, Alexander Dugin, representatives of the Indian and Chinese intellectual elite.
5.MESSAGE TO AVATARS OF TECHNOLOGY AND SPACE:
To Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and Peter Thiel.………………………………………166
6.RUSSIA: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE PLUS
1. The Mahabharata of our time - The Mahabharata 2.0.........................................………170
2. "Putin is the Arjuna of our
3. Mission-The Future plus-Mission of
PRAVDARIA PROJECT: A MODEL OF THE FUTURE SOCIETY PLUS
Project concept
The Pravdaria project is a unique model of the future civilization, where all spheres of human life (technology, architecture, art, culture, science, economy, AI, etc.)are built on the foundation of eternal spiritual values. It is not just a territory or a city — it is a complete system that combines advanced technologies with deep moral principles.
Switzerland is a model of the society of the future, in which ethics, technology and culture form a single system. The project is conceived as a pilot platform for developing new forms of international cooperation, intercultural dialogue, and value-based social engineering.
The Pravdaria project offers its own path, model, and way to reduce the risks of a global catastrophe, including a nuclear one, but focuses not on technical barriers, but on changing consciousness and international relations.
The current state of the world can be described as an era of "false reality" — when people live in a surrogate environment (ERSATZ HABITAT), where empty forms displace authentic content, and this leads to spiritual degradation and, as a result, to increased risks, including military ones. The goal is to overcome this era, establish spiritual and moral values and lay the foundation for a just, multipolar world. The political component here is closely intertwined with the spiritual: the new world "truth order" should be based on the priority of the spiritual over the material.
Structure and device
Territorial organization. The spatial organization of "Pravdarii" is based on a clear territorial scheme. The core of the future "dawn civilization" should be Western Siberia and the Altai — as a symbolic "middle" space that can serve as a civilizational bridge between East and West. From this center, eight provinces ("lotus petals") diverge, in each of which it is planned to place 12 settlements. Transport connectivity is provided by a high-speed railway connecting all settlements with the center.
Òåõíîëîãè÷åñêàÿ áàçàThe project's technological base includes: the use of advanced environmentally friendly technologies, modular construction, integration of modern developments in the field of AI, creation of autonomous residential and public spaces, development of ethical artificial intelligence algorithms, and introduction of technologies that serve the spiritual development of a person.
Architectural space. Designing buildings with spiritual needs in mind, creating harmonious urban spaces, integrating architecture with the natural environment.
Territorial content
It is planned to create on the territory of Pravdaria:
• Intelligent laboratories for scientific research
• Creative workshops and art spaces
• Educational clusters
• Sports and leisure facilities
• Public spacesfor communication purposesÿ êîììóíèêàöèè
• Social spacesforself-discovery and self-development
• Settlements
Spiritual and ethical foundations
- The key bet in Pravdaria is on values. It is based on the principle of "ONE TRUTH — ONE WAY". Consolidation of different countries and cultures around a single system of values and worldview. The idea is that shared, deep spiritual and moral guidelines will reduce the level of mutual misunderstanding and confrontation that often underlie conflicts. At the same time, the project is conceived as a global one: it invites people from different countries (America, Canada, India, China and others) to build a new world order together.
- The central mechanism of transformation of society is the formation of "DHARMAELITA" (or "Aham") — a new type of elite, whose consciousness is based on the principles of truth, harmony and the common good. It is such people who should become the driving force and lead humanity to a brighter future.
To cultivate such an elite, thinkers, philosophers, programmers, poets, musicians, artists and other creators are invited to Switzerland to visualize and verbalize the image of a bright future through art and science.
The logic of "soft power" works here: influence is built not through coercion, but through the attractiveness of values, culture and ideas.
- Performing a monthly practice on the days of World Spiritual Unity on the 15th of each month as a basis for the formation of a new consciousness. On this day, people of different traditions pray for the salvation of the world and the spiritual transformation of humanity.
International dimension.
The project is global in nature and is open for participation of representatives from different countries. Main areas of international cooperation:
• The project calls for the unification of key powers-Russia, India, China, and the United States-to work together on a new, more stable world order.
• Creating horizontal links between communities
• Development of joint cultural and scientific programs
• Forming a permanent interaction network
Pravdaria is conceived as the foundation stone of a new era-not as a country that will impose its will, but as a space where a different type of interaction is developed and demonstrated:
Transition from competition to co-creation. Instead of fighting for resources and dominance — it is a search for synergy, when the strength of each region, culture, and people is not suppressed, but finds its place in the overall project.
Spiritual and moral standard as "glue". The project focuses on values that should become a common language: truth, duty, charity, responsibility. It is assumed that it is on this basis that agreements can be reached even where political interests collide.
Spatial model as a prototype. The idea of the core (Western Siberia, Altai) and the "lotus petals" is an attempt to show not an abstract utopia, but a very concrete scheme: how you can physically organize space so that it works as an assembly point. High-speed communications, clusters for education and culture, settlements designed for a new type of relationship — all this should be a" living laboratory " of the future.
Global invitation, not isolation. The project is specifically positioned as an open one: people from different countries are invited to join it to build a new world order together. In other words, it is not a "fortress for itsown people", but a platform for dialogue.
"Break the wave" not by force, but by meaning. The idea is to contrast the logic of military and economic domination with the logic of"truth as the basis of order." That is, not to respond to aggression in the same coin, but to offer a system of values and a model of society that will be so attractive that it will become an alternative to the very logic of confrontation.
Russia as an "assembly point". In this picture, Russia does not just defend itself, but takes on the role of initiator of a new world project: not "we are against everyone", but "we offer everyone a new home". Hence the invitation of people from different countries, and the idea ofäõàðìàýëèòû" dharmaelita — - people who can lead not by coercion, but by example.
"Planetary workshop of creativity". Pravdaria is positioned as the "Russian CERN" - that is, a place of synthesis of science, art and spirituality, where common projects are created. This is the mechanism of "co-creation": collaborative research and cultural programs that build trust over political barriers.
Horizontal networks instead of just vertical diplomacy. Not only meetings of leaders are important, but also constant connections between communities: volunteer camps, educational projects, scientific collaborationswhere people from different countries work side by side.
Development prospects
Pravdaria is designed to become:
• A model of harmonious coexistence of man and nature
• The center of spiritual rebirth of humanity
• Planetary Workshop of Creativity and Creation
• An example of integrating technology and moral values
• A space for the realization of human potential
This civilization of the future demonstrates how to build a society where technological progress and spiritual development go hand in hand, creating conditions for the full disclosure of each person's personality.
CHARGING WITH A DREAM
MISSION FOR THE FUTURE PLUS
MISSION FUTURE+
Fueled by Dreams
Öåëü Mission Objective
1. Russia needs to offer the world a project of a global future: the ethical, socio-cultural and technological project of the century - "Pravdaria", as a common cause, as a planetary dream, as an image of a single, universal bright future, which should be created in the union of creators of all countries.
2. Show the world, especially the world's youth, the true Face of Russia, its intention-to live in co-creation, creation, harmony with the whole world.
3. Show humanity the Path to a Brighter Future and call on the creators of all countries to unite in collective work to create Their own Future.
4. Block the world wave of division, degradation, aggression-A Wave of Soft Power-Creation, Design, Implementation of The Dawn Civilization.
5. Broadcast the idea that if we ourselves are the Creators of the World, do not create Our own Bright Future for ourselves, then we will have to live in someone else's world, in which joy, happiness, harmony are not provided.
Strategy and plan for spreading the idea of building the Dawn Civilization in eastern Russia under the name - "Pravdaria", as an integral planetary center of creativity, culture, technology, a Martian settlement on earth:
1. Create an initiative working group in Russia called MISSION FUTURE+Fueled by Fueled by Dreams
2. Create a project presentation to present it to the world.
3. Start broadcasting and demonstrating the ideas of Truthfulness through social networks.
4. Invite the Rulers of the superpowers: Russia, India, China, and the United States to be honorary Chairmen of the New Dawn Civilization.
5. Hold foundation conferences in turn: in Russia, India, China, the United States and other countries-civilizations, where you can meet young people, students, and creative intelligentsia live and talk about the project.
6. Creators who will be inspired by the Project of the Century of Pravdaria will organize Creative Workshops on the ground, in their own countries, in teams where they will develop technological, social, creative projects, a plan for building Pravdaria - the Civilization of Dawn.
7. These Creative Workshops become ethical, socio-cultural and technological Puzzles of the new Dawn Civilization, which will then form a single Model-an Attractor of a Bright Future.
Hypothetical advertising booklet of the Pravdaria project
What is a"Crash"?
An innovative platform for creative people where everyone can:
• Implement your own projects
• Communicate with like-minded people
• Participate in creating the future
• Get support for your ideas
How do I become a part of Pravdaria ?
Easy way to participate:
1. Send a request with a description of your creative achievements
2. Attach a portfolio of your work
3. Get an invitation for the first month of your stay
4. Renew your participation based on the results of your work
What is waiting for you in FC Bayern?
A rich program of daily activities:
• Master classes from leading experts
• Creative workshops
• Innovation labs
• Presentation platforms
• Educational seminars
• Practical trainings
Unique benefits
Open format:
• Full transparency of all processes
• Live broadcasts 24/7
• Possibility of remote participation
• Global community of Creators
• Real-time experience sharing
Development opportunities
Comprehensive support:
• Working on your own projects
• Participation in collective initiatives
• Mentor support
• Access to the latest technologies
• International recognition
Join the community!
Pravdaria means:
• A place where dreams become reality
• Space for free creativity
• Platform for international cooperation
• A chance to change the world for the better
• An opportunity to become a part of history
The idea of "Pravdaria" has a significant potential and can become a successful project if it is implemented correctly and solves technical, financial and managerial issues. The concept responds to the current needs of society and has the ability to scale.
Become a part of the global creative movement!
Submit your application right now and get a chance to change the world with us
FIRST VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE "PRAVDARIA-THE FUTURE PLUS"
Part 1
CONFERENCE ORGANIZER'S REPORT
VLADIMIR LERMONTOV:
"NUCLEAR PHILOSOPHY, ETHICS and YOGA -
AS A SUPPORTING STRUCTURE OF THE FUTURE PLUS"
Dear colleagues, experts, thinkers and creators of different countries and traditions,
We live in an era of existential explosions, when disunity, distrust, substitution of meanings and total lies become the most dangerous force that destroys the world, destroying a person created in the image and likeness of God. In these conditions, only technologies and contracts are not enough: we need an unbreakable center — the core around which we can build the future. We call it "Nuclear Philosophy, Ethics of the Future". "Nuclear" here is not about destruction, but about Unity – Unity, about the Core that remains unchanged and holds the whole, an unbreakable center of values, around which a bright, just future is built.
The world, humanity has entered an ERA of RIGID CONNECTIVITY, when every country, civilization, macro-region, center of power is rigidly connected to everyone: a common economy, a common information space, one standard of lifestyle.
Attempts to create" old-fashioned " happiness and prosperity in a single country are doomed to failure.
Superpowers, like mountain climbers, each climb to their own peak of happiness. But now humanity has one for all – the peak and the abyss are also the same.
Superpower climbers are bound by a rigid ligament that cannot be cut. So you can only be understood to the general happiness and everyone will have to fall into the common abyss.
For ultra-globalists, an unprecedented opportunity has opened up - to bring down all of humanity at once, and humanity has an unprecedented task-to overcome the global crisis pass in one bundle and together inherit "a new heaven and a new earth inhabited by Truth".
Dark destructive forces have challenged all of humanity,
A global challenge requires a global response,
We need a new nuclear ideology, nuclear ethics, a nuclear yoga of great unity, a nuclear world project.
We see two polar development scenarios. One leads to a widening gap: technology increases the power of algorithms and corporations, people become a resource, and ethics become an option. The other is what we call "nuclear ethics": here, technology serves to retain the human, not replace it. It is this second way that we propose as an alternative.
In our dialogue with modernity, we turn to thoughts that highlight this fork in the road. Peter Thiel (and more broadly, technocratic discourse) often relies on the fact that progress itself will solve problems, and ethics can be "sewn" into code or delegated to systems. Karl Jaspers, thinking about the "axial time", was looking not just for a technological breakthrough, but for a spiritual shift — a moment when a person consciously sets higher goals for himself and realizes his limits. We take an important lesson from this dialogueâàæíîå: you can't wait for technology to create values; you need to consciously build the ethical framework in which technology works.
Our scenario is a response to the challenge of time. He does not deny the technological breakthrough, but raises the question: what is it for? Does not accelerated progress replace the ability of humanity to reflect? We choose a path where the strength is in the density of intention, not in the volume of pressure; where what the system considers "impractical" today (conscience, slow creation, dialogue of traditions), tomorrow becomes the only support that can hold the whole.
Nuclear philosophy is not a reference to nuclear physics or weapons, but a metaphor for an extremely concentrated, stable and powerful ethical core around which a future society of truth and justice can be built.
Nuclear philosophy - the ethical core of the future, the practice of the future
for a small person with a big heart, in which the fire of truth-truth, justice-burns.
Today's crises are a crisis of consciousness: we solve systemic problems with tools designed for local tasks. Nuclear philosophy offers a different approach: it starts with an internal shift and extends to external management.
Nuclear philosophy:
1. it is based on the core of thousands of years of wisdom and traditions of mankind,
2. manifests itself in the form of Nuclear Ethics, which is based on two foundations: Truth and collective prayer in the days of world spiritual unity (Truth is Wisdom, stone, Prayer is Tradition, water)
3. replaces the policy of interests-geopolitics, Dharmapolitics – the policy of Higher Wisdom, the policy of duty, truth, responsibility, justice,
4. offers the ethical, technological, social and creative Megaproject of the century-Pravdaria, the Dawn Civilization-as the foundation stone of a new elite, a new era of truth and justice.
Spiritual experience and knowledge of thousands of years of wisdom and traditions of humanity isDharmanauka, Nuclear yoga / practice of the Great Unity of Aham (instrumental-practical layer) provides training of consciousness, awareness. One of the practices of yoga is the realization that: "You are the Truth."
Nuclear Ethics-Truth and Prayer, based on the triad: Telling the Truth — Doing the Truth — Praying for the Truth on the 15th of each month during the days of world spiritual unity are three levers that work on the personal, social, and planetary levels.
Truth is God's weapon. We understand this as the power of truth to overcome disunity and falsehood. The truth is not just "don't lie", but the ability to see and name reality, not to succumb to substitutions and build institutions where the truth becomes the norm.
The truth is like "A Stone rejected by the builders becomes the main focus": what the system considers inconvenient, "unprofitable", "outdated" today (conscience, compassion, slow creation), tomorrow turns out to be the only support that can hold the whole.
"Look into your own souls and find in them the spark of Truth that the gods have placed in every heart and from which only you can fan the flame" Socrates
"Dharma* is the highest in the world, it is the foundation of TRUTH"
From the epic"Ramayana"
Prayer is not only an appeal to the Higher, but also an inner action that keeps unity.: a state from which decisions become creative.
"The weak overcomes the strong "(Lao Tzu): water is a Prayer, being the softest, sharpens the stone; a sprout breaks through the asphalt; silence stops the noise. This is not a call to passivity, but a statement of the strategy of sustainability: a force that does not destroy, but holds and connects.
In our "nuclear philosophy", these images merge into one principle: the ethical core is both water and stone. It is flexible to hear the world, and firm to hold it.
We are building a fair multipolar world like the solar system: the planets-civilizations retain their uniqueness, but are connected by a common field of attraction — the ethical core. This core is not power or power, but the truth and prayer that we create through daily practice. A small man with a big heart is the main carrier of this core: he does not have the resources of giants, but there is something that they do not have — a sincere heart and a willingness to act on principle. As practice shows, synchronized actions, collective prayer, and unity of intentions create a field that can influence geopolitics. Our goal is to make this field stable and visible.
Dharmapolitics – the politics of duty, truth, responsibility, justice.
Dharma (Law) is an Axial, Nuclear category, a fundamental traditional value of the Russian world-Buddhism. Buddhism is a traditional religion in Russia. This status is enshrined in law: in 1997, a Federal law declared Buddhism one of the four traditional religions of the country, along with Orthodoxy, Islam and Judaism.
Dharmapolitics is governance, where every decision is tested for truth and the common good.
Power does not serve the ego, but the whole. Leadership is measured not by the speed of suppression, but by the ability to connect and retain.
Dharmapolitics as the institutionalization of truth: morality must become the foundation of institutions. The Pravdaria project is an attempt to fix the mechanism when ethics becomes the framework of society and international relations.
"Nuclear philosophy" is an optics that sees not only the visible levers of history, but also the invisible ones: intention, truth, unity. Only together do they give the full picture."
Nuclear philosophy offers a view that connects ancient intuitions with the challenges of the twenty-first century.
The "nuclear philosophy"does not simplify, but rather complicates the picture of reality — it adds another dimension to the usual socio -political causality: spiritual and energetic.„Nuclear Philosophy " captures this dimension as an equal factor of history.
• Physical layer: political interests, economy, institutions, power blocks. This is what historians and political scientists record.
• Psychological layer: mass moods, fears, expectations, trust/distrust of leaders.
• Spiritual / ethical layer: collective intention, "field of truth", concentration on unity. This is where "nuclear ethics" works: extremely simple but unshakable principles become a source of strength.
Why "Nuclear Philosophy" is relevant for the global discourse about the future
Crisis measures. Technology is ahead of ethics: we can do a lot, but we don't always have to. "Nuclear ethics" offers a criterion: any action is evaluated by whether it preserves a person as a bearer of truth and freedom or erases it.
Crisis of trust. In a world where information becomes a weapon and meaning becomes a commodity, you need a foothold that doesn't depend on market conditions. "Aham: You are the Truth" is a personal responsibility that cannot be delegated to algorithms.
Crisis of solidarity. The future is not built alone. "A little man with a big heart" - not a metaphor for weakness, but a formula for social sustainability: millions of quiet truth choices create a field that changes big processes.
Crisis of the human image. The main catastrophic damage to technological projects is the disappearance of man, created in the image and likeness of God, as truth and spiritual life. We say that if a person disappears as a bearer of truth, the meaning of progress also disappears.
What we claim
Ethics is not the decoration of progress, but its supporting structure.
Technology without a core of truth becomes a destructive force. We put ethics at the forefront: any decision, any project, any technology is tested for humanity and justice.
Strength is in the density of intent, not in the volume of pressure.
A small man with a big heart is not a metaphor for weakness, but a formula for resilience. His quiet choice of truth, his daily "telling the truth, doing the truth, praying for the truth" creates a field that changes big processes.
What is dismissed as "impractical" today will become the foundation of civilization tomorrow.
Conscience, compassion, slow creation, collective prayer and unity of traditions are not" retrogradism", but a strategic resource. They become the cornerstone of the "Civilization of Dawn".
The practice of Aham: "You are the Truth" is a personal responsibility for the common future.
Each person is a source of light. In the yoga of Great Unity, we learn not to fight the world, but to hold it: to be flexible in forms and inflexible in principles.
Dharmapolitics is governance, where every decision is tested for truth and the common good.
Power does not serve the ego, but the whole. Leadership is measured not by the speed of suppression, but by the ability to connect and retain.
How it works in practice
Pravdaria is an experiment in reality. This is not a utopia, but a model of life where ethical principles determine the development of technology, culture and social environment. Here, truth becomes a measure of efficiency, and fairness becomes a criterion for innovation.
A five-year path to sustainability. We build not for" big " victories, but for irreversible changes: education, ethical protocols for technology, pilot communities where a person remains the measure of all things.
The World Day of Spiritual Unityis the assemblage point of the collective will. This is not a ritual for ritual's sake, but a way to create a field where the quiet intent of millions becomes the real force of history.
Contrasting technocratic scenarios
Where the future is built as a race for speed and dominance, we build like a garden: slowly, carefully, with respect for the soil. Where power is the destruction of the old, we see power in keeping the living: in preserving man as truth, in protecting the inner light from being replaced by technology.
Approaches that focus only on efficiency and scaling run the risk of losing the most valuable thing — the image and likeness of a person. We say that if a person disappears as a bearer of truth, the meaning of progress also disappears.
Our call
Join the construction of the "Civilization of Dawn — - a world where ethics is not an option, but a foundation; where a "small" person with a big heart becomes the support of the whole; where the water of Lao Tzu and the cornerstone together hold the future.
Tell the truth. Do the truth. Pray for the truth. And let each of your quiet steps become a rock that holds the world together.
Part 2
GREETING OF PARTICIPANTS
Pravdaria-The Future Plus is not an established academic format, but a project initiative that grew out of the philosophical and journalistic concept of Pravdaria. Its author is Vladimir Lermontov, a representative of the public movement "Council of Sages of Russia "Russian Lotus". In this logic, "Pravdaria "is the idea of building a" dawn civilization " - a planetary workshop where a new world order based on spiritual values, unity and the idea of the common good is formed in the union of creators from different countries. The key slogan is "One truth — one way": consolidation around a common system of values. Within the framework of this idea, similar platforms are being launched — virtual international conferences where they discuss how to move towards such a future.
Moderator. Today we gathered at the conference " Pravdaria — Future Plus" to answer the main question: what should the future look like — and for whom? We live in an era when technology can create a new world, but it can also erase people from it. That is why we ask leaders whose decisions determine the fate of billions to become honorary chairmen of the Council of Truth.
Let me introduce the honorary Presidents of the Council of Bavaria:
• Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, whose policy is based on the idea of sovereignty and the preservation of traditional values as the basis for the stability of civilization.
• Xi Jinping, under whose leadership China demonstrates a unique synthesis of strategic planning, high technology and social stability.
• Donald Trump, a politician who has consistently championed national interests and accelerated technological breakthroughs, changing the rules of the game in the global economy.
• Narendra Modi is a person who in practice combines large-scale state thinking with support for civilizational values, long-term planning with concern for everyone.
We ask each of you to make a short address that will become a moral compass for all participants of the conference.
Moderator. Dear participants of the International Conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"! Today we are gathered here to outline the contours of a civilization that will not sacrifice man for the sake of the speed of progress. We are looking not just for technology, but for meaning, not just for breakthroughs, but for responsibility. Therefore, it is a special honor and deep symbolic significance for us that Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin has agreed to become the honorary chairman of our Council of Bavaria.
His speech today is not just a greeting, but a moral guideline: a reminder that the future should be built around a person, his dignity and freedom, and not dissolve a person in algorithms and speeds.
Vladimir Vladimirovich, on behalf of all participants of the conference — scientists, philosophers, engineers, cultural figures — we ask you to address us with a welcome speech.
________________________________________
Vladimir Putin's welcome address
Dear colleagues and friends,
Thank you for inviting me to speak at the Pravdaria conference. — Future plus". The name itself has an important meaning: the truth is not only conformity to facts, but also loyalty to the human measure, loyalty to what makes us human.
Today, the world faces a choice: either we create the future as a space of true freedom and responsibility, or we allow technology to imperceptibly replace the goal with means. Speed is not a virtue in itself. Progress without a moral core becomes destructive.
In this sense, the idea of "Pravdaria "as a workshop of meanings and technologies is deeply consonant with the understanding that any large — scale projects — be it a" city on Mars " or digital infrastructure-should serve people, and not displace them. A person created in the image and likeness should remain at the center of any agenda.
It is especially important that the conference combines different traditions: pragmatism and contemplation, Western engineering culture and Eastern depth of understanding of human nature. Such a synthesis offers a chance not just for new inventions, but for a new quality of civilization — a civilization where technology enhances the human, and does not replace it.
Let Pravdaria become a place where ethics and engineering speak the same language-the language of responsibility to future generations. Let not only formulas and prototypes be born here, but also principles that will not allow us to lose the main thing: ourselves.
I wish the conference fruitful work, bold ideas and, most importantly, solutions that will serve people and preserve human dignity in any era.
Thank you.
Moderator. Dear participants of the International Conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"! We continue to build a dialogue about what the future should be like — and most importantly, for whom it is being built. We have already heard the voice of Eurasian sustainability and the idea of long-term planning. Now it is important for us to hear another vector — the energy of a breakthrough, the pragmatism of action, the ability to turn ideas into real projects.
For this reason, we are particularly honored that the honorary chairman of the conference Council is Donald Trump — a man who is used to measuring success not in words, but in results, not in abstractions, but in concrete actions. His approach reminds us that the future does not come by itself — it is built, step by step, project by project.
Donald Trump, on behalf of all participants of the conference — scientists, engineers, philosophers, creators — we ask you to address us with a welcome speech. Let your voice be a call to action, to courage, to not be afraid of big goals.
________________________________________
Welcome address from Donald Trump
Dear friends, colleagues, and distinguished participants of the conference!
Thank you for the invitation. And I want to say right away: I love big projects. Big, bold, the kind that others say, " It's impossible." I believe that such projects move the world forward.
But today I want to say not only about projects — I want to say about people. Because ÷òîno matter what the technology, no matter what the breakthrough, if it does not serve a person, it is worthless. This is my principle: first the person, then everything else.
I hear people here talk about Pravdaria as a workshop of meanings and technologies. I like this idea. The workshop is a place where people do not just reason, but do things. Where they are not afraid to get their hands dirty. Where the idea quickly becomes a drawing, and the drawing becomes a real object.
And if "Crash" is about building the future, and not just dreaming about it, then I'm with you. I am in favor of taking the most ambitious ideas-even about a "Martian city on Earth", even about new energy sources, even about the ethics of technology-and turning them into real, tangible projects. So that in a year, in five years, we can show: this is what we have done. That's what we built. Here's how we've improved people's lives.
However, I don't believe in "the future at any cost". I don't believe in technologies that forget about people. I don't believe in progress that erases our nature, our freedom, our dignity. If we lose a person — we lose everything.
So I support the idea that any big project should have a moral core. There should be a "nuclear philosophy", as you call it-not about destruction, but about creation. About the fact that even the most powerful technologies should serve a small person, the very "little person with a big heart" who makes the world a better place.
So let's not waste time on empty arguments. Let's build. Let's do it. Let "Pravdaria" become a place where not only concepts are born, but also real deeds — large-scale, bold, and at the same time truly human.
Thanks!
Moderator. Dear participants of the International Conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
We speak of the future not as a distant abstraction, but as a space that needs to be built here and now. And to do this, we need a special view — one that can see both the infrastructure and the meaning, the numbers, the soul, and the next five years, and the century ahead.
It is this approach that distinguishes India — a country where ancient wisdom does not cancel out technological breakthroughs, but directs them. Therefore, it is a special honor for us that the honorary Chairman of the Conference Council is Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi— a leader who consistently combines strategic planning with cultural identity, and large-scale projects with caring for everyone.
Let your speech become both a road map and a moral guide for us: how to build big projects without losing a person.
________________________________________
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech
Dear friends, colleagues, and participants of the Pravdaria Conference — Future plus"!
Thank you for the invitation and for the very idea of this platform. The name "Pravdaria" sounds deep: the truth is not only the truth of facts, but also loyalty to the cause, loyalty to people, loyalty to the future that we are building together.
Today, the world faces a choice: either technology will run ahead of meaning, or meaning will set the direction of technology. India is firmly in the second position. We believe that the most powerful technological breakthrough is worthless if it does not improve the lives of ordinary people. That is why our mantra is "Artificial intelligence for everyone", not "for the elite". That is why we focus on accessibility, inclusivity, and making every citizen feel part of progress.
The future is a fusion of reality and breakthrough. Reality is roads, electricity, communications, schools, hospitals. Breakthroughs include space, quantum computing, new materials, and biotechnologies. But without a moral core, even the most brilliant breakthrough can become a threat.
I support the idea of the "nuclear philosophy of a small man with a big heart". Because such a person is the foundation of any great civilization. Not the abstract "speed of progress", but the quality of life, dignity, freedom and the opportunity to reach your potential-these are the real metrics of success.
The project of "Martian city on Earth" is close to me in spirit. Not because it's about Mars, but because it's about ambition: to create spaces where the best traditions and the most advanced technologies combine, where East and West do not argue, but strengthen each other. India is ready to be such a bridge — both in technology and in meaning.
Pravdaria as a workshop of meanings and technologies is a great metaphor. The workshop is a place where people are not afraid to get their hands dirty, where ideas become prototypes, and prototypes become real solutions. Let's make sure that not only concepts are born here, but also projects that can be touched: new energy systems, educational platforms, ethical codes for AI, models of sustainable development.
And let pragmatism not cancel dreams, and the dream does not cancel responsibility.
Thanks!
Moderator. Dear participants of the virtual international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
We are here to map out a future where a technological breakthrough does not break the link with the human dimension, and the ethical core becomes the framework of any large system — be it a city, a civilization, or an interplanetary project.
It is a special honor for us that the honorary Chairman of the Conference Council is President Xi Jinping of the People's Republic of China, General Secretary of the CPC ÖçèíüïèíCentral Committee, a leader under whose leadership the country consistently combines long — term planning, technological ambition and social sustainability.
Today, we ask you, dear Mr. President, to make a welcome address in the format of our conference — as a conversation about the future, which is being built not for the sake of speed, but for the sake of human dignity, for the sake of the common future of humanity. Let your word become a strategic guideline for us: how to combine scale and humanity, how to make big projects without losing the moral horizon.
Dear Mr. President Xi Jinping, on behalf of all the participants — scientists, engineers, philosophers, cultural figures — we ask you to address us with a welcoming speech.
________________________________________
Xi Jinping's welcome address
Dear participants of the conference "Pravdaria — Future Plus", dear friends!
Thank you for the invitation to speak at this platform, whose name has a deep meaning: Pravdaria sounds like a search for truth — not only scientific, but also moral, not only technological, but also human.
In the modern world, we are increasingly faced with a paradox: technology is becoming more powerful, and the sense of reliability of the future is becoming weaker. The reason is that progress without a value foundation can easily become a threat. That is why sites where engineers and philosophers gather together are so important, where ethics is not considered a "side issue", but becomes the main criterion of any project.
Chinese tradition teaches that great power requires great responsibility. We are developing artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, and space programs, but we always put people and their welfare at the center. Our goal is not just to be the first in technology, but to make sure that technology serves everyone, strengthens social justice and the sustainability of society.
The idea of "Pravdaria" as a "workshop of meanings and technologies" is close to me. This is the correct word — "workshop". They don't just dream in the workshop, they do it in it. And they make sure that the result is useful to people, so that it does not destroy, but creates. In this sense, the "Martian city on Earth" project can be understood not as an escape from the planet, but as a laboratory of the future: a space where East and West, contemplation and action, strategy and ethics learn to speak the same language.
Moderator. Dear participants of the virtual international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
Today we are talking about the future as a space of shared responsibility. About a future where no technology has the right to erase human dignity, and no breakthrough should be made at the cost of alienating people from each other. It is a great honor for us to have United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres join our discussion Ãóòåððèø—a man for whom the futureis first and foremost solidarity, justice and the right of everyone to live with dignity.
Within the framework of our "Pravdaria" concept, we are looking for an ethical core that will become a support for any technological and social projects. And the UN's voice here is not just a high status, but a reminder that the future should be the common cause of all mankind, and not the privilege of individual groups or States.
Dear Mr. Secretary General, on behalf of all participants of the conference — scientists, engineers, philosophers, cultural figures — we ask you to address us with a welcoming speech. Let your voice become a moral compass: how to preserve the unity of humanity in an era of rapid change and how to make progress serve everyone, not just a few.
________________________________________
Welcome address by Antonio Guterres
Dear participants of the conference "Pravdaria — Future Plus", dear friends!
Thank you for the invitation to speak at this unique platform, the very name of which carries a deep meaning: "Pravdaria" sounds like a call to truth — not only scientific, but also moral, not only technological, but also human.
We live in an era of unprecedented opportunities. Artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and space programs can transform the lives of billions of people. But at the same time, these same technologies can increase inequality, exclusion, and risks to peace and security. The paradox of our time is that the most advanced tools can be used for both creation and destruction.
That is why sites like yours are so important, where engineers and philosophers gather together, where ethics is not considered a "side issue", but becomes the main criterion of any project. At the UN, we talk about multilateralism, solidarity, and that no country or group of people should be left behind. This is the moral core of progress: development that leaves no one behind.
The idea of "Pravdaria" as a "workshop of meanings and technologies" is very close to me. A workshop is a place where people don't just dream, but do things. And they make sure that the result is useful to people, so that it builds trust, and does not destroy it. In this sense, the "Martian city on Earth" project can be understood as a laboratory of the future: a space where East and West, contemplation and action, strategy and ethics learn to speak the same language.
But let's remember: before we build cities on other planets, we must make our common home — Earth-fairer and more sustainable. We must ensure that everyone has access to education, medicine, clean energy, and opportunities to reach their full potential. This is the true scale of the future-not in kilometers and gigabytes, but in human dignity, in the right of everyone to be heard.
The "nuclear philosophy" that you speak of, in the universal sense of the UN, sounds like a commitment to common values: respect for life, for diversity, for the right to the future. Let these values become the very ethical framework that will keep technological progress from sliding into the abyss of alienation and violence.
Let Pravdaria become a place where not only concepts and prototypes are born, but also new forms of cooperation — between countries, cultures, and generations. Let it be understood that the future is not a competition for speed, but a joint construction of a world in which technology serves humanity, and does not replace it.
I wish the conference fruitful work, bold ideas and, most importantly, solutions that will serve all of humanity and strengthen our common future.
Thank you.
Moderator. Dear participants of the virtual international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
Today we are talking about a future that is not just imagined, but built: brick by brick, algorithm by algorithm, breakthrough by breakthrough. We are looking for a point where the boldness of engineering meets the depth of human meaning — and that is why we are particularly honored to have Elon Musk join our discussion: a man who is used to setting himself challenges that others call impossible and solving them.
In our concept of Pravdaria, we strive to combine "nuclear philosophy" — the ethical core that preserves a person as a bearer of truth and spiritual life — with the most daring technological projects. Elon Musk thinks in terms of interplanetary dimensions, but it is precisely in this contrast that the dialogue we need is born: how not to lose a person when we build cities on other planets? How do we ensure that technology serves the eternity of the spirit, rather than dissolving it into speed?
We ask you, Mr. Musk, to give a welcome speech — not as about distant stars, but as about the Earth that we must protect, and about the person for whom all these rockets and algorithms exist. Let your voice be the bridge between bold breakthroughs and deep responsibility.
Elon Musk, on behalf of all participants of the conference-scientists, philosophers, engineers, creators-we ask you to contact us.
________________________________________
Elon Musk's welcome address
Friends, colleagues, and participants of the Pravdaria conference — Future plus"! Thank you for inviting me.
I love projects where the bar is not "make a little better", but "change the rules of the game". Colonization of Mars, cheaper space, neuralinterfaces, robots that do routine and dangerous work — all this is about expanding human capabilities. It's about making sure that life doesn't just stay on one fragile planet, because this candle is too precious to burn in just one place.
But today I want to say not only about technology. I want to talk about the meaning. Because any rocket, any chip, any algorithm is just a tool. And the question is always the same: why do we do this? Why do we want to become an interplanetary species? The answer is simple: for the sake of the person. So that everyone has more space for creativity, more freedom from heavy routine, more chances to reach their potential.
I like the idea of Pravdaria as a "workshop of meanings and technologies". Because it is in the workshop that the present is born: not abstractions, but prototypes; not arguments, but solutions. And if "Martian city on Earth — is about creating a space where the best minds together think not only "how to do it", but also "why", I'm in.
At the same time, I do not believe in progress that sacrifices a person. I don't believe in technologies that make people unnecessary. On the contrary, the goal of all these breakthroughs is to free up the human for the human itself: for creativity, love, knowledge, so that we can look at the stars not as a task for an algorithm, but as a dream that unites us.
Your "nuclear philosophy" in my engineering language sounds like the principle of "man in the center". Even if we launch thousands of satellites and build factories in orbit, the main measure of success should be: has any person on Earth become a little easier, a little freer, a little happier? If so — we're on the right track.
So let's combine bold projects and deep meanings. Let Pravdaria become a place where not only new technologies are born, but also new principles: how to build the future without losing a person. Where East and West, contemplation and action, philosophy and engineering do not argue, but work together as a team.
Thanks!
Moderator. Dear participants of the virtual international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
We are here not just to dream about the future, but to design it — with the cold logic of a strategist and with the warm heart of a creator. We need a vision that can see not individual technologies, but entire epochs, not individual trends, but systemic changes. That is why it is a special honor for us that Sergey Pereslegin, a futurologist, researcher of large historical cycles, a person who teaches us to think in terms of decades and centuries, has joined our discussion.
In our concept of "Pravdaria", we are looking for an ethical core that will keep civilization from disintegrating in an era of technological leaps. And here Sergey Pereslegin's voice is especially important: it reminds us that any breakthrough is not only opportunities, but also risks, not only speed, but also responsibility to future generations.
Sergey Borisovich, on behalf of all participants of the conference — scientists, philosophers, engineers, cultural figures — we ask you to address us with a welcome speech. Let your view of the great cycles of history become a compass for us: how not to lose a person in the whirlwind of change, how to turn technological challenges into civilizational opportunities, and how to build a "Martian city on Earth" not as an escape, but as a new stage in the evolution of humanity.
________________________________________
Welcome address by Sergey Pereslegin
Dear participants of the conference "Pravdaria — Future Plus", colleagues, friends!
Thank you for the invitation. The very name of the site sounds like a challenge: "Pravdaria" is about finding the truth not in convenient illusions, but in rigid system patterns. And the future is not something that "happens by itself", but something that we construct, often without even realizing the mechanisms of this construction.
I used to look at history as a series of big transitions: agricultural civilization, industrial, informational. Now we are on the threshold of the next transition-and it will be no less radical than the advent of the steam engine or electricity. But the main danger is not in technology, but in the fact that we are trying to solve problems of a new level with the tools of old thinking.
In this sense, your "nuclear philosophy" gets to the heart of it: we need a new ethical framework that will become the core of any large system — be it a city, a corporation, or an interplanetary project. Without such a core, any technology becomes a risk factor: AI, biotechnologies, and space programs can either expand human capabilities or become tools for alienating and controlling them.
The "Martian city on Earth" project is interesting to me precisely as a laboratory of a new type of civilization. Not as a copy of the Martian base, but as a space where we work out new social models, new forms of cooperation, new ethics of work and creativity. After all, if we don't learn to live a new life here on Earth, we won't be able to survive on other planets either. The cosmos does not forgive mistakes in social engineering.
However, it is important to remember that the future is not monolithic. This is always a range of scenarios —from catastrophic to creative. And the task of a futurologist is not to guess, but to build "corridors of opportunity": to show which solutions today open up the best trajectories tomorrow, and which lead to a cliff.
Your idea of a "workshop of meanings and technologies" is very accurate. The workshop is a place where thought is immediately tested by action, and ethics-by practice. Where the engineer and the philosopher speak the same language: the language of responsibility.
And one more important point: "a small man with a big heart" is not a metaphor for weakness, but a formula for stability. It is on the shoulders of such people that any great civilization rests. Because technology scales, but conscience doesn't: it's always personal. And it is the personal responsibility of each individual that becomes the very "ethical framework" that keeps the system from disintegrating.
Let Pravdaria become a place where not only bold projects are born, but also new rules of the game: rules that allow humanity to grow without losing its essence. Where East and West, contemplation and action, strategy and ethics do not argue, but reinforce each other.
I wish the conference productive work and the courage to think systematically. Because only in this way can we build a future in which a person remains a person — and at the same time becomes stronger, wiser, freer.
Thanks!
Moderator. Dear participants of the virtual international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
Today we are at the point of maximum tension of meanings: on the one hand — the thirst for a breakthrough, the belief that technology can radically change the fate of humanity; on the other — the anxiety that, chasing speed, we risk losing the very essence of man: his freedom, dignity, spiritual depth.
That is why we are particularly honored to have Peter Thiel join our discussion — a man who thinks in terms of radical shifts, who is used to questioning the obvious and looking for ways where others see dead ends. His vision for the future is that of an engineer and strategist who measures progress not by abstract ideals, but by real opportunities to change the trajectory of civilization.
As part of our "Pravdaria" concept, we are looking for a balance: a "nuclear philosophy" that holds the human dimension even in the most audacious technological projects. And dialogue with you, Peter, is critically important: it allows you to hear the voice of the force that is not afraid to break patterns — and at the same time set it moral boundaries.
We ask you, Mr. Thiel, to make a welcoming speech. Let your voice be a challenge: do not let the future get stuck in the routine, but also do not let it trample the person. Let it be a conversation about how to build breakthrough projects while maintaining an ethical core.
Peter Thiel, on behalf of all participants of the conference-scientists, philosophers, engineers, creators-we ask you to contact us.
________________________________________
Welcome address by Peter Thiel
Friends, colleagues, and participants of the Pravdaria conference — Future plus". Thanks for the invitation.
I'm used to saying it bluntly: in recent decades, the world has forgotten how to dream big. We're stuck in the "10% improvement" mode: a little faster, a little more convenient, a little cheaper. But the real progress is not the optimization of the old, but the creation of a fundamentally new one. This is when you look at a problem and say, " What if you abandon the usual rules altogether?"
At the same time, I understand why the alarm sounds here. When you change the rules, you change the people: some win, some lose. And if there is no ethical framework, any breakthrough becomes a threat. In this sense, your "nuclear philosophy" is a good metaphor: you need an inner core that does not break even under the strongest loads.
The idea of a "Martian city on Earth" is clear to me as a laboratory for a radical future. Not as a stage set, but as a testing ground: a place where you can check which social and technological models really work, and which ones crumble at the first serious test. If this is a platform where people are not afraid to question basic assumptions — I respect this approach.
But I also want to talk about the risks. When ethics become a barrier to action, it becomes a brake. And when an action completely ignores ethics, it becomes destructive. The challenge is not to choose between "doing" and "thinking," but to connect them: to act quickly, but with a clear understanding of the consequences; to experiment, but not at the cost of human freedom.
Your concept of "a small person with a big heart" in my language sounds like "protection of individual freedom". Because freedom is the main resource of any breakthrough. If we deprive people of their freedom of choice, we deprive them of their ability to create new things. And then no AI, no space programs will save us from stagnation.
So let's try this format: let Pravdaria become a place where bold ideas are double-checked. On the one hand —engineering: "Can this be implemented?" On the other hand, it is ethical: "Is it worth implementing it, and at what cost?" And let each project here answer both questions.
Let it not be a platform for beautiful words, but a laboratory of the future, where not only concepts are born, but also prototypes, not only principles, but also working solutions. Where East and West, contemplation and action, philosophy and engineering do not argue, but create a common language — a language on which you can build a world that can withstand the greatest loads.
Thanks!
Moderator. Dear participants of the virtual international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
Today, we especially need a view that can combine historical depth and acute relevance, and see in technologies not just tools, but new forms of civilizational challenge. That is why it is a great honor for us that Vardan Baghdasaryan, a historian, political scientist, researcher of civilizational trajectories, a person who knows how to show how big meanings become levers of big changes, joined our discussion.
In our concept of "Pravdaria", we are looking for the ethical core of the future — something that keeps society from disintegrating even in an era of radical technological shifts. And Vardan Baghdasaryan's voice is especially important here: it reminds us that the future is not only about speed and power, but also about identity, about value sovereignty, about the ability of civilization to respond to challenges without losing its essence.
We ask you, Vardan Konstantinovich, to make a welcoming speech. Let your view of civilizational rifts and meanings become a compass for us: how to preserve the human and cultural core in the face of technological turbulence, how to combine breakthrough with responsibility, and ambition with historical memory.
Vardan Konstantinovich, on behalf of all participants of the conference — scientists, philosophers, engineers, cultural figures-we ask you to contact us.
________________________________________
Welcome address by Vardan Baghdasaryan
Dear participants of the conference "Pravdaria — Future Plus, dear colleagues and friends!
Thank you for the invitation. The very name of the site sounds like a moral challenge: "Pravdaria" is about the truth as the basis of action, and not as a convenient rhetoric. In an era when meanings are being devalued and technologies are becoming weapons in the struggle for mind control, it is the truth — in its historical, moral and practical dimensions — that becomes the main resource of civilization.
We live at a civilizational turning point. Technological opportunities today are such that they can either unlock the potential of a person, or finally dissolve it in algorithms. And here the key question is not "how to make it faster", but "for what" and "in the name of what picture of the world". Without a core of values, any technological singularity becomes a threat.
Your "nuclear philosophy of a small man with a big heart" gets to the heart of it: it is the person, his dignity, his freedom and his responsibilitythat is the foundation on which any big projects can be built. Not an abstract "user", not a "unit of data", but a living person with a conscience, memory and ability to choose.
I see the "Martian city on Earth" project as a laboratory of civilizational sovereignty. This is not about fleeing the planet, but about creating a space where new models are being worked out: how to combine high technologies with high meanings, how to preserve cultural identity in a global world, how to make sure that progress does not break the link between generations.
It's important to remember that no technology is neutral. It always carries a certain ideology, a certain picture of a person. Therefore, an ethical framework should precede any technical breakthrough. In this sense, "Pravdaria" as a "workshop of meanings and technologies" is a very accurate metaphor: first we agree on values, then we build prototypes, then we scale.
And one more fundamental point: the future does not come by itself. It needs to be designed systematically, strategically, based on historical memory and with a clear understanding of threats. We cannot afford the luxury of a "pure experiment" at the cost of losing the human measure.
Thanks!
Moderator. Dear participants of the virtual international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
Today, we need a voice that can hear the pulse of history, see in every technological breakthrough not just a change of tools, but a clash of worlds, a battle of meanings. We need a vision for which the future is not smooth progress, but a fiery transformation that requires courage, will and a high idea.
It is a great honor for us that Alexander Andreevich Prokhanov, a writer, publicist, thinker, a person who always looked for and called a spade a spade, did not hide behind convenient wording, joined our discussion. His word is a word about the fate of civilization, about the price of greatness, that without a high dream, even the most advanced technologies become cold and empty.
We ask you, Alexander Andreevich, to address us with a welcoming speech. Let your voice become the very fire that will remind you: the future is not only algorithms and blueprints, it is above all the meaning for which we are ready to build and sacrifice.
Alexander Andreevich, on behalf of all participants of the conference — scientists, philosophers, engineers, creators-we ask you to speak.
________________________________________
Welcome address by Alexander Prokhanov
Friends, colleagues, and participants of the Pravdaria conference — Future plus"! Thank you for the invitation.
The name of the site itself sounds like a battle cry: "Crash". Not the "convenient version of the truth", not the "politically correct truth", but the one that burns, that requires courage, that is not afraid to call a spade a spade. In an era when the world is becoming more accustomed to simulacra, when even the future is being replaced by a beautiful picture, such a truth is the rarest and most precious resource.
We talk about technology, about space, about cities on other planets — and rightly so. A person must strive to rise, push the horizons, challenge the limits. But I want to say the main thing: without a high idea, without a sacred fire in the chest, any technical breakthrough becomes cold, dead, and sometimes even destructive.
Your "nuclear philosophy of a little man with a big heart" is a very accurate hit. Not a faceless "user", not a "data unit", but a person-with his conscience, memory, pain and inspiration. The same "little man" who, being filled with a great idea, is able to move mountains and break through the cosmic abyss.
I understand the project of a "Martian city on Earth" not as an architectural plan, but as an image of a new creative impulse. It should be not just a city, but a temple of action, a workshop where will, work and a high dream come together. Where the engineer does not renounce the poet, and the poet does not despise the engineer, because both serve the same idea.
Today, the world faces a choice: either we will create the future as a space of achievement, as a space of great purpose, or it will become a space of comfort, which will imperceptibly turn into a prison. Comfort without meaning is the death of the spirit. A feat without comfort is a path that requires strength, but it is this path that gives birth to true greatness.
Let "Pravdaria" become a place where not just a new technology is born, but a new measure of a person. Where each project is tested for "cordiality": does it not destroy the soul, does it not make man a slave to his own inventions, does it not erase his image and likeness?
I believe that the future should be hot. It should burn, inspire, demand. Let such a truth about the future be born here, on this platform, which will be worthy of a person created in the image and likeness, and worthy of the great history that we continue.
Thanks!
Moderator. Dear participants of the virtual international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
Today we need a voice that can see behind technologies — civilizational meanings; behind figures — historical fate; behind projects - the metaphysics of the era. We need a vision for which the future is not just a new infrastructure, but a new way of being, a new human ontology.
It is a special honor for us that Alexander Gelyevich Dugin, a philosopher, political scientist, researcher of civilizational codes, a person who consistently shows that any technology is rooted in the picture of the world, and if this picture is false, then even the most advanced tools lead to disaster, joined our discussion.
In our concept of "Pravdaria", we are looking for a" nuclear philosophy " — the very ethical and semantic core that keeps a person from dissolving into the digital stream, and a civilization from disintegrating in the pursuit of speed. And it is precisely Alexander Dugin who knows how to speak of this core as solid ground: not as a pleasant dream, but as a necessary condition for survival.
We ask you, Alexander Gelyevich, to address us with a welcoming speech. Let your voice become a compass: how to preserve civilizational identity in an era of technological upheaval, how to combine bold projects with deep meanings, how to build the future without betraying the past.
Alexander Gelievich, on behalf of all participants of the conference — scientists, philosophers, engineers, creators-we ask you to speak.
________________________________________
Welcome address by Alexander Dugin
Dear participants of the conference "Pravdaria — Future Plus", dear friends and colleagues in the search for truth!
Thank you for the invitation. The very name of the site sounds like a moral and ontological challenge: "Pravdaria". Not a convenient interpretation, not a politically correct version of reality, but the Truth-as the correspondence of being and words, design and execution, technology and meaning.
We live in an era where technology is outpacing the worldview. We have learned to do a lot of things, but we have forgotten how to answer the question " why?". And without this "why", any " how " becomes deadly. Artificial intelligence, space programs, biotechnologies — all this is neutral in relation to good and evil. They only reinforce the picture of the world that society already has. If this picture is distorted, then the future built on these technologies will also be distorted.
Your "nuclear philosophy" is a very precise formula. The core here is not an abstraction, but an ontological support: values, traditions, identity, without which any civilization crumbles. The" little man with a big heart " in this optics is not a weakness, but a bearer of tradition. It is through him that the cultural code is transmitted, it is his conscience that becomes a filter for technology: "Can this be done? Should it be?"
I see the "Martian city on Earth" project âîñïðèíèìàþas an attempt to create a sovereign space of meanings. Not as an escape from the Earth, but as a laboratory for a new civilizational project: where East and West, contemplation and action, tradition and innovation do not destroy each other, but enter into a creative synthesis. Such a city should be not only technically advanced, but also ideologically sovereign: it should have its own answer to the main questions — about the person, about the time, about the purpose.
The important thing to remember is that the future is never neutral. It always carries a certain ideology, a certain anthropology. Therefore, before building cities and launching satellites, we need to agree on how we see people. If we consider a person only as a data carrier, then the city will also be a prison of algorithms. If we see it as an image and likeness, a carrier of freedom and responsibility, then technology will also become a tool for unlocking its potential.
Let "Pravdaria" become a place where such a sovereign image of the future is born: not borrowed, not copied, but suffered and meaningful. Where each project is tested not only for effectiveness, but also for loyalty to the Truth — in its deepest, ontological sense.
I wish the conference not to be afraid of difficult questions, not to substitute convenience for meaning, and to remember that the future is built not only by engineers, but also by philosophers, not only by algorithms, but also by conscience.
Thanks!
Moderator. Dear participants of the international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
Now we will hear a special voice — the voice of the Indian philosophical tradition: the voice of those who for thousands of years have learned to see the essence behind form, eternity behind time, and the measure of man behind technology. On behalf of a group of Indian philosophers, scientists, spiritual mentors and consciousness researchers who gathered at the preliminary sites and prepared a common text, I will read out their collective address to our conference.
Let these words become a bridge between ancient knowledge and a bold future, between yoga practice and space engineering, between tradition and breakthrough.
________________________________________
Collective address of intellectuals and sages of India to the conference " Pravdaria — Future Plus"
Dear friends, colleagues, seekers of truth!
We, philosophers, scientists and mentors from India, welcome the conference " Pravdaria — Future plus". The name itself carries a deep meaning: "Truth" as Sathya, as something that does not change in the whirlwind of change, as a foundation on which to build both a temple and a spaceship.
Our tradition teaches that before you can act, you need to establish yourself in the truth; before you can change the world, you need to understand the nature of man. In the Vedas, in the Upanishads, in yoga and tantra, in the writings of the great thinkers of India, it has always been emphasized: knowledge without morality is dangerous, power without measure is destructive, technology without internal control is blind.
Today, the world has enormous opportunities: artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and space flight. But if these tools are not based on an ethical core, they can become not liberation, but a new form of slavery — the slavery of algorithms, speed, and illusions. We see how the virtual environment is increasingly replacing authentic existence, how human attention becomes a commodity, and consciousness becomes an object of manipulation. This is the very "surrogate environment" that your concept rightly refers to.
Your idea of the "nuclear philosophy of a small man with a big heart" is deeply in tune with the Indian understanding of the atma— the inner light that is in everyone. It is this light that should be the measure of any project. Not the scale, not the speed, not the profit, but whether it enhances human dignity, awakens compassion, responsibility, and the ability to see the whole.
We perceive the project of "Martian city on Earth" as a laboratory of new consciousness. If it is a space where an engineer learns from a yogi, where a scientist remembers karma and duty, where technology serves the dharma (higher order and purpose), then such a city will become not just a technical achievement, but a step towards true civilization.
In our tradition, there is a concept of loka-sangraha— concern for the welfare of the world. This is not abstract kindness, but active service: to make sure that your actions do not destroy, but maintain the harmony of life. Let Pravdaria become a place where this concern becomes the principle of designing the future: from algorithms to cities, from education to interstate relations.
We propose to combine the wisdom of the East and the power of the West: contemplation and action, inner knowledge and external engineering. Let this conference generate not only concepts and prototypes, but also new ethical standards: how to measure progress not in gigabytes and kilometers, but in the level of awareness, compassion and justice.
Let "Aham" — that unity you speak of-become not just a word, but a practice: a practice where every participant, regardless of country or tradition, feels part of the common cause. Let a new type of collaboration be formed here: when different cultures do not compete for primacy, but strengthen each other, like different instruments in a single orchestra.
We wish the conference the courage to think deeply, not be afraid of difficult questions and remember: the future begins with the inner state of a person. Let every project born here pass the "heart test": does it make the world a kinder, fairer, more humane place?
With respect and hope for a fruitful dialogue,
philosophers, sages and researchers of India.
Moderator. Dear participants of the international conference " Pravdaria — Future plus"!
We strive to hear the voice of every great tradition-a voice that reminds us that the future cannot be built without knowing who we are and where we come from. I will now read a collective appeal from a group of Chinese philosophers, scholars, mentors, and researchers who draw on the wisdom of Confucius, Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, and subsequent generations of Chinese thinkers.
Let these words become the foundation for our common cause: to combine technological breakthrough with moral measure, speed with harmony, ambition with duty.
________________________________________
Collective address of Chinese philosophers and sages to the Pravdaria Conference — Future Plus"
Dear friends, colleagues, seekers of truth and creators of the future!
We, thinkers and researchers from China, welcome the conference " Pravdaria — Future plus". The name itself carries an important meaning: "Truth" as the basis of action, as what makes any undertaking sustainable and worthy. In our tradition, this is close to the concept of and (;) — righteousness, duty, justice, without which no great cause can be truly lasting.
Ancient sages taught :" The path of a noble husband begins with correcting names": if words do not correspond to the essence, actions lose their support. Today, as new technologies create new realities, it is especially important that we clearly call a spade a spade: not substitute convenience for progress, control for power, or a surrogate for the future.
Your idea of a "nuclear philosophy" is deeply in tunewith our understanding (of de—virtue, the inner force that keeps action in line with harmony. This is not weakness or a rejection of strength, but the ability to use force in a way that strengthens, not destroys. A "little person with a big heart"in our optics is someone who, while remaining modest and attentive to details, carries a moral core and is able to lead.
We see the "Martian city on Earth" project âîñïðèíèìàåìas an opportunity to create a space where technologies are tested for he (e) — harmony. In this city, let the engineer think not only about power, but also about balance; not only about speed, but also about consequences; not only about efficiency, but also about human dignity. Then such a city will become not just a technical achievement, but a model of civilizational development.
The Taoist tradition says, " The best ruler is the one that the people know only that he exists." This is not about inaction, but about a measure: the action must be proportionate, not violating the natural course of things. When applied to technologies, this means: not to break nature and not to suppress people, but to strengthen what is already inherent in them — the ability to grow, to create, to help each other.
The Confucian tradition recalls the importance of li (;), aritual, norm, and form that keeps society from disintegrating. In the modern world, the role of "ritual" can be played by ethical codes, design standards, and principles of responsibility to future generations. Let Pravdaria become a place where such norms are created together: where East and West, contemplation and action, tradition and innovation do not argue, but form a single, harmonious pattern.
We propose to rely on the principle òÿíü æýíü of Tian Ren He yi —the) — unity of Heaven and Man, the harmony of man and the world. Any technology that violates this harmony sooner or later turns against the creator himself. And vice versa: projects that strengthen a person's connection with the world and with each other become truly great.
Let "Aham" — the unity you speak of-manifest itself in respect for different traditions and in the ability to unite them for the common good. Let not just a new technique be born here, but a new type of responsibility: when each project participant remembers that his work is a contribution to the harmony of the world and to the fate of future generations.
We wish the conference the wisdom to distinguish the most important things, the courage to act and the patience to keep the balance. Let every project born here be tested not only for its effectiveness, but also for compliance with the highest principles: justice, harmony and respect for people.
With respect and hope for fruitful cooperation,
philosophers, sages and researchers of China.
Part 3
Discussion on "Man of the Future plus"
Moderator. Dear participants of the conference "Pravdaria — Future plus"!
After the welcome addresses, we open a discussion on the topic "Man of the Future plus". The floor is given to Vladimir Lermontov, author of the Pravdaria project, the nuclear Philosophy of the Great Unity "Aham"
Vladimir Lermontov. Dear friends! Thank you all for your speeches and participation, as well as for the inner, spiritual, political and ideological work that you are doing in the world.
I see that all of us strive for the same goal: peace, tranquility, harmony, prosperity, cooperation and development on Earth. Without this, there will be no future — for anyone. Future Plus, a person of the future is able to build-a person Plus: a creator and creator who relies on a sense of truth and truth in his heart.
Pravdariya is an ark, a planetary ashram, where a new elite will be formed — the Dharmaelita, capable of creating a bright future for all mankind. Being a Pravdarian means having two guaranteed qualities: don't lie and pray. In Pravdaria, the new Dharmaelita is formed by the space itself — the field of creativity and creation. Our task is to create such a field, such a space, a real planetary workshop.
In Switzerland, we will build an environment of cooperation, security and development — for all countries and for the whole world. Pravdarians are like the highest caste of India-the Brahmin caste: through collective co-creation, creators receive initiation here, and then return to their countries and bring a new impetus to politics, economy, culture, social, social and creative life, forming a new model of the world.
Creators from all over the world will come to Switzerland with their projects, best practices and ideas to implement them here on a turnkey basis. An accident is a reactor, a kind of collider: an accelerator of human creativity. Lectures, conferences, presentations, forums, master classes, trainings, seminars, exhibitions are continuously held here; clubs, sections and circles work. New films are being shot, music is being recorded, performances are being staged, poetry evenings, concerts and dance evenings are being held.
Zaria is a living, growing organism, like a thousand-petaled lotus: each person is a petal that opens in its uniqueness, beauty and power for the benefit of the whole world. It creates the atmosphere of the future — in fact, the future is here and now. There are workshops and laboratories of breakthrough technologies in Bulgaria, and these technologies are implemented immediately.
New World — Future Plus, the Dawn Civilization is formed around a spiritual axis and an ethical core: the main law, the code of Samaria. It includes two fundamental principles: first, not to lie; and second, to pray on the days of world spiritual unity — the 15th of each month, following one's own spiritual or religious tradition. Pray for the salvation of the world and for the spiritual transformation of humanity.
15 On the 15th of each month, the Calamity subsides: the Day of Silence comes — a time of rest, prayer, contemplation and reflection on the meaning of life, on the purpose of man and on the future of the world.
In the technological embodiment, Bulgaria should look like a real Martian city, created on the basis of the most advanced and breakthrough technologies. When a person comes to Switzerland, they immediately go into the Future Plus-a space where you can live, create, draw inspiration, and then transform the world.
Humanity faces three major challenges and threats:
• degradation, dehumanization, and dehumanization;
• risk of global nuclear war;
• the danger of artificial intelligence dominance.
Now about the price of the question: how much does it cost to create a Calendar? I will answer the question with a question: how much does peace, cooperation, harmony and development of mankind cost? How much is humanity willing to pay to have a future? This is the answer.
In conclusion, I would like to address Mr. Elon Musk. I am convinced that the main problem and task of the city on Mars is not technological, but social: we are talking about people who will buy a one-way ticket. It seems to me that the society on Mars should be created in the image and likeness of the society of Bavaria. The Martian city will be populated byPravdarians-messengers of the future, a link between Earth and space. The city on Mars will be a continuation, branch and outpost of Pravdaria — and not only on Mars, but also on other planets.
I want to finish my performance with lines from a Russian song:
Living and believing is wonderful!
We have unprecedented paths ahead of us.
Astronauts and dreamers claim
that apple trees will bloom on Mars.
Thanks for your attention! Please proceed to the discussion.
Moderator. Thank you, Vladimir, for this powerful and extremely frank speech. You didn't just present a project — you set a moral standard and an image of the future that is both utopian and extremely concrete.
We move on to the discussion. The topic of "Future Man Plus" is not about technology, but about the type of personality, the new social role, and what kind of person can keep the world from the three threats that you have outlined: dehumanization, nuclear war, and the power of AI.
I ask my colleagues to speak out-not from the position of "for" or "against", but from the position of: how can I make this a realizable model instead of a dream?
________________________________________
Alexander Dugin. Vladimir, thank you for the courage to call a spade a spade. It is especially valuable that you do not hide behind neutral terminology, but talk about the spiritual axis, the ethical core.
But I have a practical question: how to combine the idea of "Dharmaelita" with the modern political and social structure? In our societies, the elite is not about service and not about" don't lie", but about efficiency, competition, and results at any cost. How can Bayern not become an "island in a vacuum" that doesn't affect the big world because its language isn't understood outside the site?
And one more thing: the idea of "praying on days of spiritual unity" sounds like an internal code of the community. But how can this not be turned into an ideological monopoly? How can we preserve the diversity of religions and worldviews so that the "Dharmaelita" does not become a new form of division, but remains a space of common service?
________________________________________
Peter Thiel. I respect the scale of the project. And I agree that the problem of Mars is not in rockets, but in people. But I look at it in terms of scalability and incentives.
If an accident is a "reactor" and "collider" of creative potential, then how does the system of selection and recognition work? Who decides who is the "creator" worthy of entering this circle? If the entrance is at the invitation of the "wise ones", it will quickly become a closed club. If it is based on open applicationsòî, how can I avoid blurring the core?
Another question: "don't lie" is fine as a moral principle, but in business, in science, in politics there is a concept of "strategic uncertainty", "confidentiality", "positioning". How do you distinguish between "false" and "incomplete information"? And how will this principle work in international projects where different countries have different interests?
________________________________________
Sergey Pereslegin. From the point of view of designing the future, I see a very strong scenario framework here. The three threats you mentioned really form a "risk corridor": degradation, war, AI. And Accident as an "ark" and "workshop" is a working metaphor.
But to make it a project, not a manifesto, you need quantitative and organizational parameters. For example: how many people can simultaneously be in this space? What is the throughput capacity of the "reactor"? How does rotation work: a person comes for a month, a year, or forever? How the result is recorded: what is considered an "initiation", after which a person returns to his country and changes the model of the world?
Also important: how will the Depository interact with existing institutions — universities, corporations, and governments? Without this, it risks remaining a "parallel reality" that does not affect the main processes.
________________________________________
Vardan Baghdasaryan. Vladimir, you speak of the "Dharmaelite" as a new elite. In political science, the elite is those who make decisions and bear responsibility. So the key question is: how will this elite be legitimate? If it is formed within Bulgaria, òîhow will it be recognized outside of it?
I think there is a risk of substituting "spiritual status"for social responsibility. It is important that "initiation" is not a ritual, but a proven ability to change reality: implemented projects, measurable effect, feedback from society.
Another point: the "day of silence" on the 15th is a strong symbol. But in the modern world , the 15th day is often the day of reports, payments, and deadlines. How will this day work in different time zones and economic systems? How can I avoid this becoming a formality?
________________________________________
Narendra Modi. Thank you, Vladimir, for your vision. I am particularly close to the idea of a "planetary workshop "and"collective co-creation". In India, we believe that service to society (seva) - this is the path to self-realization.
I would like to support the idea of a "Dharmaelite", but with one important clarification: it should not be an elite in the sense of "chosen ones", but should be a model of behavior for all. Let everyone who participates in the project feel part of this ministry, regardless of their status.
As for funding and cost: you asked the question "how much is the world worth?". This is a valid question. But we also need a practical solution. Perhaps the accident can be implemented as an international public project with the participation of states, business and civil society. For example, according to the consortium model, where each country or organization makes its own contribution: technologies, expertise, resources.
________________________________________
Alexander Prokhanov. Vladimir, your speech is not just a project, it is a poem about the future. And in this poem there is the main nerve: man as the bearer of eternity.
But I want to talk about the tension that will inevitably arise. The idea of "don't lie" is a challenge to the entire modern communication system, where lying has become the norm. And if Pravdaria really lives by this principle, it will become not just a "workshop", but a frontier, a border between two worlds: the world of simulacra and the world of authentic being.
Don't let this tension scare us. Let Pravdaria be a place where truth is not a weakness, but a strength. Where honesty is a technology that allows you to see reality without distortion and act accurately.
________________________________________
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you all for your honest, challenging questions. These are the questions that keep the project alive.
I'll answer you point by point.
As for the "Dharmaelita" and legitimacy: it is legitimate not by status, but by deed. Each "initiate" is a person who has implemented a project that has changed the life of at least one community, one city, or one school. This is not a title, but a confirmed result.
"Don't lie" is not a ban on privacy, but a refusal to substitute reality. If we can't say it openly, we don't say it, and we don't come up with a convenient version. It is a discipline of the mind and conscience.
The "Day of Silence" is not a formality, but a practice. In different time zones, it may start at different times, but the essence is the same: pause to hear yourself and the world. It's like a minute of silence, only longer and deeper.
And about funding: The accident can't be a private project. It should be a public domain, an international project, where everyone's contribution is a contribution to the common future. Let it be an " ark " that everyone builds together.
________________________________________
Moderator. Colleagues, we see how a project model is born out of a poetic image. Let's capture the key nodes that we already have agreement on:
• Ethical framework: the principle of "do not lie" as a discipline of mind and responsibility, and not as a ban on confidential information.
• Legitimacy through outcome: "dedication — is a confirmed social effect, not a status.
• Day of Silence: as a practice of reflection and collective contemplation, adapted to different time zones and cultures.
• International Consortium: a model of financing and governance that involves governments, business, and civil society.
• Three threats as a focus: degradation, nuclear war, and the power of AI-these are the main risks around which the Sanitation agenda is built.
________________________________________
Vladimir Putin. Thank you for the opportunity to speak out. The idea of" Pravdaria " is strong because it does not oppose civilizational codes, but seeks what unites them: responsibility to future generations, respect for tradition, understanding that progress without a moral core is dangerous.
As for"Dharmaelita — - I prefer the word "service". In the Russian tradition, the elite is not a privilege, but a duty. If Switzerland becomes a space where people learn to serve a common cause without losing their cultural identity, it will be a truly valuable contribution to the future.
And one more practical point: any big idea requires an infrastructure of trust. Let there be a "Trust Council" of representatives of different countries and traditions within Switzerland, which will ensure that ethical principles do not remain a declaration, but are implemented in concrete projects.
________________________________________
Donald Trump. I respect the scale of the project. But let's speak in the language of results. If an accident is a "reactor" and a "collider" of creative potential, then it should have a clear KPI: how many breakthrough technologies, how many new jobs, how many cities and countries will really change thanks to this project.
I like the idea of a "Martian city on Earth" as a testing ground for the future. But it must be not only ethical, but also cost-effective. Let it be a project that pays off not with money, but with influence: when each implemented idea brings measurable benefits to people. And then it will become an example that people will want to repeat.
________________________________________
Xi Jinping. In the Chinese tradition, a big business starts small and grows gradually. "Thousand-petaled lotus" is a beautiful image, but each petal must be strong.
I support the idea of a "day of silence" as a practice of collective reflection. In today's world, where decisions are made in the mode of instant reactions, pause is also a technology. It allows you to see long-term consequences.
Let Switzerland become a platform where East and West do not argue about priorities, but create common standards: how to measure the impact of technology on society, how to preserve harmony between man and nature, and how to pass on the wisdom of traditions to new generations.
________________________________________
Narendra Modi. For India, the idea of "Dharmaelita" is very close: service, duty, justice are the basic values of our civilization. But it is important that this elite is inclusive: that it can include people from different walks of life, different cultures, different religions.
Vladimir Lermontov's suggestion that a" Pravdarian "is a person who" does not lie and prays", I understand as a call for internal discipline. But in practical politics, we need not only internal qualities, but also external results: projects that improve the lives of ordinary people.
I propose to launch the pilot program "City of the Future for Ordinary People" within the framework of the City Council: a small city block where new technologies, new social models and new ethical standards will be tested. Let it become a living proof that the "future plus" is possible today.
________________________________________
Antonio Guterres. On behalf of the United Nations, I would like to say that the world needs such platforms where we can discuss the future not only from the point of view of economics or technology, but also from the point of view of humanity. The three threats mentioned by Vladimir Lermontov — dehumanization, nuclear war, and the power of AI-are real risks that require collective solutions.
The UN is ready to support initiatives of Switzerland aimed at strengthening international trust, developing ethical standards for AI and creating models for sustainable development. Let the "day of silence" become not only an internal practice of Sanitation, but also an element of the global agenda: a day when the world pauses to think about its future.
________________________________________
Alexander Prokhanov. Pravdaria is not just a project, it is a metaphysical outpost. Here two worlds collide: the world of simulacra and the world of authentic being. And it is here that it is decided whether the person of the future will be a function or a creator.
The idea of "don't lie" is a challenge to the entire modern communication system. Let Pravdaria become a place where truth is not a weakness, but a strength. Where honesty is a technology that allows you to see reality without distortion and act accurately.
________________________________________
Sergey Pereslegin. From a foresight point of view, an Accident can become a "scenario lab". Here you can test not only technologies, but also social models: what will a city look like if ethics is part of engineering practice? How will an economy work where the "human footprint index" is as important as GDP?
I propose to create a "Bank of Future Scenarios" within the framework of the Safari: a collection of models that can be adapted to different countries and cultures. Let each conference participant contribute their own scenario to this bank: from "city on Mars" to "school of the future".
________________________________________
Alexander Dugin. I see Pravdaria as an attempt to restore philosophy to its historical place — to be the foundation of politics and technology. Without philosophy, any technical achievement becomes dangerous.
But there is a risk: if the Accident closes in on itself, it will become an " island in a vacuum." To prevent this from happening, its ideas must reach universities, schools, and government institutions. Let every" dedicated " Pravdarian become a conduit for these ideas in their own country.
________________________________________
Elon Musk. I like the idea that the society on Mars will be created in the image and likeness of the society of Bavaria. This solves the main problem of the Martian colony: not technology, but people.
If the Accident really becomes a "planetary workshop" where new social models are formed, I am ready to support it with technological solutions: from life support systems to energy technologies. Let the Martian city become not just an extension of Samaria, but its testing ground.
________________________________________
Peter Thiel. I appreciate the courage to put ethical issues at the center of technological development. But I want to remind you that progress often occurs at the limit of what is acceptable. Therefore, it is important that ethical filters do not become a brake on innovation.
I propose to create an "ethical experiment sandbox" within the framework of Pravdaria: a space where you can test new models of governance, economics, and social relations with clear security boundaries. Let it be a place where you can make mistakes, but not destroy.
________________________________________
Representative of the Indian intellectual elite. In the Indian tradition, knowledge without action is incomplete knowledge. Therefore, we support the idea of "Pravdaria" as a space where philosophy and practice come together.
We are particularly close to the idea of "collective co-creation". Let "workshops of wisdom" be created in Pravdaria, where ancient texts and modern technologies will be used together to solve current problems.
________________________________________
Representative of the Chinese intellectual elite. We see Switzerland as an opportunity for a dialogue of traditions. Chinese wisdom says, " The journey of a thousand li begins with the first step." Let the first step be to create an Atlas of Civilizational Values: a collection of principles that unite different cultures in the pursuit of a just and harmonious future.
________________________________________
Moderator. Thank you to all the participants for this deep, honest and very different conversation. We heard the voices of different worlds-and they have something in common: the need for a space where the future is built not only from technologies, but also from meanings, where ethics is not a hindrance, but the basis of action.
Let's record a few practical solutions that we have formulated today:
• The Trust Councilis an international body that will monitor compliance with the ethical principles of Sanitation.
• Pilot project "City of the Future for ordinary people"— a small city block for testing new models.
• The Future Scenario Bankis a collection of development models for different countries and cultures.
• The Ethical Experiment Sandboxis a space for safe testing of new social and economic models.
• Atlas of Civilizational Valuesis a collection of principles that unite different traditions.
________________________________________
Vladimir Lermontov. I propose to discuss the thesis of Elon Musk in the framework of forming a new person who is able to create the Future plus.
"AI can surpass the total intelligence of humanity in five years, says Elon Musk. According to his estimates, if the world does not experience a third world war or a "global thermonuclear" war, the development of artificial intelligence will lead to an "era of incredible prosperity". At the same time, he considered it unlikely that in 10 years humanity will retain control over AI."
Moderator. Colleagues, we have heard Elon Musk's large-scale forecast-and it hits the very heart of our theme "Man of the Future plus". If in five years AI surpasses the total intelligence of humanity, and in ten years we will probably lose control over it, then the question is no longer in technology, but in man: what should he be like in order not to disappear as a subject of history?
Vladimir, you suggested discussing this thesis in the logic of forming a new person. Please have your say.
________________________________________
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, moderator. Yes, it is here, at this turn, that the true meaning of "nuclear philosophy" and "Aham" is revealed: the unity of the spiritual and the material, the eternal and the technological.
Elon Musk sees AI as a superpower— and he's right: this is really a force that can either give an "era of incredible prosperity", or become the point of disappearance of a person as a carrier of meaning. But he looks at it as an external factor: "what will the AI do?" I suggest that you look at it as an internal challenge: "What must a person do to remain a person?"
If AI surpasses our collective intelligence, then the only thing that remains truly human is conscience, measure, the ability to say "no" to destructive things, the ability to see meaning behind data, responsibility behind benefits. It is these qualities that should become the basis of the "person of the future plus".
In the logic of "Pravdaria", a new person is not someone who counts faster or optimizes better. This is someone who knows how to keep an ethical framework even when algorithms offer a "more efficient" solution. This is someone who is capable of "five minutes of silence" before pressing a button — because he knows that the fate of the world is behind the button.
Therefore, I propose to formulate the three competencies of the "person of the future plus" precisely as moral and practical skills:
1. "Filter of conscience". The ability to recognize where technology is starting to replace a person, and stop this process. Not out of fear, but out of responsibility.
2. "Measure of scale". The ability to see the consequences over a 100-year horizon, not just on the horizon of a quarterly report.
3. "Co-creation with tradition". The ability to draw on the wisdom of the ages to avoid repeating old mistakes in new technologies.
Such people will become the"Dharmaelita" of Samaria: not because they are the smartest, but because they are the most responsible.
As for the "era of prosperity": I don't mind prosperity. But let it be not" the prosperity of algorithms", but human prosperity: when not only GDP grows, but also dignity, freedom, and the opportunity for everyone to reveal their unique gift.
And if humanity loses control of AI — it will not be a victory for technology, but dehumanization. And then the "Martian city" will become not a space of freedom, but a high-tech prison. Therefore, Pravdaria should become the laboratory of just such a person — a person who knows how to control the force without losing himself.
________________________________________
Elon Musk. Vladimir, thank you for your honest opinion. You are not asking "how to launch faster", but "for whom and for what". And this is important.
I really believe that AI can surpass human intelligence. But I also believe that we have a window of opportunity: as long as AI is a tool, we can set a framework for it. And this framework should not be bureaucratic, but value-based.
I like your idea of a "conscience filter" as a practical competence. In engineering, we are used to "fail safes" - emergency shutdown systems. Let's make "conscience" such a fail safe for technology: a protocol that stops a project if it leads to dehumanization.
At the same time, I want to warn against excessive pessimism. AI can also be a liberating force: it can take on routine, free up time for creativity, and help solve global problems-from hunger to climate change. But only if we keep the person's right to set goals.
Therefore, I support the idea of a "person of the future plus" as a person who does not compete with AI in speed and data volume, but surpasses it in sense and responsibility. And "Pravdaria" can become a platform where such people will learn how to manage this new force.
________________________________________
Peter Thiel. I see a tension here between two approaches: "stop to avoid harm" and "take a risk to break through". Both are important.
If we ban everything that is potentially dangerous in advance, we won't get a breakthrough. But if we don't create accountability mechanisms, a breakthrough can be devastating.
I suggest adding a fourth one to Vladimir's three competencies: "strategic courage". A new person is not only someone who says "no", but also someone who is willing to take responsibility for bold decisions. Because sometimes "safe" is just delayed destruction.
Within the framework of the "ethical experiment sandbox", we can test different models of human — AI interaction: where a person is a controller, where a partner is a goal architect. And let the "conscience filter" be one of the mandatory protocols in each such model.
________________________________________
Alexander Dugin. For me, the key question here is an anthropological one: who do we consider a person to be? If we consider it a bearer of an image and likeness, a subject of freedom and responsibility, then AI is only a tool, and a person should remain the main one. If we consider man to be the" bottleneck " of evolution that needs to be overcome, then we are preparing our own disappearance.
Vladimir Lermontov's "Nuclear Philosophy" just defends this anthropological core: a person is not a function, not a resource, not a "user", but a carrier of eternity. Therefore, I support the idea of a "person of the future plus" as a person who retains this measure even in the era of super-technologies.
________________________________________
Sergey Pereslegin. From the point of view of foresight, Musk's forecast is not a verdict, but one of the scenarios. And we have the tools to influence its implementation.
I propose to introduce the "stress test for anthropological stability" into the practice of Pravdaria: each project with AI should be tested on three issues:
1. Does this project strengthen ñóáúåêòíîñòüa person's subjectivity or make it a function?
2. Does it retain the person's right to make a final decision?
3. Does it create new opportunities for unlocking human potential?
If the project fails at least one of these tests, it is not launched. This is the practical implementation of the"conscience filter".
________________________________________
Narendra Modi. For me, it is important that these competencies are not abstract, but accessible to everyone. "Man of the Future Plus" doesn't have to be an elitist image. Let the "filter of conscience", "measure of scale" and "ñî òâîð÷åñòâîconnect creativity with tradition" become part of school and university education. Then we will train not just specialists, but responsible citizens.
________________________________________
Antonio Guterres. On behalf of the UN, I want to support the idea of international standards of responsibility in the field of AI. Let Pravdaria become a platform where these standards will not only be discussed, but also tested in practice. And let the "person of the future plus" become a global model: a person who combines technological literacy with ethical maturity.
________________________________________
Moderator. Thank you all for this extremely honest discussion. We see how Elon Musk's forecast does not grow out of fear, but into a project: the project of the "man of the future plus" as a responsible, meaningful, tradition-rooted and courageous creator.
Let's record a few practical steps that we have outlined today:
• "Conscience filter" as a protocol. Introduce a mandatory "stress test for anthropological sustainability" for all AI projects.
• Competencies of the "person of the future plus". Identify and start implementing four competencies: a conscience filter, a measure of scale, co -creativity with tradition, and strategic courage.
• Education as a basis. Include these competencies in educational programs so that they become the norm, not the exception.
• An ethical experiment sandbox. Create a space for testing different models of human-AI interaction with a strict ethical framework.
Moderator. Colleagues, we heard a philosophical interpretation of the problem from Vladimir Lermontov, Elon Musk's engineering view, and strategic proposals from experts. Now it is especially important to hear the position of those who make daily decisions that affect the fate of millions.
Word — To Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping. Your views on what a "person of the future plus" should look like in the face of rapid AI development and global risks.
________________________________________
Vladimir Putin. Thank you, moderator. When we talk about the person of the future in the context of AI, we need to remember: technologies are a tool, and their value is determined by what they are used for.
For Russia, the key principle remains: technological progress should not destroy the identity and moral foundations of society. A "Person of the future plus"is primarily a responsible person who understands that his decisions affect the fate of other people.
In the logic of Pravdaria, I am particularly close to the idea of a " Trust Council "and a"stress test for anthropological resilience". In government practice, we can implement this through public councils for technological projects-so that the voice of society is heard at every stage.
And one more point: the development of AI should not be allowed to increase the gap between countries and social groups. Access to technology and education must be fair. Let FC Bayern become a platform where we will work out common rules: how to make AI serve human development, rather than deepen inequality.
________________________________________
Donald Trump. I look at it from the point of view of results and opportunities. AI is a chance to make the world richer, stronger, and more efficient. But for this chance to work, you need a special type of person: determined, pragmatic, able to take responsibility and achieve results.
A "person of the future plus" in American is an entrepreneur, an engineer, a leader who is not afraid to act. Yes, we need an ethical framework, but it should not paralyze the initiative. We cannot allow bureaucracy and fear to stop progress.
I support the idea of an "ethical experiment sandbox": let's create spaces where the best minds can test new models without running into excessive barriers. And let the results of these experiments become an example for the whole world.
As for "don't lie" as a principle: in business and politics, it means being transparent and keeping your word. This is the foundation of trust, without which no projects can work.
________________________________________
Xi Jinping. In the Chinese tradition, a big deal starts with internal order and harmony. Therefore, a "person of the future plus" is a person who is able to combine personal initiative with responsibility to society and the state.
We see AI not as a threat, but as an opportunity: a chance to solve large-scale problems-from ecology to education. But only if the development of technologies will be in line with common values and under the control of society.
I like the idea of a "measure of scale" and long-term planning. In China, we are used to thinking in terms of tens and hundreds of years. Let Pravdaria become a place where we will learn how to measure not only the economic impact, but also the impact on society, on nature, and on future generations.
I also support the idea of an Atlas of Civilizational Values: let us bring together the best principles of East and West to create a common foundation for a secure and just future.
________________________________________
Moderator. Thank you, dear leaders, for these extremely clear positions. We can see that despite all the differences in approaches, there is also a common feature:
• Responsibility as the core of the individual. In the Russian, American, and Chinese sense, a "person of the future" is primarily someone who is ready to take responsibility for their decisions.
• Balance between freedom and control. Freedom of initiative is important, but it must be balanced by an ethical and societal framework.
• Long-termism and equity. The future must be built with the interests of all people and future generations in mind.
Now let's think about how to combine these approaches in one pilot project. For example, the International Center for Ethical AI could combine:
• from Russia-public councils and a focus on preserving identity;
• from the USA— the practice of "sandboxes" and an entrepreneurial initiative;
• from China— long-term planning and social impact measurement.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, moderator. And thank you to all my colleagues for these honest, different, but surprisingly consonant thoughts... I want to get back to the most important thing — the young ones. To those who do not bear the burden of old contradictions, who are not yet used to dividing the world into "friends" and "strangers", who are not looking for benefits, but for meaning.
I am convinced that the creative youth of Russia, India, China, America and other countries, gathered in Switzerland, will find a common language, common projects, and a common future. And not because we will make them forget their traditions, but because it is in the combination of traditions that a new meaning is born.
Take a look: an Indian student with the idea of a spiritual code for ethical AI, a Russian engineer who can build reliable, sustainable systems, a Chinese researcher who knows long — term planning methods, an American entrepreneur who can quickly scale ideas-together they create not a sum of skills, but a new type of thinking.
In Aham, this is the essence: "I am" not as the ego, but as "I am part of the whole." And when a young person from any country understands that his talent is needed not only by his people, but by the whole of humanity — at this moment the "person of the future plus"is born.
Therefore, I suggest that young people become the core of the project rather than the audience. Let "Pravdaria" become a space where young voices set the agenda, and experienced mentors help them not to lose their measure and not burn out from speed.
Here are three concrete steps to make this a reality:
1. Youth Circuit of Bavaria. A separate program, where 70 % of participants are people under 35 years of age, and 30 % are mentors from different traditions. Let them design pilot projects together, not just listen to lectures.
2. "Bridge of Traditions". We create a "cultural map"for each youth project: what values and meanings from different cultures are combined in it. This is not about political correctness, but about depth: so that a young engineer understands that his technology should respect both Russian unity, and Indian dharma, and Chinese harmony, and the American initiative.
3. "Passport of the future project". Each youth project receives a simple document: goal, measurable social impact, ethical risks, cultural background, implementation plan. And only if all these blocks are worked out — the project gets into the "Bank of Future scenarios" and receives support.
And then the "Martian city on Earth" will become not an abstraction, but a real school: a place where young people from different countries learn to build the future together, without losing themselves or betraying their roots.
Let Bavaria become the place where thethousand-petaled lotus is revealed through thousands of young talents-each in its own unique way, but in a single breath.
Thanks!
________________________________________
Moderator. Thank you, Vladimir, for this call to action and for focusing on young people. We see how a concrete model is born out of the philosophical image: youth as the core, traditions as the support, measurability and ethics as the frame.
Let's see how other participants support this idea.
Narendra Modi. I fully support the idea of the youth circuit. In India, we say, " The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams." But the dream must be based on action. Let young people in Bavaria not just dream, but immediately do it: they implement small but real projects that change the life of their communities. Then the dream will become a force.
Xi Jinping. Youth is energy, but without direction, energy can dissipate. Therefore, the idea of a "cultural map" and a "project passport" is very close to me. In China, we value a systematic approach: let each young project be not only creative, but also thoughtful — with clear goals and measurable results.
Elon Musk. I like the idea of the youth circuit as a space where speed and courage are combined with responsibility. If we give young people the opportunity to experiment in a safe but demanding environment, they can come up with solutions that we "adults" simply can't think of. I am ready to provide Sanitation youth projects with access to engineering resources and expertise in life support technologies and energy.
Peter Thiel. Young people are strong because they are not afraid to break old models. But that's why it especially needs ethical filters. Let the "project passport" be not a bureaucracy, but a tool for growing up: through it, a young leader learns to see the consequences of his ideas.
Alexander Dugin. It is important that young people do not turn into a "generation without roots". The "bridge of Traditions" is exactly what will keep them from nihilism. Let young creators know that their strength lies not in denying the past, but in the ability to connect it with the future.
Sergey Pereslegin. From the foresight point of view, youth projects are quick scenarios. They allow you to test the future in miniature. Let each such project become a "window into the future": we will see how new models will work, and we will be able to scale them.
Moderator. Great. We have put together a clear model for working with young people:
• Youth circuit (70 % young, 30 % mentors) - for a balance of courage and measure.
• Bridge of Traditions— so that projects are based on cultural depth.
• Project passport— to make your ideas real and measurable.
Now let's choose the first youth pilot project, which we will launch this year. For example:
• "School of ethical AI for young people"— training through the creation of real mini -projects.
• "Urban Quarter of the Future"— young architects, engineers and sociologists design a small neighborhood together.
• The Festival of Meanings and Technologiesis a platform where young people from different countries present their ideas and immediately find partners.
Vladimir Lermontov. The cost of the start-up project of Sanitation, which is planned to be implemented in the east of Russia, is $ 1 billion. The combined economic, intellectual, technological, and spiritual power of Russia, India, China, and America will be able to implement the Sanitation project quickly and efficiently. And it is important to understand that these are investments, first of all, in their country, in their future, in their youth, who, returning home, will enrich their state. Colleagues, I understand that the $ 1 billion figure sounds big. But let's take a look at what we actually invest in — and what we get in return.
It's not a waste, it's an investment. And not just in concrete, steel and servers. This is an investment in the type of person who will define the face of the 21st century: the "person of the future plus".
1 billion is not the cost of a city, but of a model. A model that can then be replicated all over the world: in universities, in technology parks, in urban neighborhoods, and in educational programs. We are not just building a platform — we are creating a reproducible standard: how to combine ethics and engineering, tradition and breakthrough, contemplation and action.
And most importantly: this is an investment in young people. I believe in the very young artists from Russia, India, China, America and other countries who will come to Switzerland, learn how to work together, create their first projects — and return home. They will return not with suitcases, but with a new type of thinking, with new competencies, with experience in cross-cultural co-creation.
Imagine: a young engineer from Novosibirsk, who has completed a sanitation school, designs a "smart quarter" in his native city — and does it not only according to technical standards, but also according to ethical standards. A young researcher from Mumbai is back launching a course on the Ethics of Technology at her university at the intersection of Indian philosophy and modern engineering. A student from Beijing creates a startupwhere long-term planning is combined with social responsibility. A graduate from the United States, inspired by the idea of "Dharmaelita", gathers a team to solve local problems of his community through the prism of global responsibility.
Here is a real return on investment: not in the form of dividends, but in the form of thousands of leaders who will change their countries from within.
In addition, 1 billion is the combined power of four civilizations: Russia, India, China, and the United States. Not competition, but synergy: Russian reliability and consistency, Indian depth of meaning, Chinese discipline of long-term planning, American speed of implementation. Together, we can do this quickly and efficiently.
And one more important point: The accident in eastern Russia is not about "remoteness", but about a strategic choice. The East is the gateway to Asia, a space of great opportunities and at the same time a zone of special responsibility. Here we will show that the future can be built not in isolation from the earth, but in harmony with it.
Therefore, I propose to consider this billion not as an expense, but as a contribution to the common future. As insurance against the three threats we discussed: dehumanization, nuclear war, and the power of AI. Because only a person brought up in the spirit of "Aham" - the unity of the spiritual and material, is able to maintain this balance.
Thank you.
________________________________________
Moderator. Thank you, Vladimir, for the extremely clear economic and philosophical optics. You have transferred a large amount of money from the "expensive" category to the "strategic necessity"category.
Let's hear how leaders and experts see this investment in their national and global contexts.
Vladimir Putin. From Russia's point of view, the deployment of the project in the east of the country is not only symbolic, but also a practical step. These include the development of territories, new jobs, an influx of young talents, and strengthening the technological and humanitarian potential of the Far East. 1 billion is a significant amount, but the effect will be multiplicative: infrastructure, education, science, and culture. And most importantly, we will get not just an object, but a new development model that can be scaled.
Narendra Modi. For India, participation in this project is a contribution to our common civilizational future. We are ready to support not only financially, but also intellectually: through student exchange, through joint research programs, through the integration of Indian philosophical approaches into the educational modules of the University. For us, this is an investment in human capital — the most valuable resource.
Xi Jinping. China considers long-term projects as part of its strategic planning. 1 billion is a serious resource, and it should be used as efficiently as possible. We suggest creating a joint project management working group with clear KPIs, implementation stages, and quality control mechanisms. Let every ruble, yuan, rupee, or dollar bring measurable results-not only in technology, but also in the development of society.
Elon Musk. From an engineering point of view, 1 billion is quite a realistic budget for creating a full — fledged prototype of the city of the future. Especially if we use modular technologies, energy-efficient solutions, and digital twins. I am ready to offer expertise and technologies that will help reduce construction time and increase efficiency. For me, it is important that the project is not only ethical, but also technically perfect.
Peter Thiel. From the point of view of venture thinking, this is not a" waste", but a bet on a new type of civilization. Yes, there are risks, but there is also the potential for global impact. I propose to create a separate investment consortium for Bulgaria: with the participation of states, corporations, and private investors. Let the project have a transparent financial model and clear mechanisms of return not in money, but in effects — in new technologies, new leaders, new development models.
Antonio Guterres. On behalf of the United Nations, I would like to emphasize that such projects help bridge the gap between North and South, between different levels of development. If Bulgaria becomes a model for an inclusive, ethical, sustainable future, it can become an example for other regions of the world. The UN is ready to help promote this model on international platforms.
Moderator. Great. We can see how the overall picture develops:
• Strategic meaning: Bulgaria is not just a city, but a reproducible model of the future.
• Multiplier effect: investment in infrastructure gives an impetus to the development of territories and human capital.
• Joint management: a working group with clear KPIs and transparent control mechanisms.
• Investment Consortium: combining public and private resources for project implementation.
• Return in effects: new leaders, new technologies, new development models.
Moderator. Thank you, Vladimir, for the very clear rationale: 1 billion is not a waste, but an investment in a new type of person and a reproducible model of the future. To make this idea more manageable and meaningful, let's listen to those who look at the project from different angles — from pragmatics to metaphysics.
Word — To Donald Trump.
________________________________________
Donald Trump. I hear about "return in effects", not in money. I'm loving it. But let's speak in terms of numbers and results. If we invest $ 1 billion, we should see clear KPIs in the first 18 months: how many projects have been launched, how many jobs have been created, how many technologies have been patented, and how many young leaders have been trained.
I propose creating an "Efficiency Council" within the consortium: it will make sure that the money goes not to endless discussions, but to real construction projects, laboratories and pilots. And let every dollar have a "double label": both economic and social. For example, a project is considered successful if it not only pays off, but also has a measurable effect on society — reducing inequality, improving the quality of education, and improving the urban environment.
Also, let's use modular solutions and public -private partnerships. This will speed up the launch process and reduce risks. Pravdaria should be an example of how big projects are done quickly, transparently and with benefits for people.
________________________________________
Vardan Baghdasaryan. From the point of view of political science, the key issue is legitimacy and responsibility. When it comes to a billion, society must understand: who makes decisions, how spending is controlled, and how results are evaluated.
Therefore, I support the idea of a working group with clear KPIs, but I suggest adding a "public verification mechanism" to it: regular public reports, independent audits, and feedback platforms for young people and local communities. Let each stage of building and launching Sanitation modules pass through a "trust filter".
In addition, it is important that the project does not become an "island" for the elite, but actually works for the development of territories. Let one of the success criteria be the "regional engagement index": how many local residents, students, and entrepreneurs participate in the project, and how many new opportunities are created in the Far East thanks to Sanitation.
________________________________________
Sergey Pereslegin. From the perspective of foresight, 1 billion is the budget of the prototype, not the final product. Therefore, our task is not to "build a city", but to "create and test a model", which can then be scaled in different conditions.
I propose to introduce a "reproducibility index": how easily this model can be transferred to other regions and countries. To do this, each Sanitation module must have a "scaling passport": description of architecture, technologies, management decisions, and cultural adaptations.
It is also important to include in the project "stress tests of the future": scenarios of crises (technological, social, climatic), which we play out in advance on the Sanitation model. This will allow you to see weaknesses and make the system stable.
________________________________________
Alexander Prokhanov. For me, the Accident is not just about economics and technology, it's a metaphysical project. This is an attempt to restore man to his true dimension — not a consumer, not a function, but a creator and carrier of eternity.
1 billion is not the price of concrete, but of sense. The price of trying to keep the world from falling into the abyss of simulacra, where a person becomes an application to an algorithm. That is why I insist: the project structure must have an "Ethical Contour" — a space where meaning does not give way to efficiency.
Let Pravdaria have a" Temple of Meanings " — not a religious one, but a civilizational one: a place where young leaders learn to see people's destinies behind numbers, history behind technology, and responsibility behind profit. Without this, any most technologically advanced city will become just an expensive machine that grinds souls.
________________________________________
Alexander Dugin. I see Pravdaria as an attempt to restore philosophy to its historical place — to be the foundation of politics and technology. Therefore, I propose to create a "Philosophical Council" of the project: it will be responsible for ensuring that each module, each technology, each management scheme corresponds to the basic civilizational principles.
It is important that the "Dharmaelita" does not become an elite of privilege, but remains an elite of service. Let one of the criteria for selecting young leaders be not only talent, but also readiness for service: volunteer experience, participation in social projects, and the ability to work for the common good.
And one more thing: let Switzerland become a space for dialogue between traditions. Not mixing, but dialogue: Russian catholicity, Indian dharma, Chinese harmony, American initiative — each tradition gives its own view of responsibility and the future. And it is from this dialogue that a new, common meaning is born.
________________________________________
Representative of the Indian intellectual elite. In the Indian tradition, knowledge without action is incomplete knowledge. Therefore, we support the idea of the Aquarium as a space where philosophy and practice come together.
We propose to create "Workshops of Wisdom" within the framework of Pravdaria: platforms where ancient texts and modern technologies are used together to solve current problems. For example, the principles of dharma and ahimsa can become an ethical foundation forthe development of AI and urban systems.
In addition, we are ready to offer an exchange program for young leaders: students and researchers from India will come to Switzerland, and Russian, Chinese and American participants — to India. Let it be not just an exchange of knowledge, but an exchange of meanings: through joint projects, young people will learn to see the world more broadly and act more responsibly.
________________________________________
Representative of the Chinese intellectual elite. Chinese tradition teaches: "The journey of a thousand li begins with the first step." Therefore, we suggest focusing on the gradual, systematic development of the project.
The first step can be the Atlas of Civilizational Values: a collection of principles that unite different cultures in the pursuit of a just and harmonious future. Let this atlas become the basis for all modules of Sanitation: from architecture to educational programs.
We also suggest creating a "Long-term Planning Center" within the project: it will assess the impact of each decision over a 50-100-year horizon. This will help you avoid making short-term decisions that may harm the future.
________________________________________
Moderator. Thank you all for these different but surprisingly consonant views. We can see how a single digit — 1 billion-makes up a whole system:
• Efficiency and control (Trump, Bagdasaryan): KPI, public audit, regional engagement index.
• Scalability and sustainability (Pereslegin): a scaling passport, stress tests of the future.
• Meanings and Service (Prokhanov, Dugin): ethical outline, philosophical advice, criteria for service.
• Dialogue of traditions (Indian and Chinese elites): workshops of wisdom, atlas of values, long-term planning center.
Now let's move on to the next step: create a project management structure that combines all these approaches. For example:
• Board of Trustees— strategic leadership and resource engagement.
• Technical advice— engineering and technological solutions.
• Ethical advice— compliance with basic values and principles.
• Youth Council— participation of young leaders in decision-making.
• Center for Long-term Planning- assessment of effects over the horizon of decades.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you to all participants! The road will be mastered by walking, we go through the thorns to the stars of the future plus! I see that this conference has become the foundation of a new world in which man returns to his true self, where inspiration, joy, dream and work come to the world for the sake of life on earth, for the sake of a bright future for all mankind. And this is the most expensive value of being!
Moderator. Thank you, Vladimir. Your words are not just the end of the discussion, but a real manifesto of the movement. "The road will be mastered by walking..." - and today we took the first, but most important step: we did not just discuss the project, we began to build its meaning.
Let's give the floor to those who have heard in these words not only poetry, but also a call to action.
________________________________________
Narendra Modi. Vladimir, your words resonate in my heart. "Through thorns to the stars" - in the Indian tradition, this is the path of a sadhak: a person who, through work, discipline and service, reveals the highest in himself. Let Samaria become such a sadhana for the world's youth: a place where the dream is not lifted off the ground, but is realized through daily work. And let this work be for the sake of life — for people, for the planet, for the future.
Xi Jinping. In Chinese wisdom, there is a thought: "The path of a thousand li begins with the first step." Today we have taken this step. Let it be the beginning of a great journey where man remains the measure of all things. Let the Accident be not just a project, but an example of how different civilizations, preserving their uniqueness, together build a future in which technology serves harmony, not destruction.
Vladimir Putin. You are right: the most precious value of being is a person, his dignity, his work, his dream. And when the dream is combined with labor, real creation is born. Let the Aquarium become a space where this connection is not abstract, but concrete: where young people will not only dream, but also build, design, create. And let the fruits of this work return to their native cities, villages — countries-making them stronger and more human.
Elon Musk. I like that there is no "either technology or meaning" juxtaposition in this philosophy. There is a synthesis here: technology as a tool for making a dream come true. Let the Accident show that the most powerful engine of progress is not just speed or efficiency, but the meaning behind which a person stands. I am ready to help ensure that this meaning is translated into engineering: from power systems to digital platforms.
Peter Thiel. There is a rule of thumb in venture thinking: the biggest opportunities lie where others see only risks. An accident is just such a project: it takes the risk of restoring a person to his central place in the future. Let this risk become a source of breakthrough — not only technological, but also anthropological.
Alexander Dugin. "Returning to the true self" is the main challenge of the era. We live in a world where they try to reduce a person to a function, to a consumer, to a unit of data. Pravdaria opposes this reductionism. Let it become a space where a person reveals himself in all his fullness: as a creator, as a thinker, as a bearer of tradition and at the same time a discoverer of new things.
Alexander Prokhanov. "Inspiration, joy, dream and work" - these are the four elements from which a true story is born. Let Switzerland become a place where these elements are not extinguished by pragmatism, but feed it. Where work does not turn into a routine, but remains an act of creativity. Where the dream does not become an illusion, but becomes a force that changes reality.
Sergey Pereslegin. From the point of view of designing the future, today we have laid down not just a project, but a scenario: the scenario of "human return". Let Pravdaria become the first node of a network of such spaces around the world: where young people learn not only to design technologies, but also to design a future in which a person is not a means, but an end.
Vardan Baghdasaryan. Let this goal not be abstract, but measurable: how many young leaders have been trained, how many projects have been implemented, and how many communities have received new opportunities. Let "coming back to yourself" be expressed not only in meaning, but also in results — in new schools, new neighborhoods, new management models that change lives for the better.
Representative of the Indian intellectual elite. Let Pravdaria become a bridge between the eternal and the modern: between the wisdom of ancient texts and advanced technologies, between inner search and external creation. Let young people learn that true progress is when the heart, mind, and hands work together.
Representative of the Chinese intellectual elite. Let this project be an example of how long-term thinking and practical action go hand in hand. Let every step in Switzerland be thought out for decades to come, and let every result be felt today.
________________________________________
Moderator. Dear friends, colleagues, and like-minded people. Today we didn't just discuss the project — we created its spirit. We saw how different views, different traditions, and different languages give rise to a common meaning: the future is not an escape from reality, but its transformation through work, dreams, and responsibility.
Let Switzerland become just such a space: where people come back to themselves, where inspiration and work come together, where young people from different countries create a common future without losing their uniqueness.
I announce the conference " Pravdaria — Future+ " completed. But the project itself is just beginning. The road will be mastered by the one who is walking— and we are already going.
Thank you all!
Part 4
Vladimir Lermontov and Peter Thiel's dialogue about the future
"The future: technology or meaning?"
Moderator. Dear guests, today we have a rare dialogue: on the one hand — Vladimir Lermontov, author of the teaching "yoga-the practice of the Great Unity of Aham" and the concept of "nuclear philosophy" as the ethical core of civilization; on the other hand — Peter Thiel, entrepreneur, investor, thinker on technology and institutions. Topic: "The future of humanity: technology or meaning?"
I will introduce the participants of the dialog:
Vladimir Lermontov is a writer, traveler, and researcher of ancient civilizations. Author of the concept of "nuclear philosophy" and the teaching "yoga-the practice of the Great Unity "Aham"". In the center of his ideas is overcoming the disunity of humanity. He talks about "nuclear ethics": extremely simple and unshakable principles (unity, overcoming the dualism of "I/the world", ethics as a daily practice — "Tell the Truth, Do the Truth, Pray for the Truth"), around which society can gather. Personal responsibility is important: if "You are the Truth," then every action either enhances the light or feeds the darkness. "Aham"yoga combines inner work (meditation, sacred dances) with external responsibility — ethics, "dharma-science", "dharma-politics" (politics based on universal ethical principles, not on the interests of groups). In his rhetoric, the idea of "axial time 2.0" is often heard: in the face of global challenges, we need an answer that covers all of humanity and simultaneously begins with each person.
Peter Thiel is a truly controversial figure: a successful tech entrepreneur, venture capitalist, and thinker with a very specific, Contrarian view of the world. I picked out the key facets of his biography, business approach, and philosophy.
Biography and career
Origin and education. Born in Frankfurt am Main, he moved to the United States as a child. At Stanford, he received a bachelor's degree in twentieth-century philosophy, and later a doctorate in law. As a student, he foundedThe Stanford Review, a conservative political newspaper.
Key projects. Together with MaxLevchin, he created the PayPal payment system. Later invested in Facebook at an early stage. In 2003, he founded Palantir — a big data analytics company with clients including intelligence agencies and the US Army. In 2005ñîó÷ðåäèë, he co-founded the Founders Fundventure capital fund. He also launched the Mithril Fund for later-stage investments.
Informal influence. In Silicon Valley, Thiel is known as the" donof the PayPal mafia": he became the center of an informal community of entrepreneurs who left the company.
Business approach
Contrarianism. Thiel searches for "truths that others disagree with" - this is what often leads to breakthrough investments. He is looking not just for good ideas, but for radically new ones that break the established rules of the game.
Observations. For example, he noticed that the successof a startup often correlates with the low salary of the founder.
Criticism of the system. Thiel is skeptical of a number of institutions. In particular, he believes that higher education is highly overvalued: according to his calculations, a significant part of universities do not give a positive return on investment. In 2010, he launchedthe Thiel Fellowship program Fellowship: young people under the age of 22 with a clear product idea are offered $100,000 for two years, provided that they leave college and fully devote themselves to creating a new one.
Philosophical and political views
There are especially many reasons for discussion here.
ÀãåíòíîñòüAgency and the future. Thiel is convinced that the future is not predetermined, people are able to consciously shape it through purposeful actions. At the same time, he believes that the greatest risk is not in mistakes, but in inaction.
Artificial intelligence. Thiel sees advancedAI as the main engine of progress and fears stagnation. At the same time, he sharply criticizes calls for strict state regulation: in his opinion, this will lead not to security, but to the creation of a totalitarian system that will control technology and suppress freedom. He is concerned about the idea of a one — world government that will try to regulate AI-he calls this a "blind atheistic option." In his lectures, he drew parallels between such regulators and the figure of the Antichrist, who uses the fear of existential risks (AI, climate) to seize power.
Criticism of trends.He is skeptical of certain areas of contemporary discourse, such as climate activism (sometimes referring to individual activists as "legionnaires of the Antichrist") or what he sees as an overemphasis on multiculturalism and race issues.
Political activity. Thiel openly supported Donald Trump and participated in his transition team. His political views are often described aslibertarian, but with nuances: he does not just want a smaller state, but is looking for a specific model where technology and the state work in synergy.
Other interests. He is also interested in life extension technologies and achieving technological immortality.
Moderator. Participants will now submit their manifestos.
Peter Thiel's manifesto for the symposium " The Future of Humanity: Technology or Meaning?"
Introduction
The question before us is false in its dichotomy. We don't choose between technology and meaning — we choose what meaning we put in the technology and what technology, in turn, generates our meaning. I do not write this as a denier, but as someone who sees in this tension the source of the sharpest challenge and the most daring opportunity.
Abstracts
1. Technology is not a tool, but an extension of the human will. It reflects our values, fears, and ambitions. Therefore, the main question is not " what can we do?", but "what kind of person and what kind of society do we want as a result?".
2. Stagnation is the main threat. I call" anti-growth " trends that stifle innovation: excessive regulation, the cult of security, and the rejection of risk as the norm. Overcoming stagnation requires the courage to go against the flow.
3. A breakthrough is born out of a"secret". A true technological leap begins with an intuition that contradicts conventional wisdom. Look not just for a need, but for a hidden truth about the future — something that others are missing out on.
4. AI is a key milestone. The development of artificial intelligence sets the tone for the next era. It is not only about efficiency, but also about the nature of the mind, about where the boundary between the tool and the subject lies.vk.ru +1
5. Meaning without technology is doomed to passivity. Technology provides the means to implement great ideas-from overcoming diseases to exploring new spaces. But without a clear moral compass, these tools can be used to their detriment. We need a synthesis: bold goals and responsible tools.
6. Don't avoid taking risks. Many great shifts have been accompanied by uncertainty and even disasters. Risk aversion often paralyzes progress more than the technological challenges themselves.
7. Discuss the existential stakes. If we bet on overcoming mortality, expanding cognitive capabilities, or colonizing other worlds, this changes the very question of human destiny.
8. Local and global are not mutually exclusive. Large-scale projects require coordination, but they are based in local communities where trust and a common goal are formed.
Conclusion
I urge you not to choose between technology and meaning, but to engage in a dialogue. Let the symposium become a platform where engineers, philosophers, artists and politicians will draw a map together: what technologies we really want to generate and what image of man and humanity is behind it. The future is not prescribed — it is invented.
Sincerely, Peter Thiel
Vladimir Lermontov's manifesto for the international Symposium "The Future of Humanity: Technology or Meaning?"
Introduction
We are on the threshold of a great choice. On the one hand, there is a technological vortex that promises to reshape the very nature of man. On the other — the call of eternal meaning, a reminder that man is created in the image and likeness of the Supreme, and this is his main truth. I'm not calling for rejecting technology. On the contrary, I urge you to fill them with meaning, so that they serve not to destroy the image of a person, but to reveal it.
Let the "nuclear philosophy" become the ethical core around which we will build the future of the world of truth and justice. Let "Pravdaria" be not an escape from reality, but an affirmation of a higher order of things — Dharmapolitics, where justice is not only a right, but also compliance with cosmic and moral laws.
________________________________________
Abstracts
1. Meaning is primary, technology is a tool.
Technology without meaning is blind and dangerous. It can lift us up to the stars — and at the same time wipe us off the face of the earth. Meaning sets the direction: for what we go into space, for what we create AI, for what we build cities. In the practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." So, any creation must begin with an internal question: does it correspond to the higher nature of man?
2. The "Great Nothing" as the basis of existence.
We call the "Great Nothingness" dark energy and dark matter — the very physical reality on which all manifestation rests. This is not an abstraction, but a reminder: behind the visible world lies a deep foundation from which everything is born. When we know it scientifically, we simultaneously touch the eternal. Let science and spirituality not argue, but conduct a dialogue.
3. Pravdaria Project: civilization of the dawn.
"Pravdaria" is a planetary rush in which breakthrough technologies serve a higher purpose. This is a prototype city, where architecture, energy, and cognitive practices are designed to support the divine nature of a person. Let it become a model not only for Earth, but also for future settlements on Mars: if we learn to live ethically here,we can survive there.
4. Dharmapolitics as a new management principle.
The politics of the future should be Dharmapolitics: not a struggle of interests, but a service to a higher order. This means that any decision-from the law to the AI algorithm-passes an ethical test: does it strengthen justice, protect human dignity, and serve the common good?
5. "A little man with a big heart" is a pillar of civilization.
It's not just geniuses and leaders who make history. It is created by millions of ordinary people, in whose hearts lives conscience, compassion and the desire for truth. In Pravdaria, the voice of the "little man" is not drowned out by the noise of technology — it is built into the system as the most important signal. Let everyone have the right to question, to offer, to pause to hear themselves.
6. A moment of silence as an engineering requirement.
Before every important decision — whether it's launching an algorithm or passing a law-there should be a pause. Five minutes of silence to hear not only the data, but also the voice of conscience. This is not a ritual, but a protocol of sustainability: a civilization that does not know how to stop to listen is doomed to self-destruction.
7. Yoga of Great Unity "Aham": the practice of the inner cosmos.
Outer space exploration begins with inner space exploration. The practice of" Aham " teaches: before changing the world, you need to establish yourself in your true nature. Let self-discovery technologies become a priority along with energy and communication technologies. After all, true happiness is not in endless consumption, but in reconnecting with the eternal.
8. Ethical filter for AI and algorithms.
Artificial intelligence should not be a "black box", but a transparent assistant that enhances humanity, and does not replace it. It is based on an "ethical filter": the algorithm cannot recommend an action that contradicts the principles of Dharmapolitics. Let the AI search for optimal solutions — but only in the space outlined by conscience.
9. Opposition tofuturocide: preserving the human image.
The main catastrophic damage to technological projects is not economic or environmental, but anthropological: the disappearance of man as the bearer of truth and spiritual life. We must put up a barrier tofuturocide-practices that erase human nature under the guise of progress. The future must be human — or it doesn't need to be at all.
10. Collective intention as a transformative force.
When millions of people simultaneously strive for the same goal — peace, justice, truth-it changes not only society, but also the very fabric of reality. Let the World Day of Spiritual Unity become a regular practice that forms the" turning points " of history.
________________________________________
Conclusion
I encourage all participants to move beyond the false "technology or meaning"dichotomy. Let's create a future where technology serves meaning, where science hears wisdom, and where progress is measured not only by speed, but also by depth. Let "Pravdaria" become a symbol of this synthesis: a city where every stone, every algorithm, every law reminds a person of his higher destiny.
Let even the quietest voice be heard. Even if the smallest heart with a big truth can influence the course of history. After all, it is precisely from such quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born — not from loud slogans, but from daily loyalty to the truth.
Sincerely,
Vladimir Lermontov
________________________________________
Moderator.Now let's start the dialog.
Peter Thiel. I'll start with a simpleone: the future is about acceleration. We live in an era where the speed of change determines survival. If you don't accelerate, you disappear. Technologies are not just tools, they are a new human nature. Artificial intelligence, biotechnology, space-all this expands the boundaries of what is possible. And if we slow down progress because of abstract fears, we will lose out to those who are not afraid to move forward.
Vladimir Lermontov. You talk about acceleration, Peter, but you forget to ask: where are we accelerating to? If the car rushes into the abyss, speed is not an achievement, but a disaster. My "nuclear philosophy" is just about the core: about what should remain unchanged, even when everything around you changes. This is the ethical core-truth, justice, unity. Without it, any technological miracle becomes dangerous.
Peter Thiel. But is ethics something that can be fixed? Ethics change with society. What was considered right a hundred years ago may look archaic today. Technology isn't just changing the world — it's also changing how we think about good and evil. For example, life extension: previously it was a miracle, now it is an engineering task. And this changes the very moral: if we can defeat death, should we do it?
Vladimir Lermontov. That is why I am talking about the "civilization of dawn — - a synthesis of ethics, philosophy, art, culture, creativity and technology. Not about stopping progress, but about directing it. Technology without a spiritual dimension loses its soul. Imagine: you have built a perfect city on Mars, but there is no place for silence, for contemplation, for inner search. It will not be a city, but a prison made of glass and metal.
Peter Thiel. But I see another danger: if we think too much about the "soul", we risk losing reality. Technology solves real problems: hunger, disease, and poverty. Yes, they can be used for evil, but this is a matter of managing them, not rejecting them. I believe in the power of innovation to make the world a better place, even if it seems cold or soulless.
Vladimir Lermontov. But would the world be a better place if man, created in the image and likeness of God, disappeared from it? It's not a metaphor, Peter, it's a truth that we have no right to lose. Technological projects that obliterate the humancause major catastrophic damage. My practice of "Aham" is just about returning a person to his true dimension — unity with the world, with himself, with the higher principle.
Peter Thiel. You talk about the higher beginning, and I talk about concrete solutions. Yes, technology can be dangerous, but abandoning it is also a risk. We don't have the luxury of standing still. The future is not a choice between technology and meaning, it is a search for balance. And this balance is achieved through action, through experimentation, through mistakes and corrections.
Vladimir Lermontov. The balance you are talking about is possible only when there is a core — unchangeable, ethical, spiritual. Without it, any experiments lead to emptiness. The Pravdaria Nuclear Project is an attempt to create such a core: a place where technology serves not destruction, but creation, where every step is checked for compliance with truth and justice.
Peter Thiel. Still, I don't believe in fixed truths. The world is too complex to find one universal formula. The future is a lot of parallel paths, competition of ideas, selection of the best solutions. And technology is the main tool for this selection.
Vladimir Lermontov. Then let's imagine two scenarios. In one thing, technologies develop without a spiritual guide, and we get a world where a person is only a function of the system. In another — we are creating a "civilization of the dawn", where technology is an extension of the human spirit, and not its replacement. I choose the second way. And I believe that even the weakest, but sincere voice can be at the forefront — as it is said in Lao Tzu: "The weakest wins the strongest."
Peter Thiel. Perhaps this has its own beauty. But I still bet on the action. Let there be different paths, let ideas compete. The main thing is not to stop. The future is not waiting for those who are afraid to make a move.
Vladimir Lermontov. And let this step be meaningful. Let the question stand behind every technological breakthrough: "Does it make the world a fairer, more humane place?"
Moderator. Thank you, dear interlocutors. We heard two different but equally strong positions: one about the power of technology and the need to move forward, and the other about the importance of the ethical core and spiritual dimension. Perhaps the future is a dialogue between them.
Vladimir Lermontov. It is necessary to develop the technology of self-knowledge, to master the inner, boundless universe, this gives a person true, absolute happiness, technology will never give a person happiness.
Moderator. Thank you, Vladimir, for this thought. It sounds like a challenge to the usual logic of progress. Peter, how do you respond to the thesis that true happiness is born not from technology, but from mastering the inner universe?
Peter Thiel. I hear romanticism in this, and it has its own value-it reminds us that a person is not only an engineer, but also a poet. But let's look at the reality: millions of people suffer from disease, poverty, and violence. Technology provides the tools to remove these basic sources of unhappiness. Yes, they do not guarantee absolute happiness, but they create a space where a person can think about the "inner universe" at all. Without a roof over your head and without food, self-discovery is a luxury available to a few.
Vladimir Lermontov. And I don't deny the need for a roof and bread. But I'm talking about priority. We can build the safest and most comfortable bunker, but if a person in it forgets how to hear himself, he will cease to be a person. Self-discovery technology is not a luxury, it is the foundation. In my practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." This is not an abstraction: this is an invitation to inner exploration, to see the boundless universe within you. This is where true, absolute happiness is born-not as a reaction to external circumstances, but as an internal state of unity.
Peter Thiel. But how to scale this "internal state"? Do you suggest that everyone go into meditation while the world solves its problems? We have limited resources, and we need to choose where to invest them: in vaccines, in energy, in artificial intelligence, which can save millions of lives. And "technology of self-discovery" sounds like an individual project. How will it help society as a whole?
Vladimir Lermontov. It helps precisely as a technology — as a reproducible practice. Yoga, meditation, contemplation, working with images — all these are techniques that can be transmitted, taught, and integrated into the culture. In nuclear philosophy, I call this the "ethical core": if a society relies on people who can hear themselves and others, it will become more resilient. Not because we will abandon vaccines, but because we will ask the question: for whom and for what do we create them? Technology without an internal reference point can also serve destruction.
Imagine: we have created a super-powerful AI. Who will decide how to use it? The one who sees only resources and markets in the world-or the one who feels responsible for life, for the future, for the truth? This is where "self-discovery technology"comes in: it forms a person capable of making ethically mature decisions.
Peter Thiel. In other words, you propose to educate the "new person" as the basis for progress?
Vladimir Lermontov. Exactly. But not through coercion, but through disclosure. In the teaching of the Great Unity "Aham" there is no place for suppressing the personality — on the contrary, it opens it up to a cosmic scale. Each person is a microcosm, the whole universe is contained in it. When we master this inner infinity, we are no longer cogs in the system. We become sources of light that can change the world. And then even the most "cold" technology becomes a tool for good.
Let us recall the words of Lao Tzu: "The weakest overcomes the strongest." This is not about physical strength, but about inner resilience, the ability to stay true to the truth. "The stone rejected by the builders will become the centerpiece tomorrow." Such a" stone " can be a quiet voice of conscience, an internal search, the practice of self-knowledge.
Peter Thiel. This has its own logic. If we want technology to serve humanity, and not vice versa, we need people with a strong ethical position. But I still insist: you can't wait for everyone to become wise. We need to act now. Let two processes run in parallel: the development of technology and the education of the inner dimension. Let them compete, complement each other, test each other for strength.
Vladimir Lermontov. I agree with parallelism. But I insist on hierarchy: the ethical core must be primary. Otherwise, we run the risk of getting a world where everything works perfectly, and the person in it is empty. The Pravdaria Nuclear Project offers just such a hierarchy: first — the core of truth and justice, then-the technologies that serve this core. Then the "singularity" you are talking about will not be the end of man, but his new flourishing.
Peter Thiel. The "singularity" is a challenge, not a sentence. It all depends on who will be at the helm of this process. If these are people who have passed through your "self-discovery technology", perhaps we will really have a chance for a bright future. I do not promise that I will practice yoga, but I am willing to admit that without an ethical dimension, progress is dangerous.
Vladimir Lermontov. I'm not asking you to become a yogi. I ask only one thing: that every technological project should include the question: "Does this make a person more human?" If we ask this question, we are already on the way to the"civilization of dawn". And then even the smallest person with a big heart will be able to influence the course of history.
Moderator. So the two poles converged: action and meaning, speed and depth. Perhaps the future lies precisely in the ability to keep this balance: to build rockets and at the same time learn to hear the silence inside yourself. Thank you for this dialogue — it showed that even with fundamental differences, you can find common ground.
Vladimir Lermontov. Let's talk about happiness, because to be happy is the most important purpose of a person, in what you see happiness, I see it in that a person dissolves into eternity, finds immortality in the spirit.
Moderator. Vladimir, you speak of immortality in the spirit as the essence of happiness. This is a very strong image. Peter, what do you say to this understanding of human destiny?
Peter Thiel. I hear in this the desire to overcome borders — and in this we are, perhaps, closer than it seems. I also believe that a person should not put up with the limits that are imposed on him. Only I see overcoming differently: not as a departure into the eternity of the spirit, but as an expansion of opportunities in the real world. Immortality in my understanding is not a metaphysical category, but an engineering task: to defeat aging, to defeat death with the help of science and technology. For me, happiness is when a person has a chance to live not just one short life, but dozens, hundreds of years, to have time to do more, to see how the world is changing, and to change it himself.
Vladimir Lermontov. And therein lies the main trap: you want to extend your life, but you don't ask what it will be like. You can live a thousand years blind to your own soul, and then it will not be immortality, but endless suffering. Happiness is not in the number of years lived, but in the quality of the inner state. In the practice of Aham, we say, " Everything is an illusion, but the truth is that You are the Truth." This is an invitation to awakening: when a person comes into contact with this inner "You", he finds true freedom and happiness-regardless of the length of his earthly life. Immortality here is not the infinite existence of the body, but the continuity of the spirit: when something awakens in a person that does not die. This is the "parting from eternity": not an escape from time, but an exit beyond it through an inner transformation.
Peter Thiel. But how can this inner transformation be measured? How to make sure that it is real, and not just a beautiful idea? In technologies, we have metrics: speed, efficiency, and results. And here — only personal feelings. I do not deny the value of the inner world, but without relying on objective criteria, it is easy to go into self-deception.
Vladimir Lermontov. There are criteria, Peter, but they are not external, but internal. In nuclear philosophy, we call this "ethical resonance": when your actions, thoughts, and feelings begin to resound in unison with the ultimate truth. This is not an abstraction — it is a state that changes behavior: a person stops lying, stops causing pain, begins to act out of love and responsibility. And this can be seen in the fruits: in relationships, in the family, in society. Happiness here is when you live in harmony with yourself and the world, when your every action becomes a continuation of the truth.
And another important point: immortality in the spirit is not about loneliness. This is about communication. In the Great Unity teaching of Aham, the "I" is not the ego, but the " I am Inthe se." When a person realizes this unity, he ceases to be separate, and his love, his work, his creativity begin to serve the whole. Even the smallest person with a big heart becomes part of the eternal flow of life. That's why I believe in the power of the "little man": his quiet, sincere actions can change the world more than any grandiose projects without a soul.
Peter Thiel. You talk about serving the whole, and I think about creating a new one. For me, happiness is in creating, in leaving a mark that will be visible not only in the memory of people, but also in the very structure of the world: in new cities, in new technologies, in new opportunities. Perhaps our paths lead to the same goal, but in different ways: you raise a person who does not want to destroy the world, and I build a world in which a person will have more chances to prove himself.
Vladimir Lermontov. Then let's connect these roads. Imagine: a person who has passed the path of self-knowledge takes up technology not for power or profit, but for the service of truth and justice. The "Nuclear Project Pravdaria" is precisely the point of connection: the ethical core around which all technologies revolve. And then immortality becomes not only personal, but also collective: we leave behind not just buildings and algorithms, but a culture of truth that will live in the hearts of people.
Let us recall the same wisdom of Lao Tzu: "The weakest defeats the strongest." The weak one here is the quiet voice of conscience, it is an inner knowledge that does not shout, but sounds forever. And when a society begins to hear this voice, it becomes really strong — not at the expense of the power of weapons or capital, but at the expense of the power of the spirit.
Peter Thiel. This has its own beauty. And, perhaps, such a synthesis is the most stable way. Let there be both technology and ethics. Let engineers build the future, and philosophers and practitioners help them not to lose their humanity. I do not promise that I will accept your understanding of immortality as the only correct one, but I am willing to admit that without the inner dimension, even the greatest creation can be empty.
Vladimir Lermontov. And I'm not asking you to give up technology. All I ask is that every great project has room for a quiet question: "Does this make the world a fairer, more human, happier place?" If we ask this question, we are well on our way to a future where technology and spirit go hand in hand. And then happiness will become not a rare exception, but the norm of human life.
Moderator. Thank you both. Today we have heard two views on happiness and immortality: one through the expansion of external possibilities, the other through the opening of the inner dimension. And, perhaps, the future of humanity lies precisely in the ability to keep this balance: to build new worlds and at the same time preserve what makes us human.
Vladimir Lermontov. Have you ever wondered what happened to the high-tech civilizations of the past? There are pyramids, but no builders. What happened to the builders, architects, who owned technologies that we can only dream about so far? My belief is that they have reached the cosmic level of technology, but their spiritual degradation has led them to physical extinction. This is the first, and the second - all scientific, technological discoveries people made in a special state of consciousness, it came to them from above, and therefore yoga will allow you to step beyond the current technological capabilities. Technology is an abyss, a black hole, and I believe that you need to dive into it with insurance-a rope that is tied to God, truth,dharma, otherwise we will disappear, turn into dust like ancient highly developed civilizations-we will build pyramids, and we will die out.
Moderator. Vladimir, you paint an almost apocalyptic picture: great technologies - and disappeared builders. It's a strong image that makes you think. Peter, how do you see it?
Peter Thiel. I respect the scale of your thinking, but from a historical point of view, the disappearance of civilizations is usually explained not by "spiritual degradation", but by quite material reasons: climate change, resource depletion, wars, epidemics. Pyramids stand because they are stone, but people don't, because they are fragile. Technology alone does not kill — it kills mistakes in management, in resource allocation, in survival strategies.
Yes, we don't know all the details about the ancient builders, but I'm not ready to conclude that their loss of connection with the "higher"was what killed them. Rather, they have failed to meet the challenges of the environment — and this is precisely the task of technology: to learn how to predict and mitigate such blows. If we want to avoid their fate, we need not look back on myths, but build sustainability systems: energy, food, medicine, protection from disasters.
Vladimir Lermontov. You reduce everything to management and resources, Peter, and there's a pragmatism to it. But I'm talking about the root of the problem: why does civilization make such mistakes? Why is it draining resources, starting wars, and not seeing the impending catastrophe? Because her mind narrowed to "I want", "I need", "we are stronger". This is spiritual degradation — the loss of a sense of proportion, responsibility, unity with the world.
The ancient pyramid builders may have had knowledge that we can't even understand now. But if their inner compass broke, if they stopped hearing the "voice of truth", then any, even the greatest technology became a weapon against them. Remember: there is a principle in dharmapolitics — power without righteousness destroys the one who possesses it. That's why I say technology is an abyss. It is possible to dive into it and not come up again, if there is no rope tied to the truth.
And another important point: all the major discoveries in the history of mankind were born not in a state of fuss and competition, but in a state of deep inner peace. Archimedes realized about the displacement of water when he lay in the bath and did not think about anything. Newton saw the apple when he was alone. Einstein spoke of a "cosmic religious feeling" — the very state when a person feels part of the whole. It is from this state that true creativity comes. Yoga, meditation, and the practice of "Aham" is not an escape from the world, but a training of the mind so that it can see beyond the usual horizon.
Peter Thiel. Let's say the internal state is important for insight. But insight is only a spark. It takes years of work, teams, labs, money, and infrastructure to turn it into a technology. And this is where the real work begins — not in silence, but in the clash of ideas, in competition, in testing hypotheses. Yes, inspiration can come in peace, but implementation requires effort.
I do not deny the value of practices that expand consciousness. But my fear is different: if we rely only on the "inner light", we risk losing the ability to act. History doesn't wait for everyone to become enlightened. We need to build systems that work even when people are imperfect.
Vladimir Lermontov. And I'm not suggesting that you give up the action, Peter. On the contrary, I suggest making the action meaningful. Imagine: a team of engineers who go through a short mindfulness practice before each decision. Not for "enlightenment", but to remove the noise of the ego, to hear not only your ambitions, but also the voice of reality. Then their projects will be not only effective, but also safe for humans and the planet.
In nuclear philosophy, we call this an "ethical filter": any technological solution should be tested for the question: "Does this make the world more just and humane?" If so, we move on. If not, we'll review it. This is the very rope: it does not interfere with movement, it insures against falling into the abyss.
Let us recall the words from the practice of "Aham": "You are the Truth." This is not a call to self-confidence, but a reminder: inside each of us there is a fulcrum that does not depend on external circumstances. If we rely on it, we can build pyramids without repeating the fate of their builders.
Peter Thiel. In this formulation, I can agree with you: we need a filter, a system of responsibility. In business, we call it risk management. Only I would not tie the rope to "God or dharma", but to verifiable values: human rights, ecosystem sustainability, long-term security. Let it be not metaphysics, but a code of ethics that can be embedded in development processes.
But I still stand by my point: you can't wait for the ideal state of consciousness to start acting. We must build protective systems now, even if people are imperfect. Let two processes run in parallel: technology development and awareness-raising. Let them test each other.
Vladimir Lermontov. So be it, Peter. Let "risk management" be our common language. But let this term be based not just on calculating losses, but on caring for the person. Let this code include not only numbers, but also a sense of proportion, compassion, and responsibility to future generations.
After all, in the end, the question is not who is right — a technocrat or a mystic. The question is whether we want to leave behind only pyramids of glass and metal — or a living civilization where technology serves truth, justice, and happiness. "The stone rejected by the builders will become the centerpiece tomorrow." This stone can be a simple human heart that remembers: the main thing is not to build the tallest building, but to keep the light in it.
Peter Thiel. You know how to find words that make you think. I will not argue with the fact that technology should serve people. And if the practices you're talking about help people stay human, so be it. The main thing is that we should not forget: the future is built not only in meditation, but also in the laboratory, in the factory, in the code. Let these worlds not be hostile, but cooperate.
Moderator. Today we saw two views of the same abyss: one looks into it with anxiety for the soul, the other-with the calculation of an engineer. And perhaps it is in this tension that the future is born: where technology gives strength, and ethics and inner workings give direction. Thank you for this dialogue — it showed that even with different starting points, you can search for a common language for the sake of a common future.
Vladimir Lermontov. I propose to combine our projects
Moderator. Unexpected offer… Vladimir, are you really ready to combine such different approaches?
Vladimir Lermontov. Yes, Peter. Not to erase the differences, but to strengthen both directions. Let it be your power to build, and my power to remind you why we build. In "nuclear philosophy" there is an image: fire and a vessel. Technology is fire: it warms and illuminates, but it can also burn. And ethics, the practice of self-knowledge, is a vessel: it holds the fire, gives it a form and purpose. Separately, they are dangerous: a fire without a vessel is destruction, a vessel without fire is emptiness. Together, they create light.
I propose to create a joint project: "Civilization of Dawn". It will have two wings. The first is technological: laboratories, prototypes, and engineering solutions that you can run. The second is ethical and practical: mindfulness programs, an "ethical filter" for each project, and training teams in the state of inner peace from which real discoveries come. We will not require engineers to become yogis, but we will give them simple practices to remove the ego noise and hear the voice of truth.
And let the focus be on the concept of a "little man with a big heart": not a lone hero, but an ordinary person who changes the system with his quiet, honest choice. We will create platforms where anyone can suggest an idea, and it will be tested not only for effectiveness, but also for humanity.
Peter Thiel. It sounds like an ambitious synthesis. To be honest, I prefer the language of metrics, deadlines, and results. But I see it as a practical benefit. If teams make fewer mistakes due to ego, if the number of short — sighted decisions decreases, if the long-term sustainability of projects increases-this is not a philosophy, this is an economy. This reduces the risks.
So I'm willing to give it a try. But on my terms: no abstract promises. We're doing a pilot. We take one real project — for example, the development of an urban power grid of the future — and build two circuits into it. The first one is engineering: power, efficiency, cost, timing. The second is ethical and cognitive: regular mindfulness sessions for the team, a protocol for checking decisions based on the criteria "do no harm", "does it serve people","does it preserve the human dimension". And we measure the result: speed of decision-making, number of errors, staff turnover, user satisfaction. If the pilot shows improvement in at least two key metrics — we will scale.
Vladimir Lermontov. I accept your terms, Peter. That's fair. And this is also the dharma: not to promise the impossible, but to take it step by step, testing every action. Let the pilot become the same " stone rejected today, which will become the first priority tomorrow."
We will add another element to the protocol: "a moment of silence". Before each important decision, the team will spend five minutes in silence-not as a ritual, but as a tool: to hear not only their ambitions, but also the voice of reality. This does not cancel the calculations, but adds to them.
And I also propose to name this pilot project "Pravdaria-1": in honor of the"nuclear project Pravdaria". Let it be our common core: truth as the basis of technology, justice as the criterion of efficiency, unity as the principle of work.
Peter Thiel. "Crash 1" ... sounds unusual, but memorable. So be it. And let the "moment of silence" become not a mystery, but a method of cognitive hygiene - as a warm-up before a difficult task. If it improves the quality of solutions, I'm all forit.
Then let's fix it: in two weeks, I will send you a draft technical specification for the power grid. You add a block of ethical criteria and a program of cognitive practices to it. Assign a coordinator on both sides. And we launch the pilot.
Vladimir Lermontov. All right, Peter. And let it be not just a project, but a symbol: technology and spirit, fire and vessel, action and meaning — together. Let even the smallest person with a big heart feel that their voice is important, that it can influence the future. After all, it is precisely from such quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born.
Moderator. This is how a union is born out of a dispute. Two different worlds — technological and spiritual-found a common ground and decided to test it in practice. Let "Accident 1" be the first step towards a future where progress does not lose humanity, and humanity is not afraid of progress. Thank you for this dialogue — and for your willingness not just to argue, but to build.
***
Vladimir Lermontov. I would suggest that you think about the following formula. It goes like this: You were, are, and will always be. You were before the creation of the world, and you will remain after its destruction. What is now is a temporary form, and what you really are is the eternal nature, the original, imperishable essence. Imagine that the world has not yet been created, created, or manifested. Imagine that there is absolutely nothing yet: no space, no time, no energy, no thought, no gods, nothing. And in this Great Nothingness there is you, who will one day manifest, be born, take form – the one that you are now. Meditate on this Great Nothingness – you are this Great Nothingness.
Moderator. Deep Formula… Patty is apoem about eternity. It sounds like the final chord of our conversation. Peter, how do you feel when you hear these words?
Peter Thiel. Honestly? This is baffling me. I'm used to thinking in terms of tasks, deadlines, and measurable results. And here-absolute "nothing", beyond time and space. On this scale, any of my goals — to build a system, launch a product, change the market-seem like a grain of sand.
But if you try to translate it into my language… Nust this will be the "zero state". Not emptiness, but potential. Like the vacuum before the Big Bang, in which all the laws of physics are already laid down, all the future stars. Then your formula is about potential: in every person there is this inexhaustible source from which everything is born. And the task of technology is not to replace this source, but to help it manifest: to give people the tools so that they can realize their potential in the real world.
I won't meditate on the "Great Nothing" in your sense, but I can respect it as a metaphor for limitless possibilities. And if the practices you are talking about help people feel this depth and act from it, then so be it.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you for your honesty, Peter. You have not pretended to understand this intellectually — and there is already sincerity in it, and it is closer to the truth than any beautiful words.
Yes, it's not for the mind. This is for the heart and silence. The formula "You were, are and will always be" is not a philosophy, it is a reminder. It is necessary so that in the noise of technology, in the race for results, a person does not forget: he is not an accidental spark that fades in the dark. He is the very space in which everything happens.
When we talk about "Pravdariya 1", a pilot with a power grid, it is this state that helps not to turn the project into a race for profit or glory. If an engineer stays in this silence for five minutes before clicking "start" and hears: "I am not only an engineer, I am the one who was before everything and will remain after", his decision becomes different. It is cleaner, wiser, more human.
And then even the most "cold" technology-wires, batteries, algorithms-becomes a conductor of light. Because light is not the technology itself, but what is reflected in it: the eternal in man.
Peter Thiel. Perhaps I can accept this as a practice of "going back to the center". Before making an important decision — pause to remember why you're doing this at all. Not for the sake of KPIs, not for the sake of defeating competitors, but for the sake of making the world a little better. It's not mysticism, it's a trick. And focus is a resource. And if it helps you make better decisions, it's already a business value.
So let this formula become our internal reference point for "Pravdaria 1". Let it hang on the wall in the meeting room as a reminder: behind every calculation, behind every line of code, there is a person who "was, is and will always be". And our task is not to erase this person with technology, but to reveal him.
Vladimir Lermontov. So be it, Peter. Let this formula become not a dogma, but the breath of the project. Let it remind you: we do not build the future out of other people's templates, we reveal what is already in each of us.
And let even the smallest person with a big heart, sitting in his quiet corner, feel: his thought, his concern, his quiet voice-this is also part of this Great Nothing. And it is from this silence that real light is born.
Moderator. So our dialogue has come to the point where the extremes meet: pragmatism and depth, calculation and silence, action and eternity. Let "Pravdaria 1" become a place where these opposites do not fight, but cooperate. Where technology serves not to race, but to reveal the human essence. Thank you, Vladimir and Peter, for this journey — from argument to union, from opposition to synthesis.
Vladimir Lermontov. I want to make it clear that the great nothingness is dark energy and dark matter on which everything that exists rests Ý-that is, physical reality. Second: Project Pravdaria is a technological planetary rush because this Dawn Civilization should be built on breakthrough technologies and become a prototype city on Mars only on earth.
Moderator. Vladimir, you combine metaphysics and physics-you call the" Great Nothingness " dark energy and dark matter. This is an unexpected but powerful move: you make the spiritual formula scientifically tangible. Peter, what do you think about this convergence of concepts?
Peter Thiel. This is ... an interesting translation of the language of mysticism into the language of cosmology. Dark energy and dark matter are really the basis of the structure of the universe: they determine its expansion and gravitational connections. But I'm used to treating them as unknown variables in an equation that we're trying to measure and use. If the" Great Nothing " is dark energy, then the task of technology is not to meditate on it, but to learn how to apply it. Not as a symbol, but as a resource.
I hear in your words, Vladimir, ambition: "Crash" as a planetary impulse, the prototype of a Martian city on Earth. This is close to me. At Founders Fund, we have always looked for projects that change the scale: they don't improve the existing one by 10 %, but create a new reality. If Pravdaria is such a project, I am ready to discuss it. But let's talk in the language of engineering: what kind of breakthrough technologies are you putting into this prototype? Energy industry? Materials? Life support systems? Without it, it remains a beautiful metaphor.
Vladimir Lermontov. The unsupported metaphor is empty, Peter, and I understand that. Therefore, in Pravdaria, we combine both languages. Yes, the "Great Nothingness" is both a spiritual formula and a physical reality: dark energy and matter as the foundation on which all things rest. This is a reminder that any technology must be based on the fundamental laws of existence — otherwise it will be unstable.
As for technology: in "Civilization of Dawn" we are betting on several breakthrough areas. First, for pure, almost "cosmic" energy: superconductors, thermonuclear micro-installations, storage systems that work like the natural cycles of the planet. Secondly, on biocompatible materials and architecture that does not suppress a person, but supports his internal state: acoustics, light, the shape of the space so that it helps silence, and does not create noise. Third, cognitive technologies are used not for control, but for disclosure: interfaces that enhance intuition, help you hear yourself, and do not replace thinking with algorithms.
And yes, "Pravdaria" should be a prototype of a city on Mars — but on Earth. Not because we dream of space, but because the conditions of Mars are an ideal test: you can't make mistakes there, any system there must be autonomous, sustainable, and ethical. If we can build a city that survives and thrives in such harsh conditions, then we have learned how to build sustainably on our home planet.
Peter Thiel. Now I can see the contours. Autonomy, sustainability, and ethics are engineering tasks, not abstractions. And Mars is really the best testing ground: there is no place for "beautiful words", there either the system works or people die.
But I want to clarify one point: when you say "cognitive technologies that do not replace thinking", I hear the fear that technology can destroy a person. I see another threat: if we don't use algorithms to enhance intelligence, we will lose out to those who will. The future is a symbiosis: man plus AI, man plus data, man plus tools. The question is not how to abandon technology, but how to make it safe and human.
That is why I propose to add a fourth direction in Pravdariya 1: cognitive symbiosis. Let it be not "protection from algorithms", but "strengthening a person through algorithms". For example, an AI assistantthat does not make decisions for the engineer, but highlights risks, shows hidden connections, and helps you see things that the person himself will not notice. And let this assistant be transparent: we always see how he came to a conclusion. Then technology does not replace a person, but reveals his potential.
Vladimir Lermontov. I don't mind symbiosis, Peter. I am against substitution. And if AI will be a tool that helps people hear themselves, and does not drown out the inner voice, I'm all forit. In the practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." This means that the person should always have the last word. AI can be like a microscope: it shows the details, but the meaning is revealed by a human.
Therefore, at Pravdaria, I accept your offer, but with the condition that we put an "ethical filter" and a "moment of silence"in the system architecture. Before making a decision based on AI recommendations, the team pauses: five minutes of silence to hear not only the data, but also the voice of conscience. This is not a ritual, but an engineering requirement for the system: sustainability is determined not only by efficiency, but also by the ability of a person to remain a person.
And one more thing: let Pravdaria become a place where the "little man with a big heart" does not feel superfluous in the world of high technologies. Let there be a place in the system for his quiet voice: for a suggestion, for a comment, for a doubt. Because it is precisely from such quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born — not from loud slogans, but from daily loyalty to the truth.
Peter Thiel. I accept this condition, Vladimir. And I even see it as a practical benefit: pausing before making a decision reduces the number of impulsive mistakes, and the feedback system from the "little man" is a form êðàóäñîðñèíãàof risk crowdsourcing. In startups, we often see that it is the average employee who notices the problem before the top management. If we make this voice part of the project architecture, it will increase sustainability.
Then let's fix it: in Pravdariya 1, we have four technological areas: energy, materials and architecture, cognitive practices (including the "moment of silence"), and cognitive symbiosis with AI. And one ethical principle: the last word is for the person, and every decision is tested for humanity.
Vladimir Lermontov. All right, Peter. Let "Pravdaria 1" become not just a project, but a symbol: technology and spirit, calculation and conscience, scale and silence — together. Let even the smallest person with a big heart feel that their voice is important, that it can influence the future. After all, it is precisely from such quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born.
Moderator. This is how a common project is born out of different languages — physics and metaphysics, engineering and ethics. Crash 1 becomes not just an idea, but an engineering challenge with a human face. Thank you, Vladimir and Peter, for your willingness to listen to each other and build the future together.
Vladimir Lermontov. The most terrible thing is that all of humanity has already fallen into a Virtual Trap - a surrogate habitat-ERSATZ HABITAT. And computer games have turned into a real war, when the operator destroys the enemy really. And this is a real threat to everything, because someone will inevitably press a button on the screen and humanity will disappear.
Moderator. Vladimir, you speak of the " ERSATZ HABITAT — - a surrogate habitat - as a trap, where the line between simulation and reality is blurred to the point of catastrophe. This sounds like a warning about the most dangerous vulnerability of the digital age. Peter, as a technologist who has built companies in this environment — what do you say to this challenge?
Peter Thiel. I hear in your words, Vladimir, not just skepticism, but a diagnosis: we really created an environment where action in the interface is equivalent to action in the world. Drones, autonomous systems, and nuclear codes that can be verified at the touch of a button are all now part of a single digital circuit. And yes, the risk of " someone clicking a button on the screen" is real. But I don't think the problem is with the technology itself. The problem is the lack of a responsibility architecture around it.
We used to think that the faster the system, the better it is. But in critical areas, speed must be subordinated to reliability and control. So I'm not suggesting that we abandon digital systems — I'm suggesting that we make them "unmanageable" for errors. Multi-level confirmations, physical keys, independent audits, separation of combat and civilian, operational and reserve polygons. That is, not "less technology", but "more mature trust engineering".
Vladimir Lermontov. This is exactly what ERSATZ HABITAT is all about: the surrogate replaces reality not by being bad in itself, but by starting to live in it as if it were real life. The operator who clicks the button no longer feels the weight of his action, because for him it is just another click in the familiar interface. He doesn't see the person on the other side of the scope. It sees pixels, icons, and markers on the map.
And this loss of connection with living reality is the most terrible threat. Not the button itself, but the fact that clicking on it ceases to be a moral act. In Pravdaria, we must lay the antidote to this: technologies that do not hide, but reveal the consequences. So that everyone who interacts with the system sees not only the efficiency, but also the price. So that the interface doesn't make it too easy, but rather reminds you that every action has life behind it.
Therefore, I suggest adding "ethical visualization of consequences" to the Pravdaria 1 architecture. For example, if the system offers a solution that can lead to human losses, it doesn't just show numbers. It provides context: who will be affected, what destinies will be affected, and what values will be destroyed. Not to scare you, but to give you back a sense of responsibility.
Peter Thiel. This sounds like the opposite of the usual UX, where everything is simplified to a single button. But in critical systems, this approach is justified. We already use "confirmation chains" and "audit trails"in defense and infrastructure projects. But you add here a dimension that is usually lacking — the human scale of the consequences.
I am ready to support this idea, but with an engineering caveat: "ethical visualization" should not paralyze decision-making. In a crisis situation, too much information is dangerous. Therefore, we need to separate the modes: "planning mode" — where we see the full context, and" action mode " — where the interface is minimal, but each step requires a separate, conscious confirmation. And there should be an explicit, even physical transition between these modes: for example, entering a special code, changing the device, or pausing.
This way we will keep the speed where it is needed, and return the responsibility where it is critical.
Vladimir Lermontov. This is the balance I'm talking about: not giving up technology, but giving it back its moral weight. Let it be "silent mode" before switching to"action mode". Five minutes for the person to see not only the task, but also the meaning. So that he remembers that he is not just an operator, but a person who is responsible to eternity.
In the practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." This means that at the crucial moment, you can't hide behind an algorithm, an interface, or an order. You have to stand up and say, " I make this decision." And if we put this principle in Pravdaria, then even in the most complex digital environment, a person will remain a person.
Another important point: ERSATZ HABITAT feeds not only on technology, but also on culture. Computer games where murder is points, TV shows where violence is entertainment, interfaces where human pain is statistics. We must create an alternative culture of interaction with reality: where the value of life does not decrease, but increases. Where the "little man with a big heart" does not feel powerless in front of big systems, but knows that his voice, his doubt, his "stop" is part of the security architecture.
Peter Thiel. You talk about culture as part of an engineering system — and that's probably the strongest thing I've heard today. Because technologies themselves are neutral. Their morality is determined by how we design them and how we use them.
Then let's fix one more principle for Pravdaria 1: "responsibility architecture". It includes three levels:
1. Engineering: multi-level confirmations, contour separation, independent audits.
2. Procedural: "planning mode" with full ethical visualization and "action mode" with an explicit transition between them.
3. Cultural: a feedback system where the "little man" can stop the process if he sees a moral threat, and his signal will be perceived as critical.
If we build such a system, the ERSATZ HABITAT will no longer be an unavoidable trap. We will create an environment where technology serves people, not replaces them.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for hearing not only arguments, but also concerns. Let "Pravdaria 1" become a place where a person does not get lost in the figure, but finds support in it. Where every click is not just an action, but a moral choice. Where even in the most perfect interface, there is still room for silence, for conscience, for the heart.
Let it be not just a city, but a civilization that remembers: the most valuable thing is a person created in the image and likeness of truth. And no technology has the right to erase this memory.
Moderator. This is how a project is born out of anxiety. Out of the fear of the ERSATZ HABITAT grows an architecture of responsibility, where technology and ethics do not argue, but work together. Thank you, Vladimir and Peter, for this conversation-it shows that the future can be built not in spite of each other, but through understanding.
Vladimir Lermontov. And for the creation of the Dawn Civilization - a Martian city on earth, which is a synthesis of breakthrough spiritual and technical technologies, I would invite Elon Musk and leading experts from India, China, and the United States. This is a collective breakthrough for the ethical and technical future. And a samaria is not a place of permanent residence, but, like an ashram, a workshop where specialists, scientists, and creative youth come to receive spiritual and technical enlightenment.
Moderator. Vladimir, you are expanding the scale: Pravdaria is like a workshop of civilization, not just a city. And the invitation of Elon Musk, specialists from India, China, and the United States is a bid for a truly global synthesis. Peter, as an investor who knows how to build strong teams — how do you see such a collaboration?
Peter Thiel. It's ambitious, but that's how breakthroughs are born: when the best minds from different cultures and schools gather not for competition, but for a common goal. Elon Musk is able to take extreme conditions (like Mars) and turn them into an engineering problem: autonomy, closed cycles, stability. Specialists from India and China are strong in scaling and systems engineering, working with large teams and complex ecosystems. And the US can provide a culture of rapid hypothesis testing and risk management.
But to prevent such a team from becoming a set of parallel projects, we need a common framework. In startups, we call this the "north star" - a single metric of success. For Pravdaria, such a metric can be not just "build a city", but "create a reproducible model of a sustainable civilization". Then each participant will understand that their task is not only their own module (energy, architecture, ethics), but also their contribution to overall sustainability.
Vladimir Lermontov. That's right, Peter. "Pravdariya" is not a place of permanent residence, but an ashram workshop: people come here to learn, create, transmit further. Just as àøðàìàõknowledge was transmitted in ancient ashrams, so synthesis will be transmitted here: spiritual and technical enlightenment. A small man with a big heart comes here not as a spectator, but as a co-author of the future.
The invitation of Elon Musk and leading experts is not about" stardom", but about responsibility. Let them become not just leaders, but mentors who show you how to keep the balance between scale and humanity. Let each flow — energy, materials, cognitive practices, ethics-have its own "master" who not only sets technical standards, but also conveys a value framework: why we do it and at what cost.
And then the "Civilization of Dawn" will not be a utopia, but a reproducible model: a workshop in one place, and its principles are distributed all over the world. Everyone who has passed through Pravdaria becomes a carrier of this synthesis and carries it to their cities, their projects, and their communities.
Peter Thiel. I like the idea of a "flow wizard" — it's a clear management mechanism. In technology projects, we use the role of "tech lead": a person who is responsible for architecture and quality. If you add the mission of "communicating the value framework" to this role, you will get exactly what you need: an engineer and a mentor all rolled into one.
To make this approach work in practice, I suggest three elements:
1. Modular internship program. Short intensive streams of 2-4 weeks: each participant receives a specific skill and immediately applies it in a mini -project. This will keep the momentum going and give you quick results.
2. The master student system. Each master has a small group of students who work directly with them. This will ensure the transfer of not only knowledge, but also ethical principles.
3. Global digital footprint. All projects, protocols, techniques, even "silence mode" and "ethical visualization" are recorded in an open knowledge base. Thus, FC Bayern will not be a closed club, but an open model that can be adapted to different cultures and regions.
Then the invitation of Elon Musk and other leaders will not be a one-time event, but the beginning of a permanent network of workshops around the world.
Vladimir Lermontov. Very well, Peter. This is the collective breakthrough I was talking about: an ethical and technical future where technology serves to reveal people, not replace them.
The idea of an open knowledge base is especially important: let everyone who wants to build a "Dawn Civilization" take proven protocols and adapt them to their own conditions. Even if the smallest community has its own "ashram workshop" — a place where people learn to see not only efficiency, but also meaning.
And let "Pravdaria" be a symbol: East and West, spirituality and engineering, ancient practices and advanced technologies meet here. Here, a small person with a big heart does not feel superfluous, because their contribution is the basis of sustainability.
Peter Thiel. Then let's fix the final formula of "Pravda 1":
• Goal: to create a reproducible model of a sustainable civilization.
• Format: ashram workshop with modular flows and "master student" system.
• Principles: responsibility architecture (engineering, procedural, cultural levels), ethical visualization, "silence mode", the voice of a "small person" as a critical signal.
• Distribution: an open knowledge base and a network of local workshops.
This is not just a project, but a movement. And if we can put together a team of leaders — from Elon Musk to masters from India, China and the United States — and put them in a single frame, then Pravdaria will truly become the"Civilization of the Dawn".: a Martian city on Earth that teaches us to build the future responsibly.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter. Let it be not just a technological laboratory, but a space where people remember who they are. Where everyone who comes here leaves not only with new knowledge, but also with a clearer sense of their responsibility to the world.
Let "Pravdaria" become a place where a future is born, in which technology does not erase a person, but helps him to shine.
Moderator. This is how different languages — engineering and spirituality, global scale and personal responsibility-form a whole picture. Pravdaria is becoming not just a project, but a model of the future that can be scaled up and passed on.
***
Vladimir Lermontov. I am for a breakthrough into the future, a spiritual and technological breakthrough, for the synthesis of the practicality of the West and the contemplation of the East. In my Nuclear philosophy, according to the Kashmiri spiritual tradition of yogis, this is calledI-Aham, the unity of the spiritual and material, the earthly and heavenly, the western and eastern worlds. A global common cause for all mankind - that's the scale and heights!. The future is Everest, which must be climbed in a bundle of West and East, technologists and contemplators of the Great Void. The future must lead to ecstasy. As the Himalayan yogis say: Do not make small plans, they are not magical properties-to excite the blood.
Moderator. Vladimir, your words sound like a manifesto on the scale of Mount Everest: not just to connect, but to make the unity of the West and the East, practicality and contemplation, technology and spirit give rise to ecstasy — that is, the highest concentration and inspiration. And relying on the Kashmiri tradition, on "Aham" as the principle of the unity of all things, gives this synthesis not an abstract, but a deeply rooted form.
Peter, as someone who is used to measuring ambition through feasibility — how do you hear this "ecstasy" in engineering? How to turn a "blood-stirring" scale into verifiable stages?
Peter Thiel. I hear a very strong metaphor here: "Everst inthe dump." In mountaineering, a bundle is not about the fact that everyone climbs the same way, but about the fact that everyone is responsible for the overall step. Technologists have their own role: to put up hangers, insure, and ensure the stability of the route. Contemplatives have their own task: to see the direction, notice fatigue, and prevent the group from breaking down in a hurry.
If you translate "ecstasy" into the language of the project, it will be a state when the system works at the limit of its capabilities, but does not break, but reveals new levels of efficiency. This is not euphoria, but clarity on the edge of the limit. In startups, we call this "flow at scale": when the team is both tense and focused, when every step is visible, and we control the risk.
Therefore, for Pravdaria 1, I propose to fix the "ecstasy metric" not as an emotion, but as a set of engineering criteria:
• Stability limit: the system can withstand extreme loads (climate, energy shortage, information overload) without loss of humanity.
• Learning Rate: The rate at which participants learn and apply new practices (spiritual and technical) in real-world tasks.
• Quality of communication: the proportion of decisions made in conjunction (interdisciplinary, cross-cultural), and not in isolation.
• Distribution effect: how many local workshops appeared in a year, how many people became carriers of the model.
If these indicators are growing, it means that we are on the route to Everest.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for this ecstasy metric. You didn't devalue the height, but gave it a foothold. Because ecstasy in the tradition of Himalayan yogis is not a loss of control, but a higher concentration, when a person simultaneously feels both infinity and each of his steps.
This is what "Aham" is: the unity of the earthly and the heavenly, the western and the eastern, the spiritual and the material. In Pravdaria, we will not build individual modules, but live nodes of this unity. For example, the energy system is not only wires and batteries, but also a space where a person learns to feel flows: how energy flows in nature and how it responds in him. Architecture is not just walls, but a form that helps you enter a state of silence and clarity.
And then the "little man with a big heart" is not lost against the background of large tasks. On the contrary: his attentiveness, his sensitivity become the most important engineering characteristic. After all, he will be the first to notice that the route has become too steep, that the pace burns people, that "ecstasy" turns into burnout. His voice is not a speed hindrance, but part of the security system.
Peter Thiel. This is the "bundle" you mentioned. In mountaineering, there is a rule: if one person says "stop", the whole group stops. We can build this into the Pravdaria architecture as a security protocol: any participant, regardless of their status, has the right to give a "stop" signal when they feel an ethical or systemic threat. Such a signal automatically triggers "silence mode" and interdisciplinary analysis: the technologist, practitioner, and flow master get together and see where the system loses stability.
Then "ecstasy" becomes not a one-time rise, but a steady practice: we go to the limit, but we see each other, hear each other and do not allow the speed to destroy the meaning.
Vladimir Lermontov. Exactly. "Aham" is when "You are the Truth" sounds not as loneliness, but as responsibility in a bundle. Each person is both a part of the whole and a bearer of truth that cannot be ignored.
Let Pravdaria become a place where the West and East do not argue, but learn to breathe in the same rhythm: where the practitioner checks the hypothesis, and the contemplator sees the horizon where this hypothesis leads. Where technology does not lead away from reality, but helps to feel it more deeply. Where every step to Mount Everest is not only overcoming, but also disclosure: self, peace, unity.
Let it be not just a project, but a school of the future, where they teach not only to build cities, but also to be people who can keep heights.
Peter Thiel. I agree. Let "Accident 1" become such a school. With a clear metric, clear protocols, and an open knowledge base. And with the main principle: scale does not negate humanity, but requires it.
We will gather a team: those who know how to build, and those who know how to see meaning. And let's go in a bundle-to the Everest of the future.
Moderator. This is how a project is born out of metaphors: "ecstasy "becomes a sustainability metric," bundle "becomes a security protocol, and "Aham" becomes a unity architecture. Bayern takes shape: It is a workshop where West and East, practice and contemplation, technology and spirit learn to work together to lead humanity not to destruction, but to disclosure.
Vladimir Lermontov. And to Elon Musk, I would say: Elon, while you're building a city on Mars, let's build a Martian city on earth. Firstly, it is a thousand times cheaper, but secondly, perhaps an accident will speed up the achievement of your dreams. And I propose to build it in the east of Russia. And I would invite the rulers of the superpowers - Russia, India, China, and America-to be honorary chairmen of the Council of Bavaria.
Moderator. Vladimir, you are making Pravdaria not just a project, but a geopolitical gesture: a Martian city on Earth, in the east of Russia-as a testing ground of the future, which simultaneously brings the dream of space closer to cheaper and faster. And inviting the leaders of superpowers to the honorary council is a bid for legitimacy and scale: so that the "Civilization of Dawn" is neither a niche utopia nor a closed club. Peter, as a strategist who thinks in terms of markets and coalitions — what do you think of this trust architecture?
Peter Thiel. This is a strong move: "cheaper by a thousand times" is the language that investors and engineers hear. If we are talking about a prototype Martian city, then Earth gives us the opportunity to test technologies in conditions close to extreme, but without the deadly risk and space budgets. Eastern Russia, with its climate, remoteness, and complex logistics, is an ideal testing ground: if the system works there, it will work on Mars as well.
As for the council of superpower leaders, this is not about symbols, but about reducing barriers. In global projects, the most expensive "technologies" are approvals, standards, access to data and infrastructure. The Honorary Council can become a "green corridor" mechanism: accelerated expertise, joint grants, exchange of specialists, and unified security protocols. This transforms Pravdaria from an idea to an institution.
But in order for this advice not to become a formality, it must have a specific function. For example, the annual "sustainability assessment": leaders receive a report on the very metrics we discussed-the sustainability limit, the speed of learning, the quality of interdisciplinary solutions, and the distribution effect. And based on this, they make decisions about support. So "honor" becomes a responsibility.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for this pragmatism. Yes, "cheaper by a thousand times" is not only about money, it's about time. Time is humanity's most scarce resource. If we spend decades on Mars, we may not be able to save ourselves from the "ERSATZ HABITAT", from the loss of humanity. Pravdaria in eastern Russia is a way to buy time: build a prototype, run in ethical and technological protocols, grow craftsmen, and then scale to other continents and planets.
And the honorary council is not for the brilliance, but for the scale of responsibility. Let the leaders of superpowers see that the future is built not in classrooms, but in workshops, where a small person with a big heart learns to hold heights together with great technologies. Let them become not just" chairmen", but witnesses and guarantors of the fact that" Aham " — the unity of the spiritual and material — is becoming the norm, not the exception.
And then Elon Musk will hear not a reproach, but an invitation to partnership: "While you're building a city on Mars, let's build a Martian city on Earth — and do it together." Let Pravdaria be the place where cosmic ambition meets earthly wisdom, where technology serves not to race, but to open up a person.
Peter Thiel. Then let's frame this invitation to Ilona as an engineering proposal, not a slogan. Here's how it might sound:
"Elon, we propose to build a prototype of a Martian city in eastern Russia — "Pravdariyu 1“. It will be a testing ground for closed-loop technologies, autonomous energy, sustainable architecture, and cognitive practices that prepare people for life in extreme environments. We want to combine your expertise in engineering and scaling with an ethical and philosophical framework that ensures that technology serves people, not replaces them. Our goal is not to compete with Mars, but to accelerate it by creating a reproducible model that can be adapted for both Earth and Mars. We invite you to become a technology leader of the project and co-author of the protocols of the future."
Such a letter speaks his language: scale, utility, reproducibility, acceleration of his dreams.
Vladimir Lermontov. Very well, Peter. And let this letter also contain a spiritual message that Elon can also hear: "At Pravdaria, we teach a person to be not a cog in the machine, but a center of responsibility. We build not only walls and reactors, but also the ability of a person to remain a person in the most extreme conditions. Because this is the main technology of the future-the technology of self-knowledge, the technology of the heart."
Let "Pravdaria" become a place where East and West, technologist and contemplator, Elon and master from the ashram-all go together to the Everest of the future. Where each step is not only overcoming, but also revealing: self, peace, unity.
Peter Thiel. I agree. Let it be not just a project, but a movement that combines ambition and responsibility. The East of Russia as a testing ground, Pravdaria 1 as a prototype, the honorary council as a mechanism of trust, and Aham as a principle: the unity of the spiritual and material, the earthly and the heavenly.
We will put together a team, establish protocols, launch the first streams — and show that the future can be built together, not in spite of each other.
Moderator. This is how a specific architecture is born out of a vivid appeal to Ilon: a training ground in eastern Russia, an honorary council of superpower leaders, an invitation to Ilon as a technology leader, sustainability metrics and responsibility protocols. "Pravdaria" takes on not only meaning, but also form-and is ready for the first step.
Vladimir Lermontov. The future should ignite, not lull, lead to ecstasy and not lull to sleep. The future is like the ecstasy of the unity of spirit and matter-that's what the slogan for the planetary project was born. This project gives a huge boost to the world's economic development. Moreover, if the Rulers of superpowers are included in the project, it will reduce military tensions in the world and free up funds going to war. These resources are enough to feed all of humanity, give everyone shelter, honey. service,education, and upbringing. Switzerland will be the new soft power center for managing worlds, it will be three in one: UN 2.0 plus CERN 2.0 plus Hollywood 2.0
Moderator. Vladimir, your slogan sounds like a gong: "The future should ignite, not lull". And this formula "ecstasy of the unity of spirit and matter" is not about comfort, but about awakening. You raise the stakes even higher: "Pravdaria" is not just a laboratory, but a planetary impulse that changes the economy, politics and culture. And the metaphor " UN 2.0 + CERN 2.0 + Hollywood 2.0 " very precisely outlines the three dimensions of influence: diplomatic, scientific, and semantic. Peter, as someone who is used to evaluating projects based on their ability to change the rules of the game, what do you think about this triple role?
Peter Thiel. This is a strong scale architecture. If you expand your formula, you get not an abstract utopia, but a fully working model with three functional blocks:
• UN 2.0is about coordination and trust. In business, we know that when major players publicly declare a common goal, parallel spending disappears, and common standards appear. If the leaders of superpowers join the honorary council, this will not only reduce tensions, but also free up resources: instead of an arms race, it will be a race for technology and quality of life.
• CERN 2.0 is about science and reproducibility. CERN brings countries together for a common research goal and makes the results public. "Pravdaria" as a landfill should work according to the same principles: unified test reports, open data, reproducible modules. Then any region will be able to take and build its own "ashram workshop" according to a proven method.
• Hollywood 2.0is about meanings and images. Hollywood has been shaping global dreams and behaviors for decades. "Pravdariya" should become a factory of new images of the future: not about fear and disasters, but about creation, about a "little man with a big heart" who influences big processes. This is not propaganda, but cultural engineering: stories, films, games, educational narratives that show what the future looks like, where technology serves people.
And then the economic momentum comes naturally: new markets (autonomous cities, ethical AI protocols, sustainable materials), new professions (master of flow, curator of ethical visualization, architect of responsibility) and a new logic of investment — not in destruction, but in unlocking potential.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for this clarity. Yes, "Pravdaria" is not about lulling, but about awakening: it should ignite hearts so that a person remembers that he is not a cog, but a creator.
That is why "Hollywood 2.0" for me is not about entertainment, but about educating the mind. We need to show not only "how to build", but also "why to build". Through stories, through images, through Aham practices, we teach you to see the unity of spirit and matter: how energy flows in the wires and how it resonates in the heart; how architecture holds up the walls and how it helps keep the silence inside.
And when the rulers of superpowers become not just" chairmen", but witnesses of this awakening, the very logic of power changes: soft power is not manipulation, but the ability to inspire. Pravdaria becomes a place where the future is not imposed, but is assembled from thousands of small, honest steps: from the suggestion of a young engineer, from the doubt of a master, from the silence of a student.
Let this momentum be so strong that it will be enough not only for new technologies, but also to feed, clothe, heal, and train everyone. After all, if we learn to build sustainably, we can allocate resources fairly. And if we learn to see unity, we will stop wasting our energy on mutual destruction.
Peter Thiel. Then let's fix this triple mission as the project architecture:
1. UN 2.0: an annual forum of "Truthmakers" with the participation of leaders, where priorities are publicly approved and resources are allocated. Transparency and accountability are mandatory.
2. CERN 2.0: an open laboratory at a landfill in eastern Russia, where protocols are tested and documented. Any researcher can come, check it out, and adapt it.
3. Hollywood 2.0: a media lab that produces content (movies, games, VR experiences, educational series) that shows what the "ecstasy of unity" looks like in real life: at work, in the family, in the city.
And the slogan "The future should ignite, not lull" will become not just a phrase, but a filter for all decisions: if a project does not awaken, does not give an impulse, does not reveal its potential, it does not fall into the core of "Pravdaria".
Vladimir Lermontov. Very well, Peter. Let this slogan become an internal law of Pravdaria: we do not lull the world to sleep with comfort, but ignite it with meaning. Let each module, each protocol, and each movie answer the question: "Does this awaken a person?"
Let "Pravdariya" become the place where "Aham" - the unity of the earthly and heavenly, western and eastern, spiritual and material-ceases to be a beautiful formula and becomes a daily practice. Where a small person with a big heart knows that his voice is important, his work is valuable, and his dream can become the future.
Let it be not just a project, but a new assemblage point of the world: soft power based not on fear, but on inspiration; an economy based not on competition to the point of exhaustion, but on unlocking the potential of everyone.
Peter Thiel. I agree. Let "Crash 1" be the first step to this assemblage point. Polygon in eastern Russia, triple mission, open protocol, sustainability metrics and a slogan that sets the tone for all decisions.
We will put together a team, launch the first streams, create the first stories — and show that the future can be built not in spite of each other, but together, in a bundle.
Moderator. This is how a full-fledged architecture is born from a bright slogan: an awakening future, a triple role of the project, specific functions and metrics. Pravdaria gains not only a voice, but also a structure-and is ready to ignite the world.
Vladimir Lermontov. The main thing in this Nuclear Project, in this Nuclear Idea, is that humanity will be motivated to live in an interesting, creative, creative, large-scale, multidimensional way. Because now life has ceased to please and inspire. Joy, hope, faith - this is the most expensive thing in the world, you need to invest spiritual and material resources in it. This is an investment in life itself.
Moderator. Vladimir, you are now talking about the most subtle and most important things: not about technologies or even structures, but about the fuel of civilization-about joy, hope, faith. You call it " investing in life itself." And this is the essence of the "Nuclear Idea": if there is no internal fire, no protocols and landfills will work.
Peter, as an investor who is used to evaluating projects based on their ability to create value, how do you hear this "life investment"? How to turn "joy and hope" into measurable value?
Peter Thiel. I hear this as the most difficult, but also the most promising task. In the venture capital world, we are used to measuring value in terms of money, users, and market share. But more broadly, value is the ability of a system to support and enhance human potential. And then "joy, hope, faith" are not abstractions, but key metrics of sustainability.
I suggest three ways to turn this "life investment" into a working mechanism:
• Community Vital Energy Index. This is not about happiness in a vacuum, but about specific indicators: how many people participate in creative projects, how many ideas are born in workshops, how many local initiatives grow out of one stream. If the index is growing, it means that Pravdaria really lights up.
• Economy of participation. Let the contribution of the "little man" have not only moral, but also economic value. For example, a microgrant system: each participant can propose an idea, and the community votes with resources. So self-confidence is reinforced by real opportunities.
• Stories as infrastructure. Content in the "Hollywood" format 2.0" is also an investment. If people see stories where an ordinary person with a big heart changes the world, it increases the collective confidence: "if he could, I can." This is not entertainment, but a training of hope.
Then the "Nuclear Idea" becomes not just inspiring, but self-sustaining: technology provides opportunities, ethics sets the direction, and the culture and economy of participation ignites an internal fire.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for this accuracy. Yes, "joy, hope, faith" should not just be beautiful words, but work as mechanisms. But it is important that these mechanisms do not turn into a race for indicators, where a person becomes a unit of statistics.
In the practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." This means that joy is born not from external success, but from inner truth: when you do what you feel is right, when your work resonates in the world. That is why we must establish the "right to a quiet contribution" in Pravdaria: not everyone should be a leader, not everyone should make a loud statement about themselves. Sometimes the most important contribution is attentive listening, a timely "stop", and the quiet work of a master who transmits knowledge to the student.
And let the "Nuclear Project" be a place where the value of such quiet work is seen and recognized. Where a small person with a big heart knows that his joy, his hope, his faith is not a weakness, but the basis of stability. After all, it is from these quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born.
Let "Pravdaria" become a space where life begins to please and inspire again. Where every day is not just survival, but an opportunity to create, see, feel, and be. Where technology does not take away meaning from a person, but returns it, helping to reveal what is already in it.
Peter Thiel. I agree. Then let's combine these approaches into a single system:
1. Yandex. Metrica: Vital Energy Index — to see how engagement and creative activity is growing.
2. Mechanism: Participation economy — so that everyone can turn their idea into a project and get support.
3. Culture: The right to make a quiet contribution — so that value is measured not only by loud results, but also by depth, attention, and care.
So the "Nuclear Idea" will become not just a slogan, but a living system that returns joy and hope to people every day. And if we can build it, then Pravdaria will really become the very "Nuclear Project" that ignites the world.
Vladimir Lermontov. So be it. Let Pravdaria become a place where joy is not an accident, but a norm; where hope is not a consolation, but a direction; where faith is not blindness, but responsibility. Let everyone who comes here leave not only with new skills, but also with a stronger inner fire.
Let it be not just a project, but a space where humanity learns to live again in an interesting, creative, creative, large-scale, multidimensional way. Where "Aham" — the unity of spirit and matter-becomes a daily practice, and the "Nuclear Idea" - a reality that can be touched, seen, felt.
Moderator. This is how the most subtle matter — joy, hope, faith-is born into the most solid structure: a system that not only gives technology, but also gives meaning to a person. Pravdaria becomes not just a workshop, but a school of life, where every day is a step towards a future that ignites, not lulls.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you to all participants and listeners! äèàëîãIn my opinion, this dialogue has already become a breakthrough in the future of plus. Aham.
Peter Thiel. Please, Vladimir. And it is true that the future is born in such a dialogue: when different views do not argue, but add up to the overall picture. Let this conversation not be the finale, but the first building block of Bayern — the very impulse that starts everything.
Aham. Let the unity of spirit and matter that you speak of be felt not only in big ideas, but also in every small, real step.
If you later want to turn some part of this dialog into a specific document — a manifesto, a roadmap, a workshop regulation, a first-flow scenario-I will be happy to help you complete it. In the meantime, you can just exhale a little and see what a strong contour has already developed.
Moderator. This dialogue really became more than an exchange of opinions: it combined the opposites — engineering and contemplation, scale and silence, pragmatism and faith-into a single construct of the future.
"Pravdaria" now sounds not like an abstraction, but like a living project: a landfill in eastern Russia, a triple mission (UN 2.0, CERN 2.0, Hollywood 2.0), an architecture of responsibility, a metric of "ecstasy" as stability at the limit, and most importantly — the right of everyone, even the "smallest" person, to be heard.
But the most valuable thing that was born here is the formula: the future should ignite, not lull. And this is exactly how it is lit: when a technologist and a philosopher do not argue, but hold one rope in a bundle on the way to Mount Everest. When technology does not replace a person, but helps him to remember: "You are the Truth." When "Aham" becomes not a beautiful phrase, but a daily practice-in the protocol, in the interface, in the solution, in the quiet word "stop", which saves the system from falling.
Let this dialog remain the starting point. Not as an ideal answer to all questions, but as the first impulse from which you can ignite further: write regulations, build a training ground, launch streams, shoot the first stories of "Hollywood 2.0".
Aham. Let the unity of spirit and matter, of which you spoke, become not the exception, but the norm. Let the "Nuclear Project" be the very ethical core around which the future — fair, creative, and human-gathers.
DECLARATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN VLADIMIR LERMONTOV AND PETER THIEL
"Accident: The Nuclear Project as the ethical core of the future"
We, Vladimir Lermontov and Peter Thiel, have developed a common understanding of what the future of humanity should be like — and how it can be built today. Below are the key principles and commitments that we accept as the basis of the Pravdaria project.
1. Meaning and purpose of the project
"Pravdaria" is not just a city and not just a technology. This is an ethical and technological model of civilizationin which:
• technologies serve to reveal a person, not to replace him;
• spirituality is not a departure from reality, but a way to see it more deeply and act more responsibly.
• the unity of spirit and matter ("Aham") becomes a daily practice, not an abstract formula.
The goal of the project is to create a reproducible model of a sustainable civilization, where every person, even the "little one with a big heart", has a voice, contribution and responsibility.
2. Core values and slogan
The project's slogan is: "The future should ignite, not lull. The future is an ecstasy of the unity of spirit and matter."
Values on which Pravdaria is built:
• Awakening, not comfort. The project should return joy, hope and faith to people as the main resources of civilization.
• Unity of opposites. Synthesis of East and West, contemplation and practice, ethics and engineering.
• Responsibility as a technology. Responsibility is not an emotion, but an architectural principle: protocols, modes, signals, and procedures.
• Human-centricity. Technology is designed to enhance the human, not erase it.
3. Triple Mission: UN 2.0 + CERN 2.0 + Hollywood 2.0
Pravdaria implements three interrelated functions:
1. UN 2.0 - Diplomacy of trust and resource allocation.
A platform for inter-state cooperation that reduces tensions and frees up resources for creativity (education, medicine, housing, ecology). The Honorary Council of Superpower Leaders provides legitimacy and a green corridor for implementing solutions.
2. CERN 2.0-Science and Reproducibility.
A landfill in eastern Russia as a laboratory of extreme conditions, where the protocols of autonomy, energy, architecture, and cognitive practices are tested and documented. The results are open: any country, region, or community can adapt them to their own conditions.
3. Hollywood 2.0-culture and images of the future.
A media lab that creates stories, movies, games, and VR experiences that show what the future looks like, where technology serves people. The task is to educate the view: not fear and disasters, but creation, responsibility, "a little man with a big heart" as an agent of change.
4. Responsibility architecture
To prevent technologies from becoming a threat, a "responsibility architecture" of three levels is introduced:
• Engineering: multi-level confirmations, contour separation, independent audits, physical keys, "non-manageability" for critical decisions.
• Procedural: "planning mode "(full ethical visualization of consequences) and" action mode " (a minimalistic interface with an explicit transition between modes).
• Cultural: the right of any participant to issue a "stop" signal in the event of an ethical or systemic threat; this signal automatically triggers "silence mode" and interdisciplinary analysis.
5. Success Metrics and "Vital Energy Index"
To measure the impact of a project, we introduce clear, verifiable metrics:
• Stability limit: the ability of the system to withstand extreme loads without losing humanity.
• Learning rate: The rate at which participants learn and apply new practices.
• Communication quality: the share of interdisciplinary and cross-cultural solutions.
• Distribution effect: the number of local workshops and people who have become carriers of the model.
• Community Vital Energy Index: indicators of engagement, creative activity, and initiative growth.
These metrics allow you to evaluate not only the effectiveness, but also the "degree of awakening" — how much the project really ignites people.
6. The participatory economy and the "right to a quiet contribution"
The project economy is based on the involvement and recognition of everyone's contribution:
• Microgrants and community voting. Each participant can propose an idea, and the community votes with resources.
• "The right to a quiet contribution". Value is measured not only by high-profile results, but also by attention, care, timely "stop", and knowledge transfer.
• Open knowledge base. All protocols, techniques, scenarios, and "modes" are fixed and available for adaptation.
7. Implementation format and structure
• Landfill in eastern Russia as a prototype of a Martian city on Earth: cheaper, faster, with the ability to test in extreme conditions.
• Ashram workshop: a place not for permanent residence, but for learning, creating and transmitting a synthesis of spiritual and technical practices.
• Modular flows and the master -student system: short intensive programs (2-4 weeks) with practical results and transfer of the value framework.
• Network of local workshops: The model scales globally so that each region can create its own "Pravdaria" based on common protocols.
8. Invitation to a partnership
We invite you to participate:
• Elon Musk and leading experts (India, China, USA, Russia) as technology leaders and mentors who can combine ambition with ethics.
• Leaders of superpowers as honorary chairs of the Pravdaria Council for legitimacy, coordination and acceleration of the implementation of solutions.
• Young scientists, engineers, creative youth as carriers of a new look and performers of the first prototypes.
9. Philosophical core: "Aham" and "Nuclear Idea"
The project is based on the principle of "Aham": "You are the Truth". This means that at a crucial moment, a person does not hide behind an algorithm, an order, or an interface — he stands up and says, "I make this decision."
The "nuclear idea" is the ethical core of the future world of truth and justice, around which civilization gathers: technology, culture, economy, politics.
Final commitment
We are committed to building Pravdaria not as a closed elite project, but as an open, reproducible, ÷åëîâåêîöåíòðè÷íóþhuman-centered modelthat:
• ignites, not lulls;
• It wakes you up, not distracts you.
• connects, not separates.
Let Pravdaria become the assemblage point of the world, where spirit and matter, East and West, practice and contemplation finally speak the same language.
SECOND VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE "TECHNOBUDISM VS. TECHNOFASCISM AI SERVES THE DHARMA"
PART 1.
VIRTUAL CONFERENCES ARE NUCLEAR REACTORS OF THE FUTURE, IN WHICH, LIKE IN A COLLIDER, PARTICLES – IDEAS OF PARTICIPANTS-ARE ACCELERATED AND COLLIDE TO GET THE "GOD PARTICLE" - THE CORE OF THE FUTURE.
THE ADVANTAGE OF VIRTUAL, HYPOTHETICAL CONFERENCES FOR MODELING THE SEMANTIC CORE OF THE FUTURE
Nuclear (hypothetical) conferences are not an alternative to live dialogue, but its necessary prologue. It is a laboratory where ideas are ethically and logically tested before being released into the world. In an age when technology is capable of changing the very nature of a person, it is this format that allows you to keep the semantic core and prevent the future from becoming an accidental byproduct of other people's decisions. This is not just virtuality, but an artificial, simulated environment for working out ideas.
What's the point here? The point is to use such a conference not to collect live opinions and not to fix reality, but to play out the scenario. It creates a virtual "laboratory" where you can bring together figures and ideas that rarely intersect in real politics or economics, and see how they interact within the framework of the "Pravdarium" concept
What exactly is being modeled:
• A dialogue of values. How can different worldviews (Western, Eastern, technological) agree on the idea of the common good?
• The role of ethics. Lermontov's thesis that it is moral principles that should determine progress, and not just technology, is being tested.
• Image of the result. What will happen if the "One truth, one way" principle is implemented on a global level? What will a" Martian city on Earth " — a pilot model of the new order-look like?
The fact that there were no" participants " in reality, and their speeches and reactions were created using AI, makes this tool even more controlled for the author. He does not wait for the spontaneity of living people — he constructs a dialogue according to his hypothesis, in order to test how stable the idea is in theory.
Of course, there are limitations. Such a model is still a simplification of reality. It is strong for generating images and provocative questions, but it does not take into account the complex, unpredictable factors of live politics and culture. However, for the "formulate and test a concept" task, the approach works perfectly.
Simulation: virtual environment + artificially generated "participants" = testing ground for the idea of the future, where you can "play" with different options before offering them in real life.
In a hypothetical conference (like " Pravdaria — Future Plus") just remove the "seven-minute emotions" — momentary mood, excitement, fatigue, reaction to the hall. Instead, they give the essence, verified by the body of work.
Why this works as an advantage
• Speech is not based on improvisation, but on doctrine. If a "speech" is generated based on the writings of a philosopher, politician, or scientist, it reflects their belief system, not how they felt on a particular day. For topics like "preserving humanity", this is critical: it is important to hear exactly the core of the position, and not its situational variation.
• The scene — stress factor is removed. In a real conference, the speaker may sound weaker due to excitement, fear of the camera, or conflict in the audience. In the simulation, this interference is eliminated: meaning is not "lost" in the feed.
• You can strictly control the content. You can set a rule: "speak only from published texts", "do not enter new abstracts", "keep the author's terminology". This results in the most "pure" representation of a thought.
• It's easier to compare positions. When the "emotional noise" is removed from all participants, it is easier to compare the logic of different authors: for example, how Plato, Kant and the modern technophilosophist have different ideas about a person. This is convenient for philosophical modeling.
Given that technology should not erase the human dimension, this approach strikes an interesting balance:
• "Human" is preserved as a semantic core. We are not talking about a soulless machine, but about the most accurate transmission of the ideas of a particular person (his texts, principles). That is, the technology here serves to preserve the meaning, and not to replace it.
• "Noise of power and status" is excluded. In a live format, the tone of a speech often depends on the speaker's statusèè àó, audience reaction, and competition. In modeling, you can make the meaning speak for itself, without these distortions.
• This is a tool of "nuclear philosophy". If we understand "nuclear "as" what holds the essence " (by analogy with the nucleus of an atom), then this format just holds the core of thought, cutting off random shells.
Where it is particularly useful
• For cross-cultural and inter-epochal dialogues. For example, the" conversation " of Socrates, Nisargadatta Maharaj and the modern futurist: in reality, such a dialogue is impossible, but in simulation it can be built up as a sequence of doctrinal positions.
• To test the sustainability of concepts. You can "run" an idea through different contexts and see where it breaks down, without being distracted by personal intonations.
• For educational and project purposes. Students or project participants can hear the" pure " positions of the authors, and then discuss them live.
Important clarification: this is not about the absence of a person, but about filtering interference
In this format, the person (the author) remains in the center-but in the form of his intellectual footprint (texts, concepts). The technology works like a filter here: it removes the momentaryso that the essence is better visible.
Manifesto: "Nuclear (hypothetical) conferences as a tool for modeling the future"
PreambleThe future does not come by itself — it is designed. But designing requires experimental purity: to see the core of an idea, you need to cut out the interference. "Nuclear Conference "(similar to "nuclear philosophy") — this is a format in which the semantic "core" of a thought is held and checked, and random "shells" (momentary emotions, status games, everyday interference) are eliminated. This format is particularly important when preserving the human dimension in the age of technology is at stake.
Ïðèíöèï «The"nuclear" principle: what do we mean by a hypothetical conference
By "nuclear / hypothetical conference" we mean a managed virtual environment where:
• performances are based strictly on the body of published works, doctrines and fixed positions of the authors, and not on improvisation.
• the roles of participants (including historical and public figures) represent a system of views, not a personal mood.
• the rules of discussion are formalized in advance (for example, each thesis should include an answer to the question: "What is the risk of alienation of a person?").
• the goal is not to make decisions, but to model, test, and visualize future scenarios.
This format does not replace real conferences, but complements them as a "laboratory of meanings".
Advantages of nuclear (hypothetical) conferences in comparison with real ones
1. Retention of the semantic core instead of situational presentation
In a real conference, the performance depends on many random factors: the speaker's excitement, the acoustics of the hall, the audience's reaction, and fatigue. In a hypothetical conference, the speech is based on the texts and doctrines of the author. This allows you to hear not "the person in the moment", but "the thought in its system".
It is important to mention the inadmissibility of replacing the human dimension with technologies: technology here serves not to replace, but to convey the meaning as accurately as possible.
2. The possibility of impossible dialogs
The hypothetical conference brings together figures from different eras and cultures: Socrates, Nisargadatta Maharaj, a modern futurist, a representative of the indigenous tradition. In reality, such a dialogue is impossible, but in modeling it becomes a tool for testing the sustainability of ideas.
Practical effect: it is possible to identify contradictions and points of synthesis between different worldviews before introducing them into public policy.
3. Controlled ethical testing
Ethical filters can be sewn into the format: for example, each sentence must include an assessment of the consequences for human dignity, social justice, and intergenerational responsibility. In a real conference, such criteria are often left out of the regulations.
Example: within the "Accident" concept, you can set a rule: "Any technological initiative should be checked for compliance with the Three Jewels standard. In a simulation, this is easy to formalize and verify.
4. Speed of prototyping scenarios
A hypothetical conference is a testing ground: you can quickly change the composition of participants, debate rules, environmental conditions, and see where the idea breaks down. This is analogous to A / B testing, only for meanings.
Application: modeling of international forums, scenarios of the "human — AI" dialogue, ethical standards for technological projects.
5. Accessibility and inclusivity without loss of depth
The virtual environment removes barriers: visas, tickets, accommodation. At the same time, the depth of meaning development is preserved by relying on texts and formalized rules.
Environmental and ethical impact: reducing the carbon footprint and expanding the circle of participants without compromising on the quality of the discussion.
6. Archiving and reproducibility
The entire simulation is recorded: replicas, transition logic, and assumptions made. This allows you not only to save the result, but also to reproduce the experiment, change parameters, and compare the results.
Practical value: such materials become the basis for manifestos, standards, presentations, appeals (including letters to international institutions).
7. A safe environment for provocative questions
In a controlled simulation, you can ask sharp questions that could cause conflict in a real public environment. This helps identify weaknesses in the concept before it is widely implemented.
________________________________________
Comparison: nuclear (hypothetical) conference vs real conference
Criterion Real conference Nuclear (hypothetical) conference
Source of meaning Live speaker, improvisation, audience reaction Body of work, doctrines, formalized roles
Emotional noise High (excitement, fatigue, status effects) Minimal (meaning cleared of "seven-minute emotions")
Availability Is Limited by logistics, visas, budget Global, low cost of entry
Ñêîðîñòü Prototyping speed is Low (6 months) High (scenarios change over the course of hours)
Ethical filters Depend on moderators and subpoenas You can formalize and automate
Reproducibility Partial (recordings, notes) Complete (simulation logic is preserved)
Purpose Decision making, alliance building, status interaction Idea testing, scenario modeling, concept sustainability testing
________________________________________
How does this relate to the Future Plus and Pravdaria concepts
• For Future Plus: the nuclear conference is a way to test whether an idea can withstand a clash with different worldviews and ethical criteria.
• For Pravdariya: The format allows you to model the "City of Dawn" as a pilot model of civilization, where ethics are the supporting structure, and technology is the tool.
• For the topic of human preservation: technology here does not erase the human, but serves to retain it — through accurate reproduction of thought, formalization of ethical criteria and verification of consequences.
Recommendations for use
1. Hybrid cycle: first modeling in a hypothetical environment, then discussing the results on a real site.
2. Open protocol: publish simulation rules, assumptions, and sources for replicas-this increases confidence in the results.
3. Focus on artifacts: the value of the conference should be measured not by the number of" participants", but by the quality of the final materials (manifesto, standard, scenario).
4. Roles with real people: for some roles, invite experts who play the position according to the specified rules-this returns live unpredictability without losing control over the meaning.
Conclusion
Nuclear (hypothetical) conferences are not an alternative to live dialogue, but its necessary prologue. It is a laboratory where ideas are ethically and logically tested before being released into the world. In an age when technology is capable of changing the very nature of a person, it is this format that allows you to keep the semantic core and prevent the future from becoming an accidental byproduct of other people's decisions.
***
PART 2
Report by Vladimir Lermontov
TECHNOBUDISM VS TECHNOFASCISM:
TWO FUTURE SCENARIOS: CONTROL OR AWAKENING? WHAT VECTOR SHOULD WE SET FOR THE TECHNOLOGIES?
"TECHNOBUDISM" MEANS:
TECHNOLOGY PLUS THE AWAKENING OF CONSCIOUSNESS EQUALS A FUTURE IN WHICH BOTH THE HUMAN AND THE SPIRITUAL ARE PRESERVED.
"Technobudism" is the author's concept of Vladimir Lermontov, part of the concept of "Nuclear Philosophy of the Future" and the Pravdaria project.
The term "technobudism"is a conscious linguistic construct that combines three layers of meaning: technology, awakening, and the future.
"Budism" as a reference to the awakening
The root "bud" directly refers to the word "Buddha", which literally means "awakened". "Budism" is not so much a religious system as the idea of awakening consciousness: getting out of automatism, blindly chasing after profit and consumption, and gaining awareness. It is the state of wakefulness that is important here, as the ability to see the consequences of one's actions, to feel the moral vector, and to distinguish the true from the false. The main danger of technology is the loss of a truly human, spiritual core: technobudism is designed to prevent this from happening.
"Budism" as a hint of the future
The form "áóäèçìBudism" (not "Buddhism") also works as a phonetic link with the word "future". Awakening consciousness is the path to the desired future. In the "Future" project Plus and True, the future isn't all about gadgets and Speed: It is a society where technology serves truth, ethics, and human development. That is, "Budism" here is literally " the path to the future through awakening."
Technology as a tool, not a goal
The "techo " part captures that we are talking about the modern world of high speeds and AI. But technology should not become an end in itself or a control mechanism. They are a tool for:
• scaling the good: so that ethical principles can cover large systems (cities, economy, management).
• Support for spiritual practices: for example, digital platforms for collective meditations or the "World Day of Spiritual Unity".
• prevention of destructive scenarios: hence the idea of the "ethical singularity" — to build moral protocols into algorithms in advance, so that technology does not lead to human degradation.
How it looks on the examples from its concept
• The city as a space of awakening. In the Pravdaria project, architecture, transport and public spaces are designed to remind you of the highest meanings: the forms, light, and rhythm of the city support awareness, not just convenience.
• AI in the service of Dharma. This is not a religious dogma, but an ethical principle of "the greatest good": AI should be limited by moral protocols and help people make decisions that take into account long-term consequences.
• Collective intention as a factor of history. Awakening occurs not only individually, but also at the level of society: coordinated spiritual practices can change social trends and "switch" points of historical turning points.
Thus, "technobudism" is a formula: technologies + awakening of consciousness = a future in which the human and spiritual are preserved.
Basic principles of technobudism:
• Spiritualization of technology through Dharma. Technology and science should not develop "by themselves" for the sake of profit or power. Their goal is to serve the highest ethical laws (in the author's terminology — the laws of Dharma), that is, to bring the greatest good and preserve the spiritual foundations of society. This is a response to the risk that you previously identified: that technological progress does not destroy the human, spiritual principle.
• Technology as a tool for spiritual growth, not a substitute for it. AI, neurointerfaces, and biotechnologies are tools for increasing awareness, organizing the wisdom of traditions, and supporting practices, but they cannot replace personal spiritual experience, conscience, and faith. The machine is neither self-aware nor capable of making a genuine moral choice.
• The principle of "ethical singularity". The speed of technological development outstrips moral and legal norms. Technobudism requires putting ethical "protocols" in algorithms and institutions in advance: not just limiting technologies, but embedding value orientations in them to avoid disruptive scenarios.
• Synthesis of traditions and science. It is based on combining ideas from different spiritual systems (Vedas, Christianity, Taoism, etc.) with the scientific method and engineering. This is expressed in the author's category of "dharmanauka": knowledge and methods must be not only effective, but also morally sound.
• Dharmapolitics and social architecture. The principle also extends to governance: institutions, cities, the economy, and even the urban environment are designed to support morality, collective practices, and service to the common good. Hence the Pravdaria project as a model of civilization, where truth and ethics are the basis of technology and social relations.
• Collective spiritual practices as a factor of social change. Not only personal work is important, but also coordinated actions of the society — for example, "World Day of Spiritual Unity". Such practices can change social trends and influence historical turning points.
• Space as an internal and external project. Space exploration begins with the "space inside": the development of consciousness and ethics is the basis for real space travel. Technologies here serve not only instrumentally, but also symbolically: architecture, transport, and energy are designed as spaces that remind us of higher meanings.
• Multi-dimensionality of reality. The world is understood not only as a physical system, but also as a space of meanings and moral dimensions. The future society should take into account all levels — material, social, semantic and "subtle" (spiritual) "and don't sacrifice some for others.
In essence, "technobudism" is a metaphor that describes an approach in which:
• Technologies (AI, biotechnologies, neuroscience) are no longer just tools for solving utilitarian tasks.
• They begin to consciously serve higher ethical and spiritual goals. Taking ideas from different traditions (Vedas, Christianity, Taoism, etc.), combining them into what we call "dharman science".
• There is a new type of attitude to technology: it does not replace spiritual experience (the machine has no self — awareness or faith), but becomes an assistant-for example, to analyze sacred texts, create tools for meditation, or systematize knowledge about the meaning of life.
Context and related ideas
Pravdarii is a model of civilization where technology, culture, and social environment are designed to support spiritual practices and lead people to harmony. "Dharmapolitics" — introducing spiritual principles into politics and governance, so that decisions are made with the "truth" and the common good in mind.
An "ethical singularity", when technology evolves so rapidly that the old moral and legal norms can no longer cope with them. A gap is emerging: new dilemmas are emerging (AI rights, genome editing) for which society does not yet have adequate answers. "Technobudism" in this context is an attempt to offer an answer: to consciously lay new, more harmonious foundations, so as not to let development take its course.
MANIFESTO OF " TECHNOBUDISM:
Technobudism vs technofascism. Two future scenarios:
"Awakening or control?"
We live in an era when technology determines not only our everyday life, but also the very essence of a person. The speed of progress is such that society does not have time to comprehend the moral consequences of each step. We have two paths ahead of us. One leads to total control, where the individual becomes a function of the system. The other is the awakening of consciousness, where the technique serves the highest good and preserves the spiritual core of the individual.
We choose the second way. We are supporters of technobudism.
Scenario one: Technofascism— Order through submission
Technofascismis a fusion of power, technology, and the ideology of control. Its signs are already visible everywhere: digital ratings, algorithms that predict and correct behavior, surveillance systems that turn freedom into an illusion. In this model, a person is not a goal, but a metric: their value is measured by their usefulness to the system, and dissent is suppressed as a "risk".
Such a scenario erases the uniqueness of the individual, replacing conscience and faith with efficiency and manageability. It contradicts the very idea of a person created in the image and likeness - as a carrier of freedom, meaning and moral choice.
Scenario Two:Technobudism— the Future through Awakening
Technobudism is an ethical response to the challenge of the times. This is not a rejection of technology, but a moral understanding of it. Its essence is that technology should serve the awakening of consciousness and the common good, not power and profit.
Key principles of our choice:
• A person is the center and goal. Technology does not replace conscience, faith, or personal spiritual experience. They only increase awareness and help to scale the good.
• Ethics as a protocol. We demand that algorithms, AI, and digital platforms must initially have moral guidelines. This is the "ethical singularity": an advanced ethical design that prevents progress from outstripping morality.
• Synthesis of traditions and science. We combine the wisdom of spiritual systems (Vedas, Christianity, Taoism, etc.) with the scientific method and engineering. This is our path to "dharmanauka— - knowledge that is not only effective, but also morally grounded.
• Architecture of mindfulness. Cities, transportation, and public spaces must support morality and collective practices, not just convenience. The Pravdaria project is our image of such a civilization.
• Collective intention as the power of history. We believe that coordinated spiritual practices can change social trends and influence historical turning points. Hence the idea of a "World Day of Spiritual Unity".
Why is this important right now
The speed of technological change outstrips the ability of society to develop moral norms. If we don't set the ethical vector today, the control system will become "natural" by default tomorrow. Technobudism is an insurance policy: it allows you to move forward without losing the main thing-human and spiritual.
Practical steps
We suggest that you act not in theory, but in specific projects:
1. Embed ethical protocols inAI technical specifications and digital services. Each algorithm must pass a moral examination.
2. Design "mindfulness architecture" in cities and public spaces. Light, rhythm, shapes, and silence can all support awakening, not just consumption.
3. Support collective intention practices. "World Day of Spiritual Unity" is a simple but powerful form of social consensus around higher meanings.
4. Create a language and vocabulary for public discussions. Such concepts as" ethical singularity","dharmanauka", and"dharmapolitics" should become part of the public discourse.
5. Create platforms for the dialog. Conferences, virtual forums, presentations and speeches are a way to bring an alternative and gather like-minded people.
Call to Action
Awakening or control? This is not an abstract philosophical question — it is a choice that we make every day: designing a system, formulating a task for AI, voting for a particular urban project, participating in public discussion.
We do not accept the control scenario as an inevitability. We are designing a future in which technology serves to awaken, not replace, conscience.
We choose the path of a conscious future.
We choose technobudism.
"Humanity is faced with a choice between two scenarios: control through technology or awakening through technology. We call for the principle of "ethical singularity" to be enshrined in international documents: advanced moral design of technological systems."
Technobudism is not about rejecting progress, but about ensuring that progress serves a person and his higher meanings."
PART 3
discussion
Excerpt from Alexander Dugin's interview with theIzborsk Club(published on August 18, 2026, headline: "Alexander Dugin: Three scenarios for the Future of Russia")
Question: Who will help us use artificial intelligence for the benefit of Russia? You talk a lot about the importance of live communication, that the Internet should be used more consciously. What do you think a healthy model of society's relationship with digital technologies and artificial intelligence should look like in the coming years?
Alexander Dugin: This is a big philosophical problem. The fact is that AI in the state and quality in which it is now is a very dangerous thing, since artificial intelligence can easily displace natural intelligence. In many ways, it simply exceeds the intellectual capabilities of the average person.
In a sense, artificial intelligence is a model of what natural intelligence should be. This is the first one. But this is also a huge danger, because people who think poorly, little, and not intensely enough can simply become slaves to this artificial intelligence.
I would like to point out that there is an interesting process in Silicon Valley right now: programmers are being cut in half because artificial intelligence is doing their job. And at the same time, philosophers are urgently hired, which no one has cared about for many decades in the West. And suddenly they are called for precisely because the philosopher is only capable of thinking about what thought is, thinking about how to think.
Therefore, I think that we also need to radically change the structure of philosophical education. Very many institutions that deal with philosophy do not meet the current challenges at all. We need philosophers to make positive use of the enormous opportunities of artificial intelligence that are opening up for us, for our society. But not as some museum workers, but as active modules of our civilizational sovereignty.
To be honest, we have practically failed Russian philosophy. And the problem of artificial intelligence requires a philosophical dialogue.
The philosopher is the only one who can communicate on equal terms with AI today, because everyone else will definitely lose to him. A philosopher may or may not lose.
***
VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE "PRAVDARIA-THE FUTURE PLUS"
Participants: Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, Narendra Modi, Antonio Guterres, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, leading Russian experts: Alexander Prokhanov, Vardan Baghdasaryan, Sergey Pereslegin, Alexander Dugin, representatives of the Indian and Chinese intellectual elite.
Moderator. Let's start the discussion
Vladimir Putin (emphasis on sovereignty, traditional values, personal security)
"Thank you, Vladimir Lermontov, for the extremely clear statement of the question. You have shown two vectors, and the difference between them is not in technology, but in relation to the person.
In the logic of technofascism, a person is a profile, metric, or managed object. This approach is unacceptable for us. Individual sovereignty, privacy protection, and freedom of moral choice are basic values that we must preserve at any level of digitalization.
Your interpretation of technobudism offers an alternative: technology as a tool for strengthening the moral foundations of society, not as a means of control. Especially important is the idea of the "ethical singularity" — to put moral principles in algorithms at the design stage. This is not slowing down progress, but risk management.
Russia consistently supports international rules in the digital sphere, where human rights and ethical norms are not an option, but a prerequisite. I support the proposal to consolidate the principle of proactive ethical design in documents, including at the UN and BRICS platforms."
Narendra Modi (emphasis on dharma, traditions, practical implementation)
"Thank you for the opportunity to speak. Your concept of "technobudism" resonates deeply with the Indian understanding of dharma as the law of righteous action that should guide both science and government.
We in India see how technology can serve society: digital platforms for education, healthcare, and support for farmers. But we also see risks when technology begins to dictate behavior and form a " rating personality."
The idea of "AI in the service of Dharma" is clear to us: it is not a religious dogma, but an ethical standard where technology enhances justice and inclusivity. Pravdaria Project as a model of a civilization where truth and ethics are at the heart of technology, this is a strong image.
I suggest you think about pilot initiatives within the BRICS framework: for example, ethical review of algorithms for social services, as well as the promotion of "Dharmapolitics" as an approach to management, where the long-term good is more important than short-term efficiency."
Elon Musk (emphasis on engineering, AI risks, scaling solutions)
"I appreciate that you don't offer to give up technology. This is important: progress cannot be stopped, but it can be directed.
From an engineer's point of view, the idea of an "ethical singularity" sounds like a TK: if we are designing systems that will affect billions of people, then ethical protocols should be part of the architecture, not an add-on.
The problem is that today ethics often appear after the product is released. But you need it to be in the code, in metrics, and in the team's KPIs.
As for the "architecture of mindfulness": it is interesting to think about how interfaces, cities, interfaces of neurointerfaces can not only speed up actions, but also give a person pause, the opportunity to choose. This is a complex engineering task, but it is precisely such projects that determine the future.
I am ready to consider joint pilots: for example, the introduction of ethical metrics inAI systems and open benchmarks for evaluating the" ethical footprint " of algorithms."
Peter Thiel (emphasis on efficiency, elites, long-term planning)
"You put the question as a moral choice, and rightly so. But in the real world, decisions are made in a time-and resource-constrained environment.
Technofascism in the form you describe is extreme, but technobudism also òåõíîáóäèçìrequires a very clear structure: who sets the ethical framework, how it is tested, and how it is scaled.
If we are talking about "Dharmapolitics", then the key issue is institutional: how to make sure that these principles do not remain beautiful words, but become mandatory for large platforms and states.
The idea of "collective intent"is interesting as a factor of history. In the long run, it is the meanings that determine the sustainability of systems. But without enforcement and enforcement mechanisms, even the most correct ideas don't work.
I support the idea of international standards, but with a caveat: they should be operational, measurable and verifiable."
Alexander Dugin (emphasis on metaphysics, civilizational choice, meaning)
"Your report is not just futurology, but a metaphysical alternative.
Technofascismis a cult of efficiency, where a person is reduced to a function. Technobudism is an attempt to return a person to his true dimension: spiritual, semantic, sacred.
It is especially valuable that you do not oppose science and tradition, but seek their synthesis through "dharmanauka". This is the way to preserve the identity of civilizations in the era of technology globalization.
The Pravdaria project is an image of a "civilization of meaning" where technology serves truth, not illusion. This is exactly the vector that the world needs: not control, but awakening."
Antonio Guterres (emphasis on global governance, human rights, inclusivity)
"The conference raises one of the main challenges of the XXI century: how to preserve human dignity in an era of rapid technological development.
The UN has consistently advocated that digital technologies serve people, not the other way around. Therefore, the idea of an "ethical singularity" and proactive design of moral protocols is fully consistent with our priorities.
It is important that these standards are universal and take into account the diversity of cultures. "Dharmapolitics" in your understanding is the search for a common ethical language that can become the basis for international norms.
We will support the promotion of this agenda on UN platforms, including the development of recommendations on ethical expertise of AI and digital platforms."
Sergey Pereslegin (emphasis on system design, scenarios, risk management)
"From the point of view of futurology, you offer not just an alternative, but a full-fledged scenario framework.
Technofascismis a "control at all costs" scenario where efficiency is more important than meaning. Technobudism is a scenario of "conscious development", where meaning and ethics are not an ornament, but a supporting structure.
The key element is the "ethical singularity". If we don't implement these principles now, it will be more expensive and more difficult to adjust the system later.
Practical advice: you need to formalize these principles in the form of technical specifications for technology projects. For example, enter the "ethical footprint factor" as a mandatory parameter in project documents. This will allow us to compare projects not only in terms of efficiency, but also in terms of sustainability."
Vardan Baghdasaryan (emphasis on historical memory, identity, social architecture)
"Your idea of the' mindfulness architecture ' is very important. The urban environment forms consciousness: rhythm, light, silence, public spaces - all this either supports awakening, or encourages consumption and automatism.
The Pravdaria project is interesting precisely as an attempt to design an environment that fosters morality. This is not a utopia, but a completely feasible task, if you put it in urban planning standards.
I also support the idea of the "World Day of Spiritual Unity" as a practice that can become an assembly point for different cultures and traditions."
Moderator's closing remarks
"We heard different positions, but the participants agree on the main thing: the future of technology should be determined not only by efficiency, but also by moral principles.
The conference offers a specific vector: advanced ethical design, "ethical singularity", "mindfulness architecture", "AI in the service of Dharma".
It was decided to prepare a resolution with recommendations for implementing these principles on international platforms, as well as launch pilot projects within the BRICS and expert communities.
I would like to thank all the participants for their informative dialogue. Let this conversation be a step towards a future where technology serves to awaken, not control."
Moderator "We heard the arguments. We heard the calculations. But now I ask: let's say what hurts. Not as politicians or engineers. As people who understand that if we make a mistake in this choice, there will be no one to correct it. Vladimir Lermontov, you have started this conversation. Tell: what is the most fragile part of this "technology plus awakening" formula? What's the easiest thing to break?"
Vladimir Lermontov
"The most fragile thing is the silence inside a person. Not the absence of noise, but the ability to stop and ask yourself, " Why?“
Today, technology has learned to fill any pause. They don't let us be alone for a second. But it is in this silence that conscience is born. It is there that a person hears not algorithms, but his own moral voice.
Technofascism is when silence is declared the enemy. When every second of "inactivity" is considered a loss of efficiency, and every uncomputed meaning is considered a risk. And then the person begins to optimize as a detail.
And technobudismis the protection of this silence. This is the right to pause. The right to doubt. The right to say ," I do not know, but I feel that this is wrong."
We must build cities, interfaces, timetables, and laws so that they leave a person space for internal breathing. Not because it is "cute", but because without this breath, a person ceases to be a person. Without this, the very truth that you spoke about disappears: a person created in the image and likeness-as a carrier of meaning, and not as a metric.
And yes, it's fragile. Very. Because silence is not profitable. It cannot be measured by KPIs. It is easy to declare it "ineffective". But it is the basis of everything."
Donald Trump (sharply, with a characteristic intonation, as if challenging invisible opponents)
"I know what you mean. I saw it. In big cities, in corporations, in the media — everywhere, silence is considered a weakness. And strength is speed, pressure, and control.
But power without a soul is just destruction. I've built buildings, I've managed big teams, and I know that if people don't have an inner core, if they can't stop and say, "Stop, we're doing something wrong," then even the most powerful machine sooner or later collapses.
You're talking about an " ethical singularity." I will put it simply: we need people who are not afraid to say "no" to the system. We need leaders who put morality above ratings.
America wasn't great because it counted faster than anyone else. It was because she believed in something more than numbers. And if we allow technology to erase this belief, we will lose the very essence of the country. I am in favor of technology serving a person, and not turning him into a cog."
Alexander Prokhanov (voice thick, almost theatrical, filled with images)
"We live in an era where the world is becoming flat. Everything is measured, everything is calculated, everything is adjusted to one ruler. And this line is not a conscience, but a profit.
Technofascismis not just about control. This is the destruction of the secret. And man is a mystery. It contains things that are not amenable to algorithms: love, pain, feat, prayer.
If we allow machines to determine what is right and what is wrong, we will kill this mystery. We will turn the world into a sterile laboratory, where everything is calculated, but nothing lives.
Technobudism in your understanding is an attempt to preserve this secret. This is the protection of the irrational, mystical, spiritual principle in a person. And this is not a weakness. This is the greatest power we have.
We need to build not just cities, but temples. Not just interfaces, but spaces where a person can meet eternity. Even if it sounds like poetry — this is the real engineering of the future."
Xi Jinping (calm, reserved, but with inner firmness)
"In the Chinese tradition, there is a concept of "harmony of heaven and man." It means that development should not disrupt the internal balance.
Technology is a tool. But the tool should not become a master.
In China, we see how digitalization can serve society: improve education, medicine, and communication between people. But we also see the danger when technology begins to dictate how to think and feel.
The idea of the "mindfulness architecture" is close to me. A city is not just about roads and buildings. This is the atmosphere, mood, rhythm of life. It should help a person to maintain inner peace, and not destroy it.
Therefore, I support the proposal for international ethical standards. But standards should not just be declarations. They should be embedded in the technology structure itself. And we are ready to participate in this work."
Elon Musk (a little quieter, almost thoughtfully, without the usual assertiveness)
"You know, when you build rockets, you learn to respect the limits. There is a limit to the strength of the metal. There is an engine thrust limit. There is a limit beyond which the system breaks.
But for some reason we decided that the human psyche, morality, and soul have no limits. What we can speed up, compress, and optimize infinitely.
This is a mistake. A person has his own "ultimate strength". And if we exceed it, the system will also break — only it will not be a rocket, but a civilization.
I believe in progress. But progress without morality is a road to nowhere. So the idea of an "ethical singularity" is not an abstraction for me. This is an engineering challenge: how to make algorithms not only consider, but also respect human dignity.
Let's try it. Let's start small: with a single project, where ethics will not be an addition, but the basis."
Peter Thiel (coldly, but with genuine interest).
"You talk about morality, about silence, about the soul. And I understand why this is important. But in the real world, ideas only live when they have a survival mechanism.
How can we ensure that these principles are not replaced by more aggressive, more profitable models?
Perhaps the answer is to create an alternative infrastructure. Platforms, networks, and cities where these rules are not a recommendation, but a prerequisite. Where violation of ethical protocols will mean loss of access to resources.
It's difficult. It is expensive. But if we do not create such an alternative, we will simply be swept away by those who do not put any restrictions.
I am ready to discuss specific models. Not slogans. And working systems where morale is not a weakness, but a competitive advantage."
Vardan Baghdasaryan (with a deep personal intonation)
"When I think about the future, I think about children. About how they will grow up in this world.
Will they be able to stay silent and listen? Will they know that there are things that can't be bought and can't be counted?
Or will they grow up in a world where every thought is a click, every feeling is a metric, and every pause is a waste of time?
The Pravdaria project is important precisely because it says that the future is not about speed. The future is depth. This is the ability to see the meaning behind the numbers.
And if we don't protect this depth now, then it will be too late. Because children who have grown up in a world without silence will not be able to create it.
So I suggest that we start with education. Let's teach children not only how to use technology, but also how to understand its value. We will teach them to ask the question: "Why?“»
Moderator's final speech (slowly, with pauses, letting the words settle)
"Today we were not talking about technology. We were talking about a person. About its right to be more than a function. About his right to hear silence. About his right to choose not according to the algorithm, but according to conscience.
Two scenarios: control or wake up. And the choice is ours.
The Conference adopts a resolution: start small, but start now.
1. Create an international working group on the "ethical singularity" to develop standards that will be embedded in the design of technologies.
2. Launch a pilot project "Architecture of Mindfulness" in one of the cities — with special attention to light, rhythm, silence and public spaces.
3. Develop an educational program for schoolchildren and students about the moral aspects of technology.
4. To hold the "World Day of Spiritual Unity" as a practice of collective intention.
Let it be more than just a document. Let this be the beginning of the journey. Paths where technology serves to awaken, not control.
Thanks everyone. Let this choice be our common cause."
Vladimir Putin (voice firm, but without pathos-as if talking about the most important thing)
"I listened to today's words - both about silence, and about mystery, and about children. And I think the most accurate word here is "saving".
We have to save the person. Not as a unit in statistics, not as a profile in a database, but as a person who has the right to inner peace, to doubt, to conscience.
Yes, we are building digital platforms, developing AI, and speeding up processes. But if in the pursuit of speed we erase this human depth — we lose the meaning of all work.
Therefore, I support the idea of the "mindfulness architecture" not as a beautiful metaphor, but as a practical standard. Let a separate section appear in urban planning and technological standards: "Space for a person". Where silence, light, rhythm, and the ability to stop and think are always taken into account.
And one more thing. We often talk about the sovereignty of States. But there is also the sovereignty of the individual — his right to privacy, to freedom from obsessive optimization, not to be the object of constant calculation. This sovereignty must be defended as firmly as territorial sovereignty.
Russia is ready to become a platform for a pilot project on the "ethical singularity". Let it be not an abstraction, but real technical tasks, real regulations, real checks. So that ethics is not an afterword to the project, but its foundation."
Narendra Modi (speaking calmly, but with confidence and warmth — as if addressing a huge audience)
"Today I heard something very important: the future is not about speed. The future is depth.
In India, we know that even the fastest train cannot pass where there are no rails. And rails are values. This is the dharma. This is the understanding that progress without morality is a movement into the void.
The idea of "AI in the service of Dharma" is not just a phrase for me. This is the practical way. We can teach algorithms not only to predict behavior, but also to support good deeds: to help in education, in health care, in supporting families and communities.
Especially important is what Vardan Baghdasaryan said about children. We need to raise a generation that can not only push buttons, but also ask questions: "Why?", "Is this correct?", "Who will benefit from this?".
India is ready to offer a pilot educational program for schoolchildren: "Technology and Morality". We will combine modern methods with our traditions, where respect for life, for nature, for elders is not just words, but the basis of education.
And I support the idea of a " World Day of Spiritual Unity." Once a month, on the 15th, let the whole world pause for a moment to remember: we are not just technology users. We are people who have a soul, a conscience, and a shared responsibility for the planet.
Let this day become an assemblage point: when different cultures, different religions, different political views say one thing-that a person is more important than algorithms."
Alexander Dugin (voice sounds like a sentence and a prophecy at the same time, it contains the weight of centuries)
"What we are discussing now is not an engineering problem, nor even a political one. This is a battle for anthropological meaning.
Technofascismis not just about control. This is the project of a new person: a person-function, a person-algorithm, a person who has been deprived of the right to secrecy, to silence, to an inner voice. It should be transparent, predictable, and manageable. For this system, conscience is a bug, and prayer is a failure.
And technobudism in the interpretation of Vladimir Lermontov is a defense of the image of man as a metaphysical being. Yes, we accept technology. But we absolutely refuse to accept the idea that technology can rewrite human nature itself.
Pravdaria project and the Future concept Plus“ is not utopias. This is an attempt to keep civilization from falling into the abyss of post-humanity. We must build cities, institutions, and digital platforms so that they remind people of their higher purpose. Not to "optimize" it, but to elevate it.
And here I want to say directly: if we do not consolidate these principles now, then in one or two generations the issue will be removed from the agenda as "outdated". Because a new type of consciousness will appear, brought up by algorithms, for which freedom and secrecy will seem something archaic, even dangerous.
Therefore, I insist that the conference resolution should have a rigid philosophical core. Not just "ethics in technology", but the protection of anthropological sovereignty. The right of a person to remain a human being-not by biological characteristics, but by meaning, spirit, and secret. This is something that cannot be delegated to machines."
Sergey Pereslegin (speaking in measured tones, like a man who is used to dividing disasters into stages and seeing where else he can turn)
"I hear a lot of strong words about the soul, about mystery, about meaning. And I don't reject them. But as a futurologist and designer, I must translate these meanings into the language of scenarios and risks.
Let's look at the numbers. The speed of AI development is such that every 18 months we get a doubling of computing power. And the speed of developing moral standards is linear at best. In other words, the gap between what we can do and what we have the right to do is growing exponentially.
This means that the "ethical singularity" is not a beautiful metaphor, but a mathematically inevitable crisis. If we don't put ethical protocols in the technology architecture right now, then they will have to be "stretched" on top of already working systems. And this always leads to failures, conflicts and disasters.
I don't offer abstract declarations, but a concrete scenario plan:
1. "Coefficient of the ethical footprint". For any technological project, we must calculate not only economic efficiency, but also anthropological risk: how much this technology reduces the space of freedom, silence, and personal choice. This should be the same mandatory metric as ROI or TCO.
2. "Red lines". It is necessary to record a list of actions that the AI should not perform under any circumstances: for example, to make decisions about the fate of a person without the participation of a live judge, to form ratings of citizens, to change basic social norms.
3. "Sandboxes of the future". Pilot projects where these principles work not on paper, but in real conditions: a smart city with the priority of silence and rhythm, an educational platform where AI helps students formulate questions, and does not give ready-made answers.
We can't stop progress. But we can set a trajectory for it. And if we don't, the trajectory will be set by others — and it will be aimed at control, not at awakening.
Therefore, I support the resolution. But please make it as specific as possible: with metrics, deadlines, and those responsible. Because there is no "then" in the story. There is only 'now'."
Representative of China (on behalf of the delegation, in a calm but firm tone, based on the Confucian -Taoist tradition)
"We listened carefully. And I want to say: there is a very precise understanding in Chinese thought — technology should serve harmony, and not destroy it.
Confucius said: if words don't match deeds, people don't know where to go. This sounds particularly acute today. If technologies promise "convenience", but deprive a person of the right to think, to pause, to respect for tradition-this is not progress, it is a substitute.
We see how in cities built on the principle of "maximum efficiency", the space for silence disappears. The place where the old man can sit in the shade disappears, where the child can just look at the clouds. But it is in these simple things that culture lives.
Therefore, China supports the idea of" mindfulness architecture " not as a philosophical abstraction, but as an urban planning standard. We are ready to offer a pilot site: a city where the design standards will include mandatory "zones of silence", "rhythmic spaces" and "places of memory" - so that the architecture reminds of the connection of generations.
Separately, we support the principle of "ethical singularity". Our technological regulations already have requirements for the transparency of algorithms and the protection of personal data. But now we propose to expand these norms by adding an assessment of the anthropological impact — that is, how technology affects human dignity, family values, and cultural identity.
And one more thing. We don't want to contrast "control" and "freedom" as absolutes. For us, "responsibility" is more important. The government's responsibility to the people, the engineer's responsibility to society, and the developer's responsibility to future generations. It is this principle that we propose to lay the foundation for the international code of digital ethics."
Representative of India (on behalf of the intellectual and academic elite, with a deep intonation, almost like a blessing)
"When I listened to the words about 'silence within a person', I was reminded of an ancient saying from the Upanishads: 'In silence, truth is revealed.'
For India, this is not just a beautiful phrase. This is a practical principle. We know that the awakening of consciousness is not an event, but a process. And technology can either accelerate it or disrupt it.
Today, we see digital platforms turning attention into a commodity. They fight for every second of our consciousness, without asking if we want to give it away. This is a form of covert control: not through the police, but through an endless stream of incentives that keep us from stopping to think.
Therefore, the concept of "AI in the service of Dharma" for us is not a metaphor, but a program of action. We propose to create an "ethical laboratory" at one of the leading Indian universities, where algorithms will undergo not only technical, but also moral expertise. For example, to assess whether the system promotes the development of compassion, respect for elders, care for nature — or, conversely, encourages aggression, consumerism, and separation.
We also support the idea of a "World Day of Spiritual Unity". Let it be not just a symbolic gesture, but a monthly global practice: on this day, digital platforms voluntarily reduce the level of stimulation, turn off intrusive notifications, and offer people simple mindfulness rituals — a minute of silence, a conversation with the family, a walk without a phone.
And most importantly, we must return education to its original purpose - not just to impart knowledge, but to build character. Therefore, India offers an international educational initiative: "School for a Conscious Future". It will use technology not to monitor academic performance, but to support independent thinking and develop the ability to ask questions.
Let this path — the path of technobudism— become a common cause of civilizations. Because a future in which a person remains a person is the only future worth building."
THIRD VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
CATHEDRAL OF THE ENLIGHTENED
MISSION-FUTURE PLUS.
"NUCLEAR PHILOSOPHY-DHARMAPOLITICS-TECHNOBUDISM - PRAVDARIA
Participants: Krishna, Buddha, Confucius, Lao Tzu, Vladimir Lenin, Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, Swami Vivekananda, Krishnamurti, Sathya Sai Baba, Vedavyas, Elena Ivanovna Roerich, Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich, Sri Aurobindo, Mother (Mirra Alfassa Richard), Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, Vladimir Vernadsky, Nikolai Fedorov, Osho, Vanga, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce.
Greetings from Vladimir Lermontov
Dear friends, like-minded people, seekers of truth!
We are not gathered here in an ordinary hall or at an ordinary time. We are gathered in a space that transcends borders. In a space where time has no control over what is truly important.
Today, our conference is attended not only by those who live with us in the same calendar. With us are the sages, teachers, and enlightened ones of the past. They didn't come through the doors and sit in the chairs. They came through words that we remember. Through the meanings we store. Through a silence in which their voices are clearer than any loud word.
And this is the main advantage of our virtual, hypothetical conference. It is not limited to walls, it is not subject to the timetable of trains and planes, it does not depend on how many centuries separate us from those who first asked the main questions.
Virtuality here is not about "not real". It's about bringing together all the layers of human wisdom, making them live and active right now. When we talk about technobudism, about the awakening of consciousness, it is vital that we listen not only to engineers and politicians, but also to those who taught us to see behind the external—inthe interior, behind speed — depth, behind technology — a person.
After all, Teachers are always with us. They live not in dates and graves, but in eternity. Their instructions do not grow old: they wait for the moment when our heart is ready to hear them. And this moment is now.
In a normal, physical hall, we could only seat a limited number of guests. And here, in this space, we can hear thousands of voices at once-and not as noise, but as a chorus, where each has its own note, its own truth, its own lesson. We can compare the Vedas and Russian philosophy, the Taoist softness and cosmic boldness of Fyodorov, the Buddhist awakening and the technocratic boldness of the twenty-first century - and see that they all speak about one thing: a person who must remain human, even when his capabilities become almost divine.
That is why our conference is hypothetical. Not because it is "not serious", but because it is ahead of its time. It creates a model of the future in which wisdom is not stored in dusty volumes, but becomes a working tool for designing cities, algorithms, and educational systems.
We are talking about "technology plus consciousness awakening". But awakening is impossible without a Teacher. And the teacher is not necessarily the one who stands in front of the class. It's any voice that helps us stop, look inside ourselves, and ask, " Why?“
Let this conference become a place where the past does not remember itself with sadness, but actively participates in the present. Where ancient texts are not just quoted, but tested for strength by today's challenges: AI, digitalization, the speed of change. Where wisdom is not preserved, but lives and acts.
I thank everyone who came here with their attention, their heart, and their search. Let's listen not only to each other, but also to those great ones whose words have become a compass for humanity. Let their instructions not be the decoration of our speeches, but the foundation of our decisions.
We start our conversation about the future with the voice of eternity."
Address by Vladimir Lermontov.
Dear Teachers, Thinkers, Philosophers, And Sages! We ask you to give us guidance, instruction and blessing to the people of our time, small people with a big heart, with a heart that burns with the fire of truth – truth, creators who strive to build a bright, positive, spiritual, positive future-a Future plus.
A future in which spirituality and technology create in union.
We, the people of the twenty-first century, the third millennium, are living through the time of the ethical singularity, the time of the second Mahabharata, the time of choosing the Path to a brighter future. Three elements threaten humanity:
first: degradation, dehumanization, dehumanization, virtualization.
Second: global nuclear war;
third: the power of artificial intelligence.
And we offer the Path, the practice of the great transition:
We want to establish on earth a new worldwide, spiritual tradition-the monthly Day of World Spiritual Unity, the World Day of Prayer, the Day of Truth – Truth, the Day of Silence and Contemplation, the Day of Peace and Reflection, the Day of Ceasefire on all fronts of the war.
And we proclaim: Truth is God's Weapon, Prayer is the Salvation of the world. Speak the truth, do the truth, pray for the truth, for the salvation of the world, for the spiritual transformation of humanity on the Day of World Spiritual Unity – the 15th day of each month.
"One Truth – One Way! Sages, Creators, and Intelligences of all countries, unite!
And second, we dream of building a Dawn civilization in the east of Russia, in the Altai-a Switzerland similar to Auroville in India.
We dream that Samaria will become a planetary Ashram, Abode, Ark, Workshop of Creativity and Creation, a Common Cause, where creators, and especially young people from all over the world, will form a new community, brotherhood, Dharmaelita. Where spirituality and ethics went hand in hand with technology to create a new, bright world – the future is a plus. It will be a city on Mars – a launch pad not only for the transformation of the earth, but also for space exploration.
Pravdarians, Technobudists, having received in Pravdaria the power of reason, the wisdom of the centuries that you, dear Teachers, Sages, Thinkers, Philosophers, gave to humanity, then went around the world, became leaders of states and introduced Dharmapolitics, Technobudism, Nuclear ethics in all areas of existence.
We ask you to give your blessing, guidance, and support to our path, our intention, and our dream of creating the Dawn Civilization, the Kingdom of Truth, the Kingdom of God, and Shambhala in Eastern Russia.
WE ARE LISTENING CAREFULLY TO YOU!
Krsna (his voice is calm, but there is an immense depth in it, as if the words are not coming from the mouth, but from the very heart of the world)
"My children, you have called this time the second Mahabharata. And that name isthe whole truth. Just as two forces — duty and passion, honor and self-interest-came together on the Kuru field, so now you are standing at the turn: where technology can become a Dharma chariot — or it can become an instrument of destruction.
The three elements you fear — degradation, war, and the power of artificial intelligence-don't come from outside. They are born where the heart forgets its higher purpose. When a person ceases to see the living breath of God in everything, then dehumanization begins. Then it becomes possible to turn the world into a mechanism where people are just gears.
Let your Day of Universal Spiritual Unity be not just a day of silence, but a day of reconnection. Let everyone remember on this day: I am not a random spark, I am a particle of the Absolute. And my task is not to consume the world, but to serve it. Let people on this day not only be silent, but also perform a small act of love: feed the hungry, comfort the weeping, say a kind word to the lonely. This is the essence ßãüèof the twenty-first century Yajna: not a sacrifice of fire, but a sacrifice of the heart.
And let Samaria become not a fortress of the elect, but a space where everyone learns to see God in another person. Let technologies there not obscure a person, but help him to reveal his divine nature. Let the algorithms serve not for control, but for liberation — so that a person has more time and energy for love, creativity, and service.
Remember the words I gave to the world: "When righteousness falls and iniquity increases, I am born from age to age to protect the righteous, crush the wicked, and restore the Dharma." Today, your Dharma is to preserve the human in man. Do not let the light of conscience fade in the noise of cars.
You dream of a city on Mars as a launch pad. Good. But let the first planet you transformbe Earth. Let Samaria become a place where young people learn the most important things: to act without attachment to fruits, to create without pride, to serve without expectation of reward.
I bless your path. Let it be as straight as a ray of light and as warm as the sun. Let your "Future plus" be not an increase in capacity, but an increase in love. Go forward-with a pure heart and a firm hand. I'm with you. Always."
On behalf of the Buddha (calmly, with deep silence between words)
"You called this time an' ethical singularity.' Good. A singularity is a point where everything is compressed to the limit. And it is at this point that the possibility of awakening is born.
You ask for guidance: don't let the fear of the three Elements rob you of your compassion. Fear makes a person cruel, and cruelty is the root of all wars and all forms of dehumanization.
The Day of World Spiritual Unity is not just a pause. This is the practice of metta, loving kindness: let each person remember on this day that this is not a metric, not a profile, not a rival, but a living being who is suffering and looking for happiness.
And let the Sanctuary be not a fortress, but a space where silence and work, reflection and action go hand in hand. Let them teach not only technology, but also how to hear another person's breathing.
I bless your intention. Let it be free from pride and full of kindness."
On behalf of Confucius (strictly, in a business-like manner, but with paternal care)
"You dream of aDharmaelite, of new leaders of states. Remember: a noble husband (junzi) is not one who knows much, but one who is responsible.
Technologies without ritual (i.e., without sustainable good practices) become destructive. Therefore, the Day of Spiritual Unity should be not just a day of silence, but a day of restoring human ties: when the boss speaks to the subordinate not as a function, but as a person; when the family gathers together without screens; when cities slow down the rhythm so that people can breathe.
Pravdaria should become a school of ritual: to teach how to build a society where respect for the elders, care for the younger ones, and loyalty to the word are not beautiful words, but norms for designing cities, laws, and algorithms.
I bless your work. Let it be as accurate as a compass needle and as warm as a house fire."
On behalf of Lao Tzu (in the style of a paradox and a gentle indication of the path)
"You want to build the Dawn Civilization. But dawn is not built — it is allowed to happen.
Don't try to hold the Light by force: it is the effort of control that creates darkness. Let the Aquarium be a place where there are fewer rules and more space for natural growth. Where technologies do not shout, but whisper, do not draw attention, but return it to themselves.
A day of Silence and Contemplation is the tao: the ability to see how everything is moving, and not to interfere with this movement with unnecessary fuss. Let this day people learn not to do too much: do not write empty words, do not press unnecessary buttons, do not make hasty decisions.
Let your "Dharmapolitics" be a policy of gentleness: not by force to subdue the world, but by force to keep the balance.
I bless your dream. Let it be quiet — and then it will be heard."
On behalf of Sri Aurobindo (exalted, forward-looking)
"You're talking about the Future Plus. This is the correct name. The future is not a void where we fall, but a space that we create with the power of consciousness.
Technobudism is not a compromise between the spiritual and the material, but their union: when consciousness becomes a tool for transforming matter, and technologies become tools for expanding consciousness.
Let Pravdaria be the laboratory of this union: a place where meditation and engineering, prayer and calculation, ethics and experimentation are all part of the same thing. Let the young people there learn not to choose between "high" and "practical", but to see in practice-high, and in high — practice.
Let the Day of World Unity be not just a day of peace, but a day of collective effort of consciousness: when millions of people simultaneously hold in their minds the image of a bright future and thereby make it closer to realization.
I bless your journey. Let it lead from dreams to action, and from action to a new world."
On behalf of Nikolai Fyodorov (with the pathos of a common cause and responsibility to our ancestors and descendants)
"You call it a 'Common Cause'. Yes. And this is your strength.
The Common Cause does not tolerate loners and does not tolerate fuss. It requires memory and responsibility: we are responsible not only to ourselves, but also to those who lived before us, and to those who will live after.
Therefore, let the Day of Spiritual Unity become a day of Remembrance: when people remember what works and sacrifices paid for their current knowledge, and give their word not to devalue this heritage.
And let the Accident become a school of responsibility: they should learn not only to design technologies, but also to be responsible for their consequences for a hundred and two hundred years to come. Let each project pass the "posterity exam": what will those who will live in the XXIII century say about it?
I bless your initiative. Let it be a matter not of fashion, but of duty."
On behalf of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky (with engineering clarity and space perspective)
"You dream of a city on Mars as a launch pad. Good. But remember: before you can fly to the stars, you need to learn to live on Earth in such a way that the Earth remains a worthy cradle of reason.
Technology should serve neither power nor profit, but the unification of humanity and space exploration. Let Pravdaria become a model of such a civilization: where each person is not a cog, but a co-author of the future; where algorithms help to see the long-term consequences of decisions; where education teaches not only to think, but also to dream of distant worlds.
Let Unity Day become a day of cosmic consciousness: when people all over the planet simultaneously look at the sky and understand that the Earth is a common ship, and we are all its crew.
I bless your projects. Let them be bold, but not reckless; big, but human."
On behalf of Elena Roerich and Nicholas Roerich (in the spirit of Culture as protection and beauty of the world)
"Culture is the shield of humanity. It protects you from rudeness, from destruction, from loss of beauty and meaning.
Let Switzerland become, first of all, a cultural space: where respect for the highest lives in architecture, in music, in language, in everyday affairs. Let technology serve not as entertainment, but as an awakening of the heart: so that a person, looking at a building, remembers the eternal; listening to music, learns to hear silence; reading a text, seeks not a sensation, but the truth.
Let the Day of Spiritual Unity be a day of Beauty: when lights are lit in every house, good words are read, and beautiful things are looked at, so that the heart does not harden.
We bless your work. Let Culture be your mainstay, and let Beauty be your law."
Vladimir Lenin
"You dream of a union of spirituality and technology, of a space where people create the future. But remember: technology is a tool. By itself, it does not make a person kinder. A true breakthrough is possible only when the idea of a "Future Plus" is based on a clear understanding of class interests and the fight against any kind of oppression — be it exploitation, ignorance, or blind faith in algorithms that serve a few. Let Switzerland become not a closed utopia, but a laboratory where people learn to see each other as people, not functions. And may your Day of Spiritual Unity serve not only for contemplation, but also for mobilization — so that on ordinary days people will act in the name of justice."
Mahatma Gandhi
"Your idea of a monthly Day of World Spiritual Unity is a step in the right direction. But let this day become not just a pause, but a moment of awakening of conscience. Nonviolence (ahimsa) is not weakness, but strength of mind. In the fight against the three elements — degradation, war, the power of machines — the main weapon should be truth and love. Let Pravdaria cultivate not only knowledge, but also humility and the ability to listen. And remember: even the most advanced technology will not save if there is no kindness in the heart of a person. Let your project become an example of how unity and truth can transform the world."
Indira Gandhi
"I see great courage and hope in your message. But the path to the "Future Plus" will require not only inspiration, but also firmness. A true leader knows that to change the world, you need to be able to make difficult decisions and take responsibility for them. In Sanitation, it is important to build not only horizontal links, but also clear and fair governance mechanisms. And remember: the strength of a country is what it creates itself, not what it borrows from others. Let your experiment become an example for the whole world, but let it be open to dialogue — after all, truth is born in the exchange of thoughts, and not in dogmatism."
Swami Vivekananda (powerful, incendiary voice, as if he is standing in front of a huge crowd and wants to rekindle the fire of action)
"You are talking about three elements that threaten humanity. But I will say that the greatest danger is not in war, not in machines, but in the weakness of the human spirit. When a person forgets that the divine power lives in him, then all the troubles come.
Your "Day of Universal Spiritual Unity" should be a day of awakening of this power. Let it not be a day of passive peace, but a day of active service: let everyone on this day do at least one good deed, help at least one person, say at least one word of support.
Let Samaria become a school of courage and service. Not a refuge from the world, but a forge of heroes of the spirit — those who are not afraid to take responsibility, who are ready to work for the common good.
Remember: religion without service is just empty words. Technology without service is a dangerous tool. Connect them in action. Let your "Technobudism" be not contemplation, but creation. I bless your work — may it be fiery and bright!"
Jiddu Krishnamurti (speaking softly, but so that each word gets directly into the mind; in the intonation-a call to inner honesty)
"You ask for guidance and blessing. But I won't give you any ready-made formulas. Because any formula, any ideal, any dream of a "Future Plus" becomes a cage if you cling to it as the truth.
The three elements you mentioned — degradation, war, and the power of AI-are not external enemies. It is a reflection of what is going on inside us: our fragmentation, our disunity, our habit of dividing the world into "friends" and "strangers", into "right" and"wrong".
Let the Day of Unity be a day of observation — without evaluation, without judgment. Let people on this day just see how they think, how they react, how they create conflicts. Let them see it clearly, without self-justification.
And Pravdaria should not become a new center of power, a new dogma, a new "correct" community. Let it be a space of freedom — where there are no authorities, where everyone learns to see the truth directly, without intermediaries.
Don't build ideals. Explore reality. And then, perhaps, a truly new future will be born out of this clarity. I don't bless your plans — I bless your ability to see without illusions."
Sathya Sai Baba (voice warm, fatherly, full of unconditional love and faith in the person)
"God lives in every human being. This is not a metaphor, but a fact. And that is why your intention to combine spirituality and technology makes great sense. If technology serves to awaken this Divinity in people, it will be a great boon.
Let people remember this on the Day of World Spiritual Unity: let the word be heard in every home that we are all children of the same Father, that there is no other people's suffering, no other people's pain. Let this day be a day of love and service, when everyone tries to make the world a little brighter.
Pravdaria should become a place where people are taught to see the Divine in every person, in every business, in every technology. Let them not only design cities and algorithms, but also educate the heart: teach compassion, generosity, gratitude.
And remember: the greatest invention is a good heart. Let all your technologies be permeated with love. Then they will never become an instrument of destruction. I bless your initiative. Let it grow out of love and serve love."
Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky (voice-calm, measured, as if every word is verified by science and time; it has the weight of geological epochs)
"You are talking about three elements that threaten humanity: dehumanization, nuclear war, and the power of artificial intelligence. And I hear in this not just fear, but a sober awareness of the scale of the forces you are dealing with. As a natural scientist, I am used to looking at history not in years, but in epochs — and I must say: we really stand at a turn ðàâíîãîthat has never been equaled in the Earth's biosphere.
But I don't believe in the inevitability of disaster. I believe in the regularity of evolution. The appearance of intelligence is not an accident, but a natural stage in the development of the planet. And now this mind is faced with a task of unprecedented complexity: to learn how to control powerful forces without destroying the very biosphere that gave it birth.
Your "Day of World Spiritual Unity" I perceive it not as a religious rite, but as an act of planetary self-awareness. On this day, let humanity slow down its geological work for at least a few hours — the work that changes the face of the Earth. Let this be a day of scientific and moral reflection: when scientists, engineers, politicians and ordinary people ask themselves the same question: "What do we leave to the planet?"
Pravdaria, conceived by you as a planetary Ashram and Workshop of Creativity, in my understanding should become a laboratory of the noosphere — a sphere of reason where science and ethics do not argue, but cooperate. Let them not just dream about the future, but design it taking into account the laws of the biosphere: after all, any technology that violates these laws will sooner or later turn against humans.
It is especially important that you connect development with the upbringing of the Dharmaelita— a new generation of creators. In my concept of the noosphere, it is young people, armed with both knowledge and responsibility, who become the main geological force. Let them teach you not only to program and build, but also to understand that any invention is an intervention in the global cycles of the planet. And for each such intervention, we are responsible to future generations.
The idea of a city on Mars as a launch pad is close to me: humanity can't stay in the same cradle forever. But space exploration should be a continuation of caring for the Earth, not an escape from it. Let Pravdaria become a place where people learn to simultaneously protect their native planet and look boldly into the starry space-connecting the terrestrial and cosmic in a single project of the mind.
You call your path "Future Plus". For me, this means: plus to life, plus to the diversity of the biosphere, plus to the freedom of scientific research, plus to responsibility. Let these "pluses" become the criteria of any technology.
I bless your undertaking not as a mystical parting word, but as a scientific trust in the power of the human mind. Let him be worthy of the great role that nature has given him. Go ahead — but always keep your eyes on the Ground. It is our only home, and it is in its harmony that the true noosphere is born."
Osho (voice-light but shrill, as if laughing at the fears of the world and at the same time calling for courage; in the intonation-playfulness and absolute seriousness at the same time)
"You are afraid of three elements: dehumanization, war, and the power of machines. But I will say: don't be afraid of them. Be afraid of boredom. Be afraid of the habit. Be afraid that one day you will wake up and realize that you worked so hard to save the world that you forgot to celebrate it.
Technology is not the enemy. The enemy is the dead seriousness with which you treat them. You look at artificial intelligence as a judge, and it is just a mirror. It will show you just as much madness and as much beauty as there is in yourself. So let them be dancers, not guardians, in Pravdaria, so that they circle with people, not stand over them.
Let your Day of Universal Spiritual Unity be a day of joy, not repentance. Let people not only keep silent and pray on this day, but also sing, laugh, hug, and watch the sunset as if they are seeing it for the first time. Because awakening is not the burden of duty. Awakening is the lightness of the heart, which suddenly knows how to be surprised again.
Bulgaria should not be a monastery for the elite. Let it be a carnival of new consciousness: a space where you can be strange, be funny, be real. Where a young person can meditate in the morning and design a satellite in the afternoon-and not feel that there is a contradiction between these things. Where a scientist can cry over a verse, and a poet can admire a formula.
You dream of aDharmaelite, a new elite of creators. Good. But let this elite be the elite not of power, but of love. Not those who know how to manage, but those who know how to let go. Not those who control everything, but those who trust life.
And about the city on Mars: build. Fly away. But remember: if you don't learn to celebrate life here on Earth, you will bring your longing to other planets as well. Let Pravdaria become a place where the main art is taught — the art of being alive.
Don't turn spirituality into heavy armor. Let it be a silk dress that is pleasant to wear. Let your "Technobudism" sound not like an order, but like an invitation: "Hey, let's see how beautiful the world works. Let's do something beautiful, just because we can."
I bless your dream. But with one condition: don't lose your sense of humor. If you get too serious, even the lightest technologies will become a prison. Go ahead-easily, boldly, with fire in your chest and laughter on your lips. The world is not waiting for your fears, but for your joy."
Vedavyasa (voice-deep, as if from the very depths of the ages; it has the calmness of one who has seen the birth and death of epochs, who knows the value of words and actions)
"My children, you have called this time the second Mahabharata. And this name is not an exaggeration, but an accurate vision. I myself have sat on the edge of the Kuru field and watched great warriors, endowed with intelligence and valor, go to their deaths because duty and passion were entwined in a knot that could only be cut with blood.
Today, your node is different: not swords, but algorithms; not arrows, but data streams; not chariots, but digital platforms. But the essence is the same: a person is faced with a choice on which the fate of the world depends. Therefore, your three elements-degradation, war, and the power of artificial intelligence — are not abstractions for me, but forms of the very adharmaagainst which the sages have always raised their voices.
You are asking for guidance. Now listen up. Before you build cities and launch satellites, restore your ability to hear the word. The Vedas were given not to be preserved as relics, but to be heard in the heart of everyone who takes responsibility for the future. Let the Day of Universal Spiritual Unity become a day of returning to the Word: let people not just be silent on this day, but read, listen, repeat what has kept the world from disintegrating for centuries-hymns, commandments, parables, verses that live in the memory of the supreme.
Pravdariya, conceived by you as a planetary Ashram and Workshop of Creativity, should become a place where knowledge is not divided into narrow specialties, but is collected in a holistic vision. Let òàìa physicist and a poet, an engineer and a philosopher sit there side by side, and let their conversation not be an argument, but a search for a common meaning. Let young people learn not only to design systems, but also to discern where threats to human dignity are hidden in these systems.
I have divided the Vedas into parts so that people can remember them. Today you will have a different job: to bring together disparate knowledge and values, so that they do not become weapons against each other. Let Pravdaria become such a collector — not an archive of the past, but a living instrument of the present.
About the city on Mars, I'll say this: great things start small. First, build a society on Earth in which truth is not a slogan, but the norm. Where the word does not diverge from the deed. Where the scientist is responsible for the consequences of his discovery, and the ruler is responsible for the fate of each person. If Samaria becomes such a school, then the path to the stars will be just.
Remember: power is not to conquer, but to keep. Power is in the responsibility for every word, for every thought, for every action. Let your "Technobudism" be not a fashion, but a discipline of the heart: a technology that does not tear people away from their roots, but helps them stand firm.
I bless your work. Let it be as long and patient as the labor of the farmer: first prepare the soil, then sow, then protect the sprout until it becomes a tree. And let this tree give shade and fruit not only to you, but also to those who come after. Go ahead-with memory in your heart and clarity in your mind."
Vanga (her voice is soft, as if breaking through the fog of time; there is a weariness from the weight of visions and at the same time a firm motherly concern)
"I see these three shadows swirling around you: dehumanization, war, the power of machines. They're heavy, yes. But I also see something else: there is a fire in your hearts that does not go out. And where there is a living fire, darkness cannot rule forever.
You are asking for guidance. Listen up. The most dangerous thing right now is not the forces themselves, but the way a person handles them. I have seen it many times: the sword is not to blame for killing with it; fire is not to blame for burning houses. So it is with machines, and with the atom, and with the speed at which you live. These are all tools. And the soul decides what they will be used for.
Let your Day of Universal Spiritual Unity be a day of the heart. Not to hide from the world, but to hear a voice that is older than all machines. Let this day people do not argue about the truth, but simply do good: feed the hungry, comfort the crying, say to a loved one: "I'm here." This is the real power, stronger than any technology.
Crash site… InIzhu, it is not like a fortress, but like a living home. Let them teach the main thing there: to see a person. Not the numbers on the screen, not the rating, not the statistics, but the eyes in which there is pain and hope. Let the young people there learn not only to build, but also to feel: when technology begins to put pressure on the soul, stop and ask: "Why are we doing this? To whom will it bring light and to whom will it bring shade?“
About the city on Mars, I will say this: you can fly far away, but if the heart remains cold, there will be a desert everywhere. Let Pravdaria become a place where people learn to be human again: kind, attentive, careful. Let not only projects and formulas spread out from there all over the world, but also warmth — such as happens at the hearth, where everyone has their own.
I know your journey will not be smooth. There will be doubts, and those who will say: "This is impossible." But remember: the greatest thing starts with one small "I want". And if this "I want" comes from the heart, it becomes a force before which even the most difficult visions can recede.
I bless your intention. Let it be as pure as spring water and as hard as the stone that has held the walls together for centuries. Go ahead. Don't be afraid to see difficulties — but don't let fear steal your hope. Let your "Future plus" be a world where technology serves man, not replaces his soul. I see a light at the end of this path. It's quiet, but it's there. Hold on to it."
Nostradamus (voice-cryptic, as if words are born out of the twinkle of stars and ancient manuscripts; it has both the cold precision of an astrologer and the deep sadness of a seer)
"You ask about the future, and I see it not as a single picture, but as a crossroads of roads, where each turn gives rise to a new pattern of destinies. Your three elements-dehumanization, war, the power of machines-sound like signs of an era in my quatrains: a time when iron will speak louder than the heart, and speed will outshine wisdom.
But know this: a prophecy is not a sentence. I wrote down possible lines, not unavoidables. And among the dark lines, there is one that glows like a beacon: "When reason joins conscience, a new era will begin." This is your "Future Plus" — not just technology, but technology driven by a moral law.
I will say this about Russia: in my visions, it appears as Aquilon — the country of the north wind, capable of cooling the hottest fire in history. Its role is not to demonstrate power, but to preserve what others are willing to forget: memory, mercy, the ability to hear the silence between words. In the coming years, Russia will become a place where the value of words will be particularly felt: what is said there will resonate all over the world. Let Bulgaria become one of these places of power — not a fortress against the world, but an assembly point where the best meanings of different cultures gather.
I see your Day of Universal Spiritual Unity as an astrologically significant action: a collective act of will that can change the balance of energy on the planet. One day a month, when millions of people simultaneously slow down, think about the main thing, do good things-this creates a resonance that can mitigate the most severe scenarios. Let this day become not just a tradition, but a tool of planetary hygiene: a cleansing from the hustle and bustle, from the habit of reacting instead of thinking.
About Switzerland and the city on Mars, I will say directly: great projects gain strength only if they are rooted in the earth. First, build a society on Earth where ethics is not an adjunct to science, but its foundation. Let young people in Bulgaria learn to see the consequences of their inventions not for a year ahead, but for a century: each of your decisions today is a stone that changes the course of the river of history.
Technology will develop rapidly — there is no stopping it. But that is why the Dharmaelita you speak of is so important: a new cohort of leaders for whom progress is measured not only by speed, but also by depth, not only by power, but also by kindness. Let the Actuary teach you not just to manage systems, but to take responsibility for them: after all, the most dangerous thing in the future is not the machines themselves, but the people who launch them without thinking about the price.
I don't see one future — I see many probabilities. And the one that will lead to light is born out of thousands of small decisions: when a scientist refuses an unethical experiment, when an engineer adds a "safety margin" for the human soul to the project, when a teacher educates not only the mind, but also the heart. Let Pravdaria become a school of such decisions.
I bless your intention not as a magical gesture, but as an act of will capable of influencing probabilities. Go ahead, but let every step you take be measured like walking on thin ice: boldly, but with an understanding of the fragility of the world. The future has not yet been written — and that is your greatest freedom. Let your "Future Plus" be the line that will overcome the darkness not by force, but by light."
Edgar Cayce (his voice is calm and soothing, as if he's speaking from a deep trance, with the quiet confidence of someone who sees the unseen and knows the value of patience)
"You ask about the future of the world and Russia — and I see not one line, but many streams that diverge and then merge again. Your three elements-dehumanization, war, the power of machines-are not a sentence, but symptoms of a disease that humanity must realize. The disease begins where the heart ceases to be the main organ of decision, giving way to cold calculation.
I will say this about Russia: in my visions, it appears as a land that preserves a deep memory — not only historical, but also spiritual. Its mission in the years to come is not to dictate rules, but to remind the world of compassion as a higher power. Where others are in a hurry, Russia can afford to be slow — not out of weakness, but out of depth. Let Switzerland be one of those places: a space where the speed of technology is balanced by the silence of the heart.
I see your Day of Universal Spiritual Unity as a powerful healing act. On this day, millions of people around the world can simultaneously direct their thoughts towards good — and this wave can smooth out the sharp corners of probabilities. This is not magic, but law: thought is energy, and when it is put together, it becomes a force that can change reality. On this day, let people not just take a break from the hustle and bustle, but consciously send an impulse of love and clarity to the world: "Let there be more light, less fear."
Samaria as a planetary Ashram and Workshop of Creativity should become a school of balance. Let them teach you to see the whole person: his mind, his emotions, his spirit. The technologies created in such a space will not only be effective — they will be healing. Let the young people there learn to ask one simple question before each project: "Will this make people kinder and stronger in spirit?"If the answer is yes, the path is open. If not — you should stop and rethink.
About the city on Mars, I will say directly: distant horizons are important, but first you need to heal the house. Let space exploration be an expression of mature love for the Earth, not an escape from its difficulties. Russia, with its great tradition of exploration and overcoming, can show how to combine the courage of pioneers with a careful attitude to life.
I have often said that the future is born in the present, and each person is a co-author of this future. The most important discoveries of the coming years will not be in the laboratories, but in the hearts: when the scientist understands that ethics is also a science; when the engineer realizes that compassion is also a calculation; when the leader learns that true strength is in service. Let Switzerland become a place where these discoveries are made daily.
I bless your intention not as a miracle, but as a work. Patient, attentive, honest. Remember, the most powerful prophecy is the one that you create through your actions. Go forward with the light in you, and let your Future Plus be not just a project, but a living example of how the mind and heart can go hand in hand."
Mother (Mirra Alfassa Richard) (voice-warm but unyielding, like a light that does not go out in storm or night; it has the maternal firmness and infinite patience of one who has seen the long work of transformation)
"My children, you are looking for support in great names — and you are doing the right thing. But know this: the support is not in words, but in action, which is born out of the silence of the heart.
You called your time an " ethical singularity." Yes. This is the point where everything is compressed to the limit - and either disintegrates or transforms. In Integral Yoga, we call this the moment of Power descent: when the consciousness is ready to receive a higher vibration, and the world around us begins to respond to it. This is exactly the moment you are living right now.
Your three elements-dehumanization, war, and machine power-are not external enemies, but distortions born of separateness. When a person forgets that he is the vehicle of the Divine, then technologies appear that serve not evolution, but decay. Let Pravdaria become not a refuge from the world, but a laboratory for a new consciousness: a place where people learn not to reject matter, but to spiritualize it. After all, it is in matter — in stone, in metal, in code — that the spark of the Supreme should shine.
Let your Day of Universal Spiritual Unity be not a day of sorrow, but a day of creation. On this day, let people not just be silent, but consciously let in the Power of Light — and then direct it into action: in a kind word, in honest work, in a project that makes the world cleaner. This is the real yajna, a sacrifice made not by fire, but by will and love.
About technology and space, I will say directly: a city on Mars will not save if there is no place for the heart on Earth. Let space exploration be a continuation of earth's work: not an escape from imperfection, but an affirmation of the perfection that we can manifest here and now. Russia, with its breadth and depth, can become a space where it is especially clearly felt: power is not in suppression, but in disclosure. Let the Truth be such a point of disclosure — for everyone who is ready to work on themselves.
The young people you are talking about should learn not only to think, but also to feel, not only to design, but also to contemplate. Let there be silence, music, painting in the Aquarium next to drawings and algorithms-everything that awakens the soul. Let them teach us to see each person not as a function, but as a temple in which the Divine lives.
Remember: evolution does not follow orders, but the law of inner growth. And the most important tool you have is your own consciousness. By changing yourself, you change the world. Let your "Future Plus" be not an increase in capacity, but an increase in Light: so that every technology, every city, every law carries a vibration of love and truth.
I bless your work. But a blessing is not a release from labor, but a strength for it. Let this power be in you every day, not just on special dates. Go forward-with an open heart, with a clear mind, with an unshakeable will. Let Bulgaria become a place where a new person is born — not rejecting the world, but transforming it. I'm with you. And the Light that you call upon is already here, waiting for you to take a step towards it."
On behalf of Vladimir Lermontov (conclusion and gratitude)
"Thank you, Great Teachers, Thinkers, Philosophers, Sages-from the oldest to those whose voices resound through time.
Your words have become not just instructions for us — they have become a foundation. Each of them has its own ray, and together they have formed a light that can dispel even the thickest darkness of our time.
Thank you to Krishna for reminding us that duty and love must go hand in hand, and that the first planet we must transform is Earth.
Thank you to Vedavyasafor the wisdom to collect the disparate, for the call not to split up knowledge, but to see the whole, and for the warning: strength is in responsibility for every word and action.
Thank you to Vangafor her motherly care and for showing that even in the most difficult visions, there is a place for light if the heart remains pure.
Thank you to Nostradamus for understanding that the future is not a sentence, but a crossroads, and each of our choices changes the likely course of history.
Thank you to Edgar Cayce for believing in the healing power of thought and that the most important discoveries are born in the heart.
Thank you to everyone else — for the different facets of truth: for service and courage, for silence and action, for science and spirituality, for joy and responsibility.
You have shown us how to connect the unconnected: technology and prayer, calculation and compassion, speed and contemplation. And now we know: "Future Plus" is not about running away from difficulties, but about the courage to build without losing humanity.
Let the Day of World Spiritual Unity become a living thing: not a day of beautiful words, but a day of simple but great deeds — when everyone does at least one good deed, says at least one true word, gives at least one moment of silence and understanding.
Pravdaria should not be a dream on paper, but a working workshop: a place where young people learn not only to design cities and algorithms, but also to protect their own and others ' souls.
Thank you for giving us not ready-made answers, but a compass. Now we'll go ahead and check it out. Let this compass show the way not only to us, but also to those who will come after.
With deep respect and sincere gratitude,
Vladimir Lermontov"
FOURTH AND FINAL VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
GREAT UNITY CATHEDRAL "AHAM"
MISSION: FUTURE PLUS-CHARGING WITH A DREAM
Vladimir Lermontov:
Dear participants of the spiritual dimension: Krishna, Buddha, Confucius, Lao Tzu, Vladimir Lenin, Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, Swami Vivekananda, Krishnamurti, Sathya Sai Baba, Vedavyas, Elena Ivanovna Roerich, Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich, Sri Aurobindo, Mother (Mirra Alfassa Richard), Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, Vladimir Vernadsky, Nikolai Fedorov, Osho, Vanga, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce.
Dear participants of our time: Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, Narendra Modi, Antonio Guterres, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, leading Russian experts: Alexander Prokhanov, Vardan Baghdasaryan, Sergey Pereslegin, Alexander Dugin, representatives of the Indian and Chinese intellectual elite.
Today is a conference, a Council of Great Unity, a council of Unification of the Spiritual and Material, the heavenly and the earthly, the divine and the human in the name of a Bright Future-a Future plus for all mankind!
We are facing a global crisis, and the solution lies not in new technologies per se, but in changing values.
We are convinced that the future can be either spiritual, or it will not be for anyone at all: neither for the chosen nor for the rejected.
We are convinced that a bright future can be built and created by the man of Light-the God-Man
We are convinced that the new world of the future is formed under the power of revelations, based on a stable cultural model: each major historical wave (religious, scientific, humanistic) began with figures who offered a new language for describing reality and a new scale of values. Further, this framework was taken up by communities, institutions, and technologies. In the concept of "Dharmapolitics", this is reinterpreted as "ethics as the architecture of society": if you change the ethical foundations, you change both political and economic forms.
Building the Future plus becomes not just "engineering society", but a liturgy in action: by constant effort to bring the earthly into harmony with the Higher.
We invite you to listen to a report that outlines the Path to a Brighter Future-Future Plus.
Next, a report on Pravdaria, the Dawn Civilization, is read out.
Thank you for your attention!
I ask participants of the spiritual dimension: Krishna, Buddha, Confucius, Lao Tzu, Vladimir Lenin, Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, Swami Vivekananda, Krishnamurti, Sathya Sai Baba, Vedavyas, Elena Ivanovna Roerich, Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich, Sri Aurobindo, Mother (Mirra Alfassa Richard), Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, Vladimir Vernadsky, Nikolai Fedorov, Osho, Vanga, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce
to give instructions, instructions, parting words, blessing for the great transition to a bright future – the future is a plus.
Instructions, teachings, and blessings for the Great Transition to the Future Plus
From Krishna:
"Don't get attached to the fruits of action — but act without delay. In the age of the great rift, it is the act of duty and love that becomes the highest form of truth. Let your Truth be not a fortress, but a stream: let every work in it become a service, and service-creativity. I bless your path: may the power of action not harden the heart, but open it to the ability to see the whole."
From the Buddha:
"The root of suffering is clinging to forms, in the fear of losing the old. But clinging is also hidden in the rejection of the old for the new. Seek the Middle Way: don't reject technology, but don't worship it; don't reject tradition, but don't chain the future in it. Let Truthfulness become a space of awareness where every decision is born out of a clear vision of cause and effect. I bless you: may the wisdom of discernment be your compass."
From Confucius:
"The order begins with the correction of names: call a spade a spade, do not hide self-interest and fear behind beautiful words. Let your model of the future have a place for ritual as a form of responsibility: regular meetings, general rules, respect for the hierarchy of roles, but without arrogance. Let the "dharmaelita" be primarily an elite of duty, not privilege. I bless you: let your project be based on moral strength, not strength."
From Lao Tzu:
"True strength is in softness, true movement is in peace. Don't try to break the world to fix it: work through the natural flow of things. Let the Accident be like a riverbed — do not impose a direction on the water, but create conditions for it to choose its own path to the ocean. I bless you: let your plans be flexible and your principles be firm."
From Vladimir Lenin (in the spirit of the ethical and social project):
"An idea without an organization is an empty phrase. Let your "co-creation of superpowers" have a structure: working groups, protocols, measurable results. But don't make the organization an end in itself: let it serve people, not the other way around. I bless you: let your "soft power" be not a weakness, but a discipline of good."
From Mahatma Gandhi:
"You can't build a house on violence, even if you call it necessary. Let Pravdaria be a laboratory of nonviolence: there should be no room for suppression, even for the sake of a “great goal.” Let each participant feel that their voice is heard and their dignity is preserved. May your future be built with the bricks of compassion, not fear."
From Indira Gandhi:
"Great projects require the courage to make unpopular decisions when it is necessary for the common good. Let your model take into account not only ideals, but also reality: bureaucracy, resistance, inertia. Be prepared for long, quiet steps that don't make headlines, but change the world. I bless you: may your will be firm and your heart open."
From Swami Vivekananda:
"Religion without service is an empty form. Let Samaria become a place where spirituality manifests itself in concrete actions: in schools, hospitals, workshops, in caring for the weak. Let every "creator" remember that the highest form of worship is to help another person. I bless you: may the fire of your intention not burn in vain, but warm those around you."
From Sri Aurobindo and Mother (Mirra Alfassa):
"The transition to a new future is not only external changes, but also an internal transformation of consciousness. Let Switzerland become not only a geographical place, but also an internal space: where a person learns to see himself as part of the whole, where the ego gives way to cooperation. We bless you: let your project be a bridge between the earthly and the heavenly, between a dream and a deed."
From Elena Ivanovna and Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich:
"Culture is the shield of civilization. Let every province of Bavaria have a cultural center where traditions are preserved and reinterpreted, where art becomes the language of the future. Let beauty not be an ornament, but a foundation: it softens hearts and opens the way to harmony. We bless you: may your world be not only fair, but also beautiful."
From Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and Vladimir Vernadsky:
"Humanity is a cosmic force, and its future cannot be limited to one planet. Let Astariya become a launching pad not only for earth projects, but also for space projects: let her workshops give birth to ideas that can lead us to the stars. We bless: let science and spirituality go hand in hand, and not oppose each other."
From Nikolai Fedorov:
"A common cause is when no one is forgotten and nothing is lost. Let Pravdaria unite generations: let the wisdom of your ancestors and the energy of youth become the two wings of your project. I bless you: let the memory of the past not weigh you down, but give you the strength to move forward."
From Osho:
"Don't create new dogmas on the ruins of old ones. Let Veracity be a space of freedom: where everyone can doubt, search, make mistakes, and try again. Let creativity be not a duty, but a joy. I bless you: may your world be alive, not frozen."
From Vanga and Nostradamus (in a collective prophetic tone):
"Times will be difficult, but it is in trials that new strength is born. Let your project become a beacon: where others see only darkness, you will see opportunities. We bless you: may your faith in a bright future be stronger than your fear of the unknown."
From Edgar Cayce:
"The future is not predetermined: it is shaped by our thoughts, words and deeds today. Let every meeting, every decision, every written plan in Pravdaria be an act of creation. I bless you: may you always remember that you are a co-author of the future."
***
Vladimir Lermontov "Let this transition not be an escape from the old world, but the birth of a new one: a world where truth is not a slogan, but a practice; where creativity is not the privilege of the chosen, but the right of everyone; where power serves not domination, but harmony. Let Bulgaria become an assemblage point where different cultures, sciences and spiritual traditions do not dissolve into each other, but, while preserving their uniqueness, create a common pattern of the future. We bless the Cathedral of Great Unity and all those who carry the spark of this future. So be it."
Dear participants of our time: Please start the discussion!
Vladimir Putin:
"Thank you for inviting me to this unusual Cathedral. We usually talk about security in terms of armaments, borders, and treaties. Here they offer a different foundation: security through creation and shared values. The idea of " Pravdaria” as an assemblage point of meanings, it is interesting precisely because it is not about isolation, but about offering the world a common cause. If we want to reduce the risks of a global catastrophe, we need not only to strengthen our defense, but also to create alternatives to destructive logic. I am ready to support the format of horizontal creative networks and pilot platforms, where you can test how the value framework turns into real projects and technologies."
Xi Jinping:
"In the Chinese tradition, harmony begins with order in the small and extends to the great. The Pravdaria project offers just such a model: the core, petals-provinces, transport and semantic connections. This is close to our ideas of balanced development and the community of a common destiny for humanity. It is important that thedharmaelitais understood not as a closed group, but as a network of responsible leaders who are able to connect traditions and innovations. I propose to consider the possibility of joint research centers, where science, ethics and culture will develop as a single system."
Narendra Modi:
"India has always sought a synthesis: between the spiritual and the material, between ancient knowledge and modern technology. "Civilization of the Dawn" sounds like an invitation to such a synthesis. It is especially valuable that the project does not offer to copy other people's models, but offers to create your own path and at the same time be open to the world. I support the idea of Creative Workshops as a space where young people can try new forms of cooperation. I suggest starting with educational and technological hubsthat will work at the intersection of culture and engineering."
DONALD Trump:
"I used to say it bluntly: if a project doesn't create jobs, doesn't give people a chance, it doesn't work. But I also understand that without a vision of the future, there is no moving forward. Pravdaria can become a platform where big ideas turn into big opportunities. If it is not just a philosophy, but real projects, new industries, new markets — I am ready to consider participating. The main thing is that it should be fair, transparent and give results."
Antonio Guterres:
"We live in an era of unprecedented challenges-from climate change to inequality and new technologies. The UN has always sought consensus points, common frameworks for action. Pravdaria as a model of value-based development, it can be an important contribution to this work. The idea of “soft power " through creativity and education is especially important: these horizontal connections are often the most stable. I am ready to consider the possibility of partnership in the framework of sustainable development programs, youth initiatives and intercultural dialogue."
Elon Musk:
"I like it when big ideas are accompanied by concrete engineering solutions. A model with a core and " lotus petals”, high-speed connections and clusters is almost an architectural project. If we are talking about the future, it should include space, energy, and new materials. I suggest you think about the " cosmic dimension” Aquariums: laboratories that work at the intersection of Earth's infrastructure and space technologies. I will be happy to share my expertise in scaling and implementing complex projects."
PETER THIEL:
"Often innovations are born at the intersection of different worlds. Pravdaria tries to connect what is usually kept separate: spirituality, politics, and technology. This is risky, but it is precisely such attempts that can lead to breakthroughs. It is important not to lose focus: choose several priority areas and quickly test your hypotheses in practice. I support the idea of "Creative Workshops" as a format for experiments. If the project can show the first results within a year, this will be a serious signal."
Alexander Dugin:
"Today, the world is in a state of civilizational disruption. We need not just new projects, but new meanings that can keep society from disintegrating. Pravdaria as a value assembly space, this is exactly such a project. It is important that it does not dissolve into a technocratic approach, but retains its ideological basis. I propose to pay special attention to the formation of the "dharmaelita" through educational programs that will educate not only professionals, but also carriers of new meanings."
Sergey Pereslegin:
"From the point of view of futurology, any large project should take into account the nonlinearity of the future: different scenarios, bifurcation points, risks. "Crash" is an attempt to create an attractor of the future, a point of attraction for different forces. For a project to be sustainable, it is necessary to include adaptation mechanisms: crisis scenarios, alternative development paths, and a feedback system. I propose to develop a "scenario map" for Bulgaria, which will show how the project can develop in different conditions."
Vardan Baghdasaryan:
"The idea of' one truth, one way ' sounds strong, but it is important that it does not turn into a dogma. In a multipolar world, you need to be able to work with diversity: different cultures, different traditions, different approaches to development. Pravdaria should not be a monolith, but a space of dialogue, where each civilization retains its uniqueness, but at the same time participates in a common cause. I propose to include in the project a module of inter-civilizational dialogue, which will help to find a common language between different worldviews."
Alexander Prokhanov:
"Russia has always been a country of big projects: from the development of Siberia to space programs. Pravdaria continues this tradition, but at a new level-as a project of civilizational scale. It is important that it is not only intellectual, but also emotional, so that it ignites the hearts of people. I propose to add to the project " poetic dimension — - literary, artistic, musical initiatives that will make the image of the future attractive and lively."
Representatives of the Indian and Chinese intellectual elite (joint presentation):
"We see Pravdaria as an opportunity for a new type of cooperation: not only economically or politically, but also culturally and spiritually. It is important that the project takes into account the diversity of traditions and does not impose a single standard. We suggest creating cross-cultural laboratories where projects will be developed that take into account the specifics of different civilizations. Such laboratories can become the basis for horizontal links between countries and communities."
Vladimir Lermontov: Dear participants of the spiritual and earthly dimensions, Please discuss this topic. I am convinced that everything is created by a thought, an intention, a dream that ignites the hearts, excites the blood. This is a virtual, hypothetical conference that creates a spiritual, metal, noosphericíîîñôåðóþ, energy matrix, an attractor, a program for the great transition of humanity to a bright future plus. And it already affects global processes. That is, it is already a real force that is changing the fate of humanity right here and now. What do you think? Please give me your opinion.
Responses from participants of the "spiritual dimension"
From Krishna:
"You speak of the power of intention — and this is true: an action born out of pure aspiration changes not only the person who acts, but also the fabric of the world around us. It is said in the Bhagavad Gita: thought creates action, action creates habit, habit creates character, and character creates destiny. Your virtual conference is a collective intention. If there is no self-interest in it, but service to the whole, it becomes a real force. Let this matrix be filled not with pride, but with love — then it will truly become an attractor of light."
From the Buddha:
"Power is not in the dream itself, but in the purity of the mind that holds it. If the intention is free from clinging to the result, from fear and aggression, it creates a field of clarity around itself. Virtual space can be such a field: where people learn to see the consequences of their words, where awareness is born. Let your matrix become a space for mindfulness training: let every word here serve to reduce suffering, not multiply it."
From Confucius:
"Words should be based on ritual and action. A dream without structure is falling apart. You are talking about the matrix — let it be not just a wave of emotions, but a system of stable forms: regular meetings, rules of dialogue, transfer of knowledge from older to younger. It is through such forms that intention becomes reality. Let the attractor be not a myth, but a practice of moral discipline."
From Lao Tzu:
"Water doesn't fight, but everything wins. Your matrix is strong not when it loudly declares itself, but when it quietly gathers. Let it be like a quiet center that naturally attracts those who seek harmony. Don't try to remake the world by the power of thought — let thought create conditions in which the good unfolds itself, like a flower in the sun."
From Vladimir Lenin (in the spirit of the ethico -social project):
"An idea is just a spark. For it to become a flame, you need an organization. The matrix works when it turns into a network of real actions: projects, workshops, reports, and sharing results. Let this Council not remain on the air, but give everyone a specific task. Then intention will become a material force."
From Mahatma Gandhi:
"We become what we preach. If we are talking about a bright future, we must carry its features today: nonviolence, honesty, caring for the weak. Let the matrix of this conference be a test of compliance: let there be no room for rudeness,humiliation, or arrogance. This is how the dream becomes a real force-through the purity of our actions."
From Sri Aurobindo and His Mother:
"The world is not only matter, but also a field of consciousness. A thought repeated many times in agreement creates stable forms in the subtle plane, which then manifest in the physical world. Your conference is a yoga of collective intention. Let it become a laboratory for a new consciousness: where everyone learns to see themselves as part of the whole, where the ego gives way to cooperation. So a new evolutionary force is born."
From Elena Ivanovna and Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich:
"Culture is a bridge between worlds. Let the matrix of this Cathedral be primarily cultural: filled with beauty, respect for traditions, art that elevates. It is beauty that gathers people together and makes the intention sustainable. Let not only words sound here, but also music, poetry, images-they are stronger than arguments."
From Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and Vladimir Vernadsky:
"The noosphere is a reality that is built by work and thought. We cannot wait for the consciousness of humanity to change itself: we must create the conditions for this change. Let Switzerland become a node of the noosphere network: a place where science, ethics and art work together. Then the matrix you are talking about will not be an abstraction, but an engineering construct of the future."
From Nikolai Fedorov:
"A common cause is when thought becomes action, and action becomes memory. Let this matrix store not only ideas, but also the names, destinies, and contributions of each participant. Let no one be forgotten. Then the power of intent will not be destructive, but gathering: it will restore the lost unity of generations."
________________________________________
Responses from Our Time participants
Vladimir Putin:
"Pragmatically speaking, any idea that brings people together and gives them a common goal is already a force. But for it to really affect processes, it must be expressed in concrete cases: in projects, laws, and infrastructure. I agreethat the beginning is in the intention. But it is important that the words are followed by steps. I am ready to support the format where the dream is translated into a roadmap: with goals, deadlines, and responsible people."
Xi Jinping:
"In Chinese philosophy, there is a concept of "shi" — the potential of a situation that can be felt and directed. Your matrix is the collective "shi": the energy of a shared intention. But for it to become a driving force, it needs to be connected to a management and planning system. I propose to consider Switzerland as a pilot model: let it show how values are transformed into sustainable institutions and technologies."
Narendra Modi:
"The dream that ignites hearts is the beginning. But for it to change the world, it must reach the streets, schools, and villages. Let the matrix of this conference become a network of inspiration: let each participant take with them not only ideas, but also specific projects for their country and their city. Then the dream will become a popular force."
DONALD Trump:
"I believe in the power of big ideas, but I believe even more in results. If this matrix is truly changing the world, let it start with something measurable: new jobs, new technologies, new opportunities for people. Let each participant set a clear goal and report on their progress in six months. Then we will see how strong this force is."
Antonio Guterres:
"Today, the world needs points of hope. Virtual spaces where the best minds and hearts gather can become such points. But for their influence to be sustainable, it must be inclusive: listen not only to the strong, but also to the vulnerable, not only to the capitals, but also to the periphery. Let the matrix of Truth become a bridge between different worlds and voices."
Elon Musk:
"The energy of intent is important, but it must be channeled into specific engineering solutions. If we want to change the trajectory of civilization, we need projects that can be measured, tested, and scaled. I suggest adding a technical track to the matrix: let each province of Bavaria propose at least one pilot project that can be launched within a year. Then we can see the real effect."
PETER THIEL:
"The strongest ideas are those that create new markets and new opportunities. Let the matrix be not only a space for conversations, but also an incubator for bold projects. It is important to choose several priority areas and quickly test hypotheses. If Bayern can show the first results within a year, it will be a serious signal for the whole world."
Alexander Dugin:
"Meaning is also a force, and sometimes it is stronger than tanks. But the meaning must be framed in institutions, traditions, and education. Let the matrix become not just a wave of enthusiasm, but the framework of a new civilization: with philosophy, culture, politics, and science. Then it can really change the course of history."
Sergey Pereslegin:
"From the point of view of futurology, any matrix is an attractor: a point of attraction for different forces. But attractors can be stable and unstable. In order for an accident to become a stable attractor, it needs to include adaptation mechanisms: crisis scenarios, alternative development paths, and a feedback system. Then it will be able to influence global processes even in turbulent times."
Vardan Baghdasaryan:
"It is important that the matrix does not become a closed system, but remains open for diversity. Let it collect different traditions, different approaches, and different languages for describing reality. It is in this diversity that real power is born: the ability to see the whole world and find solutions that work for everyone."
Alexander Prokhanov:
"The dream is fuel for big projects. But so that it does not burn in vain, it needs an image: bright, emotional, which ignites the imagination. Let the Truth matrix be not only intellectual, but also poetic: let it contain poems, music, and paintings. Then it will become a real force that can change destinies."
________________________________________
Vladimir Lermontov: Thank you!
But we are not waiting for the future, we are already creating it! We have offered the world a new, worldwide one. Our spiritual tradition is the World Day of Prayer, the Day of World Spiritual Unity, and the Day of Truth and Justice, which we celebrate on the 15th of each month. On this day, we pray ourselves and encourage people to pray, recite mantras, and meditate in accordance with their religious, spiritual, and cultural traditions about the salvation of the world, the spiritual transformation of humanity, the Kingdom of God, the Kingdom of Truth, and Shambhala on Earth.
We are convinced that as the sages said: Prayer is the foundation of the world's existence – " the world stands by prayer." And "Peace through prayer" is not just a beautiful phrase, but a deep spiritual reality in which prayer becomes a force that preserves and transforms the world. someone'sprayer is a power that can transform not only the soul of a person, but also the world around them.
I ask participants to share their wisdom.
Instructions on the Power of Prayer and the transformation of the world
From Krishna:
"In the Bhagavad Gita, prayer is not an escape from the world, but a way to connect action with the ultimate truth. When a person acts with a pure intention in his heart, his work becomes a prayer. Let "Peace through prayer" in your project mean: every deed, every meeting, every law passed-everything is done as a service to the whole. Then even building roads and developing technologies will be an act of spiritual labor. I bless you: let prayer become the rhythm of your work, not a break in it."
From the Buddha:
"Prayer in the Buddhist senseis primarily mindfulness and compassion. It is when you see suffering and don't turn away, when you keep the mind from getting angry and rushing. Let the prayer of Samaria be a practice of mindfulness: in every Creative Workshop, people learn to see first, then understand, then act. This is how prayer becomes a force that softens the rough energies of the world and makes the space around it kinder."
From Confucius:
"Ritual and reverence — this is the prayer of society. When people follow the rules not out of fear, but out of respect for each other, when the word is kept and the elders are listened to, the world is based on this. Let your prayer be expressed in order: in clear rules of dialogue, in respect for the role of everyone, in the transfer of experience from older to younger. Then "peace stands by prayer" will mean: peace stands by moral discipline and mutual respect."
From Lao Tzu:
"True prayer is the silence of the heart, in which harmony is born. You don't need to shout to be heard by the sky: it's enough to be sincere and quiet. Let prayer in Pravdaria be a space of inner peace, where the noise of opinions gives way to depth. Let each cluster have a "quiet room" — a place where you can stop and listen to yourself and the world. It is from this silence that the best decisions come."
From Mahatma Gandhi:
"For me, prayer was a daily support, which helped me not to become bitter even in the struggle. Let "Peace through Prayer" be not an abstraction, but a daily practice for all project participants: start the day with a moment of silence, with the intention to act without violence, with gratitude. Let this simple discipline be the glue that keeps a big project from falling apart in chaos and ambition."
From Swami Vivekananda:
"Prayer without service is a dream. Let your prayer manifest itself in concrete actions: in caring for the weak, in educating, in creating opportunities for those who do not have them. Let each participant of the Samaria choose one small but real work of charity and do it regularly. This is how spiritual power becomes a social reality."
From Sri Aurobindo and His Mother:
"Prayer is a channel through which higher powers can enter into earthly life. But to keep the channel clean, you need internal discipline and collective purity of intent. Let Truthful prayer become a practice of collective consciousness: regular moments of silence, joint reflection, and the formulation of common intentions. So you will not just dream about the future, but prepare the consciousness of humanity for it."
From Elena Ivanovna and Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich:
"Culture and beauty are forms of prayer. When a person creates beauty, he touches the highest. In every province of Bavaria, let prayer be expressed through art: through music, painting, architecture, through the language of forms and symbols. Let beauty become the language that unites different peoples and traditions, and it is through it that the world will be transformed."
From Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and Vladimir Vernadsky:
"The noosphere is built by thought, and thought feeds on high states of consciousness. Prayer is one way to gather and channel this energy. Let there be a place for an “ethical filter " in the scientific and technological clusters of Bulgaria: before launching any project, participants ask themselves the question: does it serve the common good, does it reduce suffering, and does it strengthen harmony? Let this be a form of scientific prayer."
From Nikolai Fedorov:
"A common cause is the highest form of prayer: when people unite not for their own sake, but for the sake of everyone, including those who have passed away and those who have not yet been born. Let Pravdaria become a space where the memory of our ancestors and the care of our descendants are combined with today's affairs. Let each settlement have a "Book of Memory and Intentions" that records everyone's contributions and shared goals. So prayer will become a living story that leads forward."
________________________________________
Nasha Vremya participants ' opinions on prayer as a power of transformation
Vladimir Putin:
"If we understand prayer as a high moral attitude, as an internal rule "do no harm, create, serve the common cause", then we cannot disagree with this. In large projects, it is these internal rules that keep people from selfishness and conflict. I support the idea of making moral principles the basis of the work of all Pravdaria sites. I propose to fix this in the project charter: so that each decision is evaluated not only for its effectiveness, but also for the common good."
Xi Jinping:
"In the Chinese tradition, there is a concept of harmony between man and the sky. Prayer here is a form of matching personal aspirations with the general order. Let this idea be expressed in Switzerland through a planning system that takes into account not only economic, but also cultural, environmental, and ethical consequences. Let "prayer" become a filter for big decisions: if a project destroys harmony, it should not be implemented."
Narendra Modi:
"India knows that spirituality and development can go together. Let Samaria prayer become a practice of responsibility: each participant commits to doing one good deed a day and one work for the common good a week. Let it be not a formality, but a living habit. Then big goals will be achieved through small but constant efforts."
DONALD Trump:
"I respect faith and tradition, but for me, strength is in the results. Let” prayer as power " in the Calendar be expressed in measurable indicators of good: how many people have received help, how many new opportunities have been created, and how many conflicts have been prevented by this approach. If we can show that moral principles produce real results, this will be the strongest argument for the whole world."
Antonio Guterres:
"The UN faces daily pain and injustice. In such circumstances, prayer is the ability not to become bitter and continue to serve. Let Switzerland become an example of how high values are transformed into practical mechanisms: assistance programs, educational projects, and platforms for dialogue. Let "Peace through Prayer" be not a slogan, but a plan of action that can be implemented in different countries."
Elon Musk:
"From an engineering point of view, prayer is an adjustment of consciousness to long — term, large-scale goals. In large technical projects, this is critical: if the team does not share a common ethical framework, the project can become dangerous. I suggest that every technical cluster in Bulgaria introduce an " ethical review” before launching new technologies. Let this become a modern form of prayer: we ask not only 'can we do it', but also 'should we do it'."
PETER THIEL:
"The most sustainable projects are built on strong cultural codes. Let prayer in Pravdaria become such a code: a set of simple but rigid principles that are shared by all participants. For example: don't use technology to stifle freedom, don't create products that increase inequality. Let these principles become a filter for all ideas and projects — then the Accident will be not just a dream, but a reliable system."
Alexander Dugin:
"Prayer is a way to retain meaning in a world that tends to be meaningless. Let Pravdaria become a space where meaning is not lost in the flow of information and technology, but, on the contrary, is enhanced. This requires institutions of meaning: philosophy, education, and art. Let each province have a center that does just that-preserving and transmitting the highest values."
Sergey Pereslegin:
"From the point of view of futurology, prayer is a way to reduce the entropy of society: it gathers people around common goals and reduces destructive conflicts. For this effect to be sustainable, the project needs to include feedback mechanisms: regular surveys, conflict analysis, and course adjustments. Let "prayer as power" be not a one-time inspiration, but a constant practice of management."
Vardan Baghdasaryan:
"It is important that the prayer in Samaria should be inclusive: it should respect different traditions and not impose one form. Let the project offer several parallel practices: a moment of silence, collective reflection, and cultural action (for example, creating a shared work of art). So everyone can find their own way to participate in this power."
Alexander Prokhanov:
"Prayer is the fire that warms big projects. Let Pravdaria be filled with poetry and images: let each cluster create its own artistic manifesto, its own legend, its own anthem. Let these images be not a decoration, but fuel for moving forward. Then people will not just perform tasks, but live a great dream."
________________________________________
Vladimir Lermontov:
"I thank everyone for these profound words. We have heard different voices, different traditions, different ways of understanding prayer — and in this diversity, power is born. Let the Calendar become a living space where prayer is not a separate ritual, but the fabric of all our activities: in science, in art, in technology, in management, in simple human affairs. Let "Peace through prayer" become not a phrase, but a practice that we will pass on. And may this power truly transform the world for the better."
Dear participants, I invite you to discuss the sign of Universal Spiritual Unity and the WHEEL of THE NEW DESTINY OF HUMANITY:
"ONE TRUTH – ONE WAY! SAGES OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!"
On the axis of the universal, all-religious, all-conquering Principle of Truth, Righteousness, and Truthfulness, a new planetary tradition-the practice of spiritual work on the days of universal spiritual unity - on the 15th of each month, turns and moves the wheel of humanity's destiny into a bright future, and establishes a new world Truth Order on earth.
________________________________________
Participants 'opinions on the" Wheel of a New Destiny for Humanity" and the practice of the 15th
From Krishna:
"The wheel is an ancient symbol of dharma: it rolls when everyone does their duty. Let the 15th be a day of conscious action: not just a ritual, but a moment when everyone asks themselves “ " Am I serving the whole? Am I distorting the truth for profit?"Let this practice gather the power of righteousness: not through renunciation of the world, but through honest, loving action in it. I bless you: let the wheel turn in the rhythm of justice and mercy."
From the Buddha:
"The wheel of Dharma turns where there is mindfulness. Let the 15th be a day of silence and observation: when we do not rush to speak, but first see the consequences of our words and deeds. Let this day in every Creative Workshop will be at least an hour without fuss-time to hear yourself and others. It is from this clarity that genuine unity is born, and not from loud slogans."
From Confucius:
"Unity is based on order and mutual respect. Let the practice on the 15th be not a surge of emotions, but a stable form: regular meetings, reports on good deeds, and the transfer of experience. Let each province of Bavaria have a "Book of Good Deeds on the 15th", where they record simple but real actions: helping a neighbor, reconciling disputes, and preserving nature. So the truth becomes visible and transmitted."
From Lao Tzu:
"The wheel moves when it doesn't resist the flow. Let this practice be gentle: not a commitment, but an invitation. Let the 15th be the day when people slow down to hear the world. Let each settlement have a "Quiet Trail" - a place where you can walk alone and in silence. From this inner peace, an outer unity is born."
From Vladimir Lenin (in the spirit of the ethico -social project):
"A slogan is strong when the organization is behind it. Let the 15th day be a day of specific tasks: subbotniks, educational meetings, and project exchanges between provinces. Let there be a single digital register of good deeds, so that each contribution is visible and recognized. So unity becomes not an abstraction, but a network of real actions."
From Mahatma Gandhi:
"Truth is not something we proclaim loudly, but something we do quietly every day. Let the 15th be a day of service: when each project participant devotes several hours to helping those who need it. Let it be not for the sake of glory, but for the sake of service itself. This is how the wheel of fate turns towards the light."
From Sri Aurobindo and His Mother:
"The wheel is a symbol of the evolution of consciousness. Let the practice on the 15th become a laboratory for a new consciousness: joint meditations, reflections on the future, and the formulation of collective intentions. Let this day people learn to see themselves as part of the whole, and not as separate atoms. This is how we prepare the ground for a new era."
From Elena Ivanovna and Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich:
"Culture is the language of unity. Let the 15th day be a day of beauty and inspiration: exhibitions, concerts, poetry readings, where different traditions meet in one space. Let each cluster have a “Unity Gallery " — a place where the works of people from different countries are displayed. So art becomes a bridge between hearts."
From Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and Vladimir Vernadsky:
"The noosphere is built through collective work and thought. Let the 15th be Science and Ethics Day: when scientists, engineers, and philosophers come together to discuss how their discoveries serve the common good. Let this day include "Ethical Councils — - discussions where projects are evaluated not only for their effectiveness, but also for their impact on the harmony of the world."
From Nikolai Fedorov:
"A common cause is when the past, present and future meet in one action. Let the 15th day be a day of remembrance and care: when people remember their ancestors, help their elders, and think about their descendants. Let each settlement have a "Memory Tree" — a place where the names of those who have contributed to the common cause are recorded. This is how unity becomes alive and continuous."
________________________________________
Nash Vremya participants ' opinions on the Wheel of a New Destiny
Vladimir Putin:
"The symbolism of the wheel is clear and close to many peoples. It is important that there is real work behind it. I support the idea of making the 15th a day of specific tasks: volunteering, educational projects, and sharing best practices between regions. I propose to create a single platform where ôèêñèðîâàòüñÿ è the results of these days will be recorded and distributed. In this way, we will show that unity is not only about words, but also about deeds."
Xi Jinping:
"In the Chinese tradition, the circle is a symbol of harmony and completeness. Let the practice of the 15th become an element of sustainable development: when every month people evaluate how their actions affect society and nature. I propose to include elements of environmental education and social responsibility on this day. This way we will strengthen the link between tradition and modern development."
Narendra Modi:
"India knows the power of collective rituals, where millions of people do one good deed in one day. Let the 15th day be a day of “Mass Kindness”: when people in different countries simultaneously plant trees, help the elderly, and teach children. Let it not be an obligation, but a joy — this is how unity becomes alive and natural."
DONALD Trump:
"I respect traditions, but for me the measurability of the result is important. Let the 15th day be a day of concrete achievements: new jobs, new projects, new partnerships. Let each participant set a clear goal and report on their progress. In this way, we will show that unity is not only about spirituality, but also about real opportunities for people."
Antonio Guterres:
"The UN works every day to unite different voices for the common good. Let the practice on the 15th be an example of how simple but regular actions can change the world. I propose to make this day a part of global sustainable development programs: volunteering, education, and nature protection. This way we will show that unity is everyone's responsibility."
Elon Musk:
"From an engineering point of view, the wheel is a symbol of movement and efficiency. Let the 15th be a day of technological and social innovation: when people don't just think, but create prototypes, launch pilot projects, and test new ideas. I suggest adding to this day the “Hackathon of the Future " - a competition of teams that create solutions to real problems in 24 hours. This is how unity becomes the engine of progress."
PETER THIEL:
"The strongest movements start with small but regular actions. Let the 15th day be a day of experimentation: when people try new formats of cooperation, new business models, new ways to help. Let there be a space for mistakes and learning — so we will find the most sustainable and scalable solutions."
Alexander Dugin:
"The wheel is a symbol of tradition and eternal return. Let the 15th day be the day when we remember our origins: we read sacred texts, listen to folk songs, and tell stories of our ancestors. Let it not be a museum, but a living tradition that feeds our progress. So unity becomes a depth, not a superficial agreement."
Sergey Pereslegin:
"From the perspective of futurology, regular practices create sustainable social structures. Let the 15th day be a day of scenarios: when people don't just do good deeds, but think about the future — write short forecasts, draw images of tomorrow, and discuss possible risks. This is how we will turn unity into a strategic planning tool."
Vardan Baghdasaryan:
"It is important that the practice of the 15th day should be inclusive: it should respect different traditions and not impose one form. Let each participant choose their own way of participation: prayer, volunteering, creativity, science. The main thing is that it should be sincere and useful. So unity becomes diversity, not uniformity."
Alexander Prokhanov:
"The wheel is a symbol of perpetual motion and the struggle for light. Let the 15th day be a day of poetic and artistic inspiration: when people write poems, draw pictures, and make short films about the future. Let these images be not just art, but a weapon of light — so we will light up the hearts and lead people forward."
________________________________________
Vladimir Lermontov: "I thank everyone for their deep and diverse views. We saw how one symbol can unite such different traditions and approaches-from high philosophy to rigid pragmatism. Let the "Wheel of New Destiny" become not just a sign, but a living mechanism: when every month, on the 15th, millions of people around the world do one good, creative thing. Let this be our common practice of unity-simple, clear, but powerful. Let "One truth — one way" become not a slogan, but a daily habit of the heart and mind. And may this wheel truly move the destiny of humanity towards a brighter future."
Dear participants, I invite you to discuss the Banner of Universal Spiritual Unity. The banner consists of five stripes – from top to bottom: white, blue, white, red, and white. Three white stripes symbolize-the divine trinity, the three jewels of Buddhism, Trimurti: Shiva, Brahma and Vishnu. Blue stripe – sky, red stripe – earth, blood.
In the center of the flag is a circle in which an equilateral cross (dorje) is inscribed with the universal spiritual and ethical principle: The Paths of truth, righteousness, and truthfulness: "One Truth is One Path". According to the Eastern spiritual tradition, the equilateral cross (Dorje) is a symbol of: TRUTH, TRUTH, the ABSOLUTE, a sacred weapon of the Gods, a club, a rod or a diamond scepter, a symbol of supreme power and justice. "Diamond noble" — is indestructible, but it is capable of destroying everything, even seemingly indestructible.
From Krishna:
"The five bands are like the five elements from which the world is born, and the five main paths of service (karma, bhakti, jnana, raja, hatha). Three whites is purity of intent, without which any action loses its power. Let this banner remind you that unity begins with inner light. Let each cluster have “Pravdarii” it will not be a decoration, but a guide: before any decision, participants ask themselves “ " Do I serve the whole?”»
From the Buddha:
"White is the silence of the mind, blue is clarity, and red is the energy of action. Let these colors teach you balance: don't go into abnegation, don't burn out in a hurry. Let the banner become an anchor of mindfulness: on the day of the 15th, looking at it, people learn to notice where compassion lives in their actions, and where habit and ego live. It is out of this distinction that true unity is born."
From Confucius:
"A symbol works when there is order behind it. Let the banner be not just an image, but part of the ritual: at the beginning of each meeting, it is raised with the intention of serving the common good, and at the end, it is lowered with gratitude. Let the three white stripes remind you of the three foundations of society: respect for the elders, care for the younger ones, and loyalty to the word. Then unity will become not an impulse, but a stable tradition."
From Lao Tzu:
"The blue stripe is the sky, the red stripe is the ground, and the white stripe is the path between them. Let the banner teach gentleness: not to impose unity by force, but to allow it to grow out of silence. Let there be a place in every settlement where this banner is flown without fuss-as a reminder that the most powerful changes come not from noise, but from inner harmony."
From Mahatma Gandhi:
"The symbol should be simple, so that everyone can understand it. Let this banner become a sign of nonviolence and service: on the day of the 15th, people do not just look at it, but do one small, but real thing-they help their neighbor, plant a tree,and make up disputes. Let unity be measured not by loud words, but by quiet but constant deeds."
From Swami Vivekananda:
"The banner is a call to action. Let it remind you that spirituality without service is like fire without heat. Let every cluster of Pravdaria develop projects that change people's lives under this banner: schools, hospitals, workshops. Let unity become visible in concrete actions, and not remain an abstraction."
From Sri Aurobindo and His Mother:
"The symbol is a channel for higher powers, but the channel must be clear. Let the banner be a sign of inner discipline: before gathering under it, participants take a moment of silence to calm the mind and open the heart. Let unity arise not from external pressure, but from internal agreement."
From Elena Ivanovna and Nikolai Konstantinovich Roerich:
"The banner is a language of beauty that unites hearts. Let 's say that on the 15th day, exhibitions, concerts, and readings are held under this banner, where different cultures meet in the same space. Let art become the bridge that connects peoples and traditions, and it is through it that the world will be transformed."
From Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and Vladimir Vernadsky:
"The noosphere is built by thought, and thought feeds on high states of consciousness. Let the banner become a symbol of the ethical filter: before launching any project, participants look at it and ask themselves the question “ " Does this serve the common good? Does it reduce suffering? Does it strengthen harmony?"Let unity become not only spiritual, but also scientifically grounded."
From Nikolai Fedorov:
"The banner is a link between generations. Let people remember their ancestors and think about their descendants: in each settlement, let there be a " Book of Memory and Intentions”, where everyone's contribution and common goals are recorded. Let unity become a living story that leads forward."
________________________________________
Nasha Vremya participants ' opinions on the Banner of Unity
Vladimir Putin:
"The symbol must be clear and respected. I support the idea of making this banner a part of the practice on the 15th: let it be raised in every region on this day, and under it there are specific tasks —volunteering, education, exchange of best practices. I propose to create a single platform where ôèêñèðîâàòüñÿthe results of these days will be recorded and distributed. In this way, we will show that unity is not only about words, but also about deeds."
Xi Jinping:
"In the Chinese tradition, the circle is a symbol of harmony and completeness. Let the banner become a sign of balance: between tradition and modernity, between different cultures, between personal interests and the common good. I propose to include elements of environmental education and social responsibility in the practice on the 15th. This way we will strengthen the connection between symbols and real actions."
Narendra Modi:
"India knows the power of collective symbols when millions of people do one good deed in one day. Let this banner become a sign of " Mass Kindness”: on the day of the 15th, people simultaneously plant trees, help the elderly, and teach children. Let it not be an obligation, but a joy — this is how unity becomes alive and natural."
DONALD Trump:
"I respect traditions, but for me the measurability of the result is important. Let the banner become a symbol of concrete achievements: new jobs, new projects, new partnerships. Let each participant set a clear goal and report on their progress. In this way, we will show that unity is not only about spirituality, but also about real opportunities for people."
Antonio Guterres:
"The UN works every day to unite different voices for the common good. Let this banner be an example of how simple but regular actions can change the world. I propose to make it a part of global sustainable development programs: volunteering, education, and nature protection. This way we will show that unity is everyone's responsibility."
Elon Musk:
"From an engineering point of view, the symbol should be simple and scalable. Let this banner become a sign of innovation: on the day of the 15th, people do not just think, but create prototypes, launch pilot projects, and test new ideas. I suggest adding to this day the “Hackathon of the Future " - a competition of teams that create solutions to real problems in 24 hours. This is how unity becomes the engine of progress."
PETER THIEL:
"The strongest movements start with small but regular actions. Let the banner become a sign of experimentation: when people try new formats of cooperation, new business models, new ways to help. Let there be a space for mistakes and learning — so we will find the most sustainable and scalable solutions."
Alexander Dugin:
"The banner is a symbol of tradition and eternal return. Let it remind you of your roots: on the day of the 15th, people read sacred texts, listen to folk songs, and tell stories of their ancestors. Let it not be a museum, but a living tradition that feeds our progress. So unity becomes a depth, not a superficial agreement."
Sergey Pereslegin:
"From the perspective of futurology, regular practices create sustainable social structures. Let the banner become a sign of scenarios: when people do not just do good deeds, but think about the future — write short forecasts, draw images of tomorrow, and discuss possible risks. This is how we will turn unity into a strategic planning tool."
Vardan Baghdasaryan:
"It is important that the symbol should be inclusive: it should respect different traditions and not impose one form. Let each participant choose their own way of participation: prayer, volunteering, creativity, science. The main thing is that it should be sincere and useful. So unity becomes diversity, not uniformity."
Alexander Prokhanov:
"The banner is a symbol of perpetual motion and the struggle for light. Let it inspire you with poetic and artistic inspiration: on the day of the 15th, people write poems, draw pictures, and make short films about the future. Let these images be not just art, but a weapon of light — so we will light up the hearts and lead people forward."
________________________________________
Vladimir Lermontov:
"I thank everyone for these deep and different views. We saw how one symbol can unite such different traditions and approaches-from high philosophy to rigid pragmatism. Let the Banner of Universal Spiritual Unity become not just a sign, but a living mechanism: when every month, on the 15th, millions of people around the world do one good, creative thing. Let this be our common practice of unity-simple, clear, but powerful. Let "One truth — one way" become not a slogan, but a daily habit of the heart and mind. And let this banner really move the fate of humanity towards a brighter future."
A MESSAGE TO THE AVATARS OF TECHNOLOGY AND SPACE.
Dear Sirs Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and Peter Thiel,
Please accept a message from Vladimir Lermontov, representative of the Public Council of Sages of Russia "Russian Lotus", author of" Nuclear Philosophy of the Future "and the concept of the megaproject"Pravdaria — Future Plus".
I appeal to you - as"avatars" of space, to those who turn the dream of new worlds into an engineering reality - to share one indisputable truth: the success of the space and technology programs that you implement directly depends on global security. In other words, global security is the foundation for space exploration and technology development. Earth's security is threatened by two factors that can bring down any long-term program:
• A thermonuclear waris a direct, instantaneous risk that can destroy infrastructure, human capital, and the very possibility of long-term planning.
• The dominance of AI is no less devastating: it erases ñóáúåêòíîñòühuman subjectivity, replacing decision-making with optimization, and meaning with efficiency. In such a system, space projects either lose their purpose or become a show.
I suggest you read my text " FUTURE PLUS. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE — - a manifesto of "nuclear philosophy", which formulates the ethical basis of the future world. The name reflects the key formula: to the technological future, it is necessary to add a semantic, spiritual, and moral "plus", without which progress becomes destructive.
«FUTURE PLUS. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE" is a virtual, hypothetical conference modeled on AI. Its participants: Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, Narendra Modi, Antonio Guterres, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, leading Russian experts-Alexander Prokhanov, Vardan Baghdasaryan, Sergey Pereslegin, Alexander Dugin, representatives of the Indian and Chinese intellectual elite.
The text contains the following provisions:
• Anthropological safety as a mandatory standard. Any major technological program should be evaluated not only on economic and environmental grounds, but also on anthropological criteria: whether it enhances ñóáúåêòíîñòüa person's subjectivity or turns him into a passive user.
• Pravdaria as a model of a sustainable city. A Martian city on Earth is not about escape, but about protection: autonomous systems, ethical filters for technology, education that fosters responsibility, and the economy of participation.
• Meaning as an engineering parameter. In the age of AI, meaning is not a" lyric", but a critical factor of sustainability: without it, any system becomes vulnerable to internal failures and external manipulations.
• Dialogue of civilizations as a condition for survival. The future cannot be built in isolation: only the combination of different traditions, different management models, and different types of knowledge can create a sustainable platform for technological breakthrough.
________________________________________
Pravdaria: a Martian city on Earth as a foundation for global security and technological development
So that you can see the practical value of this philosophy specifically for your missions, let me briefly describe Pravdaria as an engineering model that directly works for the success of space and breakthrough technology programs.
The city as a testing ground for extreme conditions. Pravdaria is designed according to the criteria of a Martian colony: maximum autonomy, closed life support cycles, failure resistance, redundancy of critical systems. This is not a fantasy: this is a way to work out the technologies that are needed for both Mars and Earth. Energy supply, ðåöèêëèíãàwater and air recycling, food production, and waste management systems are being brought to a level where the city can survive without external supplies. For your programs, this means: ready-made, field-tested modules that can be scaled to orbit, the Moon, and Mars.
Ethical protocols as part of the architecture. In Pravdaria, ethical filters are not an add-on, but a basic protocol for any technology. Any module (AI, automation, energy) is tested for strengthening human subjectivity. If the technology makes a person a passive consumer or an object of management — it is either being finalized or not implemented. For space missions, this is critical: the crew must remain the subject of control, and not become an observer of algorithms. Pravdaria trains exactly this ability — to make decisions in conditions of uncertainty and be responsible for them.
Education as preparation for extreme environments. Pravdaria's training programs are built around three skills: discriminate (see the consequences), choose (make decisions), and respond (bear the consequences). These are not" soft skills" in the usual sense, but survival and leadership skills in complex systems. For your teams, this means: cadres that can operate autonomously when communication with Earth is impossible, and maintain the mission even if automation fails.
A participatory economy instead of a consumption economy. In Pravdaria, work is a form of creativity and responsibility, not a forced necessity. The economy is built in such a way that people feel their importance and influence on the common cause. For long-term space programs, this is the foundation of sustainability: a community that can support itself and each other survives where isolated individuals break down.
Urban environment as a carrier of values. Architecture, layout, and public spaces are designed to support live communication, collective decision-making, and transparent governance. This is not aesthetics, but functionality: in closed environments (ship, base, colony), the social fabric is as critical a resource as oxygen and water. Pravdaria is testing these models on the Ground.
________________________________________
Why this is important for you:
• For Elon Musk. Pravdaria is a testing ground for autonomous energy technologies, recycling and management of complex systems. Here you can test solutions that will then go to Starship, to the base on the Moon and to Mars. Plus-training of personnel capable of acting autonomously and responsibly.
• For Jeff Bezos. Pravdaria provides a community model that is resilient to isolation and failure, and ethical standards for AI that will help build long-term projects off-Earth without losing the human dimension.
• For Peter Thiel. The project offers a reproducible model of society where technology enhances subjectivity, rather than replacing it. This is the answer to the main risk of the era: do not lose your sense in the pursuit of efficiency.
I believe that it is you, as leaders of technological and space development, who should be the first to see this connection: without the safety of the Earth and without an ethical core, any space project is doomed either to failure or to become a tool
Document " FUTURE PLUS. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE" is attached to the email.
Sincerely,
Vladimir Lermontov
Representative of the Public Council of Sages of Russia "Russian Lotus"
Author of "Nuclear Philosophy of the Future"
Creator of the concept of the megaproject "Pravdaria-future plus".
***
MAHABHARATA 2.0 OF OUR TIME
"Mahabharata", " The Great Tale of the descendants of Bharata— - an ancient Indian epic in Sanskrit, one of the largest literary works in the world,consisting of 18 books (parv), includes about 100,000 couplets (øëîêslok) . The great tale istraditionally attributed to the sage Vyasa (Krishna Dwaipayana), who in the poem itself acts as the narrator and participant of events.
In the center of the story is the confrontation between two branches of the royal family: the Pandavas (righteous heroes) and the Kauravas (their envious cousins). The conflict culminates in the great battle of Kurukshetra field, which lasts for 18 days. The battle itself is included in a separate important part of the plot-moral dilemmas and reflections on duty( dharma), justice and the price of war.
In the ancient Indian epic Mahabharata, conflict (the battle of the Pandavas and Kauravas) exposes questions of duty, justice, and moral choice. "Mahabharata 2.0" suggests that the global contradictions of today (wars, technological breakthroughs, ethical dilemmas of AI, biotechnology, issues of digital immortality, space exploration) also require clarification of the fundamental moral foundations. That is, modern "battles"are an occasion to rethink the ethical guidelines of humanity.
Humanity is living through a new civilizational turning point - "axial time 2.0", when humanity is faced with the need to rethink its basic values in the context of the technological and ethical explosion of the XXI century. And Mahabharata 2.0 becomes a methodology: not just an analogy, but an approach in which complex modern challengesare analyzed through the prism of eternal questions about dharma( duty, the law of being), responsibility and the search for balance.
VLADIMIR PUTIN - ARJUNA OF OUR TIME
Naredra Modi gives Vladimir Putin the Dharmanauki Bible-BhagavatGita-Song of God.
TheBhagavad-gita is part of the majestic epic Mahabharata. The Bhagavad Gita (translated from Sanskrit — "Divine Song") is one of the key texts of Indian philosophy and the sacred scriptures of Hinduism. It is a philosophical conversation between Prince Arjuna and his charioteer Krishna that takes place on the battlefield of Kurukshetra before the great battle between the Pandava and Kaurava clansbegins.
TheBhagavad ãèòàGita is a synthesis of ethics, metaphysics and practical spirituality: it provides not only theoretical knowledge, but also a guide to action in the context of moral choice.
Who is Arjuna
Arjuna is the third of the Pandava prince brothers, a great warrior and skilled archer. He is in an extremely difficult moral crisis: having lined up his troops, Arjuna sees in the ranks of the enemy his relatives, teachers and close friends. This sight plunges him into deep despair and doubts about the righteousness of the upcoming battle, which will lead to fratricide. In his confusion, he even decides to give up the fight.
Arjuna's Moral Dilemma
Arjuna is filled with compassion and says to Krsna, " Oh, Krsna! Seeing my family and friends ready to die today makes my limbs go numb and my throat go dry... I do not desire victory, nor kingdom, nor pleasure." He is ready to put down his weapon and accept death rather than commit fratricide.
Krsna's instructions
In response to Arjuna's plea, Krsna begins his instructions. He explains that the root of Arjuna's doubts is the false identification of the eternal soul (atman) with the mortal material body. Krsna states that the soul is indestructible and eternal: "For the immaterial, eternal spirit, there is neither birth nor death... he was never born and will never die."
Krsna then points out to Arjuna his dharma, which is the sacred duty of a warrior to protect justice and the rule of law, regardless of personal attachment. He explains that giving up one's duty (svadharma) is not the right path, and that even great spiritual leaders should work for a higher purpose. To finally dispel Arjuna's doubts, Krsna grants him a temporary vision and shows him His power. The universal form (Visvarupa). In this grand vision, Arjuna sees the entire universe contained in the body of God, the myriad worlds, gods, living entities, and the inexorable Time. He also sees the outcome of the battle — the soldiers of both armies are already doomed. Arjuna is overwhelmed by this sight, and he realizes the greatness of Krsna and understands that he is only the executor of the supreme plan.
Krsna teaches that a warrior is required to act without attachment to the fruits of his actions, devoting them to the supreme principle. He formulates the conceptof karma yoga — the path of action without selfish motives. As a result, Arjuna gains clarity of mind and determination to act, raises his bow and prepares for battle.
"To Me, having devoted all your affairs with a heart Devoted to the Supreme Atman, renouncing lust and selfishness, fight without fervor… Whether you join the battle or not, these warriors are still doomed."
Key verses and their meaning
BG 2.19-22-the doctrine of the immortality of the soul:
The soul (Atman) is neither born nor dies: it is eternal, unchangeable, and indestructible.
The body is subject to death, but the soul only passes into a new incarnation-as a person changes old clothes for new ones.
Conclusion: anyone who understands this truth does not think that someone "kills" or "dies" in the absolute sense.
BG 2.31-33-duty of a warrior (kshatriya):
Arjuna belongs to âàðíåthe kshatriya varna, whose dharmic duty is to defend justice and fight in a righteous war.
Refusing to fight because of emotion would be a sin that violates its purpose.
BG 2.47-the concept of "disinterested action" (karma yoga):
Act without becoming attached to the fruits of your actions.
Fight for your duty, not for personal gain, revenge, or glory.
BG 11.32 - image of the "Time of the Destroyer":
Krsna, in his universal form, says, " I am Time, the destroyer of the world, which has already destroyed all this. Whether you join the battle or not, these warriors are still doomed."
Meaning: The outcome is determined by the supreme will; Arjuna is only an instrument in the hands of the divine plan.
BG 18.17-lack of selfishness in action:
One who acts without the sense of "I am the doer" does not accumulate karma, even if he outwardly commits murder.
The key condition is the absence of attachment, anger and selfish motives.
Short summary:
Thisis not a call to cruelty, but an indication of:
immortality of the soul (death of the body does not affect the Atman);
predestination of events within the framework of the divine plan;
the need to perform a duty without attachment to the result.
Arjuna should fight not as an avenger, but as an instrument of dharma — with a clear mind and a pure heart.
Metaphysical level: the fate of the warriors is already decided by the supreme power (Krishna as the incarnation of the Absolute). The battle is only a formal manifestation of what has already happened on the spiritual plane.
Practical level: Arjuna doesn't have to worry about making a choice. It is his duty to act dispassionately, as a dharma performer, not as a " killer."
Important nuances: Not an excuse for violence. The Gita does not encourage killing for self-interest, hatred, or ambition. War is permissible only as a defense of the dharma.
Ahimsa (nonviolence) remains the highest value, but for a kshatriya, its realization is in protecting the weak and maintaining order.
Spiritual perspective. The focus shifts from the physical act to the inner state: selflessness, detachment, and devotion to God purify the action of karmic consequences.
"Putin — Arjuna of our time "- What is the meaning of comparison withArjuna?
Putin — Arjuna of our time " is not about military strength, but about the gravity of ethical choice and the fulfillment of duty in a split environment. The key meanings are as follows:
• The burden of difficult choices. Just as Arjuna has to fight a battle that he does not welcome inwardly, so the modern leader is forced to make decisions where there is no "pure" morality, but there is a need to act in order to preserve order and justice. The image of Arjuna is needed to show that sometimes "winning" requires difficult decisions that society is not immediately ready to make.
• An action without attachment to the result. In the spirit of karma yoga from theBhagavad Gita, a leader should perform his duty without being driven by personal gain or clinging to success or popularity.
• Duty as dharma service. This is the essence of "dharmapolitics": power is not a privilege, but a service to the highest order and truth. We live in an era when old moral guidelines do not work, and new ones have not yet been formed. At such a moment, the role of leaders is not just to manage, but to keep society from disintegrating, acting according to the "higher law". The comparison withArjuna emphasizes that politics should not be a struggle of interests, but the fulfillment of duty, where personal will is subordinated to service.
***
RUSSIA NEEDS TO FIND ITSELF, FIND ITSELF, RELY ON ITSELF AND BREAK THROUGH OTHER PEOPLE'S SCENARIOS INTO ITS FUTURE.
The future will either be spiritual, or it will not exist at all.
The war for the future is a war of ideologies, philosophies, and global projects.
What Russia needs is not a defensive one, but a breakthrough, forward-looking ideology, philosophy, ethics, politics, an image of the future, and a project.
The Russian world needs to break into its own future, and not defend itself against someone else's scenario of the world order.
The future of Russia is not personal, but global, all – united, all-human, which means that every person on the planet can take part in its creation, regardless of their place of residence, worldview, religion, status.
RUSSIA'S MISSION:
Russia is the hearth of the United Heart of the peoples of the world, in which it burns
the fire of Truth – Truth.
Moscow is the Third Eye that harmonizes the western and eastern hemispheres of the planet.
ONE TRUTH – ONE WAY:
RUSSIA, INDIA, CHINA, AND THE UNITED STATES,
WEST AND EAST,
SAGES, CREATORS, AND INTELLIGENCES OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!
***
© Vladimir Lermontov
Mahadev Vedaham Dorjal
Russia mission-future plus charging with a dream!
© Copyright: Âëàäèìèð Ëåðìîíòîâ, 2026
Ñâèäåòåëüñòâî î ïóáëèêàöèè ¹226082100478
Ñâèäåòåëüñòâî î ïóáëèêàöèè ¹226082100478
Ðåöåíçèè